Open Access

European inter-comparison studies as a tool for perfecting irradiated food detection methods


Cite

Fig. 1

Multiline EPR signal of dried Morocco raisin irradiated with the dose of 0.5 kGy. Unirradiated raisin does not show any EPR signal. g0 corresponds to geometric centre of multi-component signal.
Multiline EPR signal of dried Morocco raisin irradiated with the dose of 0.5 kGy. Unirradiated raisin does not show any EPR signal. g0 corresponds to geometric centre of multi-component signal.

Fig. 2

EPR signal of irradiated sample of matured hazel-nut shells harvested in Polish farms. Two satellite lines of isotropic triplets distanced by 6.0 mT assigned to cellulose radical are considered the evidence of radiation treatment. The central line of the cellulose triplet is superimposed by a strong native singlet and overgrows the frames of the figure.
EPR signal of irradiated sample of matured hazel-nut shells harvested in Polish farms. Two satellite lines of isotropic triplets distanced by 6.0 mT assigned to cellulose radical are considered the evidence of radiation treatment. The central line of the cellulose triplet is superimposed by a strong native singlet and overgrows the frames of the figure.

Fig. 3

EPR signal of chicken bone sample, irradiated with 0.5 kGy, assigned to a singlet of axial symmetry of  ion radical.
EPR signal of chicken bone sample, irradiated with 0.5 kGy, assigned to a singlet of axial symmetry of ion radical.

Results of the PSL (for hot peppers) and TL (for sweet peppers) examination of minerals isolated from the dried peppers

Name of sample TL intensity (150–250°C) Glow ratio A/B

Glow A Glow B
Hot peppers 107 664 2 446 361 0.437
Sweet peppers 8 271 517 9 420 144 0.878
eISSN:
1508-5791
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Chemistry, Nuclear Chemistry, Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, other