INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Relations between nurse interns’ future hope scores and their personal characteristics.

Items Future hope Mann–Whitney test P-value

M ± SD Median
Age, years old (20–25)
  ≤22 5.46 ± 1.85 6.00
  ≥23 5.55 ± 1.85 6.00 0.06 0.80
Gender
  Male 5.63 ± 1.94 6.06
  Female 5.44 ± 1.81 6.00 0.81 0.37
University
  Suez Canal 5.60 ± 1.55 5.88
  Zagazig 5.39 ± 2.11 6.13 0.09 0.76
Graduation grade
  Good 5.20 ± 1.76 5.50
  Very good 5.76 ± 1.79 6.38 H = 7.64 0.02*
  Excellent 5.11 ± 1.98 5.63
Pre-university education
  General 5.51 ± 1.88 6.00
  Technical 5.10 ± 1.11 5.00 2.27 0.13
Chose nursing by own will
  No 5.02 ± 1.76 6.00
  Yes 5.63 ± 1.88 6.19 1.69 0.057
Have nurse role model
  No 5.45 ± 1.76 5.75
  Yes 5.58 ± 1.98 6.25 1.46 0.23
Have chronic disease
  No 5.49 ± 1.88 6.00
  Yes 5.70 ± 1.31 5.88 0.02 0.89

Sociodemographic characteristics of nurse interns in the study sample (N = 210).

Sociodemographics n % M ± SD Median
Age, years old (20–25) 22.3 ± 0.9 22.0
  ≤22 128 61.0
  ≥23 82 39.0
Gender
  Male 62 29.5
  Female 148 70.5
Graduation grade
  Good 40 19.0
  Very good 119 56.7
  Excellent 51 24.3
University
  Suez Canal 105 50.0
  Zagazig 105 50.0
Pre-university education
  General 200 95.2
  Technical 10 4.8
Chose nursing by own will
  No 118 56.2
  Yes 92 43.8
Have nurse role model
  No 125 59.5
  Yes 85 40.5
Have chronic disease
  No 199 94.8
  Yes 11 5.2

Scores of professional identity, wellness, and future hope among nurse interns in the study sample (N = 210).

Items Scores

M SD Median Quartiles

1st 3rd
Professional identity (max = 5) 3.45 0.77 3.56 3.02 3.43
Benefit of retention/risk of turnover 3.35 0.93 3.50 3.00 3.35
Independence of career choice 3.25 0.60 3.00 3.00 3.20
Professional self-image 3.38 0.93 3.50 2.88 3.37
Social comparison and self-reflection 3.57 0.97 3.67 3.00 3.57
Social modeling 3.85 1.05 4.00 3.50 3.85
Wellness (max = 5) 3.04 0.99 3.19 2.50 3.03
Physical 2.86 1.11 2.92 2.14 2.85
Psychological 3.04 1.09 3.20 2.53 3.03
Social 3.22 1.11 3.46 2.61 3.21
Future hope (max = 8) 5.50 1.85 6.00 4.66 5.48
Agency 5.50 1.80 6.00 5.00 5.48
Pathway 5.50 2.00 6.00 4.33 5.48

Relations between nurse interns’ professional identity scores and their personal characteristics.

Items Professional identity Mann–Whitney test P-value

M ± SD Median
Age, years old (20–25)
  ≤22 3.35 ± 0.75 3.53
  ≥23 3.60 ± 0.78 3.71 7.36 0.007**
Gender
  Male 3.06 ± 0.88 3.18
  Female 3.61 ± 0.66 3.71 18.25 <0.001**
University
  Suez Canal 3.54 ± 0.59 3.53
  Zagazig 3.35 ± 0.91 3.71 0.12 0.73
Graduation grade
  Good 3.35 ± 0.79 3.47
  Very good 3.48 ± 0.80 3.65 H = 1.70 0.43
  Excellent 3.44 ± 0.68 3.53
Pre-university education
  General 3.46 ± 0.78 3.59
  Technical 3.24 ± 0.60 3.29 1.82 0.18
Chose nursing by own will
  No 3.28 ± 0.74 3.35
  Yes 3.66 ± 0.76 3.82 18.50 <0.001**
Have nurse role model
  No 3.32 ± 0.75 3.47
  Yes 3.63 ± 0.77 3.82 9.91 0.002**
Have chronic disease
  No 3.43 ± 0.78 3.53
  Yes 3.74 ± 0.58 3.65 1.03 0.31

Relations between nurse interns’ wellness scores and their personal characteristics.

Items Wellness Mann–Whitney test P-value

M ± SD Median
Age, years old (20–25)
  ≤22 3.06 ± 1.01 3.23
  ≥23 3.01 ± 0.96 3.05 0.18 0.67
Gender
  Male 3.17 ± 1.08 3.36
  Female 2.99 ± 0.94 3.13 1.41 0.24
University
  Suez Canal 3.09 ± 0.80 3.16
  Zagazig 3.00 ± 1.14 3.21 0.03 0.85
Graduation grade
  Good 2.72 ± 1.05 2.77
  Very good 3.20 ± 0.90 3.24 H = 6.22 0.04*
  Excellent 2.92 ± 1.06 3.21
Pre-university education
  General 3.05 ± 1.00 3.21
  Technical 2.82 ± 0.72 2.73 1.93 0.16
Chose nursing by own will
  No 2.89 ± 0.97 3.04
  Yes 3.24 ± 0.98 3.42 8.08 0.004**
Have nurse role model
  No 2.99 ± 1.02 3.16
  Yes 3.12 ± 0.94 3.24 0.59 0.44
Have chronic disease
  No 3.04 ± 1.00 3.20
  Yes 3.07 ± 0.69 3.00 0.22 0.64

Correlation matrix of professional identity, wellness, and future hope scales scores and nurse interns’ age and graduation grade.

Scales Spearman rank correlation coefficient

Professional identity Wellness Future hope
Wellness 0.142*
Future hope 0.273** 0.676**
Age 0.181** −0.071 0.000
Graduation grade 0.029 0.062 −0.016

Best fitting multiple linear regression model for the professional identity, wellness, and future hope score.

Items Unstandardized coefficients Standardized coefficients t-test P-value 95% Confidence interval for B r-square Model ANOVA Variables entered and excluded


B Std. Error Lower Upper
Professional identity 0.16 F = 14.33, P < 0.001 Age, pre-university education, graduation grade, university, chronic disease
Constant 40.22 3.26 12.341 <0.001** 33.79 46.65
Female gender 8.59 1.82 0.30 4.710 <0.001** 4.99 12.18
Chose nursing by own will 5.02 1.70 0.19 2.946 0.004** 1.66 8.38
Nurse role model 3.79 1.72 0.14 2.205 0.029* 0.40 7.18
Wellness 0.03 F = 6.60, P = 0.011 Age, gender, pre-university education, graduation grade, university, nurse role model, chronic disease
Constant 216.85 6.72 32.277 <0.001** 203.60 230.09
Chose nursing by own will 26.07 10.15 0.18 2.568 0.011* 6.06 46.08
Future hope 0.49 F = 67.46, P < 0.001 Age, gender, pre-university education, graduation grade, university, nurse role model, chronic disease
Constant 0.11 4.04 0.028 <0.001** 7.85 8.07
Chose nursing by own will 3.21 1.54 0.11 2.082 0.039* 6.25 0.17
Wellness score 0.14 0.01 0.68 13.616 <0.001** 0.12 0.16
Professional identity score 0.24 0.06 0.21 4.147 <0.001** 0.13 0.35
eISSN:
2544-8994
Lingua:
Inglese
Frequenza di pubblicazione:
4 volte all'anno
Argomenti della rivista:
Medicine, Assistive Professions, Nursing