Items | Future hope | Mann–Whitney test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
M ± SD | Median | |||
≤22 | 5.46 ± 1.85 | 6.00 | ||
≥23 | 5.55 ± 1.85 | 6.00 | 0.06 | 0.80 |
Male | 5.63 ± 1.94 | 6.06 | ||
Female | 5.44 ± 1.81 | 6.00 | 0.81 | 0.37 |
Suez Canal | 5.60 ± 1.55 | 5.88 | ||
Zagazig | 5.39 ± 2.11 | 6.13 | 0.09 | 0.76 |
Good | 5.20 ± 1.76 | 5.50 | ||
Very good | 5.76 ± 1.79 | 6.38 | 0.02 |
|
Excellent | 5.11 ± 1.98 | 5.63 | ||
General | 5.51 ± 1.88 | 6.00 | ||
Technical | 5.10 ± 1.11 | 5.00 | 2.27 | 0.13 |
No | 5.02 ± 1.76 | 6.00 | ||
Yes | 5.63 ± 1.88 | 6.19 | 1.69 | 0.057 |
No | 5.45 ± 1.76 | 5.75 | ||
Yes | 5.58 ± 1.98 | 6.25 | 1.46 | 0.23 |
No | 5.49 ± 1.88 | 6.00 | ||
Yes | 5.70 ± 1.31 | 5.88 | 0.02 | 0.89 |
Sociodemographics | % | M ± SD | Median | |
---|---|---|---|---|
22.3 ± 0.9 | 22.0 | |||
≤22 | 128 | 61.0 | ||
≥23 | 82 | 39.0 | ||
Male | 62 | 29.5 | ||
Female | 148 | 70.5 | ||
Good | 40 | 19.0 | ||
Very good | 119 | 56.7 | ||
Excellent | 51 | 24.3 | ||
Suez Canal | 105 | 50.0 | ||
Zagazig | 105 | 50.0 | ||
General | 200 | 95.2 | ||
Technical | 10 | 4.8 | ||
No | 118 | 56.2 | ||
Yes | 92 | 43.8 | ||
No | 125 | 59.5 | ||
Yes | 85 | 40.5 | ||
No | 199 | 94.8 | ||
Yes | 11 | 5.2 |
Items | Scores | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M | SD | Median | Quartiles | ||
1st | 3rd | ||||
3.45 | 0.77 | 3.56 | 3.02 | 3.43 | |
Benefit of retention/risk of turnover | 3.35 | 0.93 | 3.50 | 3.00 | 3.35 |
Independence of career choice | 3.25 | 0.60 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 3.20 |
Professional self-image | 3.38 | 0.93 | 3.50 | 2.88 | 3.37 |
Social comparison and self-reflection | 3.57 | 0.97 | 3.67 | 3.00 | 3.57 |
Social modeling | 3.85 | 1.05 | 4.00 | 3.50 | 3.85 |
3.04 | 0.99 | 3.19 | 2.50 | 3.03 | |
Physical | 2.86 | 1.11 | 2.92 | 2.14 | 2.85 |
Psychological | 3.04 | 1.09 | 3.20 | 2.53 | 3.03 |
Social | 3.22 | 1.11 | 3.46 | 2.61 | 3.21 |
5.50 | 1.85 | 6.00 | 4.66 | 5.48 | |
Agency | 5.50 | 1.80 | 6.00 | 5.00 | 5.48 |
Pathway | 5.50 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 4.33 | 5.48 |
Items | Professional identity | Mann–Whitney test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
M ± SD | Median | |||
≤22 | 3.35 ± 0.75 | 3.53 | ||
≥23 | 3.60 ± 0.78 | 3.71 | 7.36 | 0.007 |
Male | 3.06 ± 0.88 | 3.18 | ||
Female | 3.61 ± 0.66 | 3.71 | 18.25 | <0.001 |
Suez Canal | 3.54 ± 0.59 | 3.53 | ||
Zagazig | 3.35 ± 0.91 | 3.71 | 0.12 | 0.73 |
Good | 3.35 ± 0.79 | 3.47 | ||
Very good | 3.48 ± 0.80 | 3.65 | 0.43 | |
Excellent | 3.44 ± 0.68 | 3.53 | ||
General | 3.46 ± 0.78 | 3.59 | ||
Technical | 3.24 ± 0.60 | 3.29 | 1.82 | 0.18 |
