[1. Acciaro, M., Hoffmann, P.N., Eide, M.S., 2013. The energy efficiency gap in maritime transport. Journal of Shipping and Ocean Engineering. 3(2013), 1-10.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Adland, R., Cariou, P., Jia, H., Wolff, F.C., 2018. The energy efficiency effects of periodic ship hull cleaning. J. Clean. Prod. 178, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.247.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.247]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Bedford, F., Rutland, C., Dittrich, P., Raab, A., Wirbeleit, F., 2000. Effects of direct water injection on DI diesel engine combustion. No. 2000-01-2938. SAE Technical Paper.10.4271/2000-01-2938]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Bergmann, A., Rotzek, J.N., Wetzel, M., Guenther, E., 2017. Hang the low-hanging fruit even lower - evidence that energy efficiency matters for corporate financial performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 147(2017), 66-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.074.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.074]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Boylston, J.W., 2011. LNG as a fuel for vessels some design notes. http://leg.wa.gov/JTC/Documents/Studies/LNG/LNGFuelDesignNotes_060911.pdf. (Accessed 20 October 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Buhaug, O., Corbett, J.J., Eyring, V., Endresen, O., Faber, J., Hanayama, S., Lee, D.S., Lee, D., Lindstad, H., Markowska, A.Z., Mjelde, A., Nelissen, D., Nilsen, J., Palsson, C., Wanquing, W., Winebrake, J.J., Yoshida, K., 2009. Prevention of air pollution from ships - Second IMO GHG Study. MEPC 59/INF.10. International Maritime Organization, London, UK.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Chryssakis, C., Balland, O., Tvete, H.A., Brandsæter, A., 2014. Alternative fuels for shipping chain. Position paper: 17-2014. https://transportemaritimoglobal.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/dnv-gl-alternative-fuel-2014-positionpaper.pdf. (Accessed 09 November 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Deal, A.L., 2013. Liquefied natural gas as a marine fuel. NEPI Working Paper. http://www.glmri.org/downloads/lngMisc/NEPI%20LNG%20as%20a%20Marine%20Fuel%205-7-13.pdf. (Accessed 18 October 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[9. DeCanio, S.J., Watkins, W.E., 1998. Investment in energy efficiency: do the characteristics of firms matter? The review of economics and statistics. 80(1), 95-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465398557366.10.1162/003465398557366]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. DNV GL, 2019. Current price development oil and gas. https://www.dnvgl.com/maritime/lng/current-price-development-oil-and-gas.html. (Accessed 12 March 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Eide, M.S., Longva, T., Hoffmann, P., Endresen Ø., Dalsøren, S.B., 2011. Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship CO2 emissions. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(1), 11-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2010.533711.10.1080/03088839.2010.533711]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Fridell, E., Winnes, H., Styhre, L., 2013. Measures to improve energy efficiency in shipping. FAL Bulletin, 324(8). http://www.transportportal.se/energieffektivitet/measures%20to%20improve%20energy%20efficiency%20in%20shipping.pdf. (Accessed 09 May 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Genesis Energy, 2010. Solar energy. http://www.electrocity.co.nz/images/factsheets/solar%20energy.pdf. (Accessed 12 November 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Gromicko, N., 2012. Disadvantages of Solar Energy. https://www.nachi.org/disadvantages-solar-energy.htm. (Accessed 12 November 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Gupta, P., Anand, S., Gupta, H., 2017. Developing a roadmap to overcome barriers to energy efficiency in buildings using best worst method. Sustainable Cities and Society, 31(2017), 244–259. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.005.10.1016/j.scs.2017.02.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Hoeven, V.D.M., 2011. Solar energy perspectives. https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/solar_energy_perspectives2011.pdf. (Accessed 12 November 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[17. IMO, 2014. Third IMO GHG study 2014: executive summary and final report. http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Documents/Third%20Greenhouse%20Gas%20Study/GHG3%20Executive%20Summary%20and%20Report.pdf. (Accessed 15 October 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[18. IMO, 2017. MARPOL73-78: brief history - list of amendments to date and where to find them. http://www.imo.org/en/KnowledgeCentre/ReferencesAndArchives/HistoryofMARPOL/Documents/MARPOL%2073-78%20Brief%20History%20-%20List%20of%20amendments%20and%20how%20to%20find%20them.htm. (Accessed 04 January 2018)]Search in Google Scholar
[19. IMO, 2019. Energy efficiency measures. http://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/Environment/PollutionPrevention/AirPollution/Pages/Technical-and-Operational-Measures.aspx. (Accessed 13 March 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[20. International Gas Union, 2015. World LNG report-2015 edition. http://www.igu.org/sites/default/files/node-page-field_file/IGUWorld%20LNG%20Report-2015%20Edition.pdf. (Accessed 14 November 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[21. International Renewable Energy Agency, 2012. Wind power. https://www.irena.org/DocumentDownloads/Publications/RE_Technologies_Cost_Analysis-WIND_POWER.pdf. (Accessed 11 November 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Jafarzadeh, S., Utne, I.B., 2014. A framework to bridge the energy efficiency gap in shipping. Energy 69(2014), 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.056.10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.056]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[23. Johnson, H., Andersson, K., 2011. The energy efficiency gap in shipping: barriers to improvement. Paper presented at International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME) 2011 Annual Conference, Santiago de Chile.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Johnson, H., Johansson, M., Andersson, K., 2014. Barriers to improving energy efficiency in short sea shipping: an action research case study. Journal of Cleaner Production 66(2014), 317-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.046.10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.10.046]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[25. Karvonen, M., Kapoor, R., Uusitalo, A., Ojanen, V., 2016. Technology competition in the internal combustion engine waste heat recovery: A patent landscape analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 112, 3735–3743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.031.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.031]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Klemick, H., Wolverton, A., 2013. Energy-efficiency gap. In Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, ed. Jason Shogren, 74-81.10.1016/B978-0-12-375067-9.00069-3]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Kristensen, H.O., 2012. Energy demand and exhaust gas emissions of marine engines. Clean Shipping Currents, 1(6), 18-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Larsen, U., Pierobon, L., Haglind, F., Gabrielii, C., 2013. Design and optimisation of organic Rankine cycles for waste heat recovery in marine applications using the principles of natural selection. Energy 55, 803–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.021.10.1016/j.energy.2013.03.021]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[29. Lele, A., Rao, K.V.S. 2016. Ship propulsion strategies by using wind energy. In 2016 International Conference on Emerging Technological Trends (ICETT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETT.2016.787369310.1109/ICETT.2016.7873693]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[30. Marine Pollution Annex VI 2018 EEDI and SEEMP https://www.marpol-annex-vi.com/eedi-seemp/ (Accessed 19 February 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Manrique, R., Vásquez, D., Vallejo, G., Chejne F., Amell, A.A., Herrera, B., 2018. Analysis of barriers to the implementation of energy efficiency actions in the production of ceramics in Colombia. Energy 143(2018), 575-584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.023.10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.023]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[32. Mickwitz, P., Hyvättinen, H., Kivimaa, P., 2008. The role of policy instruments in the innovation and diffusion of environmentally friendlier technologies: popular claims versus case study experiences. Journal of Cleaner Production 16S1 (2008), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.012.10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[33. Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications (Ulaştırma, Denizcilik ve Haberleşme Bakanlığı), 2017. 1978 Protokolü ile Değişik, 1973 Tarihli Denizlerin Gemiler Tarafından Kirletilmesinin Önlenmesine Ait Uluslararası Sözleşme (MARPOL 73/78). http://imo.udhb.gov.tr/TR/19Marpol.aspx. (Accessed 05 November 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Nehler, T., Rasmussen, J., 2016. How do firms consider non-energy benefits? empirical findings on energy-efficiency investments in Swedish industry. Journal of Cleaner Production 113(2016), 472-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.070.10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.070]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[35. Pearson, K., 1895. Notes on regression and inheritance in the case of two parents. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 58, 240–242.10.1098/rspl.1895.0041]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Polzin, F., 2017. Mobilizing private finance for low-carbon innovation – a systematic review of barriers and solutions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 77(2017), 525–535. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.00710.1016/j.rser.2017.04.007]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[37. Poulsen, R.T., Sornn-Friese, H., 2015. Achieving energy efficient ship operations under third party management: How do ship management models influence energy efficiency? Research in Transportation Business & Management 17(2015), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2015.10.00110.1016/j.rtbm.2015.10.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[38. Reddy, B.S., 2003. Overcoming the energy efficiency gap in India’s household sector. Energy Policy 31(2003), 1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00220-3.10.1016/S0301-4215(02)00220-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[39. Rehmatullaa, N., Calleyab, J., Smith, T., 2017. The implementation of technical energy efficiency and CO2 emission reduction measures in shipping. Ocean Engineering 139(2017) 184–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.029.10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.04.029]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[40. Ruan, Y., Hang, C.C., Wang, Y.M., 2014. Government’s role in disruptive innovation and industry emergence: the case of the electric bike in China. Technovation 34(2014), 785–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2014.09.003.10.1016/j.technovation.2014.09.003]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[41. Styhre, L., Winnes, H., 2013. Energy efficient shipping – between research and implementation. Paper presented at IAME2013 Conference, Marseille, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Thollander, P., Ottosson, M., 2008. An energy efficient Swedish pulp and paper industry-exploring barriers to and driving forces for cost-effective energy efficiency investments. Energy Efficiency 1(1), 21-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-007-9001-7.10.1007/s12053-007-9001-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[43. Thomson, P.B., 1997. Evaluating energy efficiency investments: accounting for risk in the discounting process. Energy Policy, 25(12), 989-996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00125-0.10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00125-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[44. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., 2012. Dealing with barriers to energy efficiency and SMEs: Some empirical evidences. Energy 37(2012), 494-504. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.005.10.1016/j.energy.2011.11.005]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[45. Wärtsilä Encyclopedia of Marine Technology, 2017. Direct Water Injection (DWI). https://www.wartsila.com/encyclopedia/term/direct-water-injection-(dwi). (Accessed 19 December 2017)]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Ycharts, 2019. Henry hub natural gas spot price chart. https://ycharts.com/indicators/natural_gas_spot_price. (Accessed 12 March 2019)]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Yoon, B., Shin, J., Lee, S., 2018. Technology assessment model for sustainable development of LNG terminals. J. Clean. Prod. 172, 927–937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.187.10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.187]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar