1. bookVolume 27 (2021): Issue 3 (June 2021)
Conference Details
License
Format
Conference
eISSN
2451-3113
First Published
15 Dec 2015
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

UAVs Support to Naval Operations

Published Online: 12 Jul 2021
Page range: 70 - 76
Conference Details
License
Format
Conference
eISSN
2451-3113
First Published
15 Dec 2015
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The paper proposes an analysis of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) features that enable them to support naval operations in general, but the focus drawn to the Black Sea basin peculiarities in particular. In the introductory part, the authors succinctly present the Black Sea basin’s physical and strategic characteristics. Then, follows a description of UAVs features and potential missions conducted by these types of robots. In the next section, the article presents the uninhabited aerial vehicle classification and system components. The last chapter analyses the efficiencies and vulnerabilities of these vehicles. The closing section gives some short conclusions regarding the suitability of using such assets to support naval operations and a few further research directions..

Keywords

[1] National Research Council, Autonomous Vehicles in Support of Naval Operations. Washington D C, The National Academies Press, ISBN 978-0-309-38616-6, 256 p., 2005. Search in Google Scholar

[2] B. Alkire, J. G. Kallimani, P. A. Wilson and L. R. Moore, Applications for navy unmanned aircraft systems, National Defense Research Institute, ISBN 978-0-8330-4965-0, 96 p., RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, USA, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[3] L. Fiori, A. Doshi, E. Martinez, M. Orams and B. Bollard-Breen, The Use of Unmanned Aerial Systems in Marine Mammal Research, Remote Sensing, Vol. 9, Is. 543, pp. 1 – 13, 2017.10.3390/rs9060543 Search in Google Scholar

[4] G. C. Rosa, M. M. Marques and V. Lobo, Unmanned aerial vehicles in the navy: its benefits, “Mircea cel Batran” Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, Vol. XIX, Iss. 1, pp. 39 – 43, 2016.10.21279/1454-864X-16-I1-007 Search in Google Scholar

[5] E. W. J. Bergsma, R. Almar, L. P. Melo de Almeida and M. Sall, On the operational use of UAVs for video-derived bathymetry, Coastal Engineering, Vol. 152, pp. 1 – 8, 103527, 2019.10.1016/j.coastaleng.2019.103527 Search in Google Scholar

[6] A. C. Watts, V. G. Ambrosia and E. A. Hinkley, Unmanned Aircraft Systems in remote sensing and scientific research: classification and considerations of use, Remote Sensing, Vol. 4, pp. 1671-1692, 2012. Search in Google Scholar

[7] A. Zanutta, A. Lambertini and L. Vittuari, UAV Photogrammetry and Ground Surveys as a Mapping Tool for Quickly Monitoring Shoreline and Beach Changes, Journal of Marine Sciences and Engineering, Vol. 8, Iss. 52, pp. 1 – 16, 2020.10.3390/jmse8010052 Search in Google Scholar

[8] R. S. Carapau, A. V. Rodrigues, M. M. Marques and V. Lobo, Unmanned aerial systems in military environments: the benefits of interoperability, “Mircea cel Batran” Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, Vol. XX, Iss. 1, pp. 43 – 47, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[9] G. Smith, Organization and Innovation, Naval War College Review, Vol. 70, No. 3, Art. 6, pp. 78-100, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[10] G. Wilkinson, Flying into the future, Navy News, Is. 787, pp. 19, 2020. Search in Google Scholar

[11] V. Novac, E. Rusu and G. Stăvărache, Black Sea naval accidents – intervention management, Mechanical Testing and Diagnosis, IX, Volume 2, pp. 11-14, 2019.10.35219/mtd.2019.2.02 Search in Google Scholar

[12] V. Novac and E. Rusu, Black Sea littoral military operations - environment impact, Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy, Vol. XXI, pp. 607-616, 2018.10.21279/1454-864X-18-I1-091 Search in Google Scholar

[13] V. Novac and E. Rusu, Black Sea oil spills – preventive and remedial actions, 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference – SGEM 2019, Conference Proceedings, Vol. 19, Iss. 3.1, pp. 683-690, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[14] V. Novac, E. Rusu and O. Cosma, UGVs support to naval operations, International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION, Conference Proceedings, Vol. XXVI, No. 3, pp. 152 – 157, 2020.10.2478/kbo-2020-0130 Search in Google Scholar

[15] V. Novac, E. Rusu and I. C. Scurtu, UUVs support to naval operations, Scientific Bulletin of Naval Academy, Vol. XXIII, pp. 47-54, 2020.10.21279/1454-864X-20-I1-007 Search in Google Scholar

[16] V. Novac, E. Rusu and I. C. Scurtu, Opportunities and risks related to offshore activities in the western Black Sea, Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, Vol. 20, No 4, pp. 1698–1707, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[17] V. Novac and E. Rusu, Air emission from ships – western Black Sea case study, 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference – SGEM 2019, Conference Proceedings, vol. 19, issue 4.1, pp 813-819, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

[18] V. Novac, L. Moraru, C. Gasparotti, and E. Rusu, Black sea marine litter pollution related to naval operations, E3S Web of Conferences, TE RE RD 2020 International Conference Proceedings, Vol. 180, 04018, pp. 1 – 7, 2020.10.1051/e3sconf/202018004018 Search in Google Scholar

[19] G. Răducanu and I. Cîrciu, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle future development trends, Review of the Air Force Academy, No. 3, 35, pp. 105-110, 2017.10.19062/1842-9238.2017.15.3.12 Search in Google Scholar

[20] A. V. Rodrigues, R. S. Carapau, M. M. Marques and V. Lobo, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: system architecture and protocols, “Mircea cel Batran” Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, Vol. XX, Iss. 1, pp. 113 – 116, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

[21] E. Rusu and D. Butunoiu, Prediction of the extreme storms in the Black Sea with numerical wave models, Proceedings of 16th International Congress of the International Maritime Association of the Mediterranean, Vol. 2015, pp.845-851, Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-1-138-02887-6, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[22] E. Rusu, F. Onea and R. Toderascu, Dynamics of the environmental matrix in the Black Sea as reflected by recent measurements and simulations with numerical models, Chapter 3 in The Black Sea: Dynamics, Ecology and Conservation, pp. 1 – 34, ISBN: 978-1-61122-855-7, Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2011. Search in Google Scholar

[23] L. Rusu, D. Butunoiu and E. Rusu, Analysis of the Extreme Storm Events in the Black Sea Considering the Results of a Ten-year Wave Hindcast, Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, Vol. 15, No 2, pp. 445–454, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[24] J. D. Stevenson, S. O’Young and L. Rolland, Estimated levels of safety for small unmanned aerial vehicles and risk mitigation strategies, Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems, Vol. 3, pp. 205–221, 2015.10.1139/juvs-2014-0016 Search in Google Scholar

[25] S. Pop, A. Luchian, R. G. Zmădu and E. Olea, The evolution of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Review of the Air Force Academy, No.3 (35), pp. 125 - 132, 2017.10.19062/1842-9238.2017.15.3.15 Search in Google Scholar

[26] E. Stanev, Understanding Black Sea Oceanography, An Overview of Recent Numerical Modeling, Oceanography, Vol.18, No.2, pp. 56-75, 2005.10.5670/oceanog.2005.42 Search in Google Scholar

[27] A. Kara, A. J. Wallcraft and H. E. Hurlburt, Sea Surface Temperature Sensitivity to Water Turbidity from Simulations of the Turbid Black Sea Using HYCOM, Journal of physical oceanography, Volume 35, pp. 33-54, 2005.10.1175/JPO-2656.1 Search in Google Scholar

[28] A. Kara, A. J. Wallcraft and H. E. Hurlburt, A New Solar Radiation Penetration Scheme for Use in Ocean Mixed Layer Studies: An Application to the Black Sea Using a Fine-Resolution Hybrid Coordinate Ocean Model (HYCOM), Journal of physical oceanography, Volume 35, pp. 13-32, 2005.10.1175/JPO2677.1 Search in Google Scholar

[29] J. Bronk, The US Navy’s MQ-25 Unmanned Tanker Will Shape the Future of Airpower, RUSI Newsbrief, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 1-3, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. G. Dalton, Future Navies—Present Issues, Naval War College Review, Vol. 59, pp. 15-39, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. la Cour-Harbo, Quantifying Risk of Ground Impact Fatalities for Small Unmanned Aircraft, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, Vol. 93, pp. 367-384, 2019.10.1007/s10846-018-0853-1 Search in Google Scholar

[32] R. Louali, A. Elouardi, S. Bouaziz and M. S. Djouadi, Experimental Approach for Evaluating an UAV COTS-Based Embedded Sensors System, Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, Vol. 83, pp. 289–313, 2016.10.1007/s10846-015-0323-y Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo