1. bookAHEAD OF PRINT
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
10 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Grammaticalization of the Epistemic Adverb Perhaps in Late Middle and Early Modern English

Published Online: 21 May 2021
Page range: -
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
10 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Old and Early Middle English did not yet have modal sentential adverbs of low probability. Old Norse did not have such words, either. From the 13th century onwards first epistemic prepositional phrases of Anglo-Norman origin functioning as modal adverbials consisting of the preposition per/par and nouns such as adventure, case, chance were borrowed into Middle English. In the late 15th century an analogous hybrid form per-hap(s), the combination of the Old French preposition per/par ‘by, through’ and the Old Norse noun hap(p) ‘chance’, both singular and plural, was coined according to the same pattern and was gradually grammaticalized as a univerbated modal sentence adverb in Early Modern English. The Norse root happ- was the source of some other new (Late) Middle English words which had no cognate equivalents in the source language: the adjective happy with its derivatives happily, happiness, etc. and the verb happen.

Together with another new Late Middle English formation may-be, a calque of French peutêtre, perhaps superseded the competing forms mayhap, (modal) happily, percase, peradventure, perchance, prepositional phrases with the noun hap and, finally, per-hap itself in Early Modern English after two centuries of lexical layering or multiple synonymy. The history of perhaps is a clear example of grammaticalization, whereby a prepositional phrase became a modal adverb now also used as a discourse marker. We find here all the typical features of the process: phonetic attrition, decategorization, univerbation, and obligatorification.

Keywords

Allan, Kathryn. 2016. Borrowing and polysemy in Early Modern English. (Paper presented at the IAUPE conference in London in July 2016).Search in Google Scholar

AND = Anglo-Norman dictionary. http://www.anglo-norman.net/gate/Search in Google Scholar

Beijering, Karin. 2012. Expression of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian. A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Groningen.Search in Google Scholar

Brems, Lieselotte. 2012. Layering of size and type noun constructions in English. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI: 10.1515/9783110252927Search in Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2017. The evolution of pragmatic markers in English. Pathways of change. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/9781316416013Search in Google Scholar

B&T = Bosworth, Joseph & T. Northcote Toller 1898. An Anglo-Saxon dictionary. 1921. Supplement by T. Northcote Toller. 1972. Enlarged addenda and corrigenda by Alistair Campbell. Clarendon. http://lexicon.ff.cuni.cz/txt/oe_bosworthtoller.txtSearch in Google Scholar

Busse, Beatrix. 2010. Adverbial expressions of stance in early modern ‘spoken’ English. In Jörg Helbig & René Schallegger (eds.), Anglistentag 2009 Klagenfurt: Proceedings, Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier. 47–64.Search in Google Scholar

Busse, Beatrix. 2012. Historical text analysis: Underlying parameters and methodological procedures. In Andrea Ender, Adrian Leemann & Bernhard Wälchli (eds.), Methods in contemporary linguistics, De Gruyter Mouton. 285–308. DOI: 10.1515/9783110275681.285Search in Google Scholar

CMEPV = Corpus of Middle English Prose and Verse. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cme/Search in Google Scholar

Collins Cobuild Dictionary. 1995. Harper Collins Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

DOE = The Dictionary of Old English. https://www.doe.utoronto.ca/pages/index.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Doherty, Monika. 1987. Perhaps. Folia Linguistica 21(1): 45–66. DOI: 10.1515/flin.1987.21.1.45Search in Google Scholar

DSL = Dictionary of the Scots language, consisting of the original Dictionary of the Older Scottish Tongue and The Scottish National Dictionary. https://dsl.ac.uk/Search in Google Scholar

Fernández Cuesta, Julia & Sara M. Ponz-Sanz (eds.). 2016. The Old English gloss to the Lindisfarne Gospels: Language, author and context. De Gruyter. DOI: 10.1515/9783110449105Search in Google Scholar

Fischer, Olga. 2015. An inquiry into unidirectionality as a foundational element of grammaticalization: On the role played by analogy and the synchronic grammar system in processes of language change. In Hendrik De Smet, Lobke Ghesquière & Freek Van de Velde (eds.), On multiple source constructions in language change, John Benjamins. 43–61. DOI: 10.1075/bct.79.03fisSearch in Google Scholar

González Álvarez, Dolores. 1996. Epistemic disjuncts in Early Modern English. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 1(2): 219–256. DOI: 10.1075/ijcl.1.2.04gonSearch in Google Scholar

Goossens, Louis. 1982. Say: Focus on the message. In René Dirven, Louis Goossens, Yvan Putseys & Emma Vorlat (eds.), The scene of linguistic action and its perspectivization by SPEAK, TALK, SAY and TELL, John Benjamins. 85–132. DOI: 10.1075/pb.iii.6.04gooSearch in Google Scholar

Haspelmath, Martin. 2004. On directionality in language change with particular reference to grammaticalization. In Olga Fischer, Muriel Norde & Harry Perridon (eds.), Up and down the cline – The nature of grammaticalization, John Benjamins. 17–44. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.59.03hasSearch in Google Scholar

Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247. DOI: 10.1515/ling-2013-0048Search in Google Scholar

Hopper, Paul J. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization: Vol. I: Theoretical and methodological issues, John Benjamins. 17–35. DOI: 10.1075/tsl.19.1.04hopSearch in Google Scholar

Hoye, Leo. 1997. Adverbs and modality in English. Longmans.Search in Google Scholar

Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Thoughts on grammaticalization. Lincom Europa.Search in Google Scholar

Martín Arista, Javier. 2011. Adjective formation and lexical layers in Old English. English Studies 92(3): 323–344. DOI: 10.1080/0013838X.2011.564776Search in Google Scholar

Martín Arista, Javier. 2014. Noun layers in Old English: Mismatches and asymmetry in lexical derivation. Nordic Journal of English Studies 13(3): 160–178.Search in Google Scholar

MEC = Middle English Compendium. http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/m/mecSearch in Google Scholar

MED = Hans Kurath & Sherman M. Kuhn (eds.). 1956–2002. Middle English dictionary. University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar

Molencki, Rafał. 1997. Albeit a conjunction, yet it is a clause: A counterexample to the unidirectionality hypothesis? Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 31. 163–178.Search in Google Scholar

Molencki, Rafał. 2011. New prepositions and subordinating conjunctions of Romance origin in Middle English. In Jacek Fisiak & Magdalena Bator (eds.), Foreign influences on medieval English, Peter Lang. 9–24. DOI: 10.3726/978-3-653-00857-9Search in Google Scholar

Molencki, Rafał. 2012. Causal conjunctions in Mediaeval English: a corpus-based study of grammaticalization. Uniwersytet Śląski & Oficyna Wydawnicza WW.Search in Google Scholar

Molencki, Rafał. In press. From eadig to happy: The lexical replacement in the field of medieval English adjectives of fortune. In Ben Molineaux, Alpo Honkapohja & Bettelou Los (eds.), Contact in English Historical Linguistics, John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Molencki, Rafał. Forthc. The rise of the verb happen in Middle English. In Letizia Vezzosi (ed.), Current explorations in Middle English, Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Mortensen, Janus. 2006. Epistemic and evidential sentence adverbials in Danish and English. Ph.D. dissertation, Roskilde University.Search in Google Scholar

Nykiel, Jerzy. 2010. The interplay of modal verbs and adverbs: A history of mæg eaþe. In Ursula Lenker, Judith Huber & Robert Mailhammer (eds.), English historical linguistics 2008:. Vol. I: The history of English verbal and nominal constructions, John Benjamins. 143–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.314.12nykSearch in Google Scholar

OED= Oxford English Dictionary Online. http://www.oed.comSearch in Google Scholar

Onions, Charles Talbot. 1966. The Oxford dictionary of English etymology. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Palander-Collin, Minna. 1999. Grammaticalization and social embedding. I THINK and METHINKS in Middle and Early Modern English. Société Néophilologique.Search in Google Scholar

Ramat, Paolo & Davide Ricca. 1998. Sentence adverbs in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera (ed.), Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe, De Gruyter Mouton. 187–275. DOI: 10.1515/9783110802610.187Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Daisuke. 2018a. The semantics and pragmatics of modal adverbs: grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification of perhaps. Lingua 205. 40–53. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2017.12.014Search in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Daisuke. 2018b. Variation between modal adverbs in British English. The cases of maybe and perhaps. Functions of Language 25(3): 392–412. DOI: 10.1075/fol.16009.suzSearch in Google Scholar

Suzuki, Daisuke & Takashi Fujiwara. 2017. The multifunctionality of ‘possible’ modal adverbs: A comparative look. Language 93(4): 827–841. DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0176Search in Google Scholar

Swan, Toril. 1988a. The development of sentence adverbs in English. Studia Linguistica 42(1): 1–17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9582.1988.tb00782.xSearch in Google Scholar

Swan, Toril. 1988b. Sentence adverbials in English: a synchronic and diachronic investigation. Novus.Search in Google Scholar

Swan, Toril. 1991. Adverbial shifts: Evidence from Norwegian and English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Historical English syntax, De Gruyter Mouton. 409–439. DOI: 10.1515/9783110863314.409Search in Google Scholar

Swan, Toril. 1996. Adverbialization and subject-modification in Old English. In Jacek Fisiak & Marcin Krygier (eds.), Advances in English historical linguistics, Mouton de Gruyter. 443–456. DOI: 10.1515/9783110804072.443Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: An example of subjectification in semantic change. Language 65(1): 31–55. DOI: 10.2307/414841Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1995. The role of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. (Paper presented at ICHL XII, Manchester 1995, available at https://web.stanford.edu/~traugott/papers/discourse.pdf)Search in Google Scholar

Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2006. Historical aspects of modality. In William Frawley (ed.), The expression of modality, De Gruyter Mouton. 107–139. DOI: 10.1515/9783110197570.107Search in Google Scholar

Vanhowe, Martine (ed.). 2008. From polysemy to semantic change: Towards a typology of lexical semantic associations. John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/slcs.106Search in Google Scholar

Wells, Stanley, Gary Taylor, John Jowett & William Montgomery (eds.). 1987. The Oxford Shakespeare: The complete works: Original-spelling edition. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo