1. bookVolume 20 (2018): Issue 1 (June 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1647-659X
First Published
01 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Explanation by Idealized Theories

Published Online: 20 Aug 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 20 (2018) - Issue 1 (June 2018)
Page range: 43 - 63
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1647-659X
First Published
01 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The use of idealized scientific theories in explanations of empirical facts and regularities is problematic in two ways: they don’t satisfy the condition that the explanans is true, and they may fail to entail the explanandum. An attempt to deal with the latter problem was proposed by Hempel and Popper with their notion of approximate explanation. A more systematic perspective on idealized explanations was developed with the method of idealization and concretization by the Poznan school (Nowak, Krajewski) in the 1970s. If idealizational laws are treated as counterfactual conditionals, they can be true or truthlike, and the concretizations of such laws may increase their degree of truthlikeness. By replacing Hempel’s truth requirement with the condition that an explanatory theory is truthlike one can distinguish several important types of approximate, corrective, and contrastive explanations by idealized theories. The conclusions have important consequences for the debates about scientific realism and anti-realism.

Keywords

Bangu, Sorin (2015), “Why Does Water Boil? Fictions in Scientific Explanation”, in Uskali Mäki et al. (eds.), Recent Developments in Philosophy of Science, Springer, Cham, 319–330.10.1007/978-3-319-23015-3_24Search in Google Scholar

Batterman, Robert W. (2002), The Devil in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction, and Emergence, Oxford University Press, Oxford.10.1093/0195146476.003.0004Search in Google Scholar

Batterman, Robert W. and Rice, Collin C. (2014), “Minimal Model Explanations”, Philosophy of Science 81, 349–376.10.1086/676677Search in Google Scholar

Bokulich, Alisa (2011), “How Scientific Models Can Explain”, Synthese 180, 33–45.10.1007/s11229-009-9565-1Search in Google Scholar

Bokulich, Alisa (2012), “Distinguishing Explanatory from Nonexplanatory Fictions”, Philosophy of Science 79, 725–737.10.1086/667991Search in Google Scholar

Bokulich, Alisa (2017), “Models and Explanation”, in Lorenzo.Magnani and Tommaso Bertolotti (eds.), Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science, Springer, Dordrecht, 103–118.10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_4Search in Google Scholar

Brzezinski, Jerzy et al. (eds) (2007), The Courage of Doing Philosophy: Essays Presented to Leszek Nowak, Rodopi, Amsterdam.10.1163/9789401205368Search in Google Scholar

Cartwright, Nancy (1983), How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.10.1093/0198247044.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Cevolani, Gustavo, Crupi, Vicenzo & Festa, Roberto (2011), “Verisimilitude and Belief Change for Conjunctive Theories”, Erkenntnis 75, 183–202.10.1007/s10670-011-9290-2Search in Google Scholar

Craver, Carl E. (2006). “When Mechanistic Models Explain”. Synthese 153, 355–376.10.1007/s11229-006-9097-xSearch in Google Scholar

Duhem, Pierre (1954), The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton.10.1515/9780691233857Search in Google Scholar

Frigg, Roman, Bradley, Seamus, Machete, Reason & Smith, Leonard (2013), “Probabilistic Forecasting: Why Model Imperfection Is a Poison Pill”, in Hanne Andersen et al. (eds.), New Challenges to Philosophy of Science, Springer, Dordrecht, 479–491.10.1007/978-94-007-5845-2_39Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. (1965), Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Hempel, Carl G. (1966), Philosophy of Natural Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Search in Google Scholar

Hindriks, Frank (2008), “False Models as Explanatory Engines”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38, 334–360.10.1177/0048393108319414Search in Google Scholar

Hindriks, Frank (2013), “Explanation, Understanding, and Unrealistic Models”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 44, 523–531.10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Krajewski, Wladislaw (1977), Correspondence Principle and the Growth of Knowledge, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-010-1178-5Search in Google Scholar

Kuipers, Theo (2000), From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism, Kluwer, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-017-1618-5Search in Google Scholar

Lange, Marc (2015), “On ‘Minimal Model Explanations’: A Reply to Batterman and Rice”, Philosophy of Science 82, 292–305.10.1086/680488Search in Google Scholar

