This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
A reintroduction to our Knowledge Graph and knowledge panels. (2020). https://blog.google/products/search/about-knowledge-graph-and-knoswledge-panels/2020https://blog.google/products/search/about-knowledge-graph-and-knoswledge-panels/Search in Google Scholar
Ammar, W., Peters, M.E., Bhagavatula, C., & Power, R. (2017). The AI2 system at SemEval-2017 Task 10 (ScienceIE): Semi-supervised end-to-end entity and relation extraction. SemEval@ACL.AmmarW.PetersM.E.BhagavatulaC.PowerR.2017SemEval@ACL10.18653/v1/S17-2097Search in Google Scholar
Aryani, A., Poblet, M., Unsworth, K., Wang, J., Evans, B., Devaraju, A., Hausstein, B., Klas, C.-P., Zapilko, B., & Kaplun, S. (2018). A Research Graph dataset for connecting research data repositories using RD-Switchboard. Scientific Data, 5, 180099.AryaniA.PobletM.UnsworthK.WangJ.EvansB.DevarajuA.HaussteinB.KlasC.-P.ZapilkoB.KaplunS.2018A Research Graph dataset for connecting research data repositories using RD-Switchboard518009910.1038/sdata.2018.99597267429809172Search in Google Scholar
Auer, S. (2018). Towards an Open Research Knowledge Graph (Version 1) [Computer software]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1157185AuerS.2018Zenodohttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1157185Search in Google Scholar
Augenstein, I., Das, M., Riedel, S., Vikraman, L., & McCallum, A. (2017). SemEval 2017 Task 10: ScienceIE—Extracting Keyphrases and Relations from Scientific Publications. SemEval@ACL.AugensteinI.DasM.RiedelS.VikramanL.McCallumA.2017SemEval@ACL10.18653/v1/S17-2091Search in Google Scholar
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386.BaasJ.SchottenM.PlumeA.CôtéG.KarimiR.2020Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies1137738610.1162/qss_a_00019Search in Google Scholar
Beltagy, I., Lo, K., & Cohan, A. (2019). SciBERT: A pretrained language model for scientific text. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), 3606–3611.BeltagyI.LoK.CohanA.2019Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)3606361110.18653/v1/D19-1371Search in Google Scholar
Birkle, C., Pendlebury, D.A., Schnell, J., & Adams, J. (2020). Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 363–376.BirkleC.PendleburyD.A.SchnellJ.AdamsJ.2020Web of Science as a data source for research on scientific and scholarly activity1136337610.1162/qss_a_00018Search in Google Scholar
Brack, A., D’Souza, J., Hoppe, A., Auer, S., & Ewerth, R. (2020). Domain-independent extraction of scientific concepts from research articles. European Conference on Information Retrieval, 251–266.BrackA.D’SouzaJ.HoppeA.AuerS.EwerthR.2020Domain-independent extraction of scientific concepts from research articles25126610.1007/978-3-030-45439-5_17Search in Google Scholar
Burton, A., Koers, H., Manghi, P., La Bruzzo, S., Aryani, A., Diepenbroek, M., & Schindler, U. (2017). The data-literature interlinking service: Towards a common infrastructure for sharing data-article links. Program: electronic library and information systems, 51(1), 75–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-06-2016-0048BurtonA.KoersH.ManghiP.La BruzzoS.AryaniA.DiepenbroekM.SchindlerU.2017The data-literature interlinking service: Towards a common infrastructure for sharing data-article links51175100https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-06-2016-004810.1108/PROG-06-2016-0048Search in Google Scholar
Buscaldi, D., Dessì, D., Motta, E., Osborne, F., & Reforgiato Recupero, D. (2019). Mining scholarly data for fine-grained knowledge graph construction. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2377, 21–30.BuscaldiD.DessìD.MottaE.OsborneF.Reforgiato RecuperoD.2019Mining scholarly data for fine-grained knowledge graph construction23772130Search in Google Scholar
Camacho-Collados, J., & Pilehvar, M.T. (2017). On the role of text preprocessing in neural network architectures: An evaluation study on text categorization and sentiment analysis. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1707.01780.Camacho-ColladosJ.PilehvarM.T.2017ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1707.01780.Search in Google Scholar
Cho, K., Van Merriënboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014). Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation. ArXiv:1406.1078.ChoK.Van MerriënboerB.GulcehreC.BahdanauD.BougaresF.SchwenkH.BengioY.2014ArXiv:1406.1078.Search in Google Scholar
Cimiano, P., Mädche, A., Staab, S., & Völker, J. (2009). Ontology learning. In Handbook on ontologies (pp. 245–267). Springer.CimianoP.MädcheA.StaabS.VölkerJ.2009Ontology learningIn245267Springer10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_11Search in Google Scholar
Constantin, A., Peroni, S., Pettifer, S., Shotton, D., & Vitali, F. (2016). The document components ontology (DoCO). Semantic Web, 7(2), 167–181.ConstantinA.PeroniS.PettiferS.ShottonD.VitaliF.2016The document components ontology (DoCO)7216718110.3233/SW-150177Search in Google Scholar
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. ArXiv:1810.04805.DevlinJ.ChangM.-W.LeeK.ToutanovaK.2018ArXiv:1810.04805.Search in Google Scholar
D’Souza, J., & Auer, S. (2020). NLPContributions: An Annotation Scheme for Machine Reading of Scholarly Contributions in Natural Language Processing Literature. In C. Zhang, P. Mayr, W. Lu, & Y. Zhang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents co-located with the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, EEKE@JCDL 2020, Virtual Event, China, August 1st, 2020 (Vol. 2658, pp. 16–27). CEUR-WS.org. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2658/paper2.pdfD’SouzaJ.AuerS.2020InZhangC.MayrP.LuW.ZhangY.(Eds.),Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Extraction and Evaluation of Knowledge Entities from Scientific Documents co-located with the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, EEKE@JCDL 2020, Virtual EventChinaAugust 1st, 202026581627CEUR-WS.orghttp://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2658/paper2.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
D’Souza, J., Hoppe, A., Brack, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Auer, S., & Ewerth, R. (2020). The STEM-ECR Dataset: Grounding Scientific Entity References in STEM Scholarly Content to Authoritative Encyclopedic and Lexicographic Sources. LREC, 2192–2203.D’SouzaJ.HoppeA.BrackA.JaradehM.Y.AuerS.EwerthR.2020LREC21922203Search in Google Scholar
Esteves, D., Moussallem, D., Neto, C.B., Soru, T., Usbeck, R., Ackermann, M., & Lehmann, J. (2015). MEX vocabulary: A lightweight interchange format for machine learning experiments. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Systems, 169–176.EstevesD.MoussallemD.NetoC.B.SoruT.UsbeckR.AckermannM.LehmannJ.2015Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Systems16917610.1145/2814864.2814883Search in Google Scholar
Fisas, B., Ronzano, F., & Saggion, H. (2016). A Multi-Layered Annotated Corpus of Scientific Papers. LREC.FisasB.RonzanoF.SaggionH.2016LRECSearch in Google Scholar
Fricke, S. (2018). Semantic scholar. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(1), 145.FrickeS.2018Semantic scholar106114510.5195/jmla.2018.280Search in Google Scholar
Ghaddar, A., & Langlais, P. (2018). Robust lexical features for improved neural network named-entity recognition. ArXiv:1806.03489.GhaddarA.LanglaisP.2018ArXiv:1806.03489.Search in Google Scholar
GROBID. (2008). GitHub. https://github.com/kermitt2/grobidGROBID2008https://github.com/kermitt2/grobidSearch in Google Scholar
Handschuh, S., & QasemiZadeh, B. (2014). The ACL RD-TEC: a dataset for benchmarking terminology extraction and classification in computational linguistics. COLING 2014: 4th International Workshop on Computational Terminology.HandschuhS.QasemiZadehB.2014COLING 2014: 4th International Workshop on Computational TerminologySearch in Google Scholar
Hendricks, G., Tkaczyk, D., Lin, J., & Feeney, P. (2020). Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 414–427.HendricksG.TkaczykD.LinJ.FeeneyP.2020Crossref: The sustainable source of community-owned scholarly metadata1141442710.1162/qss_a_00022Search in Google Scholar
Huth, E.J. (1987). Structured abstracts for papers reporting clinical trials. American College of Physicians.HuthE.J.1987American College of Physicians10.7326/0003-4819-106-4-6263826962Search in Google Scholar
Jaradeh, M.Y., Oelen, A., Farfar, K.E., Prinz, M., D’Souza, J., Kismihók, G., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2019). Open Research Knowledge Graph: Next Generation Infrastructure for Semantic Scholarly Knowledge. KCAP, 243–246.JaradehM.Y.OelenA.FarfarK.E.PrinzM.D’SouzaJ.KismihókG.StockerM.AuerS.2019KCAP24324610.1145/3360901.3364435Search in Google Scholar
Jiang, M., D’Souza, J., Auer, S., & Downie, J.S. (2020). Targeting Precision: A Hybrid Scientific Relation Extraction Pipeline for Improved Scholarly Knowledge Organization. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 57(1).JiangM.D’SouzaJ.AuerS.DownieJ.S.2020Targeting Precision: A Hybrid Scientific Relation Extraction Pipeline for Improved Scholarly Knowledge Organization57110.1002/pra2.303Search in Google Scholar
Jinha, A.E. (2010). Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing, 23(3), 258–263.JinhaA.E.2010Article 50 million: An estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence23325826310.1087/20100308Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, R., Watkinson, A., & Mabe, M. (2018). The STM report. An Overview of Scientific and Scholarly Publishing. 5th Edition October.JohnsonR.WatkinsonA.MabeM.20185th EditionOctoberSearch in Google Scholar
Kononova, O., Huo, H., He, T., Rong, Z., Botari, T., Sun, W., Tshitoyan, V., & Ceder, G. (2019). Text-mined dataset of inorganic materials synthesis recipes. Scientific Data, 6(1), 1–11.KononovaO.HuoH.HeT.RongZ.BotariT.SunW.TshitoyanV.CederG.2019Text-mined dataset of inorganic materials synthesis recipes6111110.1038/s41597-019-0224-1679427931615989Search in Google Scholar
Kulkarni, C., Xu, W., Ritter, A., & Machiraju, R. (2018). An Annotated Corpus for Machine Reading of Instructions in Wet Lab Protocols. NAACL: HLT, Volume 2 (Short Papers), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2016KulkarniC.XuW.RitterA.MachirajuR.2018NAACL: HLT, Volume 2 (Short Papers),97106https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-201610.18653/v1/N18-2016Search in Google Scholar
Kuniyoshi, F., Makino, K., Ozawa, J., & Miwa, M. (2020). Annotating and Extracting Synthesis Process of All-Solid-State Batteries from Scientific Literature. LREC, 1941–1950.KuniyoshiF.MakinoK.OzawaJ.MiwaM.2020LREC19411950Search in Google Scholar
Lample, G., Ballesteros, M., Subramanian, S., Kawakami, K., & Dyer, C. (2016). Neural architectures for named entity recognition. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1603.01360.LampleG.BallesterosM.SubramanianS.KawakamiK.DyerC.2016ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1603.01360.Search in Google Scholar
Landhuis, E. (2016). Scientific literature: Information overload. Nature, 535(7612), 457–458.LandhuisE.2016Scientific literature: Information overload535761245745810.1038/nj7612-457a27453968Search in Google Scholar
Liakata, M., Saha, S., Dobnik, S., Batchelor, C., & Rebholz-Schuhmann, D. (2012). Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applications. Bioinformatics, 28(7), 991–1000.LiakataM.SahaS.DobnikS.BatchelorC.Rebholz-SchuhmannD.2012Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applications287991100010.1093/bioinformatics/bts071331572122321698Search in Google Scholar
Liakata, M., Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Batchelor, C.R. (2010). Corpora for the Conceptualisation and Zoning of Scientific Papers. LREC.LiakataM.TeufelS.SiddharthanA.BatchelorC.R.2010LRECSearch in Google Scholar
Lin, D.K., & Pantel, P. (2002). Concept discovery from text. COLING 2002: The 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics.LinD.K.PantelP.2002COLING 2002: The 19th International Conference on Computational LinguisticsSearch in Google Scholar
Luan, Y., He, L., Ostendorf, M., & Hajishirzi, H. (2018). Multi-Task Identification of Entities, Relations, and Coreference for Scientific Knowledge Graph Construction. EMNLP.LuanY.HeL.OstendorfM.HajishirziH.2018EMNLP10.18653/v1/D18-1360Search in Google Scholar
Luan, Y., Ostendorf, M., & Hajishirzi, H. (2017). Scientific information extraction with semi-supervised neural tagging. ArXiv:1708.06075.LuanY.OstendorfM.HajishirziH.2017ArXiv:1708.06075.Search in Google Scholar
Mysore, S., Jensen, Z., Kim, E., Huang, K., Chang, H.-S., Strubell, E., Flanigan, J., McCallum, A., & Olivetti, E. (2019). The Materials Science Procedural Text Corpus: Annotating Materials Synthesis Procedures with Shallow Semantic Structures. Proceedings of the 13th Linguistic Annotation Workshop, 56–64.MysoreS.JensenZ.KimE.HuangK.ChangH.-S.StrubellE.FlaniganJ.McCallumA.OlivettiE.2019Proceedings of the 13th Linguistic Annotation Workshop566410.18653/v1/W19-4007Search in Google Scholar
Noy, N., Gao, Y., Jain, A., Narayanan, A., Patterson, A., & Taylor, J. (2019). Industry-scale knowledge graphs: Lessons and challenges. Queue, 17(2), 48–75.NoyN.GaoY.JainA.NarayananA.PattersonA.TaylorJ.2019Industry-scale knowledge graphs: Lessons and challenges172487510.1145/3331166Search in Google Scholar
Oelen, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Farfar, K.E., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2019). Comparing research contributions in a scholarly knowledge graph. CEUR Workshop Proceedings 2526 (2019), 2526, 21–26.OelenA.JaradehM.Y.FarfarK.E.StockerM.AuerS.2019Comparing research contributions in a scholarly knowledge graph201925262126Search in Google Scholar
Oelen, A., Jaradeh, M.Y., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2020). Generate FAIR Literature Surveys with Scholarly Knowledge Graphs. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1145/3383583.3398520OelenA.JaradehM.Y.StockerM.AuerS.2020Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 202097106https://doi.org/10.1145/3383583.339852010.1145/3383583.3398520Search in Google Scholar
Pertsas, V., & Constantopoulos, P. (2017). Scholarly Ontology: Modelling scholarly practices. International Journal on Digital Libraries, 18(3), 173–190.PertsasV.ConstantopoulosP.2017Scholarly Ontology: Modelling scholarly practices18317319010.1007/s00799-016-0169-3Search in Google Scholar
Qi, P., Zhang, Y.H., Zhang, Y.H., Bolton, J., & Manning, C.D. (2020). Stanza: A Python Natural Language Processing Toolkit for Many Human Languages. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. https://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/qi2020stanza.pdfQiP.ZhangY.H.ZhangY.H.BoltonJ.ManningC.D.2020Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrationshttps://nlp.stanford.edu/pubs/qi2020stanza.pdf10.18653/v1/2020.acl-demos.14Search in Google Scholar
Soldatova, L.N., & King, R.D. (2006). An ontology of scientific experiments. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 3 11, 795–803.SoldatovaL.N.KingR.D.2006An ontology of scientific experiments31179580310.1098/rsif.2006.0134188535617015305Search in Google Scholar
Sollaci, L.B., & Pereira, M.G. (2004). The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: A fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(3), 364.SollaciL.B.PereiraM.G.2004The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: A fifty-year survey923364Search in Google Scholar
Teufel, S., Carletta, J., & Moens, M. (1999). An annotation scheme for discourse-level argumentation in research articles. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on European Chapter of ACL, 110–117.TeufelS.CarlettaJ.MoensM.1999Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on European Chapter of ACL11011710.3115/977035.977051Search in Google Scholar
Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Batchelor, C. (2009). Towards discipline-independent argumentative zoning: Evidence from chemistry and computational linguistics. EMNLP: Volume 3, 1493–1502.TeufelS.SiddharthanA.BatchelorC.2009EMNLP314931502Search in Google Scholar
Vogt, L., D’Souza, J., Stocker, M., & Auer, S. (2020). Toward representing research contributions in scholarly knowledge graphs using knowledge graph cells. Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 2020, 107–116.VogtL.D’SouzaJ.StockerM.AuerS.2020Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries in 202010711610.1145/3383583.3398530Search in Google Scholar
Vrandečić, D., & Krötzsch, M. (2014). Wikidata: A free collaborative knowledgebase. Communications of the ACM, 57(10), 78–85.VrandečićD.KrötzschM.2014Wikidata: A free collaborative knowledgebase5710788510.1145/2629489Search in Google Scholar
Wang, B.L., Lu, W., Wang, Y., & Jin, H.X. (2018). A neural transition-based model for nested mention recognition. ArXiv:1810.01808.WangB.L.LuW.WangY.JinH.X.2018ArXiv:1810.01808.Search in Google Scholar
Wang, K.S., Shen, Z.H., Huang, C.Y., Wu, C.-H., Dong, Y.X., & Kanakia, A. (2020). Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enough. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 396–413.WangK.S.ShenZ.H.HuangC.Y.WuC.-H.DongY.X.KanakiaA.2020Microsoft academic graph: When experts are not enough1139641310.1162/qss_a_00021Search in Google Scholar
Wilkinson, M.D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L.B., Bourne, P.E., & others. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 1–9.WilkinsonM.D.DumontierM.AalbersbergIj. J.AppletonG.AxtonM.BaakA.BlombergN.BoitenJ.-W.da Silva SantosL.B.BourneP.E.2016The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship311910.1038/sdata.2016.18479217526978244Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, J., Cao, Y., Wang, X.G., Li, P., & Xu, W. (2016). Deep recurrent models with fast-forward connections for neural machine translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4, 371–383.ZhouJ.CaoY.WangX.G.LiP.XuW.2016Deep recurrent models with fast-forward connections for neural machine translation437138310.1162/tacl_a_00105Search in Google Scholar