[
[1] Berov B., Ivanov P., Dobrev N., Krastanov M., 2016. Addition to the method of Mora & Vahrson for landslide susceptibility along the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. 12th International Symposium on Landslides, Napoli, Italy, 12-19 June 2016, CRC Press, A Balkema book, vol. 2, 397–403. https://doi.org/10.1201/b21520-39
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[2] Berov B., Nikolova N., Ivanov P., Dobrev N., Krastanov M., Nankin R., 2020. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS: a case study along Bulgarian Black Sea coast. 8th International Conference on Cartography and GIS, 2020, Nessebar, Bulgaria, 1, 287–296.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[3] Blaikie P., Cannon T. Davis I., Wisner B., 1994. At risk. Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London, 496 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[4] Covello V.T., 1983. The perception of technological risks: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 23, 285–297.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[5] Covello V. T., Menkes J., Mumpower J. (eds.), 1984 Risk evaluation and management.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[6] Covello V.T., Mumpower J., 1985 Risk analysis and risk management: a historical
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[7] Fischhoff B., Kunreuther H., Slovic P. (eds.), 1996 Public values in risk research. In: Challenges in risk assessment and risk management. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. Special Issue. Thousand Oaks: Sage,75–84.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[8] Fischhoff B., Slovic P., Lichtenstein S., Read S., Combs B., 2000 How Safe Is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Toward Technological Risks and Benefits. In: The Perception of Risk, pp. 80-104. London: Earthscan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[9] Dobrev N., Ivanov P., Varbanov R., Frangov G., Berov B., Bruchev I., Krastanov M., Nankin R., 2013 Landslide problems in Bulgaria: factors, distribution and countermeasures. In: Landslide Science and Practice, 7, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31313-4_24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[10] ESPON 1.3.1. Hazards Project, 2004 The spatial effects and management of natural and technological hazards in general and in relation to climate change. Final Report, March 2004. 173 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[11] European Commission, 2021 Recommendations for National Risk Assessment for Disaster Risk Management in EU. JRC123585, EUR 30596 EN, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021, © European Union, 2021; doi:10.2760/43449; doi:10.2760/80545
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[12] Frantzova A., 2016. Risk mapping methodology for environmental hazards. Proceedings, 6 th International Conference on Cartography and GIS, 13-17 June 2016, Albena, Bulgaria, (Eds: Bandrova, T., Konecny, M.), 859–870.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[13] Frantsova A., 2017 Risk mapping methodology and classification for environmental hazards. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 120 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[14] Frantsova A., 2021 Comprehensive Methodology for Natural Disaster Risk Assessment. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, Language: English, 132 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[15] Frantzova А. Shopova D. Belev G., Orehova T., 2021 Risk assessment of hydro meteorological disaster for Primorsko municipality. Third Conference “Climate, atmosphere and water resources in the face of climate change”, Sofia, 14–15 October, 3/2021, 2021, 80–90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[16] IADB / GTZ, 2003 Comprehensive Risk management by Communities and Local Governments. Component III; Indicator and other disaster risk management instrument for communities and local governments. Inter-American Development bank for the Regional Policy Dialogue: Natural Disaster network – III meeting. Preliminary Draft. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH. Washington, D.C., 123 pp
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[17] IADB, 2005 Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management. Main Technical report. Program for Latin America and Caribbean. National University of Columbia– Manizales (Columbia), Institute of Environmental Studies. Washington D.C., 2005, 224 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[18] Ivanov P., Berov B., Dobrev N., Krastanov M., Frangov S., 2017. Principles for the assessment and mapping of integrated geological hazard in Bulgaria. Geologica Balcanica, 46, 2, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56958-6, 359 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[19] Ivanov P., Nankin R., Zaalishvili V., 2020. Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility and Hazard along the Northern Bulgarian Black Sea Coast. Proceeding of 1st International conference on Environmental protection and disaster RISKs, 29.09.2020 - 30.09.2020, Sofia, Bulgaria, Part Two, Az-buki National Publishing House, 2020, 392–404, https://doi.org/10.48365/envr-2020.1.36.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[20] Ivanov P., Dobrev N., Berov B., Frantzova A., Krastanov M., Nankin R., 2022. Landslide risk for the territory of Bulgaria by administrative districts. Geologica Balcanica, 51 (3), 21–28, https://doi.org/10.52321/GeolBalc.51.3.21.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[21] Jungermann H., Slovic P., 1993 Die Psychologie der Kognition und Evaluation von Risiko. In: Bechmann,G. (ed.): Risiko und Gesellschaft. Grundlagen und Ergebnisse interdisziplinärer Risikoforschung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 167–207. In: WBGU German Advisory Council on Global Change- WBGU. (1998). World in Transition: Strategies for Managing Global Environmental Risks, Annual Report 1998, Springer-Verlag, 359 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[22] Kahnemann D., Tversky A., 1974 Judgment under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science 185, 1124–1131. In: WBGU German Advisory Council on Global Change- WBGU. (1998). World in Transition: Strategies for Managing Global Environmental Risks, Annual Report 1998, Springer-Verlag, 359 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[23] Kahnemann D., Slovic P., Tversky A.,1982 Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[24] Kahneman D., Tversky A., 2000 Choices, values and frames. Cambridge University Press. Ch., 860 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[25] Konstantinov B., Angelov K., Lakov A., Stojnev S., Konstantinov V., 1992 Landslides activization from earthquake motions. Sixth International Symposium on Landslides (ISL 1992), 1181–1186.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[26] Lakov A., Stoynev S., Konstantinov B., 2002 Geodynamic hazard and geodynamic risk along the Bulgarian Black Sea coast. Proceedings of the 9th National Mine Surveying Conference with International Participation “Analysis, Modelling and Control of Geological Risk in Disturbed Territories”, 263–268 (in Bulgarian).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[27] Nankin R., Krastanov M., Ivanov P., 2022 Erosion of Coastal Slope in the Zelenka locality, Northern Black Sea coast of Bulgaria. Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology, 36, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.52321/igh.36.1.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[28] Renn O., 1992 Concepts of risk: a classification. In: Krimsky, S. and Golding,D. (eds.): Social theories of risk. Westport,CT., London: Praeger, 53–79.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[29] Renn O., 1997 Three decades of risk research: Accomplishments and new challenges. Journal of Risk Research, 11 (1), 49–71.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[30] Renn O., 1998 The role of risk perception for risk management. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 59, 49–61.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[31] Renn O., Burns W.J., Kasperson J.X., Kasperson R.E., Slovic P., 1992 The Social Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications, Journal of Social issues. Vol. 48. No. 4. pp. 137-160.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[32] Rohrmann B., 1995 Technological risks: perception, evaluation, communication. In: Mechlers, R. E. and Stewart, M. G. (eds.): Integrated risk assessment. Current practice and new directions. Rotterdam: Balkema, 7–12. In: In: WBGU (1998). World in Transition: Strategies for Managing Global Environmental Risks, Annual Report 1998, Springer-Verlag, 359 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[33] Slovic P. Fischoff B., Lichtenstein S., 1982 Facts versus fears: Understanding perceived risk. In: D. Kahnemann, P. Slovic and A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[34] Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S., 1985 Rating the risks: the structure of expert and lay perceptions. In: Covello, V.T., Mumpower, J. L., Stallen, P. J. M. and Uppuluri,V. R. R. (eds.): Environmental impact assessment, technology assessment, and risk analysis. Volume 4. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 131–156.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[35] Slovic P., Fischhoff B., Lichtenstein S., 1986 The psychometric study of risk perception. In: Covello, V. T., Menkes, J. and Mumpower, J. (eds.): Risk evaluation and management. New York, London: Plenum Press, 3–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[36] Slovic P., 2000 The perception of risk. London: Earthscan, 473 pp
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[37] UNISDR, 2002 Living with risk. A global Review of disaster reduction initiatives. With special support from the Government of Japan, World Meteorological Organization and Asian Disaster Reduction Center (Kobe, Japan). Printed by United Nation, Geneva, Switzerland, ISBN/ISSN/DOI 9211010640, 429 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[38] UNDP, 2004 Reducing Disaster Risk. A Challenge for Development. United Nations Development Programme, Bureau for Crisis and Recovery, SBN 92-1-126160-0, Geneva, 161 pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[39] WGBU (German Advisory Council on Global Change), 1998 World in Transition: Strategies for Managing Global Environmental Risks. Annual Report 1998, Springer-Verlag, ISBN 978-3-642-52377-9; DOI
]Search in Google Scholar
[
[40] Wisner B., 2000 The Political Economy of Hazards: More Limits to Growth? Environmental Hazards 20: 59-61.
]Search in Google Scholar
