1. bookVolume 16 (2021): Issue 3 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2344-5416
First Published
06 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Perspectives of Different Stakeholder Groups About the Alignment of IFRS for SMEs with IFRS Standard

Published Online: 24 Jan 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 16 (2021) - Issue 3 (December 2021)
Page range: 109 - 122
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2344-5416
First Published
06 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This research presents the findings of a content analysis of comment letters submitted to the International Accounting Standards Board in response to the second Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs. It is being investigated whether the parties' interest has increased since the first Request for Information was issued, whether the respondents are in agreement with the IASB regarding the alignment of IFRS for SMEs to full IFRS Standards, and what their arguments are in order to gain further insight into this review process. The study is based on comment letters sent directly to the IASB between January and October 2020. The analysis revealed that the main stakeholder groups that contributed were Professional organizations, Accounting Regulation Bodies and Accounting, audit and consultant firms, the same groups that also had a high response rate to the first request for information. Regarding the jurisdictions, there was a high interest from Europe but also from the countries that have already adopted the standard in South America.

Keywords

Bamber, M., & McMeeking, K. (2016). An examination of international accounting standard-setting due process and the implications for legitimacy. British Accounting Review, 48(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2015.03.00310.1016/j.bar.2015.03.003 Search in Google Scholar

Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., & Lang, M. H. (2008). International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 467-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00287.x10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00287.x Search in Google Scholar

Bautista-Mesa, R., Muñoz-Tomás, J. M., & Horno-Bueno, M. P. (2019). Does the IASB know the needs of SMEs? A comparative analysis between the IFRS for SMEs and full IFRS due processes. In Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review (Vol. 22, Issue 2, pp. 203-217). Universidad de Murcia, https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.38226110.6018/rcsar.382261 Search in Google Scholar

Bengtsson, E. (2011). Repoliticalization of accounting standard setting-The IASB, the EU and the global financial crisis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(6), 567-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2011.04.00110.1016/j.cpa.2011.04.001 Search in Google Scholar

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.00110.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 Search in Google Scholar

Burlaud, A., & Colasse, B. (2011). International accounting standardisation: Is politics back? Accounting in Europe, 8(1), 23–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2011.57441210.1080/17449480.2011.574412 Search in Google Scholar

Chua, W. F., & Taylor, S. L. (2008). The rise and rise of IFRS: An examination of IFRS diffusion. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(6), 462-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.00410.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.004 Search in Google Scholar

Cortese, C. L., Irvine, H. J., & Kaidonis, M. A. (2010). Powerful players: How constituents captured the setting of IFRS 6, an accounting standard for the extractive industries. Accounting Forum, 34(2), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2008.11.00310.1016/j.accfor.2008.11.003 Search in Google Scholar

Danjou, P., & Walton, P. (2012). The legitimacy of the IASB. Accounting in Europe, 9(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2012.66439610.1080/17449480.2012.664396 Search in Google Scholar

Daske, H., Hail, L., Leuz, C., & Verdi, R. S. (2008). Mandatory IFRS Reporting Around the World: Early Evidence on the Economic Consequences. Consequences. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(5), 1085. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00306.x10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00306.x Search in Google Scholar

Haveroth, J., De Nez, E., Bilk, A., & Klann, R. C. (2017). Characteristics and International Perspectives of Different Stakeholder Groups in IFRS for SMEs. Journal of Education and Research in Accounting, 418–437. Search in Google Scholar

Holder, A. D., Karim, K. E., Lin, K. J., & Woods, M. (2013). A content analysis of the comment letters to the FASB and IASB: accounting for contingencies. Advances in Accounting: A Research Annual, 29(1). Search in Google Scholar

Huian, M. C. (2013). Stakeholders’ Participation in the Development of the New Accounting Rules regarding the Impairment of Financial Assets. Business Management Dynamics, 2(9), 23-35. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270049241_Stakeholders’_Participation_in_the_Development_of_the_New_Accounting_Rules_regarding_the_Impairment_of_Financial_Assets Search in Google Scholar

IASB. (2020). Comprehensive Review of the IFRS for SMEs Standard, https://www.ifrs.org/projects/open-for-comment/. Search in Google Scholar

Kaya, D., & Koch, M. (2014). Countries adoption of the International Financial Reporting Standard for Small and Medium-sized Entities (IFRS for SMEs) - Early empirical evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 45(1), 93-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.96918810.1080/00014788.2014.969188 Search in Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. In The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc06510.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc065 Search in Google Scholar

Kwok, W. C. C., & Sharp, D. (2005). Power and international accounting standard setting: Evidence from segment reporting and intangible assets projects. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(1), 74-99. https://doi.org/10.1108/0951357051058466510.1108/09513570510584665 Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. K., & Herz, P. J. (2013). A Multi-lssue/Multi-Period Analysis of the Geographic Diversity of IASB Comment Letter Participation. Accounting in Europe, 10(1), 99-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2013.77271610.1080/17449480.2013.772716 Search in Google Scholar

Larson, R. K., & Street, D. L. (2011). IFRS Teaching Resources: Available and Rapidly Growing. In Accounting Education (Vol. 20, Issue 4, pp. 317-338). https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2011.58379510.1080/09639284.2011.583795 Search in Google Scholar

Litjens, R., Bissessur, S., Langendijk, H., & Vergoossen, R. (2012). How Do Preparers Perceive Costs and Benefits of IFRS for SMEs? Empirical Evidence from the Netherlands. Accounting in Europe, 9(2), 227-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2012.72087510.1080/17449480.2012.720875 Search in Google Scholar

Mahzan, N., & Yan, C. M. (2014). Harnessing the Benefits of Corporate Governance and Internal Audit: Advice to SME. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.42410.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.424 Search in Google Scholar

Mkasiwa, T. A. (2014). SMEs’ Financial and Differential Reporting- A Review of Publications. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 1(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.5296/IJAFR.V4l2.5931 Search in Google Scholar

Oprisor, T. (2014). Contributions to an improved framework for Integrated Reporting. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference ACCOUNTING AND MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS AMIS, 1043-1057. Search in Google Scholar

Paananen, M., Renders, A., & Blomkvist, M. (2016). Causes and Consequences of Improvements in the Information Environment for Swedish Small and Mid-Sized Firms. Accounting in Europe, 13(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2016.115624010.1080/17449480.2016.1156240 Search in Google Scholar

Perera, D., & Chand, P. (2015). Issues in the adoption of international financial reporting standards (IFRS) for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMES). Advances in Accounting, 31 (1), 165-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.01210.1016/j.adiac.2015.03.012 Search in Google Scholar

Sava, R., Mârza, B., & Eşanu, N. (2013). Financial Reporting for SMEs - Past and Perspectives. Procedia Economics and Finance, 6, 713-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(13)00193-710.1016/S2212-5671(13)00193-7 Search in Google Scholar

Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research. Sage Publication, London. Search in Google Scholar

Standish, P. (2003). Evaluating national capacity for direct participation in international accounting harmonization: France as a test case. Abacus, 39(2), 186-210. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6281.0012610.1111/1467-6281.00126 Search in Google Scholar

Tiron-Tudor, A., Cordos, G. S., & Fülöp, M. T. (2018). Stakeholders’ perception about strengthening the audit report. African J. of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 6(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1504/ajaaf.2018.09113810.1504/AJAAF.2018.091138 Search in Google Scholar

Vieira, R. T., & Borba, J. A. (2015). Analysis of the IFRS 8 post-implemention review process by way of comment letters sent by companies. Revista Contabilidade e Controladoria, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.5380/rcc.v7i1.3495010.5380/rcc.v7i1.34950 Search in Google Scholar

Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis, 2nd ed. (2nd ed). Sage Publications, Inc. https://books.google.ro/books?hl=ro&lr=&id=nLhZm7Lw2FwC&oi=fnd&pg=PA5&dq=Basic+content+analysis+(Second+edition),+1990&ots=ogOnbOL5vK&sig=tGHseG2F1nMm7VkTLTITjDdGing&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Basic content analysis (Second edition)%2C 1990&f=false Search in Google Scholar

Whittington, G. (2008). Harmonisation or discord? The critical role of the IASB conceptual framework review. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 27(6), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.00610.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2008.09.006 Search in Google Scholar

Zeff, S. A. (2007). Some obstacles to global financial reporting comparability and convergence at a high level of quality. British Accounting Review, 39(4), 290-302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2007.08.00110.1016/j.bar.2007.08.001 Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo