1. bookVolume 14 (2014): Issue 6 (December 2014)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1335-8871
First Published
07 Mar 2008
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

A New Compensation Method for Measurement of Thread Pitch Diameter by Profile Scanning

Published Online: 15 Dec 2014
Volume & Issue: Volume 14 (2014) - Issue 6 (December 2014)
Page range: 323 - 330
Received: 31 Mar 2014
Accepted: 24 Oct 2014
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1335-8871
First Published
07 Mar 2008
Publication timeframe
6 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

For measurement of existing thread parameters using profile scanning, system error increases as pitch diameter, difference between the calibrating thread and measuring thread increases with the single gauge calibration method. There are several alignment deviations affecting the measurement of pitch diameter. To reduce the system error, a compensation method using two standard thread gauges to calculate the alignment deviations is proposed here. Finally, the theoretical and experimental comparisons between the single gauge calibration method and the proposed method are presented. The results demonstrate that the two gauges calibration method can effectively reduce the system error.

Keywords

[1] Merkac, T.P., Acko, B. (2010). Comparising measuring methods of pitch diameter of thread gauges and analysis of influences on the measurement results. Measurement, 43 (3), 421-425.10.1016/j.measurement.2009.12.012Search in Google Scholar

[2] Zhang, H.Y., Zhang, G.X. (2008). Online test system of large screw thread. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 44 (12), 199-202.10.3901/JME.2008.12.199Search in Google Scholar

[3] Kosarevsky, S., Latypov, V. (2010). Development of an algorithm to detect screw threads in planar point clouds. Measurement Science Review, 10 (4), 136-141.10.2478/v10048-010-0024-4Search in Google Scholar

[4] European Association of National Metrology Institutes. (2007). Determination of pitch diameter of parallel thread gauges by mechanical probing. EURAMET/cg-10/v.01, 6-9.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Hong, E., Zhang, H., Katz, R., Agapiou, J.S. (2012). Non-contact inspection of internal threads of machined parts. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 62 (1-4), 221-229.10.1007/s00170-011-3793-5Search in Google Scholar

[6] Huang, H.L., Jywe, W.Y., Liu, C.H., et al. (2010). Development of a novel laser-based measuring system for the thread profile of ballscrew. Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 48 (10), 1012-1018.10.1016/j.optlaseng.2010.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[7] Tong, Q., Jiao, C., Huang, H., et al. (2014). An automatic measuring method and system using laser triangulation scanning for the parameters of a screw thread. Measurement Science and Technology, 25 (3), 035202.10.1088/0957-0233/25/3/035202Search in Google Scholar

[8] Shchurov, I.A. (2011). Calculation of the virtual pitch thread diameter using the cloud of points from CMM. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 53 (1-4), 241-245.10.1007/s00170-010-2815-zSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Kosarevsky, S., Latypov, V. (2013). Detection of screw threads in computed tomography 3D density fields. Measurement Science Review, 13 (6), 292-297.10.2478/msr-2013-0043Search in Google Scholar

[10] Galestin, R. (2006). Advanced 2D scanning: The solution for the calibration of thread ring and thread plug gauges. In 13th International Metrology Congress. Lille: French College of Metrology Press, 363-372.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Galestien, R. (2003). Measurement of geometric parameters of internal and external screw thread and similar grooves. U.S. Patent No. 20030101602.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chen, G.S., Mei, X.S., Li, H.L. (2013). Geometric error modeling and compensation for large-scale grinding machine tools with multi-axes. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 69 (9-12), 2583–2592.10.1007/s00170-013-5203-7Search in Google Scholar

[13] Sobol, I.M., Kucherenko, S. (2009). Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 79 (10), 3009-3017.10.1016/j.matcom.2009.01.023Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sobol, I.M., Tarantolab, S., Gatellib, D., et al. (2007). Estimating the approximation error when fixing unessential factors in global sensitivity analysis. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 92 (7), 957-960.10.1016/j.ress.2006.07.001Search in Google Scholar

[15] Chen, S., Zhao, D.B., Lu, Y.H., Liu, K. (2013). A method for detecting alignment deviation on a thread-measuring instrument. Measurement Science and Technology, 24 (8), 085002.10.1088/0957-0233/24/8/085002Search in Google Scholar

[16] Rubinstein, R.Y., Kroese, D.P. (2011). Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method. John Wiley & Sons.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Supplement 1 to the “Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement” — Propagation of distributions using Monte Carlo method, 1st edition. JCGM 101:2008.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Kosarevsky, S., Latypov, V. (2013). Practical procedure for position tolerance uncertainty determination via Monte-Carlo error propagation. Measurement Science Review, 12 (1), 1-7.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. (2008). Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement, 1st edition. JCGM 100:2008.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo