This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Goodwin N. Towards people-centered integrated care: From passive recognition to active co-production. Int J Integr Care. 2016;16(2):15. doi: 10.5334/ijic.2492.GoodwinNTowards people-centered integrated care: From passive recognition to active co-production20161621510.5334/ijic.2492Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Constand MK, MacDermid JC, Dal Bello-Haas V, Law M. Scoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:271. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-271.ConstandMKMacDermidJCDal Bello-HaasVLawMScoping review of patient-centered care approaches in healthcare20141427110.1186/1472-6963-14-271Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Carinci F, Van Gool K, Mainz J, Veillard J, Pichora EC, Januel JM, et al. Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators. Int J Qual Health Care. 2015;27(2):137–146. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzv004.CarinciFVan GoolKMainzJVeillardJPichoraECJanuelJMTowards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators201527213714610.1093/intqhc/mzv004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
De Rosis S, Cerasuolo D, Nuti S. Using patient reported measures to drive change in healthcare: The experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020;20:315. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05099-4.De RosisSCerasuoloDNutiSUsing patient reported measures to drive change in healthcare: The experience of the digital, continuous and systematic PREMs observatory in Italy20202031510.1186/s12913-020-05099-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bull C, Byrnes J, Hettiarachchi R, Downes M. A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient reported experience measures. Health Serv Res. 2019;54(5):1023–1035. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13187.BullCByrnesJHettiarachchiRDownesMA systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient reported experience measures20195451023103510.1111/1475-6773.13187Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Recommendations to OECD ministers of health from the high-level reflection group on the future of health statistics [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2022 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/health/Recommendations-from-high-level-reflection-group-on-the-future-of-health-statistics.pdfOrganization for Economic Co-operation and Development2017[cited 2022 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/health/Recommendations-from-high-level-reflection-group-on-the-future-of-health-statistics.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Fernandes S, Fond G, Zendjidjian X, Michel P, Baumstarck K, Lancon C, et al. The Patient reported experience measure for improving quality of care in mental health (PREMIUM) project in France: Study protocol for the development and implementation strategy. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:165–177. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S172100.FernandesSFondGZendjidjianXMichelPBaumstarckKLanconCThe Patient reported experience measure for improving quality of care in mental health (PREMIUM) project in France: Study protocol for the development and implementation strategy20191316517710.2147/PPA.S172100Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Fujisawa R, Klazinga N. Measuring patient experiences (PREMs): Progress made by the OECD and its member countries between 2006 and 2016. OECD Health Working Papers, No. 102. OECD Publishing: Paris; 2017. doi: 10.1787/893a07d2-en.FujisawaRKlazingaNOECD Health Working Papers, No. 102.OECD PublishingParis201710.1787/893a07d2-enOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sjetne, I, Bjertnaes O, Olsen RV, Iversen HH. The Generic Short Patient Experiences Questionnaire (GS-PEQ): Identification of core items from a survey in Norway. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011(1):88. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-88.SjetneIBjertnaesOOlsenRVIversenHHThe Generic Short Patient Experiences Questionnaire (GS-PEQ): Identification of core items from a survey in Norway201118810.1186/1472-6963-11-88Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
OPEQ, Garratt AM, Bjaertnes OA, Krogstad U, Gulbrandsen P. The OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): Data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:433–437. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014423.OPEQGarrattAMBjaertnesOAKrogstadUGulbrandsenPThe OutPatient Experiences Questionnaire (OPEQ): Data quality, reliability, and validity in patients attending 52 Norwegian hospitals20051443343710.1136/qshc.2005.014423Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
CAHPS, The American Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748811/pdf/nihms391989.pdfCAHPS2012[cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3748811/pdf/nihms391989.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Delnoij DM, Rademakers JJ, Groenewegen PP. The Dutch Consumer Quality Index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:88. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-88.DelnoijDMRademakersJJGroenewegenPPThe Dutch Consumer Quality Index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development2010108810.1186/1472-6963-10-88Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
OECD. Health at a glance [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 April 4]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2021_ae3016b9-enOECD2021[cited 2023 April 4]. Available from: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/social-issues-migration-health/health-at-a-glance-2021_ae3016b9-enSearch in Google Scholar
Ministrstvo za zdravje. Nacionalna anketa [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://www.pb-begunje.si/gradiva/Rezultati2007135143657636.pdfMinistrstvo za zdravje2007[cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://www.pb-begunje.si/gradiva/Rezultati2007135143657636.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Murko E, Kralj M, Poldrugovac M, Ropret N, Šetinc M, Zaletel M. Izkušnje pacientov z zunajbolnišnično specialistično zdravstveno obravnavo: raziskava v Sloveniji med odraslimi pacienti. Javno zdravje. 2021;1:1–9. doi: 10.26318/JZ-2021-1.MurkoEKraljMPoldrugovacMRopretNŠetincMZaletelMIzkušnje pacientov z zunajbolnišnično specialistično zdravstveno obravnavo: raziskava v Sloveniji med odraslimi pacienti202111910.26318/JZ-2021-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pettersen K, Veenstra M, Guldvog B; Kolstad A. The Patient Experiences Questionnaire: Development, validity and reliability. Int J Quality Health Care. 2004;16(6):453–463. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzh074.PettersenKVeenstraMGuldvogBKolstadAThe Patient Experiences Questionnaire: Development, validity and reliability200416645346310.1093/intqhc/mzh074Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.HuLBentlerPMCutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives19996115510.1080/10705519909540118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2007.BondTGFoxCM2nd ed.MahwahLawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers2007Search in Google Scholar
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.R Core TeamViennaR Foundation for Statistical Computing2021Search in Google Scholar
Rosseel Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012;48(2):1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02.RosseelYlavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling201248213610.18637/jss.v048.i02Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kelley K. MBESS: The MBESS R Package. R package version 4.9.0 [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MBESSKelleyK2022[cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MBESSSearch in Google Scholar
Mair P, Hatzinger, R, Maier MJ. eRm: Extended rasch modeling 1.0–2 [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=eRm.2021MairPHatzingerRMaierMJ2021[cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=eRm.2021Search in Google Scholar
Mair P, De Leeuw J. aspect: A general framework for multivariate analysis with optimal scaling. R package version 1.0–5. [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=aspectMairPDe LeeuwJ2018[cited 2023 April 3]. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=aspectSearch in Google Scholar
Revelle W. psych: Procedures for personality and psychological research, version 2.1.9. [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 April 3]. Evanston: Northwestern University; 2021. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychRevelleW2021[cited 2023 April 3]. Evanston: Northwestern University; 2021. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psychSearch in Google Scholar
Stekhoven DJ. missForest: Nonparametric missing value imputation using random forest. R package version 1.5. 2022.StekhovenDJ2022Search in Google Scholar
McCoach DB, Gable RK, Madura JP. Instrument development in the affective domain: School and corporate applications. 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2013.McCoachDBGableRKMaduraJP3rd ed.New YorkSpringer2013Search in Google Scholar
Raykov T, Marcoulides GA. Introduction to psychometric theory. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis; 2011.RaykovTMarcoulidesGANew YorkRoutledge, Taylor & Francis2011Search in Google Scholar
Bruster S. The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries. Int J Qual Health Care. 2002;14(5):353–358. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/14.5.353.BrusterSThe Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries200214535335810.1093/intqhc/14.5.353Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
de Boer D, Delnoij D, Rademakers J. The discriminative power of patient experience surveys. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:332. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-332.de BoerDDelnoijDRademakersJThe discriminative power of patient experience surveys20111133210.1186/1472-6963-11-332Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hays RD, Skootsky SA. Patient experience with in-person and telehealth visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large integrated health system in the United States. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(4):847–852. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07196-4.HaysRDSkootskySAPatient experience with in-person and telehealth visits before and during the COVID-19 pandemic at a large integrated health system in the United States202237484785210.1007/s11606-021-07196-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Damman OC, Hendriks M, Rademakers J, Spreeuwenberg P, Delnoij DM, Groenewegen PP. Consumers’ interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches. Health Expect. 2012;15(2):197–211. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00671.DammanOCHendriksMRademakersJSpreeuwenbergPDelnoijDMGroenewegenPPConsumers’ interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches201215219721110.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00671Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
OECD. Measuring what matters: The patient reported indicator surveys: Patient reported indicators for assessing health system performance [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2023 April 17]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/Measuring-what-matters-the-Patient-Reported-Indicator-Surveys.pdfOECD2019[cited 2023 April 17]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/Measuring-what-matters-the-Patient-Reported-Indicator-Surveys.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Van der Veer SN, Jager KJ, Visserman E, Beekman RJ, Boeschoten EW, de Keizer NF, et al. Development and validation of the Consumer Quality index instrument to measure the experience and priority of chronic dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(8):3284–3291. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs023.Van der VeerSNJagerKJVissermanEBeekmanRJBoeschotenEWde KeizerNFDevelopment and validation of the Consumer Quality index instrument to measure the experience and priority of chronic dialysis patients20122783284329110.1093/ndt/gfs023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
NHS, Care Quality Commission. Adult inpatient survey: quality and methodology report [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2023 April 17]. Available from: https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-09/20220920_aip22_QualityMethodology.odtNHS, Care Quality Commission2021[cited 2023 April 17]. Available from: https://www.cqc.org.uk/sites/default/files/2022-09/20220920_aip22_QualityMethodology.odtSearch in Google Scholar
Johnson TP, Wislar JS. Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys. JAMA. 2012;307(17):1805–1806. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3532.JohnsonTPWislarJSResponse rates and nonresponse errors in surveys2012307171805180610.1001/jama.2012.3532Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Faraz A, Burt J, Roland M. Measuring patient experience: Concepts and methods. Patient. 2014;7:235–241. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0060-5.FarazABurtJRolandMMeasuring patient experience: Concepts and methods2014723524110.1007/s40271-014-0060-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Garratt AM, Bjørngård JH, Dahle KA, et al. The Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire (POPEQ): Development, reliability and validity. Nordic J Psychiatry (in press).GarrattAMBjørngårdJHDahleKAThe Psychiatric Out-Patient Experiences Questionnaire (POPEQ): Development, reliability and validity(in press).Search in Google Scholar
Millsap RE. Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. New York: Routledge; 2011.MillsapRENew YorkRoutledge2011Search in Google Scholar