[
Alves, H. (2013). Co-creation and innovation in public services. The Service Industries Journal 33:7/8, 671–682.10.1080/02642069.2013.740468
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International. Vol 11, no 1. 11–18.10.1093/heapro/11.1.11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonde, M., Bosse, S., Danholt, P. (2018). Translating value-based health care: an experiment into healthcare governance and dialogical accountability. Sociology of Health and Illness, 40 (7).10.1111/1467-9566.12745
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Capano, G. and Woo, J.J. X (2017). Resilience and robustness in policy design: a critical appraisal. Policy Sciences 50, 399–426.10.1007/s11077-016-9273-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cashore & Howlett (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in pacific northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51 (3), 532–551.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eriksson, E. (2015) Sanktionerat motstånd: Brukarinflytande som fenomen och praktik. Lunds universitet: Socialhögskolan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferlie, E. and Ongaro, E. (2015). Strategic Management in Public Service Organisations. Routledge: London.10.4324/9780203736432
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Finansdepartementet (2018), Med tillit växer handlingsutrymmet — tillitsbaserad styrning och ledning av välfärdssektorn. Stockholm: Finansdepartementet, SOU 2018:38.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fox, C., Baines, S.; Wilsson, R., Jallonen, H., Narbutaite-Aflaki, I., Prandini, R., Bassi, A., Ganugi, G., Aaramo- Immonen, H. (2021) A New Agenda for Co-creating Public Services. Turku: Turku University of Applied Sciences.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: past and present. Public Money and Management, 25 (1).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hall P. A. (1993) Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State: the case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics, Vol 25 (3), 275–296.10.2307/422246
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Illeris, (2006). Lärande. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaspers, S., & Steen, T. (2019). Realizing public values: enhancement or obstruction? Exploring value tensions and coping strategies in the co-production of social care. Public Management Review, 21(4), 606–627.10.1080/14719037.2018.1508608
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jönköpings kommun (2014) — 100 Förslag från Dialogen. Jönköping: Socialtjänsten Jönköping kommun (2016). 10 Förbättringar från Dialogen. Jönköping: Socialtjänsten. Jönköping kommun. (2018). En sammanhållen socialtjänst.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jönköping: Socialtjänsten. Olsson, J., Berg M., Hysing E., Kristianssen A-K., Petersén, A. (2019) Policy i teori och praktik. Studentlitteratur: Lund.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Osborne, S. (2018). From public service dominant logics to public service logics: are public service organisations capable of co-production and value co-creation? Public Management Review. 20 (2), 225–231.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Österström, S. (2018) En strategi för att möta framtida utmaningar. 1 sammanhållen Socialtjänst. Jönköping: Socialtjänsten.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lejano, R.P. (2021) Relationality: an alternative framework for analysing policy. Journal of Public Policy, 41 (2), 360–383.10.1017/S0143814X20000057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Montin, S. (2016). En moderniserad kommunallag i spänningsfältet mellan politik och marknad. Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift 118 (3).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Narbutaite Aflaki, I. and Lindh, M. (forthcoming). Empowering first-line managers as leaders towards methodical co-creation: the role of facilitated sensemaking. Public Money and Management
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollitt, Ch. & Bouckaert G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Qvist, M. and Fransson, J. (2018). Fri som en fågel. En studie om återprofessionalisering inom Försäkringskassan. CTF: Karlstad. (SKL, 2010; SKL, 2016).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Socialförvaltningen (2018) Ledningssystem för kvalitet i enlighet med Socialstyrelsens författningssamling 2011:9. Bilaga till tjänsteskrivelse, 2018–04–12. Socialförvaltningen, stab och ledning, Stefan Österström, Jönköpings kommun.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Socialstyrelsen (2021). Individens behov i centrum. Stockholm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
SOSFS (2011:9) Ledningssystem för systematiskt kvalitetsarbete. Socialstyrelsen. Stockholm. [available at] https://www.socialstyrelsen.se/globalassets/sharepoint-dokument/artikelkatalog/foreskrifter-och-allmanna-rad/2011–6–38.pdf [accessed 2020–02–21]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torfing, J., Sørenssen, E. and Røiseland, A. (2016) Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: barriers, drivers, benefits and ways forward. Administration and Society, 51(5), 795–825.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torfing, J., Ferlie, E., Jukic, T., Ongaro, L. (2021) A theoretical framework for studying the co-creation of innovative solutions and public value. Policy & Politics, 49 (2), 189–209.10.1332/030557321X16108172803520
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tuurnas, S. (2016) The professional side of co-production. Dissertation. Tampere University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voorberg, W. et al., Bekkers, V., Flemig, S., Timeus, K., Tõ nurist P. and Tummers, L. (2017) Does co-creation impact public service delivery? The importance of state and governance traditions; Public Money & Management, 37 (5), 365–372.10.1080/09540962.2017.1328798
]Search in Google Scholar
| Dec 30, 2021