Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Quaestiones Geographicae
Volume 38 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)
Open Access
Anatomy of Place-Making in the Context of the Communication Processes: A Story of one Community and one Square in a Post-Socialist City
Jacek Kotus
Jacek Kotus
,
Tomasz Sowada
Tomasz Sowada
,
Michał Rzeszewski
Michał Rzeszewski
and
Patrycja Mańkowska
Patrycja Mańkowska
| May 13, 2019
Quaestiones Geographicae
Volume 38 (2019): Issue 2 (June 2019)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
May 13, 2019
Page range:
51 - 66
Received:
Jan 19, 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/quageo-2019-0015
Keywords
place-making
,
communication processes
,
citizen’s participation
,
post-socialist city
© 2019 Jacek Kotus et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Fig. 1
Asnyk Square before renovation.Source: own compilation.
Fig. 2
Asnyk Square after renovation.Source: own compilation.
Fig. 3
Inhabitants’ opinions regarding their current and expected influence on spatial development – net index.Source: own compilation.
Fig. 4
The frequency of the respondents’ visits at Asnyk Square (%).Source: own compilation.
Fig. 5
The ways in which the respondents use Asnyk Square (%). Source: own compilation.
Fig. 6
The evaluation of the square renovation actors, ranging from ‘could not be trusted to ‘could be trusted’ (number of answer).Source: own compilation.
Fig. 7
The evaluation of the square renovation actors, ranging from ‘not caring about common good’ to ‘caring about common good’ (number of answer).Source: own compilation.