Open Access

Fatigue tests of heat-treated rails in the R350HT grade

  
Jun 30, 2025

Cite
Download Cover

Figure 1

Rail heat treatment line.
Rail heat treatment line.

Figure 2

Image of the microstructure at the corner of the rail heads after heat treatment: (a) rail from melt no. 1 and (b) rail from melt no. 2.
Image of the microstructure at the corner of the rail heads after heat treatment: (a) rail from melt no. 1 and (b) rail from melt no. 2.

Figure 3

Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 5 – pattern D2 and (b) sample 5 – pattern D2. The area of slight negative and positive sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.
Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 5 – pattern D2 and (b) sample 5 – pattern D2. The area of slight negative and positive sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.

Figure 4

Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 6 – pattern D4 and (b) sample 6 – pattern D2. The area of slight negative sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.
Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 6 – pattern D4 and (b) sample 6 – pattern D2. The area of slight negative sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.

Figure 5

Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 7 – pattern D2 and (b) sample 7 – pattern D2. The area of positive sulphur segregation with a small amount of negative sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.
Baumann’s print: (a) Sample 7 – pattern D2 and (b) sample 7 – pattern D2. The area of positive sulphur segregation with a small amount of negative sulphur segregation in the rail web is marked.

Figure 6

Hardness distribution on the cross-section of the rail head for the R350HT grade according to the standard [4] (a), and hardness distribution on the cross-section of the rail head – sample 4 (b).
Hardness distribution on the cross-section of the rail head for the R350HT grade according to the standard [4] (a), and hardness distribution on the cross-section of the rail head – sample 4 (b).

Figure 7

Dimensions of the sample for testing the fatigue crack growth rate.
Dimensions of the sample for testing the fatigue crack growth rate.

Figure 8

Dimensions of the sample for determining the K
                     Ic factor.
Dimensions of the sample for determining the K Ic factor.

Figure 9

Fatigue crack growth rate – Paris’ law.
Fatigue crack growth rate – Paris’ law.

Figure 10

Sample fractures for determining the fatigue crack growth rate representing. The photos represent the following samples: (a) sample 2a, (b) sample 2b and (c) sample 3c.
Sample fractures for determining the fatigue crack growth rate representing. The photos represent the following samples: (a) sample 2a, (b) sample 2b and (c) sample 3c.

Figure 11

Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2a.
Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2a.

Figure 12

Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2b.
Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2b.

Figure 13

Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2c.
Graph showing the dependence of da/dN on ΔK determined for the sample 2c.

Figure 14

View of fractures for samples (a) 3c and (b) 3d.
View of fractures for samples (a) 3c and (b) 3d.

Figure 15

Sample number 2a in the holders after fatigue testing.
Sample number 2a in the holders after fatigue testing.

Chemical composition for individual melts_

Number Mass in liquid state (%) 10−4 % (ppm)
of samples of melts C Mn Si P S Cr Al max V max N max O max H max
1 321,036 0.79 1.09 0.36 0.008 0.017 0.069 0.004 0.001 0.0056 18 2.00
2 321,037 0.77 1.07 0.35 0.008 0.017 0.077 0.004 0.001 0.0055 18 1.83
3 321,038 0.77 1.08 0.39 0.009 0.014 0.076 0.004 0.001 0.0054 18 1.29
4 331,713 0.78 1.12 0.37 0.016 0.017 0.078 0.004 0.003 0.0050 18 1.50
5 331,823 0.77 1.10 0.38 0.012 0.012 0.08 0.003 0.002 0.0040 14 1.3
6 331,824 0.78 1.13 0.38 0.011 0.019 0.08 0.003 0.002 0.0049 20 1.1
7 331,991 0.79 1.13 0.36 0.012 0.011 0.08 0.003 0.002 0.0043 19 1.4

Basic range of chemical composition and mechanical properties of rail steel grades for heat treatment_

Steel grade Mass (%) R m (MPa) A (%) Hardness (HBW)
C Si Mn P max S max Cr
R260 0.60–0.82 0.13–0.60 0.65–1.25 0.030 0.030 ≤0.15 880 10 260–300
R350HT 0.70–0.82 0.13–0.60 0.65–1.25 0.025 0.030 ≤0.15 1,175 9 350–390
R350LHT 0.70–0.82 0.13–0.60 0.65–1.25 0.025 0.030 ≤0.30 1,175 9 350–390
R370CrHT 0.68–0.84 0.38–1.02 0.65–1.15 0.025 0.025 0.35–0.65 1,280 9 370–410
R400HT 0.88–1.07 0.18–0.62 0.95–1.35 0.025 0.025 ≤0.30 1,280 8 400–440

Conditions for determining the fatigue crack growth rate_

Fatigue crack growth rate
Sample no. 2a 2b 2c
Load rate R 0.5 0.5 0.5
Amplitude type Sinusoidal Sinusoidal Sinusoidal
Load frequency (Hz) 15 15 15
Initial ΔK (MPa m1/2) 9.32 9.39 9.27
Initial K max (MPa m1/2) 18.64 18.78 18.54
Initial ΔP (kN) 6605.00 6600.00 6608.00
Final crack length (mm) 27.26 26.93 27.75
Temperature (°C) Room temp. Room temp. Room temp.
Measurement of the crack front
Average a (mm) 25.24 24.47 24.69
Standard deviation (mm) 1.0041 1.1314 0.3606
Paris’ law (da/dN) = CK) m
C 2.0673 × 107 4.8451 × 108 8.5625 × 108
m 1.92 2.45 2.26
R m (MPa) 1,292
R p0,2 (MPa) 894

Condition check P max/P Q ≤ 1_1_

Sample P Q (N) P max (N) P max/P Q
3a 17,810 18,344 1.03
3b 18,390 18,574 1.01
3c 17,240 18,274 1.06
3d 18,560 18,746 1.01
3e 18,560 18,746 1.01

Fatigue strength test results_

Sample no. Amplitude Force (kN) Result
1a 0.00135 10.78 No cracks
1b 0.00135 10.88 No cracks
1c 0.00135 10.75 No cracks
2a 0.00135 10.83 No cracks
2b 0.00135 10.83 No cracks
2c 0.00135 10.88 No cracks
3a 0.00135 10.83 No cracks
3b 0.00135 10.76 No cracks
3c 0.00135 10.57 No cracks

Checking the validity criterion K Ic_

Sample Check the conditions
a ≥ 2.5 K Q R p 0.2 2 \hspace{1em}{\left(\frac{{K}_{{\rm{Q}}}}{{R}_{{\rm{p}}0.2}}\right)}^{2} , [m] B ≥ 2.5 K Q R p 0.2 2 \hspace{1em}{\left(\frac{{K}_{{\rm{Q}}}}{{R}_{{\rm{p}}0.2}}\right)}^{2} , [m]
Steel – R350HT
3a 0.01981 > −0.0079 0.02498 > −0.0079
3b 0.01983 > −0.0084 0.02502 > −0.0084
3c 0.01991 > −0.0073 0.02498 > −0.0073
3d 0.02011 > −0.0088 0.02505 > −0.0088
3e 0.01993 > −0.0087 0.02496 > −0.0087

Validity check K Ic_

Sample Check the conditions
(Wa) > 2.5 K Q R p 0.2 2 {\left(\frac{{K}_{{\rm{Q}}}}{{R}_{{\rm{p}}0.2}}\right)}^{2} , [m]
Steel – R350HT
3a 0.02013 > −0.0079
3b 0.02020 > −0.0084
3c 0.02017 > −0.0073
3d 0.01993 > −0.0088
3e 0.02003 > −0.0087

Results of determining the stress intensity factor_

Sample no. K Ic (MPa m1/2) Average value K Ic (MPa m1/2) Standard deviation K Ic (MPa m1/2)
3a 39.20 39.86 1.50
3b 40.27
3c 37.59
3d 41.27
3e 40.39
2a 39.95 40.12 1.09
2b 40.77
2c 40.38
2 d 38.35
2e 41.16
1a 46.24 42.97 2.70
1b 45.36
1c 40.32
1d 40.67
1e 42.28
Requirements according to EN13674-1 for the R350HT grade Single min. value 30 MPa m1/2 Average value min 32 MPa m1/2

Results of testing the fatigue crack growth rate_

Sample no. da/dN = CK) m Indicator m/Gc ΔK = 10, MPa m1/2 Indicator m/Gc ΔK = 13.5, MPa m1/2
C m
2a 2.0673 × 107 1.9153 17.00 30.22
2b 4.8851 × 108 2.4538 13.78 28.77
2c 8.5625 × 108 2.2583 15.52 30.57
1a 1.4207 × 107 1.9498 12.66 22.72
1b 1.1649 × 107 2.0288 12.45 22.88
1c 2.8016 × 107 1.6677 13.03 21.50
4a 1.3571 × 107 2.1066 17.00 32.64
4b 1.4220 × 107 2.0735 16.84 31.38
4c 1.4038 × 107 2.0718 16.56 30.84
Requirements of the EN13674-1 standard Max 17 m/Gc Max 55 m/Gc

Validation requirements for 321038 A101 rail (samples 3)_

Determining K Ic
Sample no. 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e
R m (MPa) 1,331
R p0.2 (MPa) 696
Test temperature (°C) −20 −20 −20 −20 −20
P max (kN) 18.3443 18.5739 18.2744 18.7456 18.7456
P Q (kN) 17.81 18.39 17.24 18.54 18.56
Time test (s) 35.21 61.15 71.01 76.27 69.1
K Q (MPa m1/2) 39.2 40.27 37.59 41.27 40.97
Rate test (MPa m1/2/s) 1.11 0.66 0.53 0.54 0.59
Mean value of a 19.81 19.83 19.91 20.11 19.53
Standard dev. of a 1.1066 1.1580 0.9459 0.8739 1.2609
0.45 ≤ (a/W) ≤ 0.55 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50
P max/P Q < 1.1 1.03 1.01 1.06 1.01 1.01
K max < 0.6 K Q K max (MPa m1/2) 22.08 22.2 22.2 22.1 22.1
0.6 K Q (MPa m1/2) 23.52 24.162 22.554 24.762 24.582

Validation requirements for 321038 A101 rail (samples 3) – the criterion 2_5(K Q/R p0_2)_

Determining K Ic
Sample no. 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e
2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 < a 0 2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 0.0079 0.0084 0.0073 0.0088 0.0087
a 0 19.81 19.83 19.91 20.11 19.93
2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 < B 2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 0.0079 0.0084 0.0073 0.0088 0.0087
B 24.98 25.02 49.98 25.05 24.96
2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 < W − a 2.5 (K Q/R p0.2)2 0.0079 0.0084 0.0073 0.0088 0.0087
W − a 20.13 20.20 20.17 19.93 20.03
K Ic results 39.2 40.27 37.59 41.27 40.97

Basic properties of the tested rail steel for individual rail types_

Sample no. Basic mechanical properties
Tensile strength, R m (MPa) Yield strength R p0.2 (MPa 20°C) Elongation A (%) Necking Z (%) Hardness (HB)
1 1,286 881 9.1 18 376
2 1,249 854 10.3 22 365
3 1,238 875 10.9 23 363
4 1,262 877 10.7 22 366
5 1,284 904 11.2 23 364
6 1,270 899 10.4 23 367
7 1,293 885 11.5 21 370