Additive manufacturing with geopolymer foams: A critical review of current progress
, , and
Mar 31, 2025
About this article
Article Category: Review Article
Published Online: Mar 31, 2025
Page range: 115 - 132
Received: Mar 13, 2025
Accepted: May 13, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/msp-2025-0013
Keywords
© 2025 Wei-Chien Wang, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1
![Process of producing the slag. Adapted from Hanani Ismail et al. paper, licensed under CC BY-NC 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ [22].](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/67d1c1278d1bec042eab8dd7/j_msp-2025-0013_fig_001.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20250909%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20250909T120241Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=2ba07afb21152fae79f95cccce16c4619b62ab286b1ca3b76a573370a2b31b9c&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 2

Figure 3

Figure 4

Figure 5

Figure 6

Chemical contents of industrial waste as an aluminosilicate source_
Chemical composition (%) | Fly ash | Slag | Silica fume |
---|---|---|---|
SiO2 | 52.31 | 39.8 | 92.05 |
Al2O3 | 28.59 | 11.2 | 0.72 |
Fe2O3 | 6.22 | 1.2 | 1.31 |
CaO | 4.01 | 34.4 | 0.46 |
MgO | 2.05 | 7.6 | — |
K2O | 1.62 | — | 1.51 |
SO3 | 1.79 | 0.46 | 0.41 |
N2O | — | 0.2 | 0.45 |
References | [ |
[ |
[ |
Effect of foaming agents on the compressive strength and density_
Foaming agent | Compressive strength and density | Ref. |
---|---|---|
H2O2 | Increasing H2O2 concentration from 1 to 3.5% in geopolymer foam leads to a decrease in compressive strength (44.81–3.2 MPa) and density (1,021–142 kg/m3) | [ |
Using 0.1–1% H2O2 reduces the compressive strength from 5.9 to 0.26 MPa and the apparent density from 1,100 to 230 kg/m3 | [ |
|
Al powder | The use of Al powder with increasing percentages of 0.01–0.15% reduces the compressive strength (42.0–4.6 MPa) and density (1,830–1,031 kg/m3) | [ |
1.5–5.0% of Al powder decreases the compressive strength from 4.35 to 0.9 MPa and density from 1,309 to 403 kg/m3 | [ |
Reference relationships among density, compressive strength, porosity, and thermal conductivity of geopolymer foam_
Precursor | FA | SA | Density (kg/m3) | Compressive strength (MPa) | Porosity (%) | Thermal conductivity (W/(m k)) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Metakaolin | H2O2 | Olive oil | 320–610 | 0.2–3.9 | 75–87 | 0.147 | [ |
Metakaolin | Na2O2 | SDBS | 300–460 | 0.6–1.6 | 72–81 | 0.085–0.115 | [ |
Fly ash | H2O2 | — | 240–340 | 0.60–0.38 | 79–81 | 0.09–0.07 | [ |
Metakaolin | H2O2 | — | 470–1,210 | 0.37–6.00 | 36–86 | 0.11–0.30 | [ |
FA, GGBS | SDS | RCA | 824–838 | 1.3–1.8 | 42–71 | 0.270–0.360 | [ |
Metakaolin | SLES | — | 690–1,060 | 4.7–14.8 | 56–72 | 0.197–0.364 | [ |
FA, POFA | Sika AER | — | 1,300–1,700 | 8–13 | 25–40 | 0.47–0.50 | [ |
FA | H2O2 | CSFS | 310–380 | 1.45–1.60 | 70–82 | 0.095–0.139 | [ |
FA | H2O2 | Calcium stearate | 150–240 | 0.45–0.75 | 88.94–91.94 | 0.0485–0.0594 | [ |
FA | H2O2 | Calcium stearate | 200–300 | 1.06–2.84 | 59–83 | 0.05223–0.0711 | [ |
HCFA | Natural protein | — | 844–2,100 | 2.7–57.8 | 2.82–49.42 | 0.13–1.62 | [ |
Metakaolin | H2O2 | Vegetable oil | 370–740 | 0.3–11.6 | 66–83 | 0.11–0.17 | [ |
Metakaolin | H2O2 | Tween 80 | 300–750 | 0.3–9.4 | 67–86 | 0.289–0.091 | [ |
Effect of agent material on the porosity of geopolymer foam_
Material agent | Effect on porosity | Ref. |
---|---|---|
Foaming agent | The addition of aluminum powder at concentrations of 0.07–0.2% increased porosity from 47.9 to 58.4%, while H2O2 at 0.5–2% enhanced porosity from 37.9 to 44.9% | [ |
Increasing the H2O2 concentration from 1 to 3.5% in geopolymer foam increased the porosity from 32.3 to 63.1% | [ |
|
Stabilizing agent | Tween 80 as a surfactant, with a concentration ranging from 1 to 5%, increased the porosity from 38 to 86% | [ |
Using olive oil as a stabilizing agent at concentrations ranging from 1.25 to 15% with the same H2O2 concentration reduced the porosity from 75.1 to 72.3% | [ |
|
Alkaline solution | Increased ratio of NaOH to Na2SiO3 enhanced the porosity from 55.6 to 66.3% while maintaining the same foaming agent concentration | [ |
Increasing the Na2O ratio from 4 to 7% in an alkaline solution increased the porosity of the structure from about 61.6 to 68% | [ |