[
1. M. Dashti and A. M. Stuart, The Bayesian Approach to Inverse Problems, pp. 311–424. Springer International Publishing, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-12385-1_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. J. O. Berger, Statistical Decision Theory and Bayesian Analysis. Springer, 2nd ed., 1985.10.1007/978-1-4757-4286-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. M. Burger and F. Lucka, Maximum a posteriori estimates in linear inverse problems with log-concave priors are proper Bayes estimators, Inverse Problems, vol. 30, p. 114004, 2014.10.1088/0266-5611/30/11/114004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. H. W. Engl, M. Hanke, and A. Neubauer, Regularization of inverse problems, vol. 375. Springer Science and Business Media, 1996.10.1007/978-94-009-1740-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. J. Carrillo, F. Hoffmann, A. Stuart, and U. Vaes, Consensus-based sampling, Studies in Applied Mathematics, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 1069–1140, 2022.10.1111/sapm.12470
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. M. Iglesias, K. Law, and A. M. Stuart, Ensemble Kalman methods for inverse problems, Inverse Probl., vol. 29, no. 4, p. 045001, 2013.10.1088/0266-5611/29/4/045001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. N. K. Chada, C. Schillings, and S. Weissmann, On the incorporation of box-constraints for ensemble Kalman inversion, Foundations of Data Science, vol. 1, no. 2639-8001_2019_4_433, p. 433, 2019.10.3934/fods.2019018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. M. Herty and G. Visconti, Continuous limits for constrained ensemble Kalman filter, Inverse Probl., 2020.10.1088/1361-6420/ab8bc5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. D. J. Albers, P.-A. Blancquart, M. E. Levine, E. E. Seylabi, and A. M. Stuart, Ensemble Kalman methods with constraints, Inverse Probl., vol. 35, no. 9, p. 095007, 2019.10.1088/1361-6420/ab1c09
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. K. Bergemann and S. Reich, An ensemble Kalman-Bucy filter for continuous data assimilation, Meteorologische Zeitschrift, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 213–219, 2012.10.1127/0941-2948/2012/0307
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Y. Chen and D. S. Oliver, Parameterization techniques to improve mass conservation and data assimilation for ensemble Kalman filter, 2010.10.2118/133560-MS
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. A. A. Emerick and A. C. Reynolds, Ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation, Computers and Geosciences, vol. 55, pp. 3–15, 2013.10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. G. Evensen, Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi-geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics, J. Geophys. Res, vol. 99, pp. 10143–10162, 1994.10.1029/94JC00572
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. G. Evensen and P. J. Van Leeuwen, Assimilation of geosat altimeter data for the agulhas current using the ensemble Kalman filter with a quasi-geostrophic model, Monthly Weather, vol. 128, pp. 85–96, 1996.10.1175/1520-0493(1996)124<0085:AOGADF>2.0.CO;2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. S. I. Aanonsen, G. Naevdal, D. S. Oliver, A. C. Reynolds, and B. Valles, The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering–a review, SPE J., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 393–412, 2009.10.2118/117274-PA
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. T. Janjić, D. McLaughlin, S. E. Cohn, and M. Verlaan, Conservation of mass and preservation of positivity with ensemble-type Kalman filter algorithms, Monthly Weather Review, vol. 142, no. 2, pp. 755–773, 2014.10.1175/MWR-D-13-00056.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. M. Schwenzer, G. Visconti, M. Ay, T. Bergs, M. Herty, and D. Abel, Identifying trending coefficients with an ensemble Kalman filter, IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 2292–2298, 2020.10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1490
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. B. O. S. Teixeira, L. A. B. Târres, L. A. Aguirre, and D. S. Bernstein, On unscented Kalman filtering with state interval constraints, J. Process Contr., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 45–57, 2010.10.1016/j.jprocont.2009.10.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. J. Keller, H.-J. Franssen, and W. Nowak, Investigating the pilot point ensemble kalman filter for geostatistical inversion and data assimilation, Adv. Water Resour., vol. 155, 2021.10.1016/j.advwatres.2021.104010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. J. B. Muir and V. C. Tsai, Geometric and level set tomography using ensemble Kalman inversion, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 220, no. 2, pp. 967–980, 2019.10.1093/gji/ggz472
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. C.-H. M. Tso, M. Iglesias, P. Wilkinson, O. Kuras, J. Chambers, and A. Binley, Efficient multiscale imaging of subsurface resistivity with uncertainty quantification using ensemble Kalman inversion, Geophysical Journal International, vol. 225, no. 2, pp. 887–905, 2021.10.1093/gji/ggab013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Z. Li, An iterative ensemble kalman method for an inverse scattering problem in acoustics, Modern Physics Letters B, vol. 34, no. 28, p. 2050312, 2020.10.1142/S0217984920503121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. E. Haber, F. Lucka, and L. Ruthotto, Never look back - A modified EnKF method and its application to the training of neural networks without back propagation. Preprint arXiv:1805.08034, 2018.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. N. B. Kovachki and A. M. Stuart, Ensemble Kalman inversion: a derivative-free technique for machine learning tasks, Inverse Probl., vol. 35, no. 9, p. 095005, 2019.10.1088/1361-6420/ab1c3a
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. A. Yegenoglu, S. Diaz, K. Krajsek, and M. Herty, Ensemble Kalman filter optimizing deep neural networks, in Conference on Machine Learning, Optimization and Data Science, vol. 12514, 2020.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. O. G. Ernst, B. Sprungk, and H.-J. Starkloff, Analysis of the ensemble and polynomial chaos Kalman filters in Bayesian inverse problems, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quantif., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 823–851, 2015.10.1137/140981319
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. A. Garbuno-Inigo, F. Hoffmann, W. Li, and A. M. Stuart, Interacting Langevin Diffusions: Gradient Structure and Ensemble Kalman Sampler, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 412–441, 2020.10.1137/19M1251655
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. A. Apte, M. Hairer, A. M. Stuart, and J. Voss, Sampling the posterior: An approach to non-Gaussian data assimilation, Phys. D, vol. 230, pp. 50–64, 2007.10.1016/j.physd.2006.06.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. F. Le Gland, V. Monbet, and V.-D. Tran, Large sample asymptotics for the ensemble Kalman filter, Research Report RR-7014, INRIA, 2009.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. D. Bloemker, C. Schillings, and P. Wacker, A strongly convergent numerical scheme from ensemble Kalman inversion, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 2537–2562, 2018.10.1137/17M1132367
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. D. Bloemker, C. Schillings, P. Wacker, and S. Weissman, Well Posedness and Convergence Analysis of the Ensemble Kalman Inversion, Inverse Probl., vol. 35, no. 8, 2019.10.1088/1361-6420/ab149c
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. N. K. Chada, A. M. Stuart, and X. T. Tong, Tikhonov regularization within ensemble Kalman inversion, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 1263–1294, 2020.10.1137/19M1242331
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. C. Schillings and A. M. Stuart, Analysis of the Ensamble Kalman Filter for Inverse Problems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1264–1290, 2017.10.1137/16M105959X
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. C. Schillings and A. M. Stuart, Convergence analysis of ensemble Kalman inversion: the linear, noisy case, Appl. Anal., vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 107–123, 2018.10.1080/00036811.2017.1386784
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. J. A. Carrillo and U. Vaes, Wasserstein stability estimates for covariance-preconditioned Fokker-Planck equations, Nonlinearity, vol. 34, no. 4, p. 2275, 2021.10.1088/1361-6544/abbe62
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Z. Ding and Q. Li, Ensemble Kalman Inversion: mean-field limit and convergence analysis, Stat. Comput., vol. 31, p. 9, 2021.10.1007/s11222-020-09976-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. M. Herty and G. Visconti, Kinetic methods for inverse problems, Kinet. Relat. Models, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1109–1130, 2019.10.3934/krm.2019042
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. N. K. Chada, Limit analysis of hierarchical ensemble Kalman inversion, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., 2020. In press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Z. Ding, Q. Li, and J. Lu, Ensemble Kalman inversion for nonlinear problems: Weights, consistency, and variance bounds, Found. Data Sci., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 371–411, 2021.10.3934/fods.2020018
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. A. Armbruster, M. Herty, and G. Visconti, A stabilization of a continuous limit of the ensemble Kalman inversion, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 2022. Accepted. Preprint arXiv:2006.15390.10.1137/21M1414000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. J. A. Carrillo, M. Fornasier, G. Toscani, and F. Vecil, Mathematical Modeling of Collective Behavior in Socio-Economic and Life Sciences, ch. Particle, kinetic, and hydrodynamic models of swarming, pp. 297–336. Modeling and Simulation in Science, Engineering and Technology, Birkh¨auser Boston, 2010.10.1007/978-0-8176-4946-3_12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. F. Golse, On the dynamics of large particle systems in the mean field limit, in Macroscopic and large scale phenomena: coarse graining, mean field limits and ergodicity, pp. 1–144, Springer, 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-26883-5_1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. P.-E. Jabin, A review of the mean field limits for Vlasov equations, Kinetic & Related Models, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 661–711, 2014.10.3934/krm.2014.7.661
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. L. Pareschi and G. Toscani, Interacting Multiagent Systems. Kinetic equations and Monte Carlo methods. Oxford University Press, 2013.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. G. Albi and L. Pareschi, Binary interaction algorithms for the simulation of flocking and swarming dynamics, Multiscale Model. Simul., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–29, 2013.10.1137/120868748
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. M. Ehrgott, Multicriteria optimization, vol. 491. Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. K. Miettinen, Nonlinear multiobjective optimization, vol. 12. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. P. M. Pardalos, A.Žilinskas, J.Žilinskas, et al., Non-convex multi-objective optimization. Springer, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-61007-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. M. Herty and E. Iacomini, Filtering methods for coupled inverse problems. Preprint. arXiv:2203.09841, 2022.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE transactions on evolutionary computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002.10.1109/4235.996017
]Search in Google Scholar