1. bookVolumen 4 (2017): Heft 2 (December 2017)
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2354-0036
Erstveröffentlichung
16 Apr 2015
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch
Uneingeschränkter Zugang

Approaches to Measuring Creativity: A Systematic Literature Review

Online veröffentlicht: 29 Dec 2017
Volumen & Heft: Volumen 4 (2017) - Heft 2 (December 2017)
Seitenbereich: 238 - 275
Eingereicht: 08 Sep 2017
Akzeptiert: 06 Dec 2017
Zeitschriftendaten
License
Format
Zeitschrift
eISSN
2354-0036
Erstveröffentlichung
16 Apr 2015
Erscheinungsweise
2 Hefte pro Jahr
Sprachen
Englisch

Abbey, A., & Dickson, J. W. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. Academy of Management Journal, 26, 362-368.10.2307/255984DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Almeida, L. S., Prieto, M. D., Ferrando, M., Oliveira, E., & Ferrándiz, C. (2008). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: The question of its construct validity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3, 53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2008.03.003Search in Google Scholar

*Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A Consensual Assessment Technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997-1013.10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 357-376.10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw, & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 123-167). Greenwish, CT: JAI Press.Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 385-389.10.1207/s15326934crj0904_9Search in Google Scholar

*Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154-1184.10.2307/256995Search in Google Scholar

*Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, N. (1989). The creative environment scales: Work Environment Inventory. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 231-253.10.1080/10400418909534321Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32.10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: Development and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-258.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199805)19:3<235::AID-JOB837>3.0.CO;2-CDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Bachelor, P. (1989). Maximum likelihood confirmatory factor-analytic investigation of factors within Guilford's Structure of Intellect model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 797-804.10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.797Search in Google Scholar

*Bachelor, P., & Michael, W. B. (1991). Higher-order factors of creativity within Guilford's structure-of-intellect model: A re-analysis of a fifty-three variable data base. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 157-175.10.1080/10400419109534383Search in Google Scholar

*Bachelor, P., Michael, W. B., & Kim, S. (1994). First-order and higher-order semantic and figural factors in Structure-of-Intellect Divergent Production measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 608-619.10.1177/0013164494054003004Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23-39.10.1080/10400419109534371Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J. (1994a). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multi-domain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35-46.10.1080/10400419409534507Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J. (1994b). Generality of creativity across performance domains: A replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1217-1218.10.2466/pms.1994.79.3.1217Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J. (1994c). Performance assessments of creativity: Do they have long-term stability? Roeper Review, 7, 7-11.10.1080/02783199409553609Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J. (1994d). Why you still shouldn’t trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 52, 72-73. Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J. (2011). How divergent thinking tests mislead us: Are the Torrance Tests still relevant in the 21st century? The division 10 debate. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 309-313. doi: 10.1037/a0025210Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46, 16-29. doi: 10.1002/jocb.002Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review, 37, 165-178. doi: 10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J. (2016). Domain specificity of creativity. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the Consensual Assessment Technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 113-17.10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the Consensual Assessment Technique. In C. S. Schreiner (Ed.), Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65-77). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Search in Google Scholar

*Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2014). The gold standard for assessing creativity. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education, 3, 81-93. doi: 10.4018/ijqaete.2014010104Search in Google Scholar

*Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2011). Assessing creativity in the classroom. The Open Education Journal, 4, 124-132. doi: 10.2174/1874920801104010058Search in Google Scholar

*Barbot, B., Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2015). Creative potential in educational settings: Its nature, measure, and nurture. Education 3-13, 43, 371-381. doi: 10.1080/03004279.2015.1020643Search in Google Scholar

*Barron, F., & Harrington, D. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 439-476.10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.002255DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Batey, M. (2007). A psychometric investigation of everyday creativity. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. London: University College.Search in Google Scholar

*Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 55-65. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.649181Search in Google Scholar

*Batey, M., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2010). Individual differences in ideational behavior: Can the big five and psychometric intelligence predict creativity scores? Creativity Research Journal, 22, 90-97. doi: 10.1080/10400410903579627Search in Google Scholar

*Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355-429.Search in Google Scholar

*Belcher, T. L., Rubovits, J. J., & Di Meo, P. A. (1981). Measurement of creativity: A factor analytic study. Psychological Reports, 48, 819-825.10.2466/pr0.1981.48.3.819DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Besançon, M., & Lubart, T. I. (2008). Differences in the development of creative competencies in children schooled in diverse learning environments. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 381-389. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.009Search in Google Scholar

Biernat, M. (2003). Toward a broader view of social stereotyping. American Psychologist, 58, 1019-1027.10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1019Search in Google Scholar

Blamiresa, M., & Peterson, A. (2014). Can creativity be assessed? Towards an evidenceinformed framework for assessing and planning progress in creativity. Cambridge Journal of Education, 44, 147-162. doi: 10.1080/0305764X.2013.860081Search in Google Scholar

*Brinkman, D. (1999). Problem finding, creativity style and the musical compositions of high school students. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 62-68.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01038.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Brougher, S. J., & Rantanen, E. M. (2009). Creativity and design: Creativity’s new definition and its relationship to design. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1, 605-609. doi: 10.1177/154193120905301005Search in Google Scholar

*Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 37-50.10.1207/s15326934crj1701_4Search in Google Scholar

Christiaans, H. H. C. M. (2002). Creativity as a design criterion. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 41-54.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_4Search in Google Scholar

*Clapham, M. M. (1998). Structure of the figural forms A and B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58, 275-283.10.1177/0013164498058002010Search in Google Scholar

*Clapham, M. M. (2004). The convergent validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking and creativity interest inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64, 828-841.10.1177/0013164404263883DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Colangelo, N., Kerr, B., Hallowell, K., Huesman, R., & Gaeth, J. (1992). The Iowa inventiveness inventory: Toward a measure of mechanical inventiveness. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 157-163.10.1080/10400419209534429DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Couger, J. D., Higgins, L. F., & McIntyre, S. C. (1993). (Un)structured creativity in information systems organizations. MIS Quarterly, 17, 375-397.10.2307/249584DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Craft, A. (2001). An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education. Report prepared for the qualifications and curriculum authority. Available at http://www.creativetallis.com/uploads/2/2/8/7/2287089/creativity_in_education_report.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

*Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40- year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283-291.10.1177/001698620504900402Search in Google Scholar

*Cropley, A. J. (1972). A five-year longitudinal study of DT tests. Developmental Psychology, 6, 119-124.10.1037/h0032228DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23, 72-79.10.1080/02783190009554069Search in Google Scholar

*Cropley, A. J., & Maslany, G. W. (1969). Reliability and factorial validity of the Wallach- Kogan Creativity Tests. British Journal of Psychology, 60, 395-398.10.1111/j.2044-8295.1969.tb01213.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Davidovitch, N., & Milgram, R. M. (2006). Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in higher education. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 385-390.10.1207/s15326934crj1803_12DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Davies, D., Jindal-Snape, D., Collier, C., Digby, R., Hay, P., & Howe, A. (2013). Creative learning environments in education-A systematic literature review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 8, 80-91. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.07.004Search in Google Scholar

*Davis, G. A. (1975). In frumious pursuit of the creative person. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 9, 75-87.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1975.tb00561.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Davis, G. A., & Subkoviak, M. J. (1975). Multidimensional analysis of a personalitybased test of creative potential. Journal of Educational Measurement, 12, 37-43.10.1111/j.1745-3984.1975.tb01007.xSearch in Google Scholar

Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review, 21, 619-654.10.5465/amr.1996.9702100310Search in Google Scholar

*Diakidoy, I. N., & Spanoudis, G. (2002). Domain specificity in creativity testing: A comparison of performance on a general divergent-thinking test and a parallel, content- specific test. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 36, 41-61.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2002.tb01055.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Dixon, J. (1979). Quality versus quantity: The need to control for the fluency factor in originality scores from the Torrance Tests. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2, 70-79.Search in Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 329-333.Search in Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363-406.10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363Search in Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2, 290-309.10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Finke, R. A., Ward, T. M., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Fishkin, A. S., & Johnson, A. S. (1998). Who is creative? Identifying children’s creative abilities. Roeper Review, 21(1), 40-46. doi: 10.1080/02783199809553925Search in Google Scholar

*Fleenor, J. W., & Taylor, S. (1994). Construct validity of three self-report measures of creativity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 464-470.10.1177/0013164494054002021DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Forrester, V., & Hui, A. (2007). Creativity in the Honk Kong classroom: What is the contextual practice? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 30-38.10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.003Search in Google Scholar

*Fraser, B. J., Treagust, D. F., & Dennis, N. (1986). Development of an instrument for assessing classroom psychosocial environment at universities and colleges. Studies in Higher Education, 11, 43-54.10.1080/03075078612331378451Search in Google Scholar

*Furnham, A., Batey, M., Anand, K., & Manfield, J. (2008). Personality, hypomania, intelligence and creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1060-1069. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01293.xSearch in Google Scholar

Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2016). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi. 10.1037/edu000013310.1037/edu0000133DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Galati, F. (2015). Complexity of judgment: What makes possible the convergence of expert and nonexpert ratings in assessing creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 24-30. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.992667Search in Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1993). Creating minds. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Geis, G.T. (1988). Making Companies Creative. In R. L. Kuhn (ed.), Handbook for creative and innovative managers (pp. 25-33). New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

*Getzels, J. W., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976) The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem finding in Art. New York: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

*Gluck, J., Ernst, R., & Unger, F. (2002). How creatives define creativity: Definitions reflect different types of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 55-67.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_5Search in Google Scholar

*Goldsmith, R. E., & Matherly, T. A. (1988). Creativity and self-esteem: A multiple operationalization validity study. The Journal of Psychology, 122, 47-56.10.1080/00223980.1988.10542942Search in Google Scholar

*González, M. A., Campos, A., & Pérez, M. J. (1997). Mental imagery and creative thinking. The Journal of Psychology, 131, 357-364.10.1080/00223989709603521Search in Google Scholar

*Gough, H. G. (1979). A creative personality scale for the Adjective Check List. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1398-1405.Search in Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.10.1037/h0063487DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1975). Creativity: A quarter century of progress. In I. A. Taylor, & J. W. Getzels (Eds.), Perspectives in creativity (pp. 37-59). Chicago: Aldine.Search in Google Scholar

*Han, K. (2003). Domain-specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117-142.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2003.tb00829.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Han, K., & Marvin, C. (2002). Multiple creativities? Investigating domain-specificity of creativity in young children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 98-109.10.1177/001698620204600203DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Harrington, D. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to "be creative" on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00715.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Harrington, D. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. In M. Runco, & R. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 143-169). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

*Heausler, N. L., & Thompson, B. (1988). Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 463-468.10.1177/0013164488482021DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389-407.10.2307/1423013Search in Google Scholar

*Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (2010). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 61, 569-598. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100416Search in Google Scholar

*Hennessey, B. A., Amabile, T. M., & Mueller, J. S. (2011). Consensual Assessment. In M. A. Runco, & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of creativity, vol. 1 (2nd ed.) (pp. 253-260). San Diego: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s Consensual Assessment Technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 234-244.Search in Google Scholar

*Hocevar, D. (1979a). A comparison of statistical infrequency and subjective judgment as criteria in the measurement of originality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 43, 297-299.10.1207/s15327752jpa4303_13DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Hocevar, D. (1979b). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191Search in Google Scholar

*Hocevar, D. (1979c). The development of the Creative Behavior Inventory (CBI). Paper presented at the 1979 conference of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Las Vegas, Nevada (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED170350).Search in Google Scholar

*Hocevar, D. (1979d). The unidimensional nature of creative thinking in fifth grade children. Child Study Journal, 9, 273-278.Search in Google Scholar

*Hocevar, D. (1980). Intelligence, divergent thinking, and creativity. Intelligence, 4, 25- 40.10.1016/0160-2896(80)90004-5Search in Google Scholar

*Hocevar, D. (1981). Measurement of creativity: Review and critique. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45, 450-464.10.1207/s15327752jpa4505_1DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Hocevar, D., & Bachelor, P. (1989). A taxonomy and critique of measurements used in the study of creativity. In J. A. Glover, R. R. Ronning, & C. R. Reynolds (Eds.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 53-75). New York: Plenum Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Hocevar, D., & Michael, W. B. (1979). The effects of scoring formulas on the discriminant validity of tests of divergent thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 39, 917-921.10.1177/001316447903900427Search in Google Scholar

Hoelcher, M., & Schubert, M. (2015). Potential and problems of existing creativity and innovation indices. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 1-15. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.992656Search in Google Scholar

Holland, J. L., & Nichols, R. (1964). Prediction of academic and extracurricular achievement in college. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 55-65.10.1037/h0047977DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2006). Consumer-based assessment of product creativity: A review and reappraisal. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 16, 155-175.Search in Google Scholar

*Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., & Ekvall, G. (1999). Situational Outlook Questionnaire: A measure of the climate for creativity and change. Psychological Reports, 85, 665-674.10.2466/pr0.1999.85.2.665Search in Google Scholar

James, K., & Asmus, C., (2000-2001). Personality, cognitive skills, and creativity in different life domains. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 149-159.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_3Search in Google Scholar

James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211-226.10.1207/s15326934crj1203_6DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28, 95-105. doi: 10.1002/per.1941Search in Google Scholar

*Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the Muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 298-308. doi: 10.1037/a0029751Search in Google Scholar

*Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Hawking's Haiku, Madonna's math: Why it is hard to be creative in every room of the house. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 3-19). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Search in Google Scholar

*Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 83-91. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.649237Search in Google Scholar

*Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the Consensual Assessment Technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 171-178. doi: 10.1080/10400410802059929Search in Google Scholar

*Kaufman, J. C., Evans, M. L., & Baer, J. (2010). The American Idol Effect: Are students good judges of their creativity across domains? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28, 3-17. doi: 10.2190/EM.28.1.bSearch in Google Scholar

*Kaufman, J. C., Lee, J., Baer, J., & Lee, S. (2007). Captions, consistency, creativity, and the Consensual Assessment Technique: New evidence of reliability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2, 96-106.10.1016/j.tsc.2007.04.002Search in Google Scholar

*Kaufman, J. C., Plucker, J. A., & Russell, C. M. (2012). Identifying and assessing creativity as a component of giftedness. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 60-73. doi: 10.1177/0734282911428196Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Resource review: Creativity. Change, 39, 55-58.10.3200/CHNG.39.4.55-C4Search in Google Scholar

*Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. P. (1973). Thinking creatively with sounds and words: Technical Manual (Research Ed.). Lexington, MA: Personnel Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Khattab, A., Michael, W. B., & Hocevar, D. (1982). The construct validity of higher order Structure-of-Intellect abilities in a battery of tests emphasizing the product of transformations: A confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 42, 1089-1105.10.1177/001316448204200415DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Kim, K. H. (2006a). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3-14.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2Search in Google Scholar

*Kim, K. H. (2006b). Is creativity unidimensional or multidimensional? Analyses of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 251-259.10.1207/s15326934crj1803_2DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42, 106-130. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2008.tb01290.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Kim, K. H., Cramond, B., & Bandalos, D. L. (2006). The latent structure and measurement invariance of scores on the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-figural. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 459-477.Search in Google Scholar

*King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality, 30, 189-203.10.1006/jrpe.1996.0013DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Kogan, N., & Pankove, E. (1974). Long-term predictive validity of divergent-thinking tests: Some negative evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 802-810.10.1037/h0021521Search in Google Scholar

*Krumm, G., Aranguren, M., Filippetti, V. A., & Lemos, V. (2014). Factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking verbal form B in a Spanish-speaking population. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50, 150-164. doi: 10.1002/jocb.76Search in Google Scholar

*Krumm, G., Filippetti, V. A., Lemos, V., Koval, J., & Balabanian, C. (2016). Construct validity and factorial invariance across sex of the Torrance Test of Creative Thinking - figural Form A in Spanish-speaking children. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22, 180-189. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2016.10.003Search in Google Scholar

*Krumm, G., Lemos, V., & Filippetti, V. A. (2014). Factor structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking figural form B in Spanish-speaking children: Measurement invariance across gender. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 72-81. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.843908Search in Google Scholar

*Lee, S., Lee, J., & Youn, C.-Y. (2005). A variation of CAT for measuring creativity in business products. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 143-153.Search in Google Scholar

*Lemons, G. (2011). Diverse perspectives of creativity testing: Controversial issues when used for inclusion into gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34, 742-772. doi: 10.1177/0162353211417221Search in Google Scholar

Leung, A. K.-Y., Maddux, W. W., Galinsky, A. D., & Chiu, C-Y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: The when and how. American Psychologist, 63, 169-181. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.169Search in Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S. (1991). Comparisons between museum and mass-produced art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 11-22.10.2190/6CD7-HPM2-2Q14-56GJSearch in Google Scholar

Lindauer, M. S., & Long, D. A. (1986). The criteria used to judge art: Marketplace and academic comparisons. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 4, 163-174.10.2190/C9MW-G2XR-MG4V-WKAUSearch in Google Scholar

Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_07Search in Google Scholar

Lubart, T. I., & Guignard, J. (2004). The generality-specificity of creativity: A multivariate approach. In R. J. Sternberg, E. L. Grigorenko, & J. L. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 43-56). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Search in Google Scholar

*Lubart, T. I., Zenasni, F., & Barbot, B. (2013). Creative potential and its measurement. International Journal for Talent Development and Creativity, 1, 41-51.Search in Google Scholar

*Mace, D. E., Michael, W. B., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Validity of higher-order ability constructs in Structure-Of-Intellect tests all involving semantic content and operations of cognition or evaluation: A confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 353-359.Search in Google Scholar

*Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 119-140.10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of Creativity Research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) Handbook of Creativity (pp. 449-460). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

McLaren, R. B. (1993). The dark side of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 137-144.10.1080/10400419309534472DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220-232.10.1037/h0048850Search in Google Scholar

*Michael, W. B., & Bachelor, P. (1990). Higher-order structure-of-intellect creativity factors in divergent production tests: A re-analysis of a Guilford data base. Creativity Research Journal, 3, 58-74.10.1080/10400419009534333DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Milgram, R. M., & Hong, E. (1993). Creative thinking and creative performance in adolescents as predictors of creative attainments in adults: A follow-up study after 18 years. Roeper Review, 15, 135-139.10.1080/02783199309553487Search in Google Scholar

*Miller, A. L. (2014). A self-report measure of cognitive processes associated with creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 203-218. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2014.901088Search in Google Scholar

*Moos, R. (1986). Work Environment Scale: Manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Mouchiroud, C., & Lubart, T. (2001). Children's original thinking: An empirical examination of alternative measures derived from divergent thinking tasks. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 162, 382-401.10.1080/00221320109597491Search in Google Scholar

*Mumford, M. D. (2003). Where have we been, where are we going? Taking stock in creativity research. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 107-120.10.1080/10400419.2003.9651403DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2012). A comparison of self-ratings and non-self-report measures of employee creativity. Human Relations, 65, 1021-1047. doi: 10.1177/0018726712446015Search in Google Scholar

*Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225-241.10.1080/00207590143000036Search in Google Scholar

Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 45-53.10.1177/073428299100900104Search in Google Scholar

*O'Quin, K., & Besemer, S. P. (1989). The development, reliability, and validity of the revised creative product semantic scale. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 267-278.10.1080/10400418909534323DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Palmiero, M., Nori, R., Aloisi, V., Ferrara, M., & Piccardi, L. (2015). Domain-specificity of creativity: A study on the relationship between visual creativity and visual mental imagery. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01870Search in Google Scholar

Paramithaa, A., & Indarti, N. (2014). Impact of the environment support on creativity: Assessing the mediating role of intrinsic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 102-114. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.419Search in Google Scholar

*Park, N. K., Chun, M. Y., & Lee, J. (2016). Revisiting individual creativity assessment: Triangulation in subjective and objective assessment methods. Creativity Research Journal, 28, 1-10. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2016.1125259Search in Google Scholar

*Patterson, M. G., West, M. A., Shackleton, V. J., Dawson, J. F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., Robinson, D. L., & Wallace, A. M. (2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379-408.10.1002/job.312DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 7, 258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2012.04.009Search in Google Scholar

*Plucker, J. A. (1999a). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance's (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103-114.10.1207/s15326934crj1202_3DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Plucker, J. A. (1999b). Reanalyses of student responses to creativity checklists: Evidence of content generality. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33, 126-137.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01042.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. In J. Kaufman, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Plucker, J. A., Qian, M., & Wang, S. (2011). Is originality in the eye of the beholder? Comparison of scoring techniques in the assessment of divergent thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 45, 1-22. doi: 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2011.tb01081.xSearch in Google Scholar

*Plucker, J. A., & Renzulli, J. S. (1999). Psychometric approaches to the study of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.). Handbook of human creativity (pp. 35-60). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement directions in creativity assessment has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future. Roeper Review, 21, 36-39.10.1080/02783199809553924Search in Google Scholar

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879Search in Google Scholar

*Priest, T. (2006). Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement. Psychology of Music, 34, 47-61.10.1177/0305735606059104Search in Google Scholar

Primi, R. (2014). Divergent productions of metaphors: Combining many-facet Rasch measurement and cognitive psychology in the assessment of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts (online publication). doi: 10.1037/a0038055Search in Google Scholar

*Raudsepp, E. (1981). How creative are you? New York: Perigee. Search in Google Scholar

*Reiter-Palmon, R., Robinson-Morral, E. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Santo, J. B. (2012). Evaluation of self-perceptions of creativity: Is it a useful criterion? Creativity Research Journal, 24, 107-114. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.676980Search in Google Scholar

Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 109-135. Search in Google Scholar

Rudowicz, E. (2003). Creativity and culture: A two way interaction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 47, 273-290. 10.1080/00313830308602Search in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A. (1984). Teachers' judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711-717.10.2466/pms.1984.59.3.711Search in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A. (1986). Divergent thinking and creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 375-384.10.1177/001316448604600211DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A. (1987). The generality of creative performance in gifted and nongifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 31, 121-125.10.1177/001698628703100306DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A. (1993). Divergent thinking, creativity, and giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37, 16-22.10.1177/001698629303700103DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657-687.10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502Search in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A. (2007). Creativity. Theories and themes: Research, development and practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent thinking is not synonymous with creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2, 93-96. doi: 10.1037/1931-3896.2.2.93Search in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 66-75. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.652929Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Bahleda, M. D. (1986). Implicit theories of artistic, scientific, and everyday creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 20, 93-98.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1986.tb00423.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2012.650092Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Johnson, D. J. (1993). Parents’ and teachers’ implicit theories of children’s creativity. Child Study Journal, 23, 91-113.Search in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svenson, E. (1993). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. The Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31.Search in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty year follow up. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 361-368. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2010.523393Search in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A., & Mraz, W. (1992). Scoring divergent thinking tests using total ideational output and a creativity index. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 213-221.10.1177/001316449205200126DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 211-220.10.1007/BF01538162DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A., Okuda, S. M., & Thurston, B. J. (1987).The psychometric properties of four systems for scoring divergent thinking tests. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 5, 149-156.10.1177/073428298700500206DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295-302.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36, 19-39.10.1111/j.1744-6570.1983.tb00500.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30, 933-958.10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007Search in Google Scholar

*Siegel, S. M., & Kaemmerer, W. F. (1978). Measuring the perceived support for innovation in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 553-562.10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.553DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychological Review (online publication). doi: 10.1007/s10648-015-9299-1Search in Google Scholar

*Silvia, P. J., Martin, C., &, Nusbaum, E. C. (2009). A snapshot of creativity: Evaluating a quick and simple method for assessing divergent thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 4, 79-85. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2009.06.005Search in Google Scholar

*Silvia, P. J., Wigert, B., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Assessing creativity with self-report scales: A review and empirical evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6, 19-34. doi: 10.1037/a0024071Search in Google Scholar

*Skager, R. W., Klein, S. P., & Schultz, C. B. (1967). The prediction of academic and artistic achievement at a school of design. Journal of Educational Measurement, 4, 105-117.10.1111/j.1745-3984.1967.tb00577.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607-627.10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.607Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Conway, B. E., Ketron, J. L., & Bernstein, M. (1981). People's conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 37-55.10.1037/0022-3514.41.1.37DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, N. G., & Berk, L. E. (1981). Effects of school environments on the development of young children's creativity. Child Development, 52, 1153-1162.10.2307/1129501DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Thompson, G., & Lordan, M. (1999). A review of creativity principles applied to engineering design. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, 213, 17-31.10.1243/0954408991529960Search in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Lexington, MA: Personal Press.Search in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (1969). Prediction of adult creative achievement among high school seniors. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 223-229.10.1177/001698626901300401Search in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (1972a). Career patterns and peak creative achievements of creative high school students 12 years later. Gifted Child Quarterly, 16, 75-88.10.1177/001698627201600201DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (1972b). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 236-252.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (1977). Creativity in the classroom: What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association.Search in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (1980). Growing up creatively gifted: The 22-year longitudinal study. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 5, 148-158.Search in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (1981a). Empirical validation of criterion referenced indicators of creative ability through a longitudinal study. The Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 6, 136-140.Search in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (1981b). Predicting the creativity of elementary school children (1958-80) and the teacher who made a difference. Gifted Child Quarterly, 25, 55-62.10.1177/001698628102500203Search in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-norms-technical manual- figural (streamlined) forms A and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Search in Google Scholar

*Torrance, E. P., & Haensly, P. A. (2003). Assessment of creativity in children and adolescents. In C. R. Reynoolds, & R. W. Kamphaus (Eds.) Handbook of psychological and educational assessment of children: Intelligence, aptitude and achievement (2nd ed.) (pp. 584-607). New York: The Guildford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Treffinger, D. J. (1996). Creativity, creative thinking, and critical thinking: In search of definitions. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.Search in Google Scholar

*Treffinger, D. J., Renzulli, J., & Feldhusen, J. (1971). Problems in the assessment of creative thinking. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 5, 104-112.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1971.tb00880.xDOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing creativity: A guide for educators. Sarasota: Center for Creative Learning.Search in Google Scholar

*Ulosevich, S. N., Michael, W. B., & Bachelor, P. (1991). Higher-order factors in Structure -of-Intellect (SOI) aptitude tests hypothesized to portray constructs of military leadership: A re-analysis of an SOI data base. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 15-37.10.1177/0013164491511002DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Ursyn, A. (2014). Perceptions of Knowledge Visualization: Explaining Concepts through Meaningful Images. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-4666-4703-9Search in Google Scholar

Vaughn, V. L., Feldhusen, J. F., & Asher, J. W. (1991). Meta-analyses and review of research on pull-out programs in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35, 92-98.10.1177/001698629103500208DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Vincent, P. H., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163-178.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1402_4DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children: A study of the creativity intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

*Wechsler, S. (2006). Validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking to the Brazilian culture. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 15-25.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_3DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: understanding innovation in problem solving, science, invention, and the arts. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

Westby, E. L., & Dawson, V. L. (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 1-10.10.1207/s15326934crj0801_1DOI öffnenSearch in Google Scholar

*Williams, F. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK.Search in Google Scholar

Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Fostering creativity in service development: Facilitating service innovation by the creative cognition approach. Service Science, 1, 142-153. doi: 10.1287/serv.1.3.142Search in Google Scholar

*Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 24-37. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2011.545713Search in Google Scholar

*Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 165-217.Search in Google Scholar

Empfohlene Artikel von Trend MD

Planen Sie Ihre Fernkonferenz mit Scienceendo