Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Modulation of the endosomal pathway for optimized response to drought stress: from model to crop plants


Zitieren

Introduction

Plants, as sessile organisms, persistently encounter diverse biotic and abiotic stresses that can adversely impact on their growth and thus severely impair crop production. One of the main objectives in agriculture is therefore to obtain high-yielding plants, resilient not only to diseases but also to increasingly higher temperature (Kim et al., 2021). From basic research in the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, we have gained unparalleled insights into molecular circuits underlying essential processes in how plants manage to fine-tune their responses and adapt to their environment. It thus provides a solid foundation for translational research aimed at breeding more tolerant crops.

At a cellular-molecular level, plants have evolved a plethora of mechanisms to be able to respond quickly and accurately to their ever-changing, often stressful environment. The plasma membrane (PM), acting as an interface between the extracellular surroundings and cellular constituents, is densely packed with an array of proteins involved in the sensing and transmitting of stimuli essential for adaptive responses. The transport and perception of, for example, plant hormones, which are indispensable for plant development, are centered around PM-localized proteins. Thus, their localization and abundance need to be tightly regulated and understanding this regulation is of exceptional interest. It is therefore not surprising that several regulatory pathways participate in the control of PM proteins, underlining the key functions for the spatiotemporal control of PM protein turnover in plant development and various adaptive growth responses (Korbei and Luschnig, 2013; Luschnig and Vert, 2014).

The plant endosomal system

In eukaryotes, protein homeostasis at membranes is modulated by the endomembrane network. This intricate system of internal membranes provides spatial organization for cell activities by compartmentalizing processes and functions in transporting proteins to their site of action. Vesicular transport and membrane trafficking are pivotal for higher plants, as they not only maintain the functions of organelles and cells, but are also required for fast and dynamic reactions to fluctuating inputs and stimuli (Inada and Ueda, 2014). The plant endosomal system is responsible for the transport of endocytic and biosynthetic cargo, and therefore contributes to the regulation of the protein composition of the PM, the trans-Golgi network (TGN), which in plants coincides with early endosomes (EEs) (Dettmer et al., 2006), lytic and protein storage vacuoles, as well as the cell wall. At the TGN/EE, two major trafficking pathways meet: the endocytic pathway, which represents a set of trafficking routes with cargo sorting, recycling, and degradative functions, and the secretory pathway, which exports proteins from the ER via the Golgi apparatus to the TGN/EE (Robinson et al., 2008; Viotti et al., 2010; Paez Valencia et al., 2016).

Endocytosis

Through endocytosis, which can be either dependent on the scaffolding protein clathrin (clathrin-mediated endocytosis [CME]) or independent of it, cells internalize PM-localized proteins, lipids, and extracellular material (Robinson, 2015; Sandvig et al., 2018). CME was first demonstrated in plants only quite recently (Dhonukshe et al., 2007), and extensive descriptions of the events that encompass CME are often times still based on elaborate studies in animal and yeast systems (reviewed in McMahon and Boucrot, 2011). The clathrin coat self-assembles into units composed of three clathrin heavy chains and three clathrin light chains that oligomerize together to form three-legged structures called triskelia (Chen et al., 2011; Robinson, 2015).

PM proteins in plant cells are primarily internalized by CME, which can be divided into five successive steps: nucleation, cargo selection, clathrin coat assembly, membrane scission, and uncoating (McMahon and Boucrot, 2011). In plants, CME first manifests in the bending of the PM toward the cytoplasm into a clathrin-coated pit. As clathrin does not interact directly with the membranes or cargos, the formation of these clathrin-coated pits is initiated by the recruitment of adaptor and accessory proteins to the proximity of the membrane. These hetero-tetrameric adaptor protein complexes, like the adaptor protein 2 (AP-2) complex and the plant-specific TPLATE complex (Zhang et al., 2015; Reynolds et al., 2018), as well as monomeric adaptor proteins interact with the membrane lipids and sorting motifs in cargo proteins as well as clathrin and assist in guiding them from the cytoplasm to nucleation sites. Adaptors are thus key to the formation of transport vesicles and to selection of cargo for incorporation into vesicles (Cocucci et al., 2012; Arora and Van Damme, 2021).

The clathrin-coated pits eventually mature and bud off to form clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs). After budding from the PM, the clathrin coat is shed, allowing for recycling of its monomeric constituents in further rounds of endocytosis. In mammals and yeast, this happens directly following scission from the membrane, whereas the coat of plant CCVs appears to be retained and the components are only gradually discarded on route to the TGN/EEs (Narasimhan et al., 2020). The removal of the clathrin coat frees the vesicles for fusion with TGN/EE, the site where the decision for further sorting, either recycling back to the PM or to the vacuole for degradation, takes place (Chen et al., 2011; Reynolds et al., 2018; Rodriguez-Furlan et al., 2019).

Cargo selection

To actively regulate the abundance of proteins at the PM, they need to be recognized by components of the CME machinery, specifically by adaptors. These distinguish the proteins to be internalized by motifs found in the cytosolic domains of such prospective cargo. Sorting motifs can be present in the protein sequence (intrinsic motifs) or can occur through covalently linked specific post-translational modifications like phosphorylation or ubiquitination. Importantly, several distinct sorting signals in the same cargo protein can participate in cargo recognition, adding some flexibility to subsequent sorting events (Traub, 2009; Traub and Bonifacino, 2013; Arora and Van Damme, 2021).

Linear sorting motifs found in the cytosolic domain of the proteins, like the di-leucine- and the tyrosine (YXXΦ)-based sorting motif (where Y is tyrosine, X is any amino acid, and Φ is a bulky hydrophobic residue), have also been identified in plant PM proteins (Arora and Van Damme, 2021). Nevertheless, only the tyrosine motifs have so far been linked to endocytic sorting from the PM (Geldner and Robatzek, 2008), where they were found to be important for the internalization of several PM proteins like the pin-formed (PIN) auxin efflux facilitators (Kleine-Vehn et al., 2011; Sancho-Andres et al., 2016), the brassinosteroid hormone receptor brassinosteroid insensitive 1 (BRI1) (Liu et al., 2020), the tomato pathogen-related receptor-like protein Lycopersicon esculentum ethylene-inducing xylanase receptor (LeEIX2) (Ron and Avni, 2004), and the borate exporter boron transporter 1 (BOR1) (Takano et al., 2010). Protein phosphorylation is a dynamic post-translational modification, which has a central regulatory function in the endocytosis of PM proteins in plants, albeit frequently coupled to and in combination with protein ubiquitination (Bonifacino and Traub, 2003; Traub and Bonifacino, 2013). A very elegant mechanism combining these two modifications was recently demonstrated for the PM-localized IRON-REGULATED TRANSPORTER 1 (IRT1), where phosphorylation is triggered by direct metal binding to a histidine-rich stretch in the cytosolic domain of the transporter. This in turn facilitates recruitment of the IRT1 DEGRADATION FACTOR1 E3 ubiquitin ligase IDF1, allowing for the conclusion that protein phosphorylation seems to be a prior requirement for ubiquitination and both are needed for efficient endosomal sorting of IRT1 (Dubeaux et al., 2018).

The best documented post-translational modification for endocytosis of PM proteins in plants is ubiquitination. This reversible protein modification serves as a signal triggering endocytosis and consequent sorting for degradation, and thus plays a key role in directing the entry of PM proteins into the endosomal system (Clague et al., 2012; Piper et al., 2014; Dubeaux and Vert, 2017). Protein ubiquitination is catalyzed by a series of highly conserved enzymes: ubiquitin activating enzymes (E1), ubiquitin conjugating enzymes (E2), and ubiquitin ligases (E3), resulting in the formation of an isopeptide bond between the C-terminus of ubiquitin and the free amine of a lysine residue on the target protein (Vierstra, 2012; Callis, 2014; Piper et al., 2014). Ubiquitin conjugation is extraordinarily complex in plants, exemplified by more than 1500 E3 ubiquitin ligases, found in the model plant Arabidopsis, which confer target specificity for ubiquitination (Hua and Vierstra, 2011). Furthermore, different E3 ubiquitin ligases can target the same substrates, likely essential for the fine-tuning of protein function, as well as the same E3 ubiquitin ligase can ubiquitinate different proteins (Bueso et al., 2014; Irigoyen et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2017; Fernandez et al., 2020)

Target proteins can be monoubiquitinated or poly-monoubiquitinated, where individual ubiquitin molecules are conjugated to cargo proteins or additional ubiquitin molecules are linked to an already attached ubiquitin to form chains. Different types of such polyubiquitin chains can form, depending on which lysine residues of the ubiquitin molecule are conjugated (Husnjak and Dikic, 2012). Two common forms are K48- and K63-linked ubiquitin chains, where the E2/E3 pairing determines substrate specificity and the type of chain linkage, although the same E3 may form different linkage types together with different E2s (Tomanov et al., 2014; Stewart et al., 2016). Ubiquitin binding domain (UBD)-containing proteins, which noncovalently associate with ubiquitin, are responsible for the decoding and translation of the ubiquitination code (Husnjak and Dikic, 2012). These ubiquitin receptors typically contain short amino acid stretches, lacking a strict consensus sequence, that display a low binding affinity toward ubiquitin (Husnjak and Dikic, 2012). Importantly, protein ubiquitination is a reversible process with de-ubiquitinating enzymes remodeling the ubiquitin code, contributing to the highly dynamic and reversible characteristics of endocytic trafficking decisions (Isono and Nagel, 2014). Ubiquitination of PM proteins, especially the addition of K63-linked polyubiquitin chains, serves as a signal for endocytosis and further sorting to the vacuole (Husnjak and Dikic, 2012; Romero-Barrios and Vert, 2018). This was shown for several different PM proteins like the iron transporter IRT1 (Dubeaux et al., 2018), the abscisic acid (ABA) receptors PYL4 and PYR1 (Bueso et al., 2014), and the auxin efflux facilitator PIN2 (Leitner et al., 2012b) as well as the brassinosteroid receptor BRI1 (Di Rubbo et al., 2013; Martins et al., 2015). Endocytic vesicles co-localize with K63-linked polyubiquitinated cargo (Johnson and Vert, 2016), and the molecular mechanisms driving endocytosis of such cargos are essentially conserved in plants. Nevertheless, some key players involved in this process appear plant-specific (Dubeaux and Vert, 2017; Gao et al., 2017; Schwihla and Korbei, 2020).

Recycling

After internalization from the cell surface, endocytosed vesicles deliver their content via fusion to the TGN/EE and the cargo proteins can either be recycled back to the PM or be further sorted to multi-vesicular bodies (MVBs) and on to the vacuole for degradation (Paez Valencia et al., 2016). The recycling machinery includes small GTPases and their regulators as well as the retromer complex, while the Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT) machinery is in charge of sorting PM proteins to their degradation (Buono et al., 2017; Isono and Kalinowska, 2017; Rodriguez-Furlan et al., 2019). PM proteins can be recycled back to the PM by being actively diverted from the default vacuolar degradation pathway at the TGN/EE. Plants do not seem to have endosomes dedicated specifically to a recycling pathway, but this rather involves components of the TGN/EE and potentially early stages of the MVBs (Robinson and Neuhaus, 2016).

Degradative sorting

Proteins destined for degradation are not recycled back to the PM, but internalized into the intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) of the MVBs (Otegui, 2018). The signal that marks PM proteins for degradation is ubiquitination, and the ESCRT machinery is thought to exclusively capture ubiquitinated membrane cargoes and sort them into ILVs of MVBs (Shields and Piper, 2011; Dubeaux and Vert, 2017). MVBs originate from the TGN/EE in a process that requires the ESCRT machinery for ILV formation and annexins for releasing MVBs to fuse with the vacuole, whereupon ILVs and their cargo is degraded (Paez Valencia et al., 2016; Isono and Kalinowska, 2017; Cui et al., 2018; Figure 1).

Figure 1

The endosomal protein degradation system of plants. Continuous endocytosis from the PM to the TGN/EE occurs. PM protein monoubiquitination promotes endocytosis and K63-linked polyubiquitination promotes further transport to the vacuole via the concatenated ILVs of MVBs. This step involves ESCRT components. TOLs and SH3P2 fulfill ubiquitin-recognizing functions at the PM, possibly guiding K63-linked ubiquitinated cargo to the endosomal membrane and interacting with/recruiting ESCRT-I subunits. At the endosomal membrane, FYVE1/FREE1 and ALIX show interaction with ubiquitin. This reveals a complex network of several possible ubiquitin receptors in the ESCRT-mediated degradation pathway.

Abbildung 1. Das endosomale Proteinabbausystem von Pflanzen. Kontinuierliche Endozytose erfolgt von der PM zum TGN/EE. Mono-ubiquitinierung von PM-Proteinen fördert die Endozytose und K63-verknüpfte Poly-ubiquitinierung den Weitertransport in die Vakuole über die „concatenated ILVs” der MVBs. An diesem Schritt sind ESCRT-Komponenten beteiligt. TOLs und SH3P2 fungieren als Ubiquitin-rezeptoren an der PM und leiten -gemeinsam mit ESCRT-I Untereinheiten- K63-verknüpfte ubiquitinierte Proteine zur endosomalen Membran. An der endosomalen Membran interagieren FYVE1/FREE1 und ALIX mit Ubiquitin und fungieren somit als zusätzliche Ubiquitinrezeptoren im endosomalen Transport und Abbau von PM-Proteinen.

ESCRT machinery

The ESCRT machinery is a conserved, multi-subunit membrane remodeling complex. It functions in the formation of membrane invaginations, which bud away from the cytoplasm, followed by scission. This stepwise process, performed by protein complexes termed ESCRT-0 to ESCRT-III and accessory components, acts in the recognition, concentration, and sequestering of cargo into the ILVs of MVBs and membrane-deforming events (Henne et al., 2011; Paez Valencia et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2017; Isono and Kalinowska, 2017).

The ESCRT-0 complex is required for the initial targeting and concentration of ubiquitinated cargo and further recruits ESCRT-I, to which it passes on the cargo (Hurley, 2010). The ESCRT-I then recruits the ESCRT-II to the endosomes and the presence of both complexes induces invagination of the limiting membrane toward the endosomal lumen (Hurley and Hanson, 2010). ESCRT-I and -II complexes might also act in parallel to cluster ubiquitinated cargo for internalization (Hurley, 2008; Hurley and Ren, 2009). ESCRT-II then recruits and possibly activates the ESCRT-III complex, which consists of small soluble subunits that assemble into higher-ordered multimers on endosomal membranes (Teo et al., 2004). Once the ESCRTs are assembled, the ubiquitin molecule is removed from the cargo proteins by deubiquitinating enzymes, while an AAA ATPase recycles ESCRT-III back into its monomeric form (Babst et al., 1998). The recruitment and activity of the AAA ATPase is mediated by ESCRT-III–related proteins (Gatta and Carlton, 2019).

In yeast/mammals, the ESCRT-0 complex is made up of two subunits and found at the EEs and the PM (Raiborg and Stenmark, 2009; Henne et al., 2011), where it appears to preassemble with cargoes to enhance the sorting efficiency without affecting vesicle formation per se (Mayers et al., 2013). The ESCRT-0 associates preferentially with K63-linked ubiquitin chains (Nathan et al., 2013), and some subunits can recruit deubiquitinating enzymes, permitting for adjustments in cargo ubiquitination, which enforces the decision if the cargo is to be recycled or degraded (Raiborg and Stenmark, 2009). While the other ESCRT machinery complexes are ubiquitous in eukaryotes and presumably ancient in origin, the ESCRT-0 might represent a more recent addition, not found in plant genomes. The TOM1 protein family represents a family of proteins sharing the same tandem array of domains, the VHS (Vps27/Hrs/Stam) and GAT domains as the ESCRT-0 (Winter and Hauser, 2006; Mosesso et al., 2019). Furthermore, it functions either in parallel, as in mammals (Wang et al., 2010), or alternatively, as in amoeba (Blanc et al., 2009), to the ESCRT-0 complex. TOM1L1 has also been proposed to package ubiquitinated PM proteins into CCVs (Liu et al., 2009). TOM1 is widely conserved in eukaryotes, and from its phylogenetic distribution, it is likely to have been either replaced or perhaps supplemented by the ESCRT-0 in opisthokonts (Herman et al., 2011). As plants do not have canonical ESCRT-0 components, they rely on other proteins to initially recognize ubiquitinated cargo at the PM (Mosesso et al., 2019). Potential candidates that substitute for this complex are from the conserved target of myb1 (TOM1)-like (TOL) protein family (Winter and Hauser, 2006; Schwihla and Korbei, 2020).

The A. thaliana TOL protein family has a domain organization similar to the ESCRT-0 and consists of nine proteins (TOL1–9), several of which have been demonstrated to be essential for vacuolar targeting and subsequent degradation of ubiquitinated PM proteins (Korbei et al., 2013; Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020; Figure 1). TOLs bind ubiquitin with a preference toward K63-linked ubiquitin chains and participate in the early endocytic trafficking of membrane(-associated) proteins destined for degradation (Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020), such as the auxin efflux facilitator PIN2, the syntaxin KNOLLE (Korbei et al., 2013), and the borate transporter BOR1 (Yoshinari et al., 2018). A higher-order quintuple tol mutant plant line has a severe and pleiotropic phenotype involving not only mislocalization of specific PM proteins (Korbei et al., 2013), but also a general defect in the degradation of ubiquitinated proteins (Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020). TOL proteins function as ubiquitin receptors in the initial steps of the ESCRT pathway as they interact with the ESCRTI component VACUOLAR PROTEIN SORTING 23A (VPS23A), thus connecting the TOLs to the ESCRT machinery (Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020). Function and localization of TOL6 are influenced by ubiquitination, which could assist in the fine-tuning of the interplay between protein recycling and downregulation (Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020). TOLs can therefore be considered as a plant-specific substitute of ESCRT-0, functioning as multivalent ubiquitin-binding complexes and promoting cargo delivery to the vacuole (Sauer and Friml, 2014; Mosesso et al., 2019; Schwihla and Korbei, 2020).

The ESCRT-I complex, which in yeast/mammals forms a hetero-tetrameric complex containing one copy of each of the subunits (Schuh and Audhya, 2014), is responsible for binding ubiquitinated cargo and ESCRT-0 subunits (Bache et al., 2003). Arabidopsis contains two isoforms of each of the subunits VPS23 (ELC/VPS23A and VPS23B), VPS28 (VPS28-1 and VPS28-2), and VPS37 (VPS37-1 and VPS37-2), but no Mvb12-like protein (Winter and Hauser, 2006; Leung et al., 2008). Arabidopsis VPS23A, which participates in cell division and trichome development, is able to bind to ubiquitin and associate with VPS37 and VPS28 to form a putatively intact plant ESCRT-I complex (Spitzer et al., 2006).

The ESCRT-II, which has a pivotal role in linking the upstream ubiquitin-binding ESCRT complexes to the downstream ESCRT-III complex, is a Y-shaped heteromer of the subunits Vps22, Vps25, and Vps36 (Hurley, 2010). In A. thaliana, all ESCRT-II subunits are present as single-copy genes (Winter and Hauser, 2006; Leung et al., 2008; Richardson et al., 2011). The rice OsVPS22 gene encodes a functional VPS22 homolog, where vps22 mutants exhibit seedling lethality. Nevertheless, potential defects in endosomal sorting remain to be determined (Zhang et al., 2013). VPS36, which may form a putative ESCRT-II complex together with VPS22 and VPS25, is critical for embryo and seedling development and regulates vacuole biogenesis as well as endosomal sorting to the vacuole of several PM proteins (Wang et al., 2017).

ESCRT-III does not contain any known UBDs, and thus is unlikely to recognize ubiquitinated cargoes. Instead, ESCRT-III is essential for membrane scission during sorting of the endocytic cargo into ILVs (Henne et al., 2012). In contrast to the models proposed for animal systems, plant ILVs were shown to form networks of concatenated vesicles instead of individual vesicles in the lumen of the MVB. These networks remain connected by narrow bridges, thus trapping the cargo. The potential role of the ESCRT-III is to act as a diffusion barrier to prevent escape of the cargos destined for degradation (Buono et al., 2017). Consistent with this key function, overexpression of dominant negative alleles of ESCRT-III core subunits results in defects in MVB biogenesis and vacuolar degradation of PM proteins (Cai et al., 2014). Ultimately VPS4/SKD1, an ortholog of yeast/mammalian AAA ATPase, hydrolyzes ATP, leading to the disassembly of the ESCRT-III complex, allowing for recycling of the subunits. This is an essential step for the completion of the membrane scission and the formation of ILVs and, furthermore, for the MVBs to fuse with the vacuole/lysosomes (Hurley, 2010; Schuh and Audhya, 2014). All core subunits of the conserved ESCRT-III machinery have two homologs in Arabidopsis, with the exception of VPS2, which has three (Winter and Hauser, 2006; Cai et al., 2014). Nevertheless, only VPS2.1, which binds deubiquitinating enzymes, appears to function as a typical ESCRT-III subunit (Katsiarimpa et al., 2011). There is only one Arabidopsis VPS4/SKD1 homolog named SKD1 (Haas et al., 2007).

A further protein interacting with the ESCRT-III is ALIX, which also interacts with ESCRT-I subunits, therefore having the potential to link ESCRT-I and ESCRT-III (Bissig and Gruenberg, 2014). ALIX binds ubiquitin, specifically K63-linked ubiquitin chains (Dowlatshahi et al., 2012), suggesting it may function as a ubiquitin receptor for protein sorting into MVBs (Pashkova et al., 2013). Similar functions have been attributed to Arabidopsis ALIX (Figure 1), which furthermore is indispensable for plant growth and development as well as vacuole and MVB biogenesis (Cardona-Lopez et al., 2015; Kalinowska et al., 2015).

Plant genomes encode unique ESCRT components with limited sequence similarities to mammalian/yeast subunits, which interact with known ESCRT subunits to regulate endocytic sorting processes. The SH3 DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 2 (SH3P2; Figure 1) has been implicated in vacuolar trafficking of ubiquitinated cargoes as it localizes to CCVs and binds K63-linked ubiquitin chains, VPS23A, and deubiquitinating enzymes (Kolb et al., 2015; Nagel et al., 2017). FYVE 1 (Fab 1, YOTB, Vac 1, and EEA1)/FREE1 (FYVE DOMAIN PROTEIN REQUIRED FOR ENDOSOMAL SORTING 1) localizes to MVBs and binds ubiquitin, interacts with SH3P2, both VPS23 subunits, and is incorporated into the ESCRT-III complex (Barberon et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2014; Kolb et al., 2015; Belda-Palazon et al., 2016; Figure 1). It is essential for ILV formation, vacuolar biogenesis, autophagic degradation, seedling development, and localization and degradation of PM proteins and cytosolic ABA receptors (Barberon et al., 2014; Gao et al., 2014; Kolb et al., 2015; Belda-Palazon et al., 2016).

The high number of plant-specific factors, next to the conserved canonical trafficking machinery responsible for transporting PM proteins destined for degradation, reflects the need of plants to precisely adjust the abundance of their PM proteins in order to be able to respond quickly and accurately to their surroundings. Furthermore, some ESCRT subunits, as, for example, the TOL proteins, have undergone drastic gene expansions (Gao et al., 2017; Cui et al., 2018; Mosesso et al., 2019; Vietri et al., 2020). Thus, to fully understand plant adaptation mechanisms, deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of ESCRT-dependent degradation of ubiquitinated PM proteins is crucial.

While it is evident that the ESCRT machinery participates in virtually every aspect of plant growth and development, its contribution to mediating adaptive responses to environmental stimuli appears remarkable. Specifically, a variety of loci associated with ESCRT-mediated sorting have been linked to often times highly defined aspects of higher plants’ responses to biotic as well as abiotic stress conditions. Prominent examples are the ESCRT-I subunits, where a double mutant line (vps28-2 vps37-1) displays reduced endosomal sorting of a pathogen-related receptor. This plant line thus shows impaired immune responses against bacterial pathogens, although its development is otherwise normal, suggesting functional redundancy with the other isoforms (Spallek et al., 2013). Apart from that, a Zea mays ortholog of the AAA ATPase SKD1 is not essential for plant survival, but was demonstrated to be upregulated by salt or drought stress (Xia et al., 2013), and appears to be critical for adequate responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses (Wang et al., 2014, 2015). Recently, several components of the ESCRT machinery have been shown to play a critical role in the ABA signaling pathway, which is also reflected in a higher drought tolerance of their respective loss-of-function mutants (Belda-Palazon et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2016; Garcia-Leon et al., 2019). The ESCRT-I subunit VPS23A, for example, influences the stability and subcellular localization of ABA receptors by affecting their endosomal trafficking to the vacuole for degradation (Yu et al., 2016). Thus, the core function of the ESCRT machinery is essential in plant development, but diversification and redundancies within the subunits might contribute to and play an important role in adaptation processes.

Drought stress

Among the abiotic and biotic stressors, drought conditions receive particular attention as one of the most important factors that limit crop production on a global scale (Gupta et al., 2020). Drought stress restricts many aspects of plant growth and development from plant height to root morphogenesis (Gray and Brady, 2016). Thus, water represents a limiting factor for crop production in agriculture, aggravated further by current signs of climate change, which represents a serious threat for a sustainable supply with staple food (Nuccio et al., 2018; Osmolovskaya et al., 2018; Bertolino et al., 2019). Plants in their natural environment have evolved strategies to cope with limited water supply, which is reflected in a spectrum of mechanisms resulting in an increased tolerance to drought. A plant's approach to cope with such limitations involves either drought escape, which allows plants to complete their life cycle before the onset of drought, drought avoidance, antagonizing enhanced water loss, or drought tolerance characterized by (oftentimes long-term) osmotic adjustments (Zhang, 2007; Osmolovskaya et al., 2018; VanWallendael et al., 2019). However, water shortage beyond a critical threshold level will inevitably result in irreversible tissue damage together with major effects on photosynthesis, respiration, and nutrient uptake (Zhu, 2002; Osmolovskaya et al., 2018). These effects are linked to drought-related aberrations in stomata function, interfering with gas exchange, thus leading to dramatic consequences for crop plants (Zhu, 2002; Bertolino et al., 2019).

Plants carefully protect their cells from dehydration, coordinated by the phytohormone ABA, which rapidly accumulates in plants in response to drought/dehydration stress. This is accomplished by an array of ABA-mediated responses, such as stomatal closure to limit water loss and the production of protective metabolites (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki and Shinozaki, 2006; Gomez-Cadenas et al., 2015). Apart from that, ABA influences adaptive growth responses, including the control of seed germination as well as overall plant organ growth (Cutler et al., 2010; Finkelstein, 2013; Nakashima and Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, 2013). These latter ABA responses impact on plant morphogenesis as a result of an intimate interplay with responses triggered by additional growth regulators. Auxin, for example, is indispensable for root morphogenesis and functions as a key regulator of root system architecture (Lavenus et al., 2013). Ongoing research, unraveling the mechanisms of ABA–auxin crosstalk in the regulation of root growth, thus produces essential insights into the interplay between stress responses and morphogenetic signaling events and how they jointly control adaptive responses (Xie et al., 2021).

TOLs function in the modulation of hormonal pathways

Members of the TOL protein family function in the first steps in the ESCRT-mediated degradation of ubiquitinated PM-associated proteins (Korbei et al., 2013; Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020). Nevertheless, the precise function of the individual TOLs in this enlarged protein family is not yet described. There are apparent functional redundancies within members of the TOL family, as Arabidopsis single knockout plant lines show no obvious phenotype, while a higher-order mutant exhibits severe pleiotropic defects (Korbei et al., 2013). These severe developmental aberrations could be associated with defects in the recognition and further endocytic sorting for degradation of ubiquitinated membrane cargo, underlining the central role of TOLs in the regulation of plant morphogenesis (Korbei et al., 2013). Phytohormones require stringent modulation of their signaling at transcriptional, translational, and post-translational levels. Intercellular hormone transport and perception is centered around PM-localized proteins, the abundance and localization of which define the magnitude of hormonal responses (Benjamins and Scheres, 2008; Cutler et al., 2010). Protein ubiquitination and the consequential endocytic sorting play a fundamental role in controlling the function of regulators of phytohormone signaling components to adjust and eventually cease pathways (Luschnig and Vert, 2014; Yu and Xie, 2017).

PIN2, an intrinsic PM protein required for directional cellular efflux of the phytohormone auxin, represents an excellent example for such regulation (Gallei et al., 2020; Konstantinova et al., 2021). This protein is modified by K63-linked ubiquitin chains in dependence of RING DOMAIN LIGASE (RGLG)-type E3 ubiquitin ligases, as such ubiquitination acts as a principal signal for PIN2 endocytosis (Leitner et al., 2012a, 2012b). This is underlined by the expression analyses of mutant pin2 alleles, in which a constitutively ubiquitinated PIN2 was found to be endocytosed and degraded in the vacuole, whereas a ubiquitination-deficient pin2K-R allele, in which multiple lysines in the PIN2 open reading frame were replaced by arginines, failed to be degraded in the vacuole (Leitner et al., 2012b). Furthermore, a PIN2–ubiquitin fusion protein, which otherwise got constitutively endocytosed and sorted to the vacuole, was retained at the PM in the root meristem cells of a quintuple tol mutant line, indicating that TOLs are important in the initial recognition and sorting of PIN2 for degradation (Korbei et al., 2013). These and further results established TOLs being responsible for initiating the vacuolar sorting of PIN2 via the ESCRT pathway (Korbei et al., 2013; Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020).

As higher-order tol mutants show a defect in the degradation of ubiquitinated PM proteins (Korbei et al., 2013; Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020), the degradation of proteins involved in the control of ABA signaling and/or homeostasis may also be affected in these mutants. ABA responses have been intimately connected to ubiquitination and the resulting vacuolar sorting of several ABA signaling components (Yu and Xie, 2017). This was shown in recent studies on the ABA receptors, for which ubiquitination has been demonstrated to take place in the nucleus, the cytosol, as well as at the PM (Bueso et al., 2014; Irigoyen et al., 2014; Li et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2017; Fernandez et al., 2020). Members of the RING FINGER OF SEED LONGEVITY 1 (RSL1)/RING FINGER ABA-RELATED (RFA) family of E3 ubiquitin ligases show distinct functions in these processes. RFA1 and RFA4, which reside in the nucleus and cytosol, ubiquitinate and cause the degradation of PYL4 via the 26S proteasome (Fernandez et al., 2020), whereas the ubiquitination of PYL4 at the PM is catalyzed by RSL1 (Bueso et al., 2014), resulting in PYL4 sorting into the vacuole for degradation (Belda-Palazon et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2016; Garcia-Leon et al., 2019). It is not entirely resolved how these differing locations of the PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors impact on ABA signaling and subsequent responses (Rodriguez et al., 2014; Diaz et al., 2016). Nevertheless, it is now becoming evident that non-redundant pathways controlling protein stability either via K48-or K63-linked polyubiquitination modulate ABA responsiveness via control of protein half-life (Yu et al., 2016). Involvement of the ESCRT machinery in ABA signal modulation was evidenced by the physical interaction of PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors with the ESCRT-I subunits FYVE1/FREE1 and VPS23A in vesicle-like structures, and weak fyve1 and vps23a mutants displayed increased sensitivity to ABA (Belda-Palazon et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2016). ALIX was also shown to physically interact with and mediate trafficking of PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors for degradation in the vacuole (Garcia-Leon et al., 2019). Thus, a specific role for a subset of TOLs or the other ESCRT components VPS23A, ALIX, and FREE/FYVE1 in the control of ABA signaling might be brought about by modifications in ABA responsiveness via reversible adjustments in the abundance or subcellular distribution of ABA signaling elements.

Next to the regulation of auxin homeostasis (Korbei et al., 2013), TOLs could therefore also be relevant for the perception and/or downstream interpretation of signals triggered by ABA, potentially via affecting the half-life of proteins involved in the control of ABA signaling and/or homeostasis (Korbei et al., 2013; Moulinier-Anzola et al., 2020). Thus, it will be essential to decipher if TOL proteins function in modulating the ABA pathway in plants to elucidate, in addition to their general role in the endosomal degradation pathway, if and how TOLs play a more differentiated role in ABA signaling.

Overall plant performance can be considered as a product of signaling pathways defining plant morphogenesis and stress tolerance under favorable and comparably adverse growth conditions (Nuccio et al., 2018; VanWallendael et al., 2019). TOL substrate specificity and activity in the control of protein turnover positions members of this protein family at the intersection of these antagonistically acting growth determinants. Understanding TOL function in further detail is thus likely to result in important insights into the mechanisms by which plants define the trade-off between stress tolerance and plant performance under highly volatile environmental conditions (Maggio et al., 2018).

Future perspectives

In summary, these observations led to a working hypothesis in which elevated tolerance to abiotic stressors such as drought may be due to increased ABA receptor activity caused by mis-functioning members of the ESCRT machinery like potentially also the TOLs. On the other hand, root development, a process coordinated by auxin, also affects plant tolerance to abiotic stresses, including drought (Uga et al., 2013). Thus, in a tol mutant plant line, where the turnover of auxin efflux facilitators is affected, this could be important for the appropriate modulation of auxin homeostasis.

Understanding the genes responsible for modulating the responses to phytohormones, as key mediators of plant responses to drought stress, could be a great approach to maintain as well as improve the productivity of crop plants. Enhanced drought tolerance without affecting further phenotypic traits represents a highly desirable agronomic trait (Waltz, 2014). Nevertheless, such plant lines have to be subjected to extensive phenotypic analysis. Basic growth parameters, including plant and organ shape/size, root architecture, and flowering time, have to be assessed carefully, as well as the plant responses to further environmental parameters, including light quantity/quality, variable temperatures, and additional abiotic stresses as well as responses to selected pathogens. These experiments should reveal potential trade-offs in overall plant development as a consequence of the enhanced drought tolerance (Nuccio et al., 2018; Vaidya et al., 2019).

In the light of recent climate extremes, it appears imperative to generate novel crop varieties that are well adapted to adverse environmental conditions and devoid of undesirable side effects affecting overall plant fitness and/or crop yield. Green biotechnology tried to address this issue, aiming at the generation of less drought-responsive crop varieties, by exploiting a range of different approaches. Different from labor-intense and time-consuming standard breeding strategies, solutions offered by biotechnology most often involve the generation of “conventional” genetically modified organisms (GMOs), utilizing the overexpression or silencing of determinants of drought responses in plants. An alternative to these rather blunt approaches is offered by a combination of knowledge obtained in the model plant A. thaliana and revolutionary precision breeding strategies that became accessible with the establishment of the CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing system. This technique shall be exploited for the introduction of point mutations into soybean ESCRT orthologs of Glycine max (soybean), followed by an in-depth analysis of the resulting genetic varieties, with a particular emphasis on drought tolerance phenotypes. As the acceptance for precision breeding in Europe is still nominal, once such a proof of principle has been provided, corresponding genetic variations need to be obtained from soybean germplasm collections (https://www.soybase.org/soynews/newsview.php). Soybeans play an increasing role in providing a sustainable protein supply in Europe, particularly Austria with its long tradition in soybean cultivation that was launched at the BOKU already in 1878 (Haberlandt, 1878). Thus, generation of drought-tolerant soybean varieties can be considered a succession of a long-standing line of research at this university, connecting conventional breeding approaches with state-of-the-art genome editing techniques employed for the sake of sustainable agronomic applicability.

eISSN:
2719-5430
Sprache:
Englisch
Zeitrahmen der Veröffentlichung:
4 Hefte pro Jahr
Fachgebiete der Zeitschrift:
Biologie, Ökologie, andere