This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A reintroduction to our Knowledge Graph and knowledge panels. (2020). https://blog.google/products/search/about-knowledge-graph-and-knoswledge-panels/A reintroduction to our Knowledge Graph and knowledge panels2020https://blog.google/products/search/about-knowledge-graph-and-knoswledge-panels/Search in Google Scholar
Ammar, W., Peters, M.E., Bhagavatula, C., & Power, R. (2017). The AI2 system at SemEval-2017 Task 10 (ScienceIE): Semi-supervised end-to-end entity and relation extraction. SemEval@ACL.AmmarW.PetersM.E.BhagavatulaC.PowerR.2017The AI2 system at SemEval-2017 Task 10 (ScienceIE): Semi-supervised end-to-end entity and relation extractionSemEval@ACL10.18653/v1/S17-2097Search in Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Poblet, M., Unsworth, K., Wang, J., Evans, B., Devaraju, A., Hausstein, B., Klas, C.-P., Zapilko, B., & Kaplun, S. (2018). A Research Graph dataset for connecting research data repositories using RD-Switchboard. Scientific Data, 5, 180099.AryaniA.PobletM.UnsworthK.WangJ.EvansB.DevarajuA.HaussteinB.KlasC.-P.ZapilkoB.KaplunS.2018A Research Graph dataset for connecting research data repositories using RD-SwitchboardScientific Data518009910.1038/sdata.2018.99597267429809172Search in Google Scholar
Auer, S. (2018). Towards an Open Research Knowledge Graph (Version 1) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1157185AuerS.2018Towards an Open Research Knowledge Graph (Version 1) [Computer software]Zenodohttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1157185Search in Google Scholar
Augenstein, I., Das, M., Riedel, S., Vikraman, L., & McCallum, A. (2017). SemEval 2017 Task 10: ScienceIE—Extracting Keyphrases and Relations from Scientific Publications. SemEval@ACL.AugensteinI.DasM.RiedelS.VikramanL.McCallumA.2017SemEval 2017 Task 10: ScienceIE—Extracting Keyphrases and Relations from Scientific PublicationsSemEval@ACL10.18653/v1/S17-2091Search in Google Scholar
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386.BaasJ.SchottenM.PlumeA.CôtéG.KarimiR.2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studiesQuantitative Science Studies1137738610.1162/qss_a_00019Search in Google Scholar
Beltagy, I., Lo, K., & Cohan, A. (2019). SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific text. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), 3606–3611.BeltagyI.LoK.CohanA.2019SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific textProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)3606361110.18653/v1/D19-1371Search in Google Scholar
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D.A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376.BirkleC.PendleburyD.A.SchnellJ.AdamsJ.2020Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activityQuantitative Science Studies1136337610.1162/qss_a_00018Search in Google Scholar
Brack, A., D’Souza, J., Hoppe, A., Auer, S., & Ewerth, R. (2020). Domain-independent extraction of scientific concepts from research articles. European Conference on Information Retrieval, 251–266.BrackA.D’SouzaJ.HoppeA.AuerS.EwerthR.2020Domain-independent extraction of scientific concepts from research articlesEuropean Conference on Information Retrieval25126610.1007/978-3-030-45439-5_17Search in Google Scholar
Burton, A., Koers, H., Manghi, P., La Bruzzo, S., Aryani, A., Diepenbroek, M., & Schindler, U. (2017). The data-literature interlinking service: Towards a common infrastructure for sharing data-article links. Program: electronic library and information systems, 51(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-06-2016-0048BurtonA.KoersH.ManghiP.La BruzzoS.AryaniA.DiepenbroekM.SchindlerU.2017The data-literature interlinking service: Towards a common infrastructure for sharing data-article linksProgram: electronic library and information systems51175100https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-06-2016-004810.1108/PROG-06-2016-0048Search in Google Scholar
Buscaldi, D., Dessì, D., Motta, E., Osborne, F., & Reforgiato Recupero, D. (2019). Mining scholarly data for fine-grained knowledge graph construction. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2377, 21–30.BuscaldiD.DessìD.MottaE.OsborneF.Reforgiato RecuperoD.2019Mining scholarly data for fine-grained knowledge graph constructionCEUR Workshop Proceedings23772130Search in Google Scholar
Camacho-Collados, J., & Pilehvar, M.T. (2017). On the role of text preprocessing in neural network architectures: An evaluation study on text categorization and sentiment analysis. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1707.01780.Camacho-ColladosJ.PilehvarM.T.2017On the role of text preprocessing in neural network architectures: An evaluation study on text categorization and sentiment analysisArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1707.01780.Search in Google Scholar
Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. ArXiv:1406.1078.ChoK.Van MerriënboerB.GulcehreC.BahdanauD.BougaresF.SchwenkH.BengioY.2014Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translationArXiv:1406.1078.Search in Google Scholar
Cimiano, P., Mädche, A., Staab, S., & Völker, J. (2009). Ontology learning. In Handbook on ontologies (pp. 245–267). Springer.CimianoP.MädcheA.StaabS.VölkerJ.2009Ontology learningInHandbook on ontologies245267Springer10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_11Search in Google Scholar
Constantin, A., Peroni, S., Pettifer, S., Shotton, D., & Vitali, F. (2016). The document components ontology (DoCO). Semantic Web, 7(2), 167–181.ConstantinA.PeroniS.PettiferS.ShottonD.VitaliF.2016The document components ontology (DoCO)Semantic Web7216718110.3233/SW-150177Search in Google Scholar
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. ArXiv:1810.04805.DevlinJ.ChangM.-W.LeeK.ToutanovaK.2018Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understandingArXiv:1810.04805.Search in Google Scholar
D’Souza, J., & Auer, S. (2020). NLPContributions: An Annotation Scheme for Machine Reading of Scholarly Contributions in Natural Language Processing Literature. In C. Zhang, P. Mayr, W. Lu, & Y. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents co-located with the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, EEKE@JCDL 2020, Virtual Event, China, August 1st, 2020 (Vol. 2658, pp. 16–27). CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2658/paper2.pdfD’SouzaJ.AuerS.2020NLPContributions: An Annotation Scheme for Machine Reading of Scholarly Contributions in Natural Language Processing LiteratureInZhangC.MayrP.LuW.ZhangY.(Eds.),Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents co-located with the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, EEKE@JCDL 2020, Virtual EventChinaAugust 1st, 202026581627CEUR-WS.orghttp://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2658/paper2.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
D’Souza, J., Hoppe, A., Brack, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Auer, S., & Ewerth, R. (2020). The STEM-ECR Dataset: Grounding Scientific Entity References in STEM Scholarly Content to Authoritative Encyclopedic and Lexicographic Sources. LREC, 2192–2203.D’SouzaJ.HoppeA.BrackA.JaradehM.Y.AuerS.EwerthR.2020The STEM-ECR Dataset: Grounding Scientific Entity References in STEM Scholarly Content to Authoritative Encyclopedic and Lexicographic SourcesLREC21922203Search in Google Scholar
Esteves, D., Moussallem, D., Neto, C.B., Soru, T., Usbeck, R., Ackermann, M., & Lehmann, J. (2015). MEX vocabulary: A lightweight interchange format for machine learning experiments. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Systems, 169–176.EstevesD.MoussallemD.NetoC.B.SoruT.UsbeckR.AckermannM.LehmannJ.2015MEX vocabulary: A lightweight interchange format for machine learning experimentsProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Systems16917610.1145/2814864.2814883Search in Google Scholar
Fisas, B., Ronzano, F., & Saggion, H. (2016). A Multi-Layered Annotated Corpus of Scientific Papers. LREC.FisasB.RonzanoF.SaggionH.2016A Multi-Layered Annotated Corpus of Scientific PapersLRECSearch in Google Scholar
Fricke, S. (2018). Semantic scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(1), 145.FrickeS.2018Semantic scholarJournal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA106114510.5195/jmla.2018.280Search in Google Scholar
Ghaddar, A., & Langlais, P. (2018). Robust lexical features for improved neural network named-entity recognition. ArXiv:1806.03489.GhaddarA.LanglaisP.2018Robust lexical features for improved neural network named-entity recognitionArXiv:1806.03489.Search in Google Scholar
GROBID. (2008). GitHub. https://github.com/kermitt2/grobidGROBID2008GitHubhttps://github.com/kermitt2/grobidSearch in Google Scholar
Handschuh, S., & QasemiZadeh, B. (2014). The ACL RD-TEC: a dataset for benchmarking terminology extraction and classification in computational linguistics. COLING 2014: 4th International Workshop on Computational Terminology.HandschuhS.QasemiZadehB.2014The ACL RD-TEC: a dataset for benchmarking terminology extraction and classification in computational linguisticsCOLING 2014: 4th International Workshop on Computational TerminologySearch in Google Scholar
Hendricks, G., Tkaczyk, D., Lin, J., & Feeney, P. (2020). Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 414–427.HendricksG.TkaczykD.LinJ.FeeneyP.2020Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadataQuantitative Science Studies1141442710.1162/qss_a_00022Search in Google Scholar
Huth, E.J. (1987). Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials. American College of Physicians.HuthE.J.1987Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trialsAmerican College of Physicians10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-6263826962Search in Google Scholar
Jaradeh, M.Y., Oelen, A., Farfar, K.E., Prinz, M., D’Souza, J., Kismihók, G., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2019). Open Research Knowledge Graph: Next Generation Infrastructure for Semantic Scholarly Knowledge. KCAP, 243–246.JaradehM.Y.OelenA.FarfarK.E.PrinzM.D’SouzaJ.KismihókG.StockerM.AuerS.2019Open Research Knowledge Graph: Next Generation Infrastructure for Semantic Scholarly KnowledgeKCAP24324610.1145/3360901.3364435Search in Google Scholar
Jiang, M., D’Souza, J., Auer, S., & Downie, J.S. (2020). Targeting Precision: A Hybrid Scientific Relation Extraction Pipeline for Improved Scholarly Knowledge Organization. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1).JiangM.D’SouzaJ.AuerS.DownieJ.S.2020Targeting Precision: A Hybrid Scientific Relation Extraction Pipeline for Improved Scholarly Knowledge OrganizationProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology57110.1002/pra2.303Search in Google Scholar
Jinha, A.E. (2010). Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing, 23(3), 258–263.JinhaA.E.2010Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existenceLearned Publishing23325826310.1087/20100308Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM report. An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing. 5th Edition October.JohnsonR.WatkinsonA.MabeM.2018The STM report. An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing5th EditionOctoberSearch in Google Scholar
Kononova, O., Huo, H., He, T., Rong, Z., Botari, T., Sun, W., Tshitoyan, V., & Ceder, G. (2019). Text-mined dataset of inorganic materials synthesis recipes. Scientific Data, 6(1), 1–11.KononovaO.HuoH.HeT.RongZ.BotariT.SunW.TshitoyanV.CederG.2019Text-mined dataset of inorganic materials synthesis recipesScientific Data6111110.1038/s41597-019-0224-1679427931615989Search in Google Scholar
Kulkarni, C., Xu, W., Ritter, A., & Machiraju, R. (2018). An Annotated Corpus for Machine Reading of Instructions in Wet Lab Protocols. NAACL: HLT, Volume 2 (Short Papers), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2016KulkarniC.XuW.RitterA.MachirajuR.2018An Annotated Corpus for Machine Reading of Instructions in Wet Lab ProtocolsNAACL: HLT, Volume 2 (Short Papers),97106https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-201610.18653/v1/N18-2016Search in Google Scholar
Kuniyoshi, F., Makino, K., Ozawa, J., & Miwa, M. (2020). Annotating and Extracting Synthesis Process of All-Solid-State Batteries from Scientific Literature. LREC, 1941–1950.KuniyoshiF.MakinoK.OzawaJ.MiwaM.2020Annotating and Extracting Synthesis Process of All-Solid-State Batteries from Scientific LiteratureLREC19411950Search in Google Scholar
Lample, G., Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., Kawakami, K., & Dyer, C. (2016). Neural architectures for named entity recognition. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1603.01360.LampleG.BallesterosM.SubramanianS.KawakamiK.DyerC.2016Neural architectures for named entity recognitionArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1603.01360.Search in Google Scholar
Landhuis, E. (2016). Scientific literature: Information overload. Nature, 535(7612), 457–458.LandhuisE.2016Scientific literature: Information overloadNature535761245745810.1038/nj7612-457a27453968Search in Google Scholar
Liakata, M., Saha, S., Dobnik, S., Batchelor, C., & Rebholz-Schuhmann, D. (2012). Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applications. Bioinformatics, 28(7), 991–1000.LiakataM.SahaS.DobnikS.BatchelorC.Rebholz-SchuhmannD.2012Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applicationsBioinformatics287991100010.1093/bioinformatics/bts071331572122321698Search in Google Scholar
Liakata, M., Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Batchelor, C.R. (2010). Corpora for the Conceptualisation and Zoning of Scientific Papers. LREC.LiakataM.TeufelS.SiddharthanA.BatchelorC.R.2010Corpora for the Conceptualisation and Zoning of Scientific PapersLRECSearch in Google Scholar
Lin, D.K., & Pantel, P. (2002). Concept discovery from text. COLING 2002: The 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.LinD.K.PantelP.2002Concept discovery from textCOLING 2002: The 19th International Conference on Computational LinguisticsSearch in Google Scholar
Luan, Y., He, L., Ostendorf, M., & Hajishirzi, H. (2018). Multi-Task Identification of Entities, Relations, and Coreference for Scientific Knowledge Graph Construction. EMNLP.LuanY.HeL.OstendorfM.HajishirziH.2018Multi-Task Identification of Entities, Relations, and Coreference for Scientific Knowledge Graph ConstructionEMNLP10.18653/v1/D18-1360Search in Google Scholar
Luan, Y., Ostendorf, M., & Hajishirzi, H. (2017). Scientific information extraction with semi-supervised neural tagging. ArXiv:1708.06075.LuanY.OstendorfM.HajishirziH.2017Scientific information extraction with semi-supervised neural taggingArXiv:1708.06075.Search in Google Scholar
Mysore, S., Jensen, Z., Kim, E., Huang, K., Chang, H.-S., Strubell, E., Flanigan, J., McCallum, A., & Olivetti, E. (2019). The Materials Science Procedural Text Corpus: Annotating Materials Synthesis Procedures with Shallow Semantic Structures. Proceedings of the 13th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, 56–64.MysoreS.JensenZ.KimE.HuangK.ChangH.-S.StrubellE.FlaniganJ.McCallumA.OlivettiE.2019The Materials Science Procedural Text Corpus: Annotating Materials Synthesis Procedures with Shallow Semantic StructuresProceedings of the 13th Linguistic Annotation Workshop566410.18653/v1/W19-4007Search in Google Scholar
Noy, N., Gao, Y., Jain, A., Narayanan, A., Patterson, A., & Taylor, J. (2019). Industry-scale knowledge graphs: Lessons and challenges. Queue, 17(2), 48–75.NoyN.GaoY.JainA.NarayananA.PattersonA.TaylorJ.2019Industry-scale knowledge graphs: Lessons and challengesQueue172487510.1145/3331166Search in Google Scholar
Oelen, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Farfar, K.E., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2019). Comparing research contributions in a scholarly knowledge graph. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2526 (2019), 2526, 21–26.OelenA.JaradehM.Y.FarfarK.E.StockerM.AuerS.2019Comparing research contributions in a scholarly knowledge graphCEUR Workshop Proceedings 2526201925262126Search in Google Scholar
Oelen, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2020). Generate FAIR Literature Surveys with Scholarly Knowledge Graphs. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383583.3398520OelenA.JaradehM.Y.StockerM.AuerS.2020Generate FAIR Literature Surveys with Scholarly Knowledge GraphsProceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 202097106https://doi.org/10.1145/3383583.339852010.1145/3383583.3398520Search in Google Scholar
Pertsas, V., & Constantopoulos, P. (2017). Scholarly Ontology: Modelling scholarly practices. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(3), 173–190.PertsasV.ConstantopoulosP.2017Scholarly Ontology: Modelling scholarly practicesInternational Journal on Digital Libraries18317319010.1007/s00799-016-0169-3Search in Google Scholar
Qi, P., Zhang, Y.H., Zhang, Y.H., Bolton, J., & Manning, C.D. (2020). Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. https://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/qi2020stanza.pdfQiP.ZhangY.H.ZhangY.H.BoltonJ.ManningC.D.2020Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human LanguagesProceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrationshttps://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/qi2020stanza.pdf10.18653/v1/2020.acl-demos.14Search in Google Scholar
Soldatova, L.N., & King, R.D. (2006). An ontology of scientific experiments. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 3 11, 795–803.SoldatovaL.N.KingR.D.2006An ontology of scientific experimentsJournal of the Royal Society, Interface31179580310.1098/rsif.2006.0134188535617015305Search in Google Scholar
Sollaci, L.B., & Pereira, M.G. (2004). The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: A fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(3), 364.SollaciL.B.PereiraM.G.2004The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: A fifty-year surveyJournal of the Medical Library Association923364Search in Google Scholar
Teufel, S., Carletta, J., & Moens, M. (1999). An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on European Chapter of ACL, 110–117.TeufelS.CarlettaJ.MoensM.1999An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articlesProceedings of the Ninth Conference on European Chapter of ACL11011710.3115/977035.977051Search in Google Scholar
Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Batchelor, C. (2009). Towards discipline-independent argumentative zoning: Evidence from chemistry and computational linguistics. EMNLP: Volume 3, 1493–1502.TeufelS.SiddharthanA.BatchelorC.2009Towards discipline-independent argumentative zoning: Evidence from chemistry and computational linguisticsEMNLP314931502Search in Google Scholar
Vogt, L., D’Souza, J., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2020). Toward representing research contributions in scholarly knowledge graphs using knowledge graph cells. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, 107–116.VogtL.D’SouzaJ.StockerM.AuerS.2020Toward representing research contributions in scholarly knowledge graphs using knowledge graph cellsProceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 202010711610.1145/3383583.3398530Search in Google Scholar
Vrandečić, D., & Krötzsch, M. (2014). Wikidata: A free collaborative knowledgebase. Communications of the ACM, 57(10), 78–85.VrandečićD.KrötzschM.2014Wikidata: A free collaborative knowledgebaseCommunications of the ACM5710788510.1145/2629489Search in Google Scholar
Wang, B.L., Lu, W., Wang, Y., & Jin, H.X. (2018). A neural transition-based model for nested mention recognition. ArXiv:1810.01808.WangB.L.LuW.WangY.JinH.X.2018A neural transition-based model for nested mention recognitionArXiv:1810.01808.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, K.S., Shen, Z.H., Huang, C.Y., Wu, C.-H., Dong, Y.X., & Kanakia, A. (2020). Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 396–413.WangK.S.ShenZ.H.HuangC.Y.WuC.-H.DongY.X.KanakiaA.2020Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enoughQuantitative Science Studies1139641310.1162/qss_a_00021Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L.B., Bourne, P.E., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9.WilkinsonM.D.DumontierM.AalbersbergIj. J.AppletonG.AxtonM.BaakA.BlombergN.BoitenJ.-W.da Silva SantosL.B.BourneP.E.2016The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardshipScientific Data311910.1038/sdata.2016.18479217526978244Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Cao, Y., Wang, X.G., Li, P., & Xu, W. (2016). Deep recurrent models with fast-forward connections for neural machine translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4, 371–383.ZhouJ.CaoY.WangX.G.LiP.XuW.2016Deep recurrent models with fast-forward connections for neural machine translationTransactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics437138310.1162/tacl_a_00105Search in Google Scholar