[
[1] Morandi Da Silva A. G., Feres J. G. Environment and insurance. November, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Gizzi F., Porrini D., De Masi F. Building a Natural Hazard Insurance System (NHIS): The Long-Lasting Italian Case. Sustainability 2021:13(21):12269. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13211226910.3390/su132112269
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Pagano A. J., Feofilovs M., Romagnoli F. The relationship between insurance companies and natural disaster risk reduction: overview of the key characteristics and mechanisms dealing with climate change. Energy Procedia 2018:147:566–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.07210.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.072
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Croce G. Le politiche attive del lavoro nella crisi da Covid-19 (Active labor policies in the Covid-19 crisis.). Econ. Lav. 2020:54(2):91–116. https://doi.org/10.7384/98577 (in Italian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Pagano A. J., Romagnoli F., Vannucci E. COVID-19 Effects on Cultural Heritage: The Case of Villa Adriana and Villa D’Este. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2021:25(1):1241–1252. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-009410.2478/rtuect-2021-0094
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Agostino D., Arnaboldi M., Lampis A. Italian state museums during the COVID-19 crisis: from onsite closure to online openness. Museum Manag. Curatorsh. 2020:35(4):362–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2020.179002910.1080/09647775.2020.1790029
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] ANIA. Associazione Nazionale tra le Imprese Assicuratrici. Italian insurance 2016–2017. Rome: ANIA, 2017.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Munasinghe M., Clarke C. Disaster Prevention for Sustainable Development-Economic and Policy Issues. Washington: WBG., 1994.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Civil Protection Department. Emergency planning and damage scenarios [Online]. [Accessed 12.11.2021]. Available: https://rischi.protezionecivile.gov.it/en/seismic/activities/emergency-planning-and-damage-scenarios
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] Ministry of the Interior. Plan ORSEC et Plans Particuliers d’Intervention (ORSEC Plan and Specific Intervention Plans) [Online]. [Accessed 12.11.2021]. Available: https://www.gouvernement.fr/risques/dispositif-orsec (in French)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] Bedate A., Herrero L. C., Sanz J. Á. Economic valuation of the cultural heritage: Application to four case studies in Spain. J. Cult. Herit. 2004:5(1):101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2003.04.00210.1016/j.culher.2003.04.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] NIBS. HAZUS: Hazards U.S.: Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. NIBS Doc. N. 5200. Washington: HAZUS, 1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Gazzetta Ufficiale. OPCM 3431/2003 – Ulteriori modifiche ed integrazioni all’O.P.C.M. 20 marzo 2003 n. 3274, recante «Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica (Further changes and additions to the O.P.C.M. March 20, 2003 n. 3274, containing ‘First elements regarding general criteria for the seismic classification of the national territory and technical regulations for constructions in seismic areas.). Rome: Ministry of Economy and Finances, 2003. (in Italian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Łasut A. Insurance as a means of reducing economic losses due to floods. Proceedings of the Int. Conference Towards natural flood reduction strategies 2003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Thomas A., Leichenko R. Adaptation through insurance: Lessons from the NFIP. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2011:3(3):250–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/1756869111115340110.1108/17568691111153401
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] Miller B., Dixon L., Clancy N. Reasonable and Risk-Based? Replacing NFIP Generally Subsidized Rates with a Means-Tested Subsidy: Replacing NFIP Generally Subsidized Rates. South. Econ. J. 2019:85(4):1180–1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/soej.1232910.1002/soej.12329
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] Federal Emergency Management Agency. National Flood Insurance Program Regulations. Hyattsville: FEMA, 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Appiotti F., et al. Definition of a Risk Assessment Model within a European Interoperable Database Platform (EID) for Cultural Heritage. J. Cult. Herit. 2020:46:268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2020.08.00110.1016/j.culher.2020.08.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Severini G. L’immateriale economico nei beni culturali (The economic immaterial in cultural heritage.). Aedon 2015:3. (in Italian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Bottero M., Datola G., de Angelis E. A system dynamics model and analytic network process: An integrated approach to investigate urban resilience. Land 2020:9(8):24–26. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND908024210.3390/land9080242
