Cite

Introduction

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), also known as verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) strains are responsible for serious diseases such as hemorrhagic colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), especially among children and elderly. STEC are zoonotic pathogens, with ruminants considered the main reservoir. Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is a subgroup of STEC serotypes strongly associated with bloody diarrhea and HUS in industrialized countries. HUS is defined as a combination of acute kidney injury, low platelet counts, and hemolytic anemia. After HUS,some children never recover kidney function and require long-term replacement therapy, while those who recover are at risk of developing chronic kidney disease and arterial hypertension. Some have residual non-renal problems, including neurological defects, insulin-dependent diabetes, pancreatic failure, or gastrointestinal complications. STEC associated with diarrhea may resolve without any long-term consequences (WHO 2018).

STEC serotypes produce high levels of various toxins in the large intestine which are closely related to the potent cytotoxins produced by Shigella dysenteriae type 1. They appear to directly damage mucosal and vascular endothelial cells in the gut wall. If absorbed, they exert toxic effects on another vascular endothelium, e.g., renal. The mainstay of treatment for STEC infection is supportive. Although E. coli is susceptible to most used antibiotics, they have not been shown to alleviate symptoms, reduce carriage of the organism, or prevent HUS.

The knowledge of how to reduce the incidence of STEC on cattle farms still needs to be elucidated. However, tests can be performed to determine whether a given animal carries the bacterium. If necessary, meat can be given bactericidal treatment, which involves heating or irradiation. Although these techniques are helpful, they do not guarantee the absence of STEC in food. Effective prevention requires the application of strict hygiene practices throughout the entire food chain, from producer to consumer. To prevent infection, children under the age of 5 should not come into contact with farm animals, especially cattle and sheep, and their environment as well as should avoid eating unpasteurized cheese or not washed fruits, vegetables, and herbs if they are eaten raw; nor drink water that has not undergone microbiological testing, e.g., from a well or spring (The Institut Pasteur 2023).

The aim of the study was to evaluate epidemiological characteristics of Shiga toxin-producing E. coli causing infection in the pediatric population in Poland.

Experimental
Materials and Methods

Clinical samples. The study was conducted from January 1st, 2018-December 31st, 2022. All consecutive samples delivered for STEC routine testing in the Microbiology Laboratory of the University Medical Center of the Medical University of Warsaw were included in the study. A total of 180 stool samples from children suspected of HUS were included in the study. The samples came from five pediatric medical centers from five voivodeships: Mazovian, Podlaskie, Greater Poland, Lublin, and Warmian-Masurian.

Detection of STEC strains

Detection of the presence of stx1/stx2 genes in stool samples was performed using the BD MAX™ Enteric Bacterial Panel and the Viasure Real Time PCR Detection Kit (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

All examined samples were cultured on MacConkey agar to select E. coli isolates and on STEC-enriched broth (Axonbiotech GmbH, Germany). After overnight incubation at 37°C, the presence of E. coli was confirmed based on colony morphology and VITEK® 2 identification (bioMérieux, France). Total DNA was extracted from overnight cultures on Columbia Agar using the Genomic Micro AX Bacteria+ Gravity kit (A&A Biotechnology, Poland) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Quality control and concentration of DNA samples were measured using a Thermo Scientific™ NanoDrop™ Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., USA). The purity and concentration of the obtained DNA were determined by A260/A280 and A260/A230 absorbance measurements. Samples with a ratio between 1.8 ± 0.2 and a DNA concentration range between 25–50 ng were used for PCR analysis.

Primer and probe sequences applied in this study were previously reported and described by Perelle et al. (2004; 2005) (stx1 and stx2 genes) and Nielsen and Andersen (2003) (the eae gene) (Table I). Primer pair specificity was assessed by Kagkli et al. (2011). Additionally, a comparison of target sequences was performed with sequences found in the GenBank sequence database provided by NCBI, aligning them to all available bacterial, human, bovine, mouse, and rat genomes. RT-PCR reactions were performed according to the protocol described by Kagkli et al. (2011) with a slight modification. Applied GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega, USA) with Taq DNA polymerase was used. Applied Biosystems™ TaqMan® probes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., USA) were labeled with 6-carboxyfluorescein-6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (FAM-TAMRA), the concentration of each primer was 0.6 μM and the probe 200 nM. The reaction mixtures were heated at 95°C for two minutes, of amplification at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for a minute, followed by 40 cycles conducted in the CFX96 Touch™ Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA).

Characteristics of primers and probes used in the study.

Gene name GenBank Access No. Nucleotide sequences (5’→3’)* Amplicon size (bp)
sxt1 M16625 Fw**: TTTGTYACTGTSACAGCWGAAGCYTTACG 132
Rv**: CCCCAGTTCARWGTRAGRTCMACRTC
Probe: CTGGATGATCTCAGTGGGCGTTCTTATGTAA
sxt2 X07865 Fw: TTTGTYACTGTSACAGCWGAAGCYTTACG 128
Rv: CCCCAGTTCARWGTRAGRTCMACRTC
Probe: TCGTCAGGCACTGTCTGAAACTGCTCC
uh Z11541 Fw: CATTGATCAGGATTTTTCTGGTGATA 102
Rv: CTCATGCGGAAATAGCCGTTA
Poll: ATAGTCTCGCCAGTATTCGCCACCAATACC

* – in the sequences, Y is (C/T), S is (C/G), W is (A/T), R is (A/G), and M is (A/C)

** – Fw – forward primer, Rev – reverse primer

Antibiotic susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using a VITEK® 2 instrument (bioMérieux, France) for all antibiotics except azithromycin. For azithromycin susceptibility testing an MTS™ MIC Test Strip (Liofilchem S.r.l., Italy) was used and plated on Mueller-Hinton agar (Oxoid, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Results were interpreted according to EUCAST v. 12 breakpoints (EUCAST 2022). Breakpoints for azithromycin were taken from the Salmonella/Shigella criteria.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)

The analysis was performed using the CHEF-DR® II instrument (Bio-Rad, USA) according to the procedure described by Kawamori et al. (2008) with minor modifications.

E. coli from 24-hour cultures were suspended in cell suspension buffer (CBS) (100 mM Tris, 100 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) to a McFarland density of 2.0. Bacterial suspensions were mixed (1:1) with 1% agarose or agarose SeaKem® Gold Agarose (Lonza Rockland, Inc., USA) in TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). The agarose plugs with the bacterial suspension were cooled to 4°C to solidify. Lysis was performed for two selected plugs using dissolved CSB (50 mM Tris, 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) and 1%N-lauroylsarcosine sodium (Sigma Aldrich®, Merck KGaA, Germany) for 2 hours of incubation at 54–55°C under constant and vigorous agitation. To prepare the genomic DNA, two plugs were digested for 2 hours at 37°C with the enzyme restrictive XbaI (50 units on a sample) (Thermo Scientific™, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., USA) and 100 μg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) after washing 4 times with 10 ml TE buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). PFGE electrophoresis was performed using 1% PFGE agarose (Bio-Rad, USA) in 0.5 × Tris-Boran-EDTA (TBE) buffer under the following conditions: total duration 19 h, switch block included start time 2.2 s, end time 54.2 s, voltage 6 V/cm, switching angle 120° and temperature 14°C. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with ethidium bromide solution and photographed using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc™ XR + Imaging System (Bio-Rad, USA).

Agglutination with serotype O157 antiserum

E. coli O157 antigens were serotyped using the agglutination method on microtiter plates. A total of 3–5 colonies from Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood were selected for inoculation in the infusion broth and incubated overnight at 35–37°C. After incubation, 80 μl of O antiserum (SSI Diagnostica, Denmark) was mixed with 80 μl of boiled culture on a microtiter plate and incubated at 50–52°C overnight. The reaction was read under artificial light on a black background. In each run, a negative control was performed by mixing 80 μl of physiological saline at pH 7.4 with 80 μl of boiled culture.

Approval from the Ethics Committee of the Health Centers

Not applicable. Medical information was collected from medical records after the discharge of patients.

The patient’s informed consent has not been requested to collect information

Medical information was collected from medical records after the discharge of patients.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

A total of 180 stool samples from children suspected of HUS were included in the study. The samples came from five pediatric medical centers from five voivodeships: Mazovian, Podlaskie, Greater Poland, Lublin, and Warmian-Masurian.

Epidemiological analysis – risk factors for STEC infection

Medical documentation was analyzed in terms of contact with animals (e.g. domestic, farm, zoo), eating unwashed fruit, and vegetables, visiting a mini zoo, participating in scout camps.

Limitations of the study

The study was limited to children with HUS suspected who were hospitalized in tertiary hospitals.

Analysis of medical parameters of STEC-infected patients

Medical documentation was analyzed regarding diarrhea onset, platelet concentration, treatment results, recovery, and HUS complications.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed in Statistica 13 (StatSoft, Inc., USA). The relationships between variables were evaluated using the following statistical tests: Shapiro-Wilk test for normality, Levene test for equality of variances, independent t-test for two samples, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square goodness of fit test and chi-square test of independence, test of significance of Spearman’s rankorder correlation coefficient. For all analyses, a p-value of < 0,05 was considered statistically significant.

Results
Presence of verotoxin in the isolates

In 2018–2022, a total of 45 Shiga toxin-producing isolates were detected. One strain could not be cultured. The E. coli species was confirmed for all isolates except one. One isolate carrying the genes stx1 and eae belonged to the species Citrobacter freundii. The stx2 gene was detected in 86.4% (38/44); three isolates presented only the stx1 gene, and three had both genes, verotoxins stx1 and stx2. Results of the detection of verotoxins genes stx1, and stx2 are shown in Table II. The occurrence of stx1 and stx2 genes was not dependent on age (p > 0.05).

Characteristics of patients infected with STEC as diagnosed in the Medical Center of the Medical University of Warsaw, 2018–2022.

Characteristic of STEC patients Value (No.)
Boys 26
Girls 19
Median age (range) 2 years 8 months (1 month–16 years and 6 months)
Clinical manifestation Value (No.)
HUS 20
Only diarrhea 4
No data 21
Laboratory results No. cases/No. total
Direct positive PCR for stx1 and/or -2 from stool 45/45
Positive culture of STEC 44/45
PCR gene detection results No. cases/No. total
stx11 positive, stx22 negative 3/45
stx1 negative, stx2 positive 38/45
stx1 positive, stx2 positive 3/45
stx – unknown stx type 1/45
eaeA3 44/45
Serotypes No. total
O157 40
other than O157 1

1stx1 – shiga toxine type 1 encoding gene; 2stx2 – shiga toxine type 2 encoding gene;

3eaeA – intimin encoding gene

Serotyping

For 41 tested isolates, 97.6% (40/41) belonged to serotype O157, and 2.4 % (1/41) belonged to a serogroup other than O157 (Table II).

Sensitivity to antibiotics

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests were performed for 33 strains. The antimicrobial resistance was found to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (24.4%), piperacillin/tazobactam (3%), cefotaxime (6%), gentamicin (6%), ciprofloxacin (3%), azithromycin (3%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (24.2%). None of the thirty-three strains produced ESBL. The sensitivity of the tested STEC strains is presented in Fig. 1. Due to the group size being too small, it was not possible to conduct a statistical analysis of the antibiotic sensitivity of the isolates in terms of the patient’s age and gender and the presence of significant or insignificant HUS risk factors.

Fig. 1.

Antibiotic susceptibility of STEC isolates (n = 33).

AMC – amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, TZP – piperacillin/tazobactam, CTX – cefotaxime, CXM – cefuroxime, CAZ – ceftazidime, FEP – cefepime, IPM – imipenem, MEM – meropenem, AK – amikacin, CN – gentamicin, TOB – tobramycin, CIP – ciprofloxacin, SXT – trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, AZT – azithromycin.

Seasonal STEC distribution

The seasonality of infections caused by STEC has been demonstrated. Infections most often occurred from June to October, with a peak in July and August (51%) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Percentage of STEC isolates by month, 2018–2022 (n = 45).

STEC infection and age

Most STEC isolates were detected among children aged 1–5 years – 77.8% (35/45). Lower percentages of 15.6% (7/45), 4.4% (2/45), and 2.2% (1/45) occurred among age groups below one year, 12–16 years, and over 16 years, respectively. In order to check whether the occurrence of genes is age-dependent, patients were divided into two groups. The first group included children up to 2 years of age (median age), and the second group included other patients. There were no statistical differences between groups (p > 0.05, chi-square test of independence Yates correction).

STEC infection and gender

There was no relationship between STEC infections and gender: 19/45 (42.2%) girls vs. 26/45 (57.8%) boys (Table II). The occurrence of the above stx1 and stx2 genes was not sex-dependent. No statistically significant difference was observed in the incidence of STEC in girls and boys (p = 0.456, chi-square test).

Country distribution of isolated STEC strains

Isolates were most often detected in patients hospitalized in the voivodeships Masovian and Podlaskie, 51.2% and 28.9%, respectively. In other voivodeships, this percentage was 12%.

Risk factor for STEC infection

The most common risk factors for HUS in our patients with STEC isolate included living on a farm (most often cattle were bred), eating unwashed fruit and vegetables, visiting a mini zoo, or participating in scout camps.

Medical parameters in patients infected with STEC

The time interval from the onset of diarrhea to HUS in patients ranged from 1 to 8 days. The range of platelet concentrations in patients with confirmed STEC infection was from 6–201 × 103/μl.

According to available data from 18 patients, the most common result was complete recovery – in 83.3% of patients (15/18). Reported complications of HUS in the studied children were neurological complications and insulin-dependent diabetes in 11.1% (2/18) and 5.6% (1/18), respectively.

PFGE

All analyzed in PFGE strains presented STEC pathotypes with only the stx2 gene. The genetic association was obtained by comparing bands in the analyzed PFGE patterns. Closely related strains were designed based on a difference of up to three bands, related up to eight bands, but unrelated to the difference between the above nine bands in the analyzed PFGE pattern. Unrelated PFGE types were marked with different letters from A to S. Among the 23 E. coli isolates tested, 18 PFGE types were distinguished. Among them, PFGE types A, B, and C were characterized by genetic relatedness and were represented by two following subtypes A1 (n = 2), A2, (n = 1); B1 (n = 1), B2 (n = 1) and C1 (n = 2), C2 (n = 1), respectively. The genetically related strains with A1, A2, C1, C2, and B2 PFGE subtypes originated from different children from Mazovian. The other single strains with genetic relatedness belonging to PFGE type B originated from Mazovian and Podlaskie, similar to those with PFGE type C originating from Mazovian and Podlaskie voivodeships. The majority of remaining isolates were sporadic strains, unrelated among others, and represented by a single E. coli isolate. Eleven PFGE types, including D, E, F, G, I, J, M, N, O, and Q types were found in Podlaskie, H and K types were found in Mazovian, P, R types found in Warmian-Masurian and finally, L PFGE type was found in Greater Poland voivodeships. No PFGE type was determined for the tested C. freundii isolate. Table III and Fig. 3 shows the results of the analysis.

Fig. 3.

PFGE patterns of selected Escherichia coli isolates. Original designations of the isolates and their PFGE types are shown above the corresponding lanes. Salmonella Branderup and γ ladder (New England Biolabs, USA) were used as PFGE molecular weight markers. Results of the analysis of genetic relatedness of STEC strains, 2018-2022.

Molecular characteristic of selected isolates derived from gastrointestinal infections.

PFGE type/subtype No. of isolates (Total No. 24) stx1, stx2 gene presence Voivodeship
B1, D, E, F, G, I, J, M, N, O, Q 11 stx2 Podlaskie
A1, A2, B2, C1, C2, H, K 8 stx2 Mazovian
Citrobacter freundii (no PFGE type) 1 stx1 Mazovian
C1, P, R 3 stx2 Warmian-Masurian
L 1 stx2 Greater Poland

Genetic relatedness of PFGE types is marked by bold type.

Discussion

Outbreaks and sporadic cases of STEC have been reported in several countries. Typical HUS caused by STEC presents with acute illness with symptoms of bloody diarrhea. About 25% of typical HUS do not show diarrhea. Almost 90% of individuals recover without sequelae, either spontaneously or after plasma infusion or replacement plasma (Noris et al. 2021). In our study, the most common outcome was complete recovery in 83.3% (15/18) of patients. However, we reported some complications of HUS, such as neurological complications and insulin-dependent diabetes, in 11.1% and 5.6%, respectively.

Our study showed that among the analyzed STEC patients, the stx2 gene predominated with a frequency of 84.4%, and equally, 6.7% were identified with only the stx1 gene and with both stx1 and stx2 genes. The stx2 gene was reported as most frequently detected by others 49.1% – 83.3% (Jenssen et al. 2014). Januszkiewicz and Rastawicki (2016) described strains isolated in Poland from humans, cattle, and food between 1996 and 2010. The authors confirmed the presence of the stx2 gene in 11.8% and the simultaneous occurrence of stx1 and stx2 in 88,2% of isolates but did not detect any stx1 in human isolates. Our results confirm the circulation of E. coli producing verotoxin1 in the Polish pediatric population. Other researchers reported that the stx1 gene is dominant in 57.7–83%, but the stx2 gene in 11.7–17% of isolates (Bouzari et al. 2018).

Shiga toxins (ST) are a group of bacterial toxins involved in human and animal diseases. STs are produced by E. coli isolates. Other species reported as ST producers besides S. dysenteriae type 1 are occasionally C. freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, and Shigella flexneri (Herold et al. 2004). In our study, in one case, C. freundii was detected in the bloody stool of a patient suffering from diarrhoea having the stx1 gene.

The fact that our study mainly includes high-risk STEC might support the serotyping results, as 40 (97.6%) of the strains tested had serotype O157 and encoded the Shiga toxin 2 gene. Reports of non-O157 STEC serotypes associated with severe disease vary among countries. According to the ECDC report, until 2021, the most frequently reported serogroup in human STEC cases was O157, followed by O26, but in recent years, there has been an increasing trend in number of non-O157 STEC infections. The last ECDC report on STEC infections (ECDC 2022) shows serogroup O26 as the most common (34%) among HUS cases, followed by O157 (19.8%). The results of our study concern the period 2018–2022, and sporadic cases of HUS in pediatric population. Detection of the O157 serogroup was not influenced by diagnosis as PCR amplification of Shiga toxin coding genes was applied for detection. Our results agree with some other studies suggesting that E. coli O157: H7 serotype causes in children with HUS more severe diseases than non-O157. In the USA, serotype O157:H7 was the most commonly associated with STEC and most often associated with HUS (Hermos et al. 2011). Similar results were described in a recent study from Sweden (Hua et al. 2021) and China (Zhu et al. 2023). These results are inconsistent with the currently described infections and HUS associated with non-O157 E. coli serotypes, even from Poland (Rastawicki et al. 2020). This phenomenon requires further, more in-depth research.

ST production is necessary but not enough for STEC virulence. Shiga toxin production by O157:H7 is mediated by sensing quorum (Mühlen and Dersch 2020). Serotype O157:H7 harbors the locus of the pathogenic enterocyte efflux island, which encodes genes involved in removing intestinal epithelial cell microvilli and the tight adherence of bacteria to the epithelial cell membrane. The molecular mechanism underlying the pathogenicity of different STEC strains requires further elucidation. Stx2d has been described as a Shiga toxin whose cytotoxicity is activated 10- to 1,000-fold by elastase present in the intestinal mucus of mice or man (Matussek et al. 2023). Clinical STEC strains may have the following genes: stx2a, stx2b, stx2c, stx2d, stx2e, stx2f, stx2g, stx2h, stx2i, stx2j, stx2k, stx2l, stx2m (Bai et al. 2021). Bacterial genetic factors identified as molecular predictors of the development of HUS included stx subtype stx2a, stx2a, and stx2c and genes encoding intimin, toxins, secretory system proteins, and transcription regulators (Sallée et al. 2013). Rapid diagnostic targeting of these genes directly in stool samples could lead to improved care and infection control measures, reducingthe number of patients suffering from severe STEC disease (Matussek et al. 2023).

The likelihood that a patient infected with E. coli O157:H7 will develop HUS varies with age. Fifteen to twenty percent of children less than 10 years of age with culture-confirmed E. coli O157:H7 infection develop HUS. Our study confirmed this because 77% of children with confirmed STEC infection and HUS were under 5 years of age.

Fatima and Aziz (2023) reported a seasonal pattern of STEC infections, with increased incidence during the summer months. Similarly, in the 2018–2022 analyzed period, we observed that infections most frequently occurred in June, July, August, and September, with a peak in July.

Because antibiotics are strong inducers of the bacterial SOS response, which initiates the production and release of phages from bacteria, antibiotic treatment is not recommended. It was mentioned that bacterial DNA damage due to antibiotic therapy may increase the expression of genes encoding verotoxins and increase the risk of HUS (Noris et al. 2021). It is believed that disease worsening after administration of antibiotics also occurs due to changes in the commensal intestinal flora, which allows STEC to attach to the intestinal wall (Harkins et al. 2020). There is no therapy against STEC infections, and current treatment is only supportive and includes hydration therapy and, if necessary, dialysis (Koyanagi et al. 2019). An in vivo mouse model using E. coli O86 demonstrated reduced Shiga toxin production and mortality following azithromycin administration and reduced duration of STEC excretion in feces with a lower frequency of long-term STEC O104:H4 transfer (Nitschke et al. 2012). Cefotaxime, meropenem, ceftazidime, gentamicin, and kanamycin did not affect the stx gene expression or had little induction operation. Antibiotics affecting protein biosynthesis, such as polycyclic, do not affect the expression of the stx2 gene (Chen et al. 2013). Patients treated with intravenous ciprofloxacin and meropenem significantly reduced the duration of ST excretion in stool, with a concomitant reduction in the incidence of seizures and death compared with patients who did not receive antibiotics (Prado et al. 1995). According to Prado et al. (1995) use of β-lactams during the first 3 days of illness was associated with an increased risk of STECHUS. Intravenous meropenem treatment promoted ST release by E. coli O157:H7 but not the O104:H subtype. Ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin increased stx2 expression thousands of times compared to controls. Oral consumption of quinolones by E. coli patients infected with O157:H7 did not increase the possibility of progression to HUS (Chen et al. 2013). The use of trimethoprim did not show significant progression to STEC-HUS, symptomatic improvement or change in Shiga toxin excretion (Tarr et al. 2018). In a prospective study of 259 children below 10 years of age infected with E. coli O157:H7 (Wong et al. 2012) HUS was more common in children who received antibiotics, which included trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, β-lactams, metronidazole, and azithromycin (36 versus 12 percent for children who did not receive antibiotics). After controlling for other variables, the absolute increase in the risk of HUS associated with antibiotic therapy was 25 percent, equivalent to one case of HUS in every four children treated with antibiotics. Data in adults are sparser. In three adult studies that were included in the meta-analysis, antibiotics administered early in STEC infection were associated with the subsequent development of HUS (Wong et al. 2012). A multicenter study observing the application of fosfomycin in STEC infection showed a reduction/progression of STEC-HUS after administration within the first five days (Kurabayashi et al. 2015). Combination treatment with neutralizing antibodies against Stx1 and Stx2 and tigecycline reduced the toxicity levels of STEC isolates, E. coli cell counts, and the likelihood of transmission (Skinner et al. 2015). Bacterial DNA-interacting antibiotics, such as fluoroquinolones, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and β-lactams, induce bacteriophage lysogeny, leading to increased ST expression in vitro and increased transfer of toxin-encoding prophages to previously nontoxic strains in vivo (Bitzan 2009). Harkins et al. (2020) recommend that antibiotic therapy should be considered safe if the following criteria are met: i) confirmed absence of STEC with a virulence profile associated with HUS in the stool sample; ii) absence of acute or chronic kidney disease; iii) in long-term carriers of STEC associated with HUS, antibiotic therapy should not be started earlier than 2 weeks after the first isolation of the pathogen, and identical types of STEC should be isolated in two separate samples. Although the usefulness of antibiotic treatment in patients with STEC infections is a subject of ongoing debate, knowledge of STEC antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in different geographic areas is important for therapeutic and strain characterization purposes. Prado et al. (1995) found that the strains were sensitive to furazolidone, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and amikacin. Resistance was detected to tetracycline at 4%, chloramphenicol – 5%, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole – 24%, and ampicillin – 25% (Kurabayashi et al. 2015). All our isolates were susceptible to cefepime, imipenem, meropenem, and amikacin. All strains were ESBL negative. Bielaszewska et al. (2011) reported a 2011 outbreak in Germany caused by E. coli O104:H4 stx2-positive with expanded CTX-M-1 β-lactamase. STEC serotype O121 ESBL-positive isolates were described in 2019 by Kikuchi et al. (2019). Our study showed that in justified cases, all permitted antibiotics can be used in the empirical therapy of STEC infections.

In our study, PFGE analysis of 23 selected E. coli and one C. freundii strain showed 18 PFGE types; however, types A, B, and C with two subtypes showed genetic relatedness. The remaining 15 PFGE types were derived from single patients and were not related to each other. All strains with genetic relatedness have been found in Mazovian voivodeships. However, strains with type B were also found in Podlasie and type C in Warmian-Masurian voivodeships. The STEC strains with A, B, and C PFGE types derived from different persons, times, and areas reflect no epidemic transmission of these strains and show their probable persistence in the environment. On the other hand, the occurrence of the stx2 gene in the remaining sporadic STEC strains indicates other than clonal distribution of this Shiga toxinproducing gene. To evaluate the character of this distribution, further analysis should be performed. Contreras et al. (2011) described nineteen types of pulsed fields in 20 STEC isolates. Japanese scientists recovered STEC O157:H7 isolates from experimentally infected cattle and observed twelve new PFGE profiles. Changes in the PFGE profiles of STEC O157:H7 isolates occurred after passing through the gastrointestinal tract of livestock (Yoshii et al. 2009). Strain circulation is observed due to the persistence of dominant strains or repeated exposure of cattle to different strains, which can be demonstrated by PFGE analysis. No significant differences have been described between the fecal microflora of excretors and non-excretors (Bibbal et al. 2022). Matussek et al. (2023) performed whole-genome multilocus sequence typing and genome-wide phylogeny analysis to assess the phylogenetic relatedness of STEC isolates from HUS and non-HUS patients and suggested genetic differences of pathogenic STEC strains in different geographic regions and populations. Human immunity and/or bacteria-host interaction may affect STEC-related disease progression. Accessory genes were differentially presented in HUS-STEC and non-HUS-STEC strains in a pangenome-wide association study. There was no significant difference in virulence genes between O157 strains from patients with and without HUS. These data suggest that the infection dose and differences in host innate and adaptive immunity, e.g., genetic variation in patients’ complement genes, are predisposing factors to atypical HUS (Sallée et al. 2013) and may play a vital role in the pathogenesis and development of STEC-HUS. Susceptibility to STEC infection varies among people. Personalized medicine and sequencing of patient’s DNA in the STEC-HUS diagnostic process may answer the question of what genetic variability in human genes is a critical factor and why STEC diarrhea in a patient resolves spontaneously while in others it leads to HUS. Whole-genome phylogeny and multiple pangenome correspondence analysis did not separate HUS-STEC strains from non-HUS-STEC strains, suggesting that STEC strains of different genetic origins may independently acquire genes determining their pathogenicity and that other non-bacterial factors may play a key role in the pathogenicity of HUS development (Matussek et al. 2023). Recent data suggest the involvement of the complement system in the pathogenesis of STEC-HUS (Mele et al. 2014). The gut microbiota plays a pivotal role in host defense against STEC. Precolonization of Clostridium ramosum in STEC-infected mice reduced the level of secreted STX2 and prevented kidney histopathological changes. C. ramosum inhibits growth and ST production by STEC more strongly than C. perfringens (Koyanagi et al. 2019).

Conclusion

STEC has been shown to be an important pathogen causing severe post-infectious complications and deaths among the youngest children in Poland. In our study, the genetic diversity of STEC strains was seen. Almost 86.4% of isolates carried the stx2 gene, and 97.6% belonged to the serotype O157. The isolates were susceptible to antibiotics. The STEC infections were observed in the summer months, mainly in children 1–5 years (77.8%). Contact with animals was the most frequent HUS risk factor. Epidemiological analysis of STEC isolates is crucial for understanding the disease and tracking outbreaks. Collaboration between physicians and microbiologists when diagnosing patients with diarrhea, especially in cases of contact with animals, is vital. Due to the occurrence of these infections as independent epidemic outbreaks in human-animal relationships, epidemiological surveillance should be conducted considering the One Health concept.

eISSN:
2544-4646
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Microbiology and Virology