No | 3.28 ± 0.74 | 3.35 | ||
Yes | 3.66 ± 0.76 | 3.82 | 18.50 | <0.001 |
No | 3.32 ± 0.75 | 3.47 | ||
Yes | 3.63 ± 0.77 | 3.82 | 9.91 | 0.002 |
No | 3.43 ± 0.78 | 3.53 | ||
Yes | 3.74 ± 0.58 | 3.65 | 1.03 | 0.31 |
Items | Wellness | Mann–Whitney test | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
M ± SD | Median | |||
≤22 | 3.06 ± 1.01 | 3.23 | ||
≥23 | 3.01 ± 0.96 | 3.05 | 0.18 | 0.67 |
Male | 3.17 ± 1.08 | 3.36 | ||
Female | 2.99 ± 0.94 | 3.13 | 1.41 | 0.24 |
Suez Canal | 3.09 ± 0.80 | 3.16 | ||
Zagazig | 3.00 ± 1.14 | 3.21 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
Good | 2.72 ± 1.05 | 2.77 | ||
Very good | 3.20 ± 0.90 | 3.24 | 0.04 |
|
Excellent | 2.92 ± 1.06 | 3.21 | ||
General | 3.05 ± 1.00 | 3.21 | ||
Technical | 2.82 ± 0.72 | 2.73 | 1.93 | 0.16 |
No | 2.89 ± 0.97 | 3.04 | ||
Yes | 3.24 ± 0.98 | 3.42 | 8.08 | 0.004 |
No | 2.99 ± 1.02 | 3.16 | ||
Yes | 3.12 ± 0.94 | 3.24 | 0.59 | 0.44 |
No | 3.04 ± 1.00 | 3.20 | ||
Yes | 3.07 ± 0.69 | 3.00 | 0.22 | 0.64 |
Scales | Spearman rank correlation coefficient | ||
---|---|---|---|
Professional identity | Wellness | Future hope | |
Wellness | 0.142 |
||
Future hope | 0.273 |
0.676 |
|
Age | 0.181 |
−0.071 | 0.000 |
Graduation grade | 0.029 | 0.062 | −0.016 |
Items | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | 95% Confidence interval for B | Model ANOVA | Variables entered and excluded | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Std. Error | Lower | Upper | |||||||
Professional identity | 0.16 | Age, pre-university education, graduation grade, university, chronic disease | ||||||||
Constant | 40.22 | 3.26 | 12.341 | <0.001 |
33.79 | 46.65 | ||||
Female gender | 8.59 | 1.82 | 0.30 | 4.710 | <0.001 |
4.99 | 12.18 | |||
Chose nursing by own will | 5.02 | 1.70 | 0.19 | 2.946 | 0.004 |
1.66 | 8.38 | |||
Nurse role model | 3.79 | 1.72 | 0.14 | 2.205 | 0.029 |
0.40 | 7.18 | |||
Wellness | 0.03 | Age, gender, pre-university education, graduation grade, university, nurse role model, chronic disease | ||||||||
Constant | 216.85 | 6.72 | 32.277 | <0.001 |
203.60 | 230.09 | ||||
Chose nursing by own will | 26.07 | 10.15 | 0.18 | 2.568 | 0.011 |
6.06 | 46.08 | |||
Future hope | 0.49 | Age, gender, pre-university education, graduation grade, university, nurse role model, chronic disease | ||||||||
Constant | 0.11 | 4.04 | 0.028 | <0.001 |
7.85 | 8.07 | ||||
Chose nursing by own will | 3.21 | 1.54 | 0.11 | 2.082 | 0.039 |
6.25 | 0.17 | |||
Wellness score | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.68 | 13.616 | <0.001 |
0.12 | 0.16 | |||
Professional identity score | 0.24 | 0.06 | 0.21 | 4.147 | <0.001 |
0.13 | 0.35 |