Screening sesame (Sesamum indicum ) for resistance to multiple root-knot nematode species (Meloidogyne spp.)
Article Category: Research Paper
Published Online: Apr 12, 2025
Received: Jul 15, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jofnem-2025-0017
Keywords
© 2025 Marcela Chávez et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Root-knot nematodes (
Historically, RKN management has been achieved with chemical nematicides, yet the extensive use of these chemicals poses a potential hazard to the environment and human health, which has led to a decline or ban of many products (Noling & Becker, 1994; Perry & Moens, 2011). Therefore, development and implementation of economically feasible and environmentally safe alternatives is needed (Fernández et al., 2001; Noling & Becker, 1994). Crop rotation systems may introduce resistant or poor hosts that may either inhibit pathogen growth through failing to meet the nutritional needs of the pathogen, producing toxic compounds detrimental to the pathogen, or supporting antagonistic microbial communities in the rhizosphere (Rodriguez-Kabana & Canullo, 1992; Travedi & Barker, 1986). The magnitude of nematode control attained through crop rotation will vary with the year, cultivar, and resistance of the plant species, associated weed hosts, environmental conditions, and the length of the rotation (Travedi & Barker, 1986).
The introduction of sesame (
There is a need and interest to explore other suitable areas for sesame production, particularly the southeast United States due to its warm, long growing season and greater annual precipitation compared to the Southwest (Couch et al., 2017; Gloaguen et al., 2018). Nematode management is critical in North Carolina (NC), where major crops such as sweetpotato (
With the introduction of sesame into North Carolina’s agronomic rotations, it is necessary to evaluate the crop’s potential to suppress nematode populations utilizing the cultivars proposed for this region. The objectives of this study were to evaluate sesame resistance to
Nematode resistance trials were conducted at the North Carolina State University Method Road Greenhouse Complex, in Raleigh, NC. Seven commercially available sesame cultivars (Table 1) were screened for resistance to four RKN species) including
Sesame cultivars screened for resistance to
Equinomx | ES103 |
Equinom | ES107 |
Equinom | ES108 |
Sesacoy | S39 |
Sesaco | S3301 |
Sesaco | S3251 |
Sesaco | S3276 |
Equinom Ltd. (Givat Brenner, Israel).
Sesaco Corporation (Austin TX, USA).
Thirty DAP, containers were inoculated with 1,000 RKN eggs by pipetting the egg solution into a 1.5 cm deep hole made into the soil at the base of each plant, which allowed the sesame plant to develop its root system. Eggs were collected from the four RKN species individually from cultures maintained on ‘Rutgers’ tomato following the NaOCl extraction method described by Hussey and Barker (1973). Species identity of each RKN isolate is confirmed yearly through species-specific PCR primers and conducting the North Carolina Differential Host Test. To produce the initial inoculum, roots from each infected tomato were soaked in a 10% bleach solution for 40 seconds, gently massaging egg masses from the roots. The solution was then poured through a set of sieves (from top to bottom, 250 μm, 75 μm, 25 μm) and rinsed with water to remove residual bleach from the eggs. Eggs were rinsed to the bottom 25 μm sieve with water, then collected in a 50 mL centrifuge tube to a final volume of 35 mL with water. To ensure a clean sample to aid in rapid counting of inoculum density, a sucrose centrifugation step was included. Each tube was topped to 50 mL with a 70% sucrose solution and centrifuged at 400

Plants were assessed for root gall severity following a 0–10 scale adapted from Zeck (1971). (a) example of a root gall severity score of 0 in a sesame root system and (b) root gall severity score of 5 in a ‘Rutgers’ tomato root system.
Sixty days post inoculation, the sesame and tomato control plants were cut at the crown to separate the roots. Each root system was rinsed with cold water to remove soil and fresh root weight was recorded. The trial was conducted twice and arranged in a complete randomized design with six replicate plants per cultivar × RKN species combination per trial. Four plants from each treatment group were given a visual root gall severity score based on the percentage of the root system galled using a scale of 0–10, with 0 representing 0% root galling, 6 representing 50% and 10 representing 100% (Zeck, 1971; Figure 1). RKN eggs were extracted from the same four individual root systems using the NaOCl method as described above. Three 1 mL subsamples were taken from each sample to quantify egg count. The average of these three subsamples was multiplied by the final extraction volume to estimate the total number of eggs per root system (final population, Pf).
Reproductive factor (RF) was calculated for each sample using a ratio of the final population (Pf) and the initial population (Pi; herein, 1,000). Reproductive factor values were used to determine the susceptibility or resistance of the sesame cultivars to the RKN species. An RF value less than 1.0 indicates a poor host or non-host resistance, while values greater than 1.0 indicate susceptibility (Ferris et al., 1993). An RF value equal to one indicates a maintenance host, in which the population of nematodes is neither increasing nor decreasing.
Data from both trials were combined, and the trial was treated as a random effect. The effect of sesame cultivar was treated as fixed and results for each RKN species analyzed separately. Data were analyzed using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and inspected for any violations against the assumptions of ANOVA. No violations (e.g., heteroskedasticity) were observed and thus the data were analyzed without transformation or the use of alternative distributions. When appropriate, Tukey’s HSD means separation test was employed at a significance of α = 0.05.
There were significant differences in visual gall severity rating between all sesame cultivars and the tomato control (Table 2;
Visual root gall severity scores for sesame cultivars inoculated with 1,000 nematode eggs sixty days after inoculation. Values in the table are the mean of eight replicate plants. Root gall severity was rated on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = no root galling, 6 = approximately 50% of the root system galled, and 10 = 100% of the root system galled (adapted from Zeck 1971).
ES103 | 0.4 b | 0.6 bZ | 0.0 b | 0.0 b |
ES107 | 0.1 b | 1.0 b | 0.0 b | 0.0 b |
ES108 | 1.0 b | 0.7 b | 0.0 b | 0.1 b |
S39 | 0.1 b | 0.8 b | 0.0 b | 0.0 b |
S3276 | 0.4 b | 0.9 b | 0.1 b | 0.0 b |
S3251 | 0.6 b | 0.3 b | 0.0 b | 0.0 b |
S3301 | 0.7 b | 1.4 b | 0.0 b | 0.1 b |
Tomato cv. ‘Rutgers’ | 2.6 a | 6.3 a | 2.0 a | 5.0 a |
<0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Means sharing a common letter within the column are not significantly different (
There were significant differences in RF among sesame cultivars inoculated with
Reproductive factor for sesame cultivars inoculated with 1,000 nematode eggs. Values in the table are the mean of eight replicate plants.
ES103 | 0.68 | 0.15 aZ | 0.12 a | 0.04 a |
S3301 | 1.01 | 0.43 ab | 0.12 a | 0.23 a |
ES107 | 0.31 | 0.47 ab | 1.05 a | 0.03 a |
ES108 | 0.81 | 0.16 ab | 0.07 a | 0.13 a |
S3276 | 1.28 | 0.71 bc | 0.69 a | 0.08 a |
S3251 | 0.44 | 0.75 bc | 0.04 a | 0.20 a |
S39 | 1.13 | 1.63 c | 0.18 a | 0.04 a |
Tomato cv. ‘Rutgers’ | 3.96 | 6.74 d | 3.72 b | 27.50 b |
0.0649 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Means sharing a common letter within species are not significantly different (
Reproductive factor (RF) is the final nematode population divided by the initial population (herein, 1,000), evaluated at 60 days after inoculation. RF values < 1 indicate a poor host or non-host resistance, while values > 1 indicate susceptibility.
The results obtained in this study are comparable to those found in the literature, where sesame has been shown to suppress and lower RKN populations (Araya & Caswell-Chen, 1994; El-Nagdi & Youssef, 2015; Starr & Black, 1995). Starr and Black (1995) tested 10 sesame varieties in a pot experiment and found no reproduction of