1. bookVolume 20 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1647-659X
First Published
01 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Laws and Mechanisms in The Human Sciences

Published Online: 20 Aug 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 20 (2018) - Issue 1 (June 2018)
Page range: 64 - 88
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1647-659X
First Published
01 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

According to an influential epistemological tradition, science explains phenomena on the basis of laws, but the last two decades have witnessed a neo-mechanistic movement that emphasizes the fundamental role of mechanism-based explanations in science, which have the virtue of opening the “black box” of correlations and of providing a genuine understanding of the phenomena. Mechanisms enrich the empirical content of a theory by introducing a new set of variables, helping us to make causal inferences that are not possible on the basis of macro-level correlations (due to well-known problems regarding the underdetermination of causation by correlation). However, the appeal to mechanisms has also a methodological price. They are vulnerable to interference effects; they also face underdetermination problems, because the available evidence often allows different interpretations of the underlying structure of a correlation; they are strongly context-dependent and their individuation as causal patterns can be controversial; they present specific testability problems; finally, mechanism-based extrapolations can be misleading due to the local character of mechanisms. At any rate, the study of mechanisms is an indispensable part of the human sciences, and the problems that they raise can be controlled by quantitative and qualitative methods, and an epistemologically informed exercise of critical thinking.

Keywords

Andersen, H., 2012, The case for regularity in mechanistic causal explanation, Synthese, 189, 415–432.10.1007/s11229-011-9965-xSearch in Google Scholar

Bechtel, W., 2008, Mental Mechanisms, London, Routledge.10.4324/9780203810095Search in Google Scholar

Bechtel, W. and Wright, C., 2009. What is psychological explanation? In: J. Symons and P. Calvo (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology, London, Routledge, 113–130.10.4324/9780429244629-8Search in Google Scholar

Craver, C. and Darden, L., 2013, In Search of Mechanisms: Discoveries across the life sciences, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226039824.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Craver, C., 2007, Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience, Oxford, Clarendon Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299317.003.0007Search in Google Scholar

Craver, C. and Bechtel, W., 2007, Top-down causation without top-down causes, Biology and Philosophy, 22, 547–563.10.1007/s10539-006-9028-8Search in Google Scholar

Cartwright, N., 2002, Against modularity, the causal Markov Condition and any link between the two, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 53, 411–453.10.1093/bjps/53.3.411Search in Google Scholar

Crick, F., 1988, What Mad Pursuit, New York, Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Cummins, R., 2000, How does it work? versus what are the laws?: Two conceptions of psychological explanation. In: F. Keil and R. Wilson (eds.), Explanation and Cognition, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, 117–144.Search in Google Scholar

Davidson, D., 1980, Essays on Actions and Events, Oxford, Clarendon.Search in Google Scholar

Earman, J., Roberts, J. and Smith, S., 2002, Ceteris paribus lost, Erkenntnis, 57, 281–301.10.1023/A:1021526110200Search in Google Scholar

Elster, J., 2015, Explaining Social Behaviour: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107763111Search in Google Scholar

Elster, J., 1983a, Sour Grapes: Studies in the subversion of rationality, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press – Paris, Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.10.1017/CBO9781139171694Search in Google Scholar

Elster, J., 1983b, Explaining Technical Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Glennan, S., 2017, The New Mechanical Philosophy, Oxford, Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198779711.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Glennan, S., 2010, Ephemeral mechanisms and historical explanation, Erkenntnis, 72, 251–266.10.1007/s10670-009-9203-9Search in Google Scholar

Glennan, S., 2002, Rethinking mechanistic explanation, Philosophy of Science, 69, S342–S353.10.1086/341857Search in Google Scholar

Roux, S., 2018, From the mechanical philosophy to early modern mechanisms, in S. Glennann, and P. Illari, The Routledge Handbook of Mechanisms and Mechanical Philosophy, New York and London, Routledge, 26–45.10.4324/9781315731544-3Search in Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., 2009, What is analytical sociology all about? In: The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3–24.Search in Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R., 1998, Introduction. In: Social Mechanisms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1–32.10.1017/CBO9780511663901.001Search in Google Scholar

Hedström, P. and Udehn, L., 2009, Analytical sociology and theories of the middle range. In: P. Hedström and P. Bearman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 25–47.Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, C., 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation. New York, The Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Illari, P. and Williamson, J., 2012, What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences, European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2,119–135.10.1007/s13194-011-0038-2Search in Google Scholar

Kincaid, H., 1996, Philosophical Foundations of the Social Sciences, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Malinowski, B., 1935, Coral Gardens and Their Magic, New York, American Book Co.Search in Google Scholar

Norkus, Z., 2005, Mechanisms as miracle makers? The rise and inconsistencies of the “mechanismic approach” in social science and history, History and Theory, 44, 348–372.10.1111/j.1468-2303.2005.00329.xSearch in Google Scholar

Pietroski, P. and Rey, G., 1995. “When other things aren’t equal: saving ceteris paribus laws from vacuity”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 46, 81–110.10.1093/bjps/46.1.81Search in Google Scholar

Rasler, K. and Thompson, W., 2004, The democratic peace and a sequential, reciprocal, causal arrow hypothesis, Comparative Political Studies, 37, 879–908.10.1177/0010414004267980Search in Google Scholar

Risjord, M., 2014, Philosophy of Social Science, New York and London, Routledge.10.4324/9780203802540Search in Google Scholar

Rousseau, D., Gelpi, C, Reiter, D. and Huth, P. 1996, Assessing the dyadic nature of the democratic peace, 1918–88, The American Political Science Review, 90, 512–533.Search in Google Scholar

Russo, F., and Williamson, J., 2007, Interpreting causality in the health sciences, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 21, 157–170.10.1080/02698590701498084Search in Google Scholar

Steel, D., 2008, Across the Boundaries: Extrapolation in biology and social science, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Von Wright, G. H., 1971, Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Woodward, J., 2002, What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account, Philosophy of Science, 69, S366–S377.10.1086/341859Search in Google Scholar

Wright, C. and Bechtel, W., 2007, Mechanisms and psychological explanations. In: P. Thagard (ed.), Philosophy of Psychology and Cognitive Science, Amsterdam, Elsevier, 31–79.10.1016/B978-044451540-7/50019-0Search in Google Scholar

Zahle, J., 2016, Methodological holism in the social sciences. In: E. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at:<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/holism-social/>.10.1002/9781405165518.wbeos0738Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo