1. bookVolume 6 (2018): Issue 1 (January 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
06 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

Investigating Metacognitive Strategies for overcoming Barriers to Reading Comprehension: Insights from a Pakistani Context

Published Online: 18 Sep 2018
Page range: 37 - 52
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
06 Mar 2015
Publication timeframe
3 times per year
Languages
English
Copyright
© 2020 Sciendo

The main aim of this research was to investigate metacognitive strategies through reading comprehension practice by first year students of engineering departments. The students of four engineering departments were selected as the participants in this research work. The qualitative instrument based on focus group interview was used for collecting data from first year students of four engineering departments to know the perceptions and their needs to develop reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. The researchers developed interview questions for this study. These questions were validated by two experts of faculty of cognitive science and human development at university Malaysia Sarawak. The researchers obtained permission from the chairmen of four departments at a university in Pakistan. Almost 8 groups consisting of 5 informants in each participated in this research. The data was documented by using audio-tape; NVivo software, version 8 was used to organize data for obtaining main themes of the study. This research generated the most important themes for the interpretation of the results. The study contributed the most promising results which revealed that more than half of these groups used metacognitive strategies in classroom reading practice while less than half of groups did not use strategies and remained poor in reading comprehension. This research suggested administrators, teachers, and curriculum designers to design and implement reading comprehension courses and syllabus for first year engineering students.

Keywords

Ballou, A.K. (2012). Using explicit strategy instruction to improve reading comprehension. Education Masters, Paper 221.Search in Google Scholar

Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. Reading Teacher, 61(1), 70-77, doi: 10.1598/RT.61.1.7Search in Google Scholar

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In Weinert, F. & Kluwe, R. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Channa, M. A., Nordin, Z. S., Insaf Ali Siming, Ali AsgherChandio, & Mansoor Ali Koondher (2015). Developing reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies: A review of previous studies. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 181- 186, doi:10.5539/elt.v8n8p181.Search in Google Scholar

Channa, M. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2015). Social cognitive theory and the zone of proximal development in the learning of reading comprehension. Sci. Int.(Lahore), 27(1), 581-585.Search in Google Scholar

Channa, M. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2014). Identifying metacognitive strategies through learners’ reading comprehension: a review of related studies. Sci.Int.(Lahore), 26(5), 2457-2460.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. NY: Addison Wesley Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Commander, N. E., & Stanwyck, D. J. (1997). Illusion of knowing in adult readers: Effects of reading skills and passage length, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 39-52, doi:10.1006/ceps.1997.0925Search in Google Scholar

Demetriou, A. (2000), Organization and development of self-understanding & selfregulation: towards a general theory. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds), Handbook of Self-Regulation. London Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10),906-911, doi:10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906Search in Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In Dickson, W. P. (Ed.), Children's oralcommunication skills (pp. 35-60). New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In Weinert, F. E. & Kluwe, R. H. (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21-29). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-mind development: Retrospect and prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50, 274-290.Search in Google Scholar

Franco-Castillo, I. (2013). The relationship between scaffolding metacognitive strategies identified through dialogue journals and second graders’ reading comprehension, science achievement, and metacognition using expository text. FIU, Electronic Theses and Dissertations, Paper 1014.Search in Google Scholar

Hammadou, J. (1991). Interrelationship among prior knowledge, inference, and language proficiency in foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 75(1), 27-38.Search in Google Scholar

Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Huff, J. D., & Nietfeld, J. L. (2009). Using strategy instruction and confidence judgments to improve metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and Learning, 4(2), 161-176, doi: 10.1007/s11409-009-9042-8Search in Google Scholar

Kramarski, B. & Mevarech, Z. R. (2003). Enhancing mathematical reasoning in the classroom: The effects of cooperative learning and metacognitive training. American Educational Research Journal, 40(1), 281-310, doi: 10.3102/00028312040001281Search in Google Scholar

Koch, A. (2001). Training in metacognition and comprehension of physics texts. Science Education, 85, 758-768, doi: 10.1002/sce.1037Search in Google Scholar

Koutselini, Μ. & Theofilides, C. (2001). Inquiry and Cooperation. Athens: Grigoris Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, D. (2000). Metacognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(5), 178-181, doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00088Search in Google Scholar

Maki, R. (1998). Test predictions over test material. In Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J. & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117- 144). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Maki, R. H., & McGuire, M. J. (2002). Metacognition for text: Findings and implications for education. In Perfect, T. J. & Schwartz, B. L. (Eds.), Appliedmetacognition (pp. 39-67). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mevarech, Z. R., & Amrany, C. (2008). Immediate and delayed effects of metacognitive instruction on regulation of cognition and mathematics achievement. Metacognition Learning, 3(2), 147-157, doi: 10.1007/s11409- 008-9023-3Search in Google Scholar

Otani, H., & Widner, R. L. (2005). Metacognition: New issues and approaches. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 329-334, doi: 10.3200/GENP.132.4.329-334Search in Google Scholar

Palinscar, A., & Brown, A. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.Search in Google Scholar

Salataci, R. &Akyel, A. (2002). Strategy training in L1 and L2 reading, Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 1-17.Search in Google Scholar

Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475, doi: 10.1006/ceps.1994.1033Search in Google Scholar

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139, doi: 10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8Search in Google Scholar

Schwartz, B. L., & Perfect, T. J. (2002). Introduction: Toward an applied metacognition. In Perfect, T. J. & Schwartz, B. L. (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 1-11). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Shah P. M., Yusof, A., Lip, S. M., Mahmood, N., Hamid Y. E. A., & Hashim, S. M. (2010). Comparing reading processing strategies of second language readers. American Journal of Applied Science, 7, 140-144.Search in Google Scholar

Sinthopruangchai, S. (2011). A study of Thai EFL learners’ Metacognition Awareness of reading strategies. (Master Research Paper Unpublished). Language Institute, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand.Search in Google Scholar

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Tarricone, P. (2011). The taxonomy of metacognition. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wei, Y. (2005). The relationship between phonological awareness and reading ability of Thai students in English and Thai primary schools of Thailand. Curriculum and Instruction, Theses and Dissertations, UM Theses and Dissertations, (UMI No. 3175161), ProQuest Information and Learning: Collage Park, MD.Search in Google Scholar

Young, A. & Fry, J. D. (2008). Metacognitive awareness and academic achievement in college students. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(2), 1-10.Search in Google Scholar

Zelazo, P. D. (2004). The development of conscious control in childhood. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(1), 12-17.Search in Google Scholar

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo