About this article
Published Online: Dec 29, 2023
Page range: 35 - 44
Received: Sep 01, 2023
Accepted: Nov 01, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/johr-2023-0033
Keywords
© 2023 Waldemar Treder et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Pearson correlation coefficients between daily evapotranspiration (ETo) and meteorological data
SR | Tavg | Tmax | RH | U2 | Ra | VPD | #D | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETo | 0.94 | 0.66 | 0.72 | −0.69 | 0.05 | 0.62 | 0.82 | −0.41 |
Statistical analysis of the performance of the RT, BRT, RF, and ANN models in estimating daily ETo with two different meteorological input datasets
Model | Radiation | R2 | Slope | MSE | RMSE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Regression trees | + | 0.911 | 0.911 | 0.108 | 0.329 |
− | 0.813 | 0.813 | 0.228 | 0.478 | |
Boosted trees | + | 0.942 | 0.931 | 0.073 | 0.269 |
− | 0.834 | 0.825 | 0.205 | 0.453 | |
Random forests | + | 0.952 | 0.895 | 0.066 | 0.256 |
− | 0.841 | 0.799 | 0.207 | 0.455 | |
Artificial neural networks | + | 0.963 | 0.947 | 0.023 | 0.152 |
− | 0.870 | 0.843 | 0.082 | 0.286 |