Liu, Chang (1999), “Approximation, Idealization, and Laws of Nature”, Synthese 118, 229–256.10.1023/A:1005186322310Search in Google Scholar

Mäki, Uskali (1994), “Isolation, Idealization and Truth in Economics”, in Bert Hamminga and Neil De Marchi (eds.), Idealization in Economics, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 147–168.Search in Google Scholar

Mäki, Uskali (2009), “MISSing the World: Models as Isolations and Credible Surrogate Systems”, Erkenntnis 70, 29–43.10.1007/s10670-008-9135-9Search in Google Scholar

McMullin, Ernan (1985), “Galilean Idealizations”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 16, 247–273.10.1016/0039-3681(85)90003-2Search in Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1987), Truthlikeness, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.10.1007/978-94-009-3739-0Search in Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, Ilkka. (1989), “Theories, Approximations, Idealizations”, in Jerzy Brzezinski et al. (eds.), Idealization I: General Problems, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 9–57.Search in Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, Ilkka (1999), Critical Scientific Realism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2002), “Truthlikeness and Economic Theories”, in Uskali Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism, and Social Construction, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 214–228,10.1017/CBO9780511493317.011Search in Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2005), “Abduction and Truthlikeness”, in Roberto Festa et al. (eds.), Confirmation, Empirical Progress, and Truth Approximation, Rodopi, Amsterdam, 255–275.Search in Google Scholar

Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2013), “Models, Simulations, and Analogical Inference”, in Vassilios Karakostas & Dennis Dieks (eds.), EPSA11 Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, Springer International, Cham, 19–27.10.1007/978-3-319-01306-0_2Search in Google Scholar

Nowak, Leszek (1971), “The Problem of Explanation in Karl Marx’s Capital”, Quality and Quantity 5, 311–330.10.1007/BF00218986Search in Google Scholar

Nowak, Leszek (1972), “Laws of Science, Theories, and Measurement”, Philosophy of Science 39, 533–548.10.1086/288479Search in Google Scholar

Nowak, Leszek (1980), The Structure of Idealization: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. (1931–35), Collected Papers 1–6, ed. by C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA: (CP)Search in Google Scholar

Popper, Karl R. (1972), Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Account, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Rohwer, Yasha & Rice, Collin (2013), “Hypothetical Pattern Idealization and Explanatory Models”, Philosophy of Science 80, 334–355.10.1086/671399Search in Google Scholar

Rudner, Richard (1966), Philosophy of Social Science, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.Search in Google Scholar

Rueger, Alexander & Sharp, W. David (1996), “Simple Theories of a Messy World: Truth and Explanatory Power in Nonlinear Dynamics”, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47, 93–112.10.1093/bjps/47.1.93Search in Google Scholar

Salmon, Wesley C. (1984), Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Search in Google Scholar

Sellars, Wilfrid (1963), Science, Perception, and Reality, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Search in Google Scholar

Shrader-Frechette, Kristin (1989), “Idealized Laws, Antirealism, and Applied Science: A Case in Hydrogeology”, Synthese 81, 329–351.10.1007/BF00869320Search in Google Scholar

Strevens, Michael (2008). Depth: An Account of Scientific Explanation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar

Tuomela, Raimo (1979), “Scientific Change and Approximation”, in Ilkka Niiniluoto & Raimo Tuomela (eds.), The Logic and Epistemology of Scientific Change, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 265–297.Search in Google Scholar

van Fraassen, Bas (1980), The Scientific Image, Clarendon Press, Oxford.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Wayne, Andrew (2011), “Expanding the Scope of Explanatory Idealization”, Philosophy of Science 78, 830–841.10.1086/662277Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, Michael (2007), “Three Kinds of Scientific Idealizations”, Journal of Philosophy 104, 639–659.10.5840/jphil20071041240Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, Michael (2013), “Getting Serious about Similarity”, Philosophy of Science 79, 785–794.10.1086/667845Search in Google Scholar

Winsberg, Eric (2010), Science in the Age of Computer Simulation, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.10.7208/chicago/9780226902050.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo