[Acharya, Amitav et al. 2023. “How Not to Write an Academic Book Review.” The China Review, 23(3): 273-299.]Search in Google Scholar
[Andrés, Ana. 2009. Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford, UK: Chandos Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arik, Engin. 2015. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Linguistics in Web of Science.” Journal of Scientometric Research, 4(1): 20-28. https://doi.org/10.4103/2320-0057.156018]Search in Google Scholar
[Bal Gezegin, Betül. 2015. Book Review Genre in Academic Writing: A Comparative Study of English and Turkish across Ten Disciplines. Doctoral dissertation, Middle East Technical University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ball, Rafael. 2018. An Introduction to Bibliometrics: New Development and Trends. Cambridge, MA: Chandos Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, Joanne M. and Christine M. Baker. 2014. “Bibliometrics: An Overview.” RGUHS Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 4(3): 81-92.]Search in Google Scholar
[Borshchev, V.B. 2008. “The Linguist List System as a Major International Linguistic Resource.” Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics, 42(3): 189-204. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0005105508030060]Search in Google Scholar
[Brienza, Casey. 2015. Writing Academic Book Reviews. InsideHigherEd. Available from: https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2015/03/27/essay-writing-academic-book-reviews.]Search in Google Scholar
[Casanave, Christine Pearson and Yongyan Li. 2023. “Good Writing in Book Reviews.” In Robert Kohls and Christine Pearson Casanave (eds), Perspectives on Good Writing in Applied Linguistics and TESOL, pp. 139-152. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ćavar, Damir et al. 2012. “Large Mailing List Corpora: Management, Annotation and Repository.” Challenges in the Management of Large Corpora, 13-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crocco, Oliver S. and Jill Zarestky. 2024. “Why Scholars and Students Should Write Book Reviews.” New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resources Development, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/19394225241247907]Search in Google Scholar
[Crosthwaite, Peter et al. 2023. “Research Trends in Linguistics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Two Decades of Scopus-Indexed Corpus Linguistics Research in Arts and Humanities.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 28(3): 344-377. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.21072.cro]Search in Google Scholar
[Demir, Cuneyt. 2019. “The Need for a Sustainable and Balanced Critical Approach in Book Reviews.” Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 10(1): 20-36. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2019-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Diodato, Virgil P and Peter Gellatly. 1994. Dictionary of Bibliometrics. New York, NY: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dougherty, Dale and Arnold Robbins. 1997. sed & awk. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dry, Helen. 1998. “The LINGUIST List – A Personal History.” Glot International, 3(6): 11-12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goyvaerts, Jan and Steven Levithan. 2012. Regular Expressions Cookbook. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Groom, Nicholas. 2009. “Phraseology and Epistemology in Academic Book Reviews: A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Two Humanities Disciplines.” In Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani (eds), Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, pp. 122-139. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hayashi, Maria Cristina Piumbato Innocentini. 2020. “Bibliometrics Evidences of Scientific Recognition in Reviews and Interviews: Theoretical Notes and Analysis Model.” Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 18: 1-31. https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v18i00.8660743]Search in Google Scholar
[Herring, Susan C. 1992. “Gender and Participation in Computer-Mediated Linguistic Discourse.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Philadelphia, PA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hicks, Diana et al. 2015. “Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for Research Metrics.” Nature 520: 429–431. https://doi.org/10.1038/520429a]Search in Google Scholar
[Hood, William W. and Concepción S. Wilson. 2001. “The Literature of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, and Informetrics.” Scientometrics, 52(2): 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342]Search in Google Scholar
[Hyland, Ken and Giuliana Diani (eds). 2009. Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jaakkola, Maarit. 2022. Joining the Scholarly Conversation: The Basics of Writing an Academic Book Review. Nordicom, Sweden: NordMedia Network Online Educational Resources.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klaibanmai, Kamontip. 2021. Interpersonal Aspects of Academic Book Reviews: A Thai-English Comparison. Doctoral dissertation, University of Huddersfield.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kondash, Margaret F. 1999. “Ask-A-Linguist: Evaluative Analysis.” In Marilyn Domas White (ed), Analyzing Electronic Question/Answer Services: Framework and Evaluations of Selected Services, pp. 21-27. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawani, S.M. 1981. “Bibliometrics: Its Theoretical Foundations, Methods, and Applications.” Libri, 31(1): 294-315. https://doi.org/10.1515/libr.1981.31.1.294]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Alexander D. et al. 2010. “How to Write a Scholarly Book Review for Publication in a Peer-Reviewed Journal: A Review of the Literature.” The Journal of Chiropractic Education, 24(1): 57-69. https://doi.org/10.7899/1042-5055-24.1.57]Search in Google Scholar
[Lei, Lei and Dilin Liu. 2018. “Research Trends in Applied Linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A Bibliometric Analysis and Its Implications.” Applied Linguistics, 40(3): 540-561. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy003]Search in Google Scholar
[Lewis, Marilyn Nesta. 2022. “Here’s a Good Book: Hints on Writing a Book Review for Academic Journals.” RELC Journal, 53(1): 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220916239]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Lei and Linxin Liang. 2024. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Book Reviews Published in Translation Journals between 2010 and 2021.” Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 55(1): 139-164. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp-2023-0028]Search in Google Scholar
[Maricic, Ibolya. 2001. “Cyperpoliteness: Requesting Strategies on the Linguist List.” Pragmatics in 2000: Selected Papers from the 7th International Pragmatics Conference, 2: 409-416.]Search in Google Scholar
[Modern Language Association. 2007. Report of the MLA Task Force on Evaluating Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion. New York, NY: Modern Language Association (MLA). Available from: https://communityengagement.uncg.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/MLA_Task_Force_Evaluating_Scholarship_for_PromotionTenure.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[McBurney, Melissa K. and Pamela L. Novak. 2002. “What is Bibliometrics and Why Should You Care?” Proceedings of the International Professional Communication Conference, 108-114. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2002.1049094]Search in Google Scholar
[Mikics, David. 2013. Slow Reading in a Hurried Age. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mohsen, Mohammed Ali et al. 2017. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Linguistics Publications in the Web of Science.” Journal of Scientometric Research, 6(2): 109-118. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.6.2.16]Search in Google Scholar
[Molinié, Antoinette and Geoffrey Bodenhausen. 2015. “Bibliometrics as Weapons of Mass Citation [La bibliométrie comme arme de citation massive].” In Blaise Cronin and Cassiry R. Sugimoto (eds), Scholarly Metrics Under the Microscope: From Citation Analysis to Academic Auditing, pp. 819-855. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moreno, Ana I. and Lorena Suárez. 2009. “Academic Book Reviews in English and Spanish: Critical Comments and Rhetorical Structure.” In Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani (eds), Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, pp. 161-178. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Motta-Roth, Désirée. 1995. “Book Reviews and Disciplinary Discourses: Defining a Genre.” 29th Annual Convention of Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Long Beach, CA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nicolaisen, Jeppe. 2002. “The Scholarliness of Published Peer Reviews: A Bibliometric Study of Book Reviews in Selected Social Science Fields.” Research Evaluation, 11(3): 129-140. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154402781776808]Search in Google Scholar
[Odeneye, Rasidat Adesola. 2014. The Pragmatics of Publishers’ Intentions on the Linguist List Journal Publication Calls. MA thesis, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.]Search in Google Scholar
[Oinas, Päivi and Samuli Leppälä. 2013. “Views on Book Reviews.” Regional Studies, 47(10): 1785-1789. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.856530]Search in Google Scholar
[Rowe, Charley. 2008. “Hyper-Formality and Ultra-Casualness: Native and Non-Native English Style on the Ask-a-Linguist Web-Based Bulletin Board.” Bulletin VALS-ASLA, 87: 27-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rowland, Nicholas et al. 2019 “Learning ‘Scholarship as Conversation’ by Writing Book Reviews.” Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research, 2(3) 20-27. https://doi.org/10.18833/spur/2/3/6]Search in Google Scholar
[Seipel, Michael M.O. 2003. “Assessing Publication for Tenure.” Journal of Social Work Education, 39(1): 79-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2003.10779120]Search in Google Scholar
[Shatz, David. 2009. “The Odd Case of Book Reviews.” Against the Grain, 21(3): 40-41. https://doi.org/10.7771/2380-176X.2308]Search in Google Scholar
[Shaw, Philip. 2009. “The Lexis and Grammar of Explicit Evaluation in Academic Book Reviews, 1913 and 1993.” In Ken Hyland and Giuliana Diani (eds), Academic Evaluation: Review Genres in University Settings, pp. 217-235. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stepanov, Boris. 2016. “Кризис Жанра: Книжные Рецензии в Перспективе Исследований Научной Коммуникации.” Laboratorium, 8(1): 82-106.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spier, Troy E. 2024. “State of the Field: A Nationwide Study of Linguistics Education in American Colleges and Universities.” In Jáuregui Magriñár, Juan Pablo et al. (eds), Proceedings of the 23rd Meeting of the Texas Linguistics Society, pp. 1-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, Ya et al. 2021. “Linguistic Studies on Social Media: A Bibliometric Analysis.” SAGE Open, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047572]Search in Google Scholar
[Stowe, Steven. 1991. “Thinking About Reviews.” The Journal of American History, 78(2): 591-595. https://doi.org/10.2307/2079535]Search in Google Scholar
[Swales, John M. and Christine Feak. B. 2012. Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Toor, Rachael. 2012. “Why Bother Writing Book Reviews?” Chronicle of Higher Education. Available from: https://www.chronicle.com/article/Why-Bother-Writing-Book/131360]Search in Google Scholar
[Tse, Polly and Ken Hyland. 2006. “’So What is the Problem This Book Addresses?’: Interactions in Academic Book Reviews.” Text & Talk, 26(6): 767-790. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2006.031]Search in Google Scholar
[Turicensis, Justinus. 1973 [1929]. “Zehn Gebote für Rezensenten und solche, die es werden wollen.” Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik, 11: 24.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vassileva, Irena. 2023. Confrontation in Academic Communication. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.]Search in Google Scholar
[Virtanen, Tuija and Ibolya Maricic. 2000. “Queries on the Linguist List: A Move-Structured Analysis of a Computer-Mediated Genre.” In Tuija Virtanen and Ibolya Maricic (eds), Perspectives on Discourse, pp. 123-143. Växjö, Sweden: Växjö University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Vučićević, Ana Lj. and Aleksandra D. Rakić. “Focused Evaluation in Academic Book Reviews: Realisations and Functions.” Uzdanica, 20(2): 21-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Weingart, Peter. 2005. “Impact of Bibliometrics upon the Science System: Inadvertent Consequences?” Scientometrics, 62(1): 117-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0007-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhong, Lin and Lei Lei. 2020. “The Research Trends of Multilingualism in Applied Linguistics and Education (2000-2019): A Bibliometric Analysis.” Sustainability, 12(15): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156058]Search in Google Scholar
