Hydrodynamic Characteristics of a Propeller in Open Water, Ducted and in a Semi-Tunnel Conditions - a Case Study on Small Waste Collecting Vessel

1 Deng S, Mi Z. A review on carbon emissions of global shipping. Mar Dev 1(4), 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44312-023-00001-2 Search in Google Scholar

2 Ahmadzadehtalatapeh M, Mousavi M. A review on the drag reduction methods of the ship hulls for improving the hydrodynamic performance. International Journal of Maritime Technology 4, pp. 51-64 2015. Search in Google Scholar

3 Dudziak J. Teoria okrętu [Theory of ship], Book, Fundacja Promocji Przemysłu Okrętowego i Gospodarki Morskiej [Fundation for Promotion of Ship Industry and Maritime Economy], 2008. Search in Google Scholar

4 Bøckmann E, Steen S. The effect of a fixed foil on ship propulsion and motions. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’13, pp. 553–561, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

5 Niklas K, Pruszko H. The retrofitting of ships by applying retracTable bow hydrofoils: A case study. Journal of Ocean Engineering and Marine Energy 9(4), pp. 767–788, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40722-023-00289-8 Search in Google Scholar

6 Danişman DB, Gören Ö, Çalişal S. Resistance reduction studies by means of increasing the beam with waterline parabolization. GMO-SHIPMAR, no. 207, pp. 66-79, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

7 Faltinsen OM, Hydrodynamics of high-speed marine vehicles. Book, Cambridge University Press; 2006. Search in Google Scholar

8 Collins CA, Clynch JR, Rago TA, Margolina T. Comparison of swath and monohull vessel motion for regional class research vessels. Marine Technology Society Journal 41(2), pp. 56-61 2007. https://doi.org/10.4031/002533207787442231 Search in Google Scholar

9 Nguyen TV, Shimizu N, Kinugawa A, Tai Y, Ikeda Y. Numerical studies on air resistance reduction methods for a large container ship with fully loaded deck containers in oblique winds. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering, MARINE, pp. 1040-1051. 2017. Search in Google Scholar

10 RAEng. Future ship powering options: Exploring alternative methods of ship propulsion, Tech. Rep. Royal Academy of Engineering, July 2013. Search in Google Scholar

11 Carlton JS. Marine propellers and propulsion, 3rd edition. Elsevier Ltd.; 2018. Search in Google Scholar

12 Król P. Hydrodynamic state of art review: Rotor-stator marine propulsor systems design. Polish Maritime Research 28(1), pp. 72 - 82, 2021. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2021-0007 Search in Google Scholar

13 Nadery A, Ghassemi H. Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamic performance of the propeller behind the ship with and without wed. Polish Maritime Research 27(4), pp. 50 - 59, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-0065 Search in Google Scholar

14 Voermans A. Experimental determination of hydrodynamic loads on the Wärtsilä preswirl stator EnergoFlow and validation of a prediction methodology for design loads. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’19, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

15 Zhai SC, Liu DC, Han YB. Numerical study of pressure fluctuation induced by propeller cavitation with pre-shrouded vanes. Chuan Bo Li Xue/Journal of Ship Mechanics 25(10), pp. 1292-1301, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2021.10.002 Search in Google Scholar

16 Inukai Y. A development of a propeller with backward tip raked fin. In Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsion, SMP’13, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

17 Druckenbrod M, Wang K, Greitsch L, Heinke H-J, Abdel-Maksoud M. Development of hub caps fitted with PBCF. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’15, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

18 Ueda N, Oshima A, Unseki T, Fujita S, Takeda S, Kitamura T. The first hybrid CRP-POD driven fast ROPAX ferry in the world. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review 41(6), 2004. Search in Google Scholar

19 Reichel M, Pruszko H, Czerski K, Necel M. Innovative twin-CRP-pod propulsion system for ultra large container ships - Challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 15th International Symposium on Practical Design of Ships and Other Floating Structures, PRADS, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

20 Pivano L. Thrust estimation and control of marine propellers in four-quadrant operations. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Engineering Science & Technology Department of Marine Technology, 2008. Search in Google Scholar

21 Smogeli ON, Control of marine propellers. PhD thesis, Norwegian University of Science and Technology Faculty of Engineering Science & Technology Department of Marine Technology, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

22 Pivano L, Johansen TA, Smogeli ØN. A four-quadrant thrust estimation scheme for marine propellers: Theory and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 17(1), pp. 215-226, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2008.922602 Search in Google Scholar

23 Fossen TI. Marine control system-guidance, navigation and control of ships, rigs and underwater vehicles. Marine Cybernetics; Trondheim, Norway, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

24 Van Lammeren WPA, van Manen JD, Oosterveld MWC. The Wageningen B-screw series. Transactions SNAME 77, pp. 269-317, 1969. Search in Google Scholar

25 Oosterveld MWC. Wake adapted ducted propellers. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1970. Search in Google Scholar

26 Faller W, Roddy RF, Hess DE. Neural network predictions of the 4-quadrant Wageningen propeller series. Naval Surface Warfare Center Carderock Division, Hydromechanics Department Report NSWCCD‐50‐TR‐2006/004, April 2006. Search in Google Scholar

27 Sunarsih, Z. Mohd, and I. Nur. Four quadrant thrust generation model for ship manoeuvring simulation. Aust. J. Basic & Appl. Sci. 10(11), pp. 243–248, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

28 Tran M, Binns J, Chai S, Forrest AL, Nguyen H. A practical approach to the dynamic modelling of an underwater vehicle propeller in all four quadrants of operation. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment 233(1), pp. 333-344, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

29 Li D, Wang Z, Chi H. Chebyshev fitting way and error analysis for propeller atlas across four quadrants. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 1(1), pp. 52–59, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02921417 Search in Google Scholar

30 Häusler J, Saccon A, Hauser J, Pascoal AM, Aguiar AP. A novel four-quadrant propeller model. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’15, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

31 Bruce EP, Gearhart WS, Ross JR, Treaster AL. The design of pumpjets for hydrodynamic propulsion. Conference paper, Fluid Mech., Acoustics, and Design of Turbomachinery, Pt. 2, 1974. Search in Google Scholar

32 Xi P, Meng L, Huang Z, Wang Z. Controllable pitch propeller comparison of different speed and pitch matches at noncavitation condition. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1985(1):012066, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1985/1/012066 Search in Google Scholar

33 Burak Şamşul M, Görener N. The usage of propeller tunnels for higher efficiency and lower vibration. In Proceedings of the 1st International Meeting - Propeller Noise & Vibration, 2014. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.3061.4724 Search in Google Scholar

34 Bhattacharyya A, Krasilnikov V. Scale effects on a 4-bladed propeller operating in ducts of different design in open water. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’15, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

35 Falcao de Campos JAC. On the calculation of ducted propeller performance in axisymmetric flows. PhD thesis, Delft University of Technology, 1983. Search in Google Scholar

36 Blount DL. Design of propeller tunnels of high-speed craft. Marine Technology and SNAME News 34(4), pp. 276-292, 1997. https://doi.org/10.5957/mt1.1997.34.4.276 Search in Google Scholar

37 Burunsuz S, Özden MC, Özden A, Helvacıoğlu İH. Four quadrant thrust and torque prediction of INSEAN E-1619 generic submarine propeller for submarine maneuvering simulations. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

38 Gaggero S, Rizzo CM, Tani G, Viviani M. EFD and CFD design and analysis of a propeller in decelerating duct. International Journal of Rotating Machinery 2012 (2), pp. 1-15, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/823831 Search in Google Scholar

39 Ponkratov D, Zegos C. Validation of ship scale CFD self-propulsion simulation by the direct comparison with sea trials results. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Marine Propulsors, SMP’15, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

40 ITTC. Practical guidelines for ship CFD applications - 7.5-03-02-03. ITTC - Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, pp. 1-18, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

41 ITTC. Practical guidelines for ship resistance CFD - 7.5-03-02-04. ITTC - Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, pp. 1-9, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

42 Siemens PLM software. User Guide Star CCM+ v12.04. 2017. Search in Google Scholar

43 Nouroozi H, Zeraatgar H. Propeller hydrodynamic characteristics in oblique flow by unsteady ranse solver. Polish Maritime Research 27(1), pp. 6-17, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2478/pomr-2020-0001 Search in Google Scholar

44 Vier-Kwadrant Vrijvarende-Schroef-Karakterstieken Voor B-Serie Schroeven. Fourier-Reeks Ontwikkeling en Operationeel Gebruik [Four-quadrant open water propeller characteristics for B-series propellers. Fourier series development and operational use]. MARIN Report 60482-1- MS, 1984 [Limited Availability]. Search in Google Scholar

45 Oosterveld MWC, van Oossanen P. Recent developments in marine propeller hydrodynamics. In International Jubilee Meeting: 40th Anniversary of the Netherlands Ship Model Basin, NSMB Publication No. 433, 1972. Search in Google Scholar

46 ITTC. Uncertainty analysis in CFD verification and validation, methodology and procedures - 7.5-0.3-0.1-0.1. ITTC -Recommended Procedures and Guidelines, 2024. Search in Google Scholar