Journal Details
First Published
10 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

On the Shapes of the Polish Word: Phonotactic Complexity and Diversity

Published Online: 04 Jun 2021
Page range: -
Journal Details
First Published
10 Dec 2009
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

The aim of this contribution is to identify the dominant shapes of the Polish word with reference to three criteria: cluster complexity (i.e., cluster size), saturation (the number of clusters in a word), and diversity (in terms of features of consonant description). The dominant word shape is understood as the most frequent or typical skeletal pattern, expressed by means of alternations or groupings of Cs (consonants) and Vs (vowels), e.g., CVCCV etc., or by means of specific features (of place, manner, voice, and the sonorant/obstruent distinction). Our work focuses on 2 aspects of Polish phonotactics: (1) the relation between cluster complexity and saturation of words with clusters, (2) the degrees of diversity in features of place, manner, and voice within clusters. Using corpus data, we have established that only 4.17% of word shapes have no clusters. The dominant word shape for a one-cluster word is CVCCVCV. The most frequent scenario for a word shape is to contain two clusters, of which 67% are a combination of a word initial and a word medial cluster. We have found that: (1) cluster length is inversely proportional to the number of clusters in a word; (2) nearly 73% of word types contain clusters of the same size, e.g., two CCs or two CCCs (Polish words prefer saturation over complexity); (3) MOA is more diversified than POA across clusters and words.


Bargiełówna, Maria. 1950. Grupy fonemów spółgłoskowych współczesnej polszczyzny kulturalnej. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 10. 1–25.Search in Google Scholar

Baumann, Andreas & Daan Wissing. 2018. Stabilising determinants in the transmission of phonotactic systems: Diachrony and acquisition coda clusters in Dutch and Afrikaans. Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus 55. 77–107. DOI: 10.5842/55-0-780Search in Google Scholar

Bethin, Christina Y. 1992. Polish syllables: The role of prosody in phonology and morphology. Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Brysbaert, Marc & Boris New. 2009. Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods 41. 977–990. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977Search in Google Scholar

Brysbaert, Marc, Boris New & Emmanuel Keuleers. 2012. Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behavior Research Methods 44. 991–997. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0190-4Search in Google Scholar

Brysbaert, Marc, Matthias Buchmeier, Markus Conrad, Arthur M. Jacobs, Jens Bölte & Andrea Böhl. 2011. The word frequency effect: A review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. Experimental Psychology 58(5). 412–424. DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000123Search in Google Scholar

Cyran, Eugeniusz. 2006. Polish and English syllable structures. How different are they? Zeszyty Wszechnicy Świętokrzyskiej. Filologia Angielska 1(23). 151–160.Search in Google Scholar

Cyran, Eugeniusz & Edmund Gussmann. 1999. Consonant sequences and governing relations: Polish initial consonant sequences. In Harry van der Hulst & Nancy Ritter (eds.), The syllable: Views and facts, De Gruyter Mouton. 219–247. DOI: 10.1515/9783110806793.219Search in Google Scholar

Dobrogowska, Katarzyna. 1984. Śródgłosowe grupy spółgłosek w polskich tekstach popularnonaukowych [Word-internal clusters in popular science texts]. Polonica X. 5–34.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrogowska, Katarzyna. 1990. Word internal consonant clusters in Polish artistic prose. Studia Phonetica Posnaniensia 2. 43–67.Search in Google Scholar

Dobrogowska, Katarzyna. 1992. Word initial and word final consonant clusters in Polish popular science text and in artistic prose. Studia Phonetica Posnaniensia 3. 47–121.Search in Google Scholar

Dressler, Wolfgang U. & Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk. 2006. Proposing morphonotactics. Rivista di Linguistica 18(2). 249–266.Search in Google Scholar

Dukiewicz, Leokadia. 1985. Nagłosowe grupy spółgłoskowe w polskich tekstach popularnonaukowych i prasowych [Onset consonant clusters in Polish popular science and press texts]. Studia Gramatyczne 6: 17–34.Search in Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2014. Explaining phonotactics using NAD. Language Sciences 46. 6–17. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna. 2019. On the structure, survival and change of consonant clusters. Folia Linguistica Historica 53(s40–1). 107–128. DOI: 10.1515/flih-2019-0006Search in Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna, Michał Jankowski & Piotr Wierzchoń. 2011. Classification of the lexicon of modern Polish according to the structure of consonant clusters. In Wai Sum Lee (ed.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII): August 17-21, 2011, City University of Hong Kong. 619–622.Search in Google Scholar

Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Katarzyna & Paulina Zydorowicz. 2014. The production of high-frequency clusters by native and non-native users of Polish. Concordia Working Papers in Applied Linguistics 5. 130–144.Search in Google Scholar

Greenberg, Joseph H. 1978. Some generalisations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of human language. Vol. II: Phonology, Stanford University Press. 243–279.Search in Google Scholar

Gussmann, Edmund. 2007. The phonology of Polish. Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gussmann, Edmund & Eugeniusz Cyran. 1998. Polish consonantal sequences: A phonological testing ground. In Eugeniusz Cyran (ed.), Structure and interpretation. Studies in phonology, Folium. 127–138.Search in Google Scholar

Heuven, Walter J. B. van, Paweł Mandera, Emmanuel Keuleers & Marc Brysbaert. 2014. Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67(4). 1176–1190. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.850521Search in Google Scholar

Jankowski, Michał. 1994. Practical automatic phonemic transcription systems. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 28. 143–150.Search in Google Scholar

Jarosz, Gaja. 2010. Implicational markedness and frequency in constraint-based computational models of phonological learning. Journal of Child Language 37(3). 565–606. DOI: 10.1017/s0305000910000103Search in Google Scholar

Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1952. Uwagi o polskich grupach spółgłoskowych. Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego 11. 54–69.Search in Google Scholar

Mandera, Paweł, Emmanuel Keuleers, Zofia Wodniecka & Marc Brysbaert. 2014. Subtlex-pl: Subtitle-based word frequency estimates for Polish. Behavior Research Methods 47. 471–483. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0489-4Search in Google Scholar

Orzechowska, Paula. 2009. Morphonotactics in English and Polish. A dictionary- and corpus-based study of word-final consonant clusters. Ph.D. dissertation, Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań.Search in Google Scholar

Orzechowska, Paula. 2019. Complexity in Polish phonotactics: On features, weights, rankings and preferences. Springer Singapore.Search in Google Scholar

Orzechowska, Paula & Paulina Zydorowicz. 2019. Frequency effects and markedness in phonotactics. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 55(1). 157–179. DOI: 10.1515/psicl-2019-0006Search in Google Scholar

Paulsson, Olof. 1969. Das Phonemsystem der modernen polnischen Literaturschprache. Scando-Slavica 15(1). 216–236. DOI: 10.1080/00806766908600523Search in Google Scholar

Rochoń, Marzena. 2000. Optimality in complexity: The case of Polish consonant clusters. Akademie Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Rubach, Jerzy & Geert Booij. 1990. Syllable structure assignment in Polish. Phonology 7(1). 121–158. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675700001135Search in Google Scholar

Soares, Ana Paula, João Machado, Ana Costa, Álvaro Iriarte, Alberto Simões, José João de Almeida, Montserrat Comesaña & Manuel Perea. 2015. On the advantages of word frequency and contextual diversity measures extracted from subtitles: The case of Portuguese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 68(4). 680–696. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.964271Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, Geoffrey. 2019. When is a cluster really a cluster? Paper presented at the Approaches to Phonetics and Phonology conference, Lublin, 21–23 June 2019.Search in Google Scholar

Szpyra, Jolanta. 1992. Ghost segments in nonlinear phonology: Polish yers. Language 68(2). 277–312. DOI: 10.2307/416942Search in Google Scholar

Szpyra, Jolanta. 1995. Three tiers in Polish and English phonology. Wydawnictwo UMCS.Search in Google Scholar

Wiese, Richard, Paula Orzechowska, Phillip M. Alday & Christiane Ulbrich. 2017. Structural principles or frequency of use? An ERP experiment on the learnability of consonant clusters. Frontiers in Psychology 7: 2005. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02005Search in Google Scholar

Woliński, Marcin, Zygmunt Saloni, Robert Wołosz, Włodzimierz Gruszczyński, Danuta Skowrońska & Zbigniew Bronk (eds.). 2020. Grammatical Dictionary of Polish. (4th edn online (pre-release).) Institute of Computer Science PAS.Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina. 2010. Consonant clusters across morpheme boundaries: Polish morphonotactic inventory and its acquisition. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 46(4). 565–588. DOI: 10.2478/v10010-010-0028-0Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina. 2019. Polish (mor)phonotactics in first language acquisition, connected speech and cluster processing. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina & Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk. 2017. The dynamics of marked consonant clusters in Polish. In Elena Babatsouli (ed.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2017, ISMBS. 318–324.Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina & Paula Orzechowska. 2017. The study of Polish phonotactics: Measures of phonotactic preferability. Studies in Polish Linguistics 12(2). 97–121. DOI: 10.4467/23005920SPL.17.005.7023Search in Google Scholar

Zydorowicz, Paulina, Paula Orzechowska, Michał Jankowski, Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Piotr Wierzchoń & Dawid Pietrala. 2016. Phonotactics and morphonotactics of Polish and English: Theory, description, tools and applications. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo