[Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "The Social Psychology of Creativity." Boulder, CO, US: Westview Press Inc. ]Search in Google Scholar
[American Psychological Association, Coalition for Psychology in Schools and Education. (2015). Top 20 principles from psychology for preK-12 teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ed/schools/cpse/top-twenty-principles.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Angleitner, A., & Demtröder, A. I. (1988). Acts and dispositions: A reconsideration of the Act frequency approach. European Journal of Personality, 2, 121-141. doi:10.1002/per.2410020207]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain-specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 173-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1102_710.1207/s15326934crj1102_7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 16-29. doi: 10.1002/jocb.002]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Baer, J. (2013). Teaching for Creativity: Domains and Divergent Thinking, Intrinsic Motivation, and Evaluation. In M. B. Gregerson, J. C. Kaufman, & H. T. Snyder (Eds.), Teaching Creatively and Teaching Creativity (pp. 175-181). New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113-117. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Beghetto, R. A. & Plucker, J. A. (2016). Revisiting the relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and reasoning in cognitive development. New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook 1, Cognitive domain (Ed.). London: Longmans, Green and Co Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1983). The Act Frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90(2), 105-126. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.90.2.105]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Carson, S., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Creative Achievement Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37-50. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 385-389. doi:10.1207/s15326934crj0904_9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Cropley, A. J. (1994). Creative intelligence: A concept of "true" giftedness. European Journal for High Ability, 5(1), 6-23. doi:10.1080/0937445940050102]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Funder, D. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101(1), 75-90. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.101.1.75]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016, August 18). Creativity and Academic Achievement: A meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu000013310.1037/edu0000133]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Glăveanu, V. P. (2013). Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A's framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1), 69-81. doi:10.1037/a0029528]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 1, 10-32. doi:10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Han, K. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37(2), 117-142. doi:10.1002/ j.2162-6057.2003.tb00829.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ivcevic, Z. (2007). Artistic and everyday creativity: An act-frequency approach. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 271-290. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01074.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ivcevic, Z. (2009). Creativity map: Toward the next generation of theories of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 3(1), 17-21. doi:10.1037/a0014918]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M. A. (2015). Predicting creativity: Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 480-487. doi:10.1037/a0039826]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jussim, L., Eccles, J., & Madon, S. (1996). Social perception, social stereotypes, and teacher expectations: accuracy and the quest for the powerful self-fulfilling prophecy. Advances in experimental social psychology, 29, 281-388. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601 (08)60240-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Jussim, L., Harber, K. D., Crawford, J. T., Cain, T. R., & Cohen, F. (2005). Social reality makes the social mind: Self-fullling prophecy, stereotypes, bias, and accuracy. Interaction Studies, 6(1), 85-102. doi:10.1075/is.6.1.07jus]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Karwowski, M. (2015). Notes on Creative Potential and Its Measurement. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 2(1), 4-16. doi:10.1515/ctra-2015-0001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Karwowski, M., Kaufman, J. C., Lebuda, I., Szumski, G., & Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A. (2017). Intelligence in childhood and creative achievements in middle-age: The necessary condition approach. Intelligence, 64, 36-44. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2017.07.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the Muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scales (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298-308. doi:10.1037/a0029751]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure, I’m Creative-But Not in Mathematics!: Self-Reported Creativity in Diverse Domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(2), 143-155. doi:10.2190/26HQ-VHE8-GTLN-BJJM]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Russell, C. M. (2012). Identifying and asessing creativity as a component of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(1), 60-73. doi:10.1177/0734282911428196]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(2), 106-130. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lindqvist, G. (2003). Vygotsky's theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2&3), 245-251. doi:10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_14]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Milgram, R. M. (2003). Challenging out-of-school activities as a predictor of creative accomplishments in art, drama, dance and social leadership. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 305-315. doi:10.1080/00313830308599]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Milgram, R. M., & Livne, N. L. (2005). Creativity as a general and a domain-specific ability: The domain of mathematics as an exemplar. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mumford, M. D., & Norris, D. G. (1999). Heuristics. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, Vol. 1 (pp. 807-813). San Diego: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plucker, J., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39, 83-96. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rački, Ž. (2015a). Domain, Gender and Age Differences in the Creative Behavior of Children. Društvena istraživanja, 24(4), 467-485. doi:10.5559/di.24.4.01]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rački, Ž. (2015b). Effects of the educationists' implicit theories of creativity on its evaluation by means of the Idiosyncratic Creativity Contents Constellations. Suvremena psihologija, 18(2), 145-158.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rački, Ž., Bakota, L., & Flegar, Ž. (2015). Word knowledge as predictive of linguistic creative behaviors. Review of psychology, 22(1-2), 11-18.10.21465/rp0022.0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What Makes Giftedness? Reexamining a Definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180-184, 261. doi:10.1177/003172171109200821]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model of creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Root-Bernstein, R. S., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: The link between polymathy and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 127-151). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A. (2015). A Commentary on the Social Perspective on Creativity. Creativity. Theories - Research - Applications, 2(1), 21-31. doi:10.1515/ctra-2015-0003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 20(2), 93-98. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00423.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92-96. doi:10.1080/10400419.2012.650092]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Russ, S. W. (1993). Affect and creativity: The role of affect and play in the creative process. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Russ, S. W. (2003). Play and creativity: developmental issues. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47(3), 291-303. doi:10.1080/00313830308594]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Russ, S. W. (2013). Pretend play in childhood: Foundation of adult creativity. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Silvia, P. J. (2008). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 1012-1021. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.10.027]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139-148. doi:10.1037/a0014940]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creative development as acquired expertise: Theoretical issues and an empirical test. Developmental Review, 20, 283-318. doi:10.1006/ drev.1999.0504]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Simonton, D. K. (2003). Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 475-494. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.475]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 20-36. doi:10.4219/jsge-2005-389]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Giftedness as Developing Expertise: A theory of the interface between high abilities and achieved excellence. High Ability Studies, 12(2), 159-179. doi:10.1080/13598130120084311]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J., & O'Hara, L. A. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 251-272). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1), 3-54. doi:10.1177/1529100611418056]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Subotnik, R. F., & Jarvin, L. (2005). Beyond expertise: conceptions of giftedness as great performance. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 343-357). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Torrance, E. P. (1995). Insights about creativity: Questioned, rejected, ridiculed, ignored. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 313-. doi:10.1007/BF02213376]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology [English translation], 42(1), 7-97.10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210]Search in Google Scholar
[Wai, J. (2014). Experts are born, then made: Combining prospective and retrospective longitudinal data shows that cognitive ability matters. Intelligence, 45, 74-80. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2013.08.009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wai, J., & Rindermann, H. (2017). What goes into high educational and occupational achievement? Education, brains, hard work, networks, and other factors. High Ability Studies, 28(1), 127-145. doi:10.1080/13598139.2017.1302874]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wai, J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2005). Creativity and occupational accomplishments among intellectually precocious youth: An age 13 to age 33 longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(3), 484-492. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.484]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Weisberg, R. W. (1999). Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 226-250). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Winner, E. (2000). The origins and ends of giftedness. American Psychologist, 55(1), 159-169. doi:10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.159]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ziegler, A. (2005). The Actiotope Model of Giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 411-436). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ziegler, A., & Heller, K. A. (2000). Conceptions of giftedness: A meta-theoretical perspective. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 3-22). Oxford, England: Pergamon.]Search in Google Scholar
