[
Arai, K., & Matsumoto, M. (2023). Public perceptions of autonomous lethal weapons systems. AI and Ethics, 1-12.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Authority for the Digitalization of Romania/ADR. (2025). Cloudul Guvernamental: Viitorul Digital al Administrației Publice. Available at: https://www.adr.gov.ro/cloudulguvernamental/, accessed online on February 02, 2025.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brett, D. (2020). C2 vs. C4ISR vs. C5ISR vs. C6ISR: What’s the Difference?. Trenton Systems Blogs. Available at: https://www.trentonsystems.com/en-us/resource-hub/blog/c2-c4isr-c5isr-c6isr-differences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
C4ISRNET. (2025). Media for the Intelligence-Age Military. Available at: https://www.c4isrnet.com/, accessed online on February 07, 2025.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Erskine, T., & Miller, S.E. (2024). AI and the decision to go to war: Future risks and opportunities. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(2), 135-147.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Flournoy, M. (2023). AI is already at war: How artificial intelligence will transform the military. Foreign Affairs.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goecks, V.G., & Waytowich, N. (2024). COA-GPT: Generative pre-trained transformers for accelerated course of action development in military operations. ArXiv.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goldfarb, A., & Lindsay, J. (2022). Prediction and judgment: Why artificial intelligence increases the importance of humans in war. International Security, 46(3), 7-50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Horowitz, M., & Lin-Greenberg, E. (2022). Algorithms and influence: Artificial intelligence and crisis decision-making. International Studies Quarterly, 66(4), 1-11.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kreps, S., & Wallace, G.P.R. (2023). Exploring the artificial intelligence “trust paradox”: Evidence from a survey experiment in the United States. PLOS ONE, 18(7), 1-21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Laux, J., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2024). Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk. Regulation & Governance, 18, 3-32.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin-Greenberg, E. (2023). Evaluating escalation: Conceptualizing escalation in an era of emerging military technologies. Journal of Politics, 85(3), 1151-1155.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lockheed, M. (2025). Control the Chaos. Control the Outcome. Available at: https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-us/capabilities/c4isr.html, accessed online February 13, 2025.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lonergan, E. (2024). Emerging technology and the cult of the offensive. Contemporary Security Policy, 45(3), 459-493.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lushenko, P., & Sparrow, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence and U.S. military cadets’ attitudes about future war. SSRN. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4812762.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meclea, M.A., Baldea, A.M., & Boscoianu, M. (2024). Aspects regarding the post-COVID digitalisation of military higher education. EDULEARN24 Proceedings, 9675-9680.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rashid, A.B., Kausik, A.K., Sunny, A.A., & Bappy, M.H. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the military: An overview of the capabilities, applications, and challenges. International Journal of Intelligent Systems. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8676366.
]Search in Google Scholar