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Guccio C., et al. Technology and Public Access to Cultural Heritage: The Italian Experience on ICT for Public Historical Archives. 2016.10.1007/978-3-319-29544-2_4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Bellè B. M. Promesse e fallimenti nella valorizzazione degli immobili pubblici. Sci. Reg. 2017:16(3):463–472. https://doi.org/10.14650/87465
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Istituto Guglielmo Tagliacarne. Il sistema economico integrato dei beni culturali (The integrated economic system of cultural heritage.). Rome: Istituto Guglielmo Tagliacarne, 2009. (in Italian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Antonelli A. La valorizzazione del patrimonio mobiliare dello stato e degli enti locali (The enhancement of the movable assets of the state and local authorities.). Pisa: Universita di Pisa, 2017. (in Italian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[25] Emiliani A. Per un nuovo concetto di bene culturale. Capitale Cult. 2020:21:463–467. https://doi.org/10.13138/2039-2362/2338
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[26] Bottero M., Datola G., Monaco R. Fuzzy cognitive maps: A dynamic approach for urban regeneration processes evaluation. Valori e Valutazioni 2019:2019(23):77–90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[27] Instituto Nazionale di Statistica. L’Italia dei musei (The Italy of museums.). Rome: ISTAT, 2019. (in Italian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[28] Cherchi A. I musei statali valgono 27 miliardi di euro (l’1,6% del Pil italiano) (State museums are worth 27 billion euros (1.6% of the Italian GDP).). IL Sole 24 Ore [Online]. [Accessed 19.12.2021]. Available: https://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/i-musei-statali-valgono-27-miliardi-euro-l-16percento-pil-italiano-ACMvVjp (in Italian)
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[29] Parker R. S. Hazards of Nature, Risks to Development. Washington: World Bank Publications, 2006.10.1596/978-0-8213-6650-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[30] Hallegatte S., Przyluski V. The economics of natural disasters. CESifo Forum 2010:11(2):14–24. https://doi.org/10.4337/978178536598010.4337/9781785365980
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[31] Instituto Nazionale di Statistica. Mappa dei rischi dei comuni italiani. (National Institute of Statistics. Risk map of Italian municipalities). [Online]. [Accessed 12.02.2022]. Available: https://www.istat.it/it/mappa-rischi
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[32] Drdácký M., et al. Protecting the cultural heritage from natural disasters. Brussels: The European Parliament, 2007.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[33] De Masi F., Porrini D. Cultural Heritage and natural disasters: the insurance choice of the Italian Cathedrals. J. Cult. Econ. 2021:45:409–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-020-09397-x10.1007/s10824-020-09397-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[34] Abraham K. S. Efficiency and Fairness in Insurance Risk Classification. J. Storage 1985:71(3):403–451. https://doi.org/10.2307/107296310.2307/1072963
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[35] Blanco E., Dutcher E. G., Haller T. Social dilemmas with public and private insurance against losses. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2019:180:924–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.00810.1016/j.jebo.2019.02.008
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[36] Polzin F., et al. How do policies mobilize private finance for renewable energy? A systematic review with an investor perspective. Appl. Energy 2018:236:1249–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.09810.1016/j.apenergy.2018.11.098
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[37] Maio R., Ferreira T. M., Vicente R. A critical discussion on the earthquake risk mitigation of urban cultural heritage assets. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2018:27:239–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.01010.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.10.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[38] Xing J., et al. Detection and reconstruction of catastrophic breaks of high-frequency financial data with local linear scaling approximation. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2020:561:124121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.12412110.1016/j.physa.2019.124121
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[39] Feofilovs M., Romagnoli F. Assessment of Urban Resilience to Natural Disasters with a System Dynamics Tool: Case Study of Latvian Municipality. Environmental & Climate Technologies 2020:24(3):249–264. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2020-010110.2478/rtuect-2020-0101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[40] Fagioli F. F., Paolotti L., Boggia A. Trends in Environmental Management Systems Research. A Content Analysis. Environmental and Climate Technologies 2022:26(1):46–63. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2022-000510.2478/rtuect-2022-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[41] Bellieri dei Belliera A., et al. Flood risk insurance: the Blockchain approach to a Bayesian adaptive design of the contract. Colloquium 2019 ‘Innovating Actuarial Research on Financial Risk and ERM’ 2019:1–15.
]Search in Google Scholar
