Open Access

Effect of sleep quality on weaning from mechanical ventilation: A scoping review

, , , , ,  and   
Jan 31, 2025

Cite
Download Cover

Study characteristics – effect of hospitalized patient’ sleep quality (objectively measured) on weaning from mechanical ventilation

Author(s), year, country Objective(s) Study design/patients Definitions of groups Methods (parameters assessed) Use of an alternative classification for sleep assessment Use of sedation during patient monitoring Results Sleep and weaning outcome Other weaning predictors Conclusion (sleep concerning weaning)
Huttmann et al., 2017, Germany To assess sleep quality in tracheotomized patients undergoing prolonged weaning

A cross-sectional study of 19 patients undergoing prolonged weaning at a specialized weaning unit of a pneumology department

Groups: “successful weaning” and “unsuccessful weaning”

Objective measurements: PSG (10 pm – 6 am)

Gas exchange monitoring Subjective evaluation: Sleep quality and SRI

Other parameters assessed: Days on invasive MV

NO NO

7 patients (36.8%) successful weaning vs. 12 (63.2%) unsuccessful weaning

Days on MV: 39 (SD 22) successful weaning vs. 187 (SD 335) unsuccessful weaning; p = 0.473

No significant difference in sleep quality between the successful weaning and unsuccessful weaninggroups in PSG

A decreased amount of REM sleep: 9.1 (SD 6.3) vs. 5 (SD 8.4), respectively

No significant difference in nocturnal gas exchange between the groups There was no difference between successful and unsuccessful weaning groups of patients undergoing prolonged weaning.

Dres et al., 2019, Canada To determine whether abnormal sleep or wakefulness is associated with SBT outcome

A prospective multicenter study of 44 (enrolled; 37 with adequate signals) intubated mechanically ventilated patients with an SBT planned for the next day at 3 ICUs

Groups: “failed SBT,” “successful SBT (extubation),” and “successful without extubation”

Objective measurements: PSG (5 pm – 8 am)

EEG markers (ORP index + hemispheric correlation [ICC R/L ORP])

Subjective evaluation: Delirium (CAM-ICU)

Other parameters assessed: SOFA score, days on MV, length of ICU stay

YES YES

11 patients (30%) successful SBT (extubation) vs. 8 (21%) successful without extubation vs. 18 (49%) failed SBT

Days on MV: 10.4 (SD 8.6) successful SBT (extubation) vs. 5.0 (SD 2.5) successful without extubation vs. 4.4 (SD 3.2) failed SBT; p < 0.01

No significant difference in sleep architecture between the groups shown by PSG

Abnormal sleep patterns are present but not significant

More time with ORP > 2.0 and > 2.2 in the successful SBT (extubation) group than in the other two; p < 0.01.

Differences in R/L ORP ICC: 0.80 (SD 0.16) successful SBT (extubation) vs. 0.80 (SD 0.15) successful without extubation vs. 0.54 (SD 0.26); p = 0.006

SOFA score: 7 (SD 3) successful SBT (extubation) vs. 8 (SD 3) successful without extubation vs. 6 (SD 3) failed SBT; p = 0.32

Delirium: 3 (27%) successful SBT (extubation) vs. 2 (25%) successful without extubation vs. 0 (0%)failed SBT; p = 0.06

Although abnormal sleep patterns were noted, there was no association between sleep architecture changes and weaning. However, a detailed analysis of derived EEG markers (ORP, R/L ORP ICC) identified these parameters helpful in predicting SBT success.

Thille et al., 2018, France To assess the impact of sleep alterations on weaning duration

A prospective single-center study of 45 intubated patients with at least one SBT failure at a medical ICU

Groups: “short weaning” (< 3 days) and“prolonged weaning” (> 3 days)

Objective measurements: PSG (1–4 nights)

EEG reactivity at eyes opening during wakefulness assessed by a neurologist

Subjective evaluation: Delirium (ICDSC) ICU-AW (MRC score < 48)

Other parameters assessed: SOFA score, days on MV, length of ICU stay, mortality in ICU

YES YES

27 patients (60%) short weaning vs. 18 (40%) prolonged weaning

Days on MV (median, IQR): 8 (4–13) short weaning vs. 13 (15–20) prolonged weaning; p = 0.19

Weaning duration is significantly longer in patients with atypical sleep compared with those with normal sleep (median, IQR): 5 (2–8) vs. 2 (1–2); p < 0.001 and independently associated with prolonged weaning: OR = 13.9, 95% CI 3.2–85.7; p = 0.001

Weaning duration is significantly longer in patients with no REM sleep compared with the others (median, IQR): 4 (2–7) vs. 2 (1–2); p = 0.03

Delirium: 10 (37%) short weaning vs. 6 (33%)prolonged weaning; p > 0.99 SOFA score (median, IQR): 3 (2–3) short weaning vs. 4 (3–6) prolonged weaning; p = 0.02

ICU-AW: 9 (33%) short weaning vs. 12 (71%) prolonged weaning; p = 0.03

Patients with atypical sleep or no REM sleep had markedly longer weaning duration than those with normal sleep. Atypical sleep was associated with prolonged weaning (a strong predictor).

Thille et al., 2021, France To assess whether sleep alterations after extubation are associated with an increased risk of reintubation

A prospective observational single-center study of 52 extubated patients at a medical ICU

Groups: “extubation success” and “reintubation”

Objective measurements: PSG (afternoon to next morning)

Subjective evaluation: ICU-AW (MRC score < 48) Delirium (ICDSC)

Other parameters assessed: Mortality, SOFA

YES YES

44 patients (85%) extubation success vs. 8 (15%) reintubation

Days on MV (median, IQR): 3 (2–7) extubation success vs. 9 (5–15) reintubation; p = 0.043

Reintubation rates 21% (7/33) in patients with no REM sleep and 5% (1/19) in patients with REM sleep, difference −16% (95% CI −33% to 6%); p=0.23

No statistically significant changes in the other PSG sleep parameters between the groups

SOFA score (median, IQR): 3 (2–4) extubation success vs. 3 (2–5) reintubation; p = 0.919

Delirium: 4 (10%) extubation success vs. 4 (33%) reintubation; p = 0.08 ICU-AW: 11/36 (30%) extubation success vs. 6/8 (86%) reintubation; p = 0.009

Absence of REM sleep influenced the risk of reintubation in the ICU.

Dessap et al., 2015, France To assess the impact of delirium during weaning and associated alterations in the circadian rhythm

An observational multicenter study of 70 patients intubated for over 24 hours in an ICU

Groups: “successful extubation with delirium” and “successful extubation without delirium”

Objective measurements: Excretion of the melatonin urinary metabolite 6-SMT during weaning

Subjective evaluation: Delirium (CAM-ICU)

Other parameters assessed: SOFA score, days on MV, mortality in ICU

NO YES

43 patients (61.4%) successful extubation with delirium vs. 24 (34.3%) successful extubation without delirium; 3 comatose patients (4.3%)

Days on MV (median, IQR): 4.1 (2.6–7.4) successful extubation with delirium vs. 2.8 (1.6–6.9) successful extubation without delirium; p = 0.133

Reduced excretion of 6-SMT (ng) in patients with delirium (median, IQR): 20.212 (23.207–39.920) vs. 18.880 (11.462–27.325); Interaction between delirium and 6-SMT secretion: F statistic = 2.65; p = 0.019

SOFA score (median, IQR): 8.0 (6.0–11.0) successful extubation with delirium vs. 5.5 (4.0–7.8) successful extubation without delirium; p = 0.1

More complications during weaning in patients with delirium: 40 (93%) vs. 15 (63%); p = 0.02 (OR 5.95, 95% CI 1.26–28.13; p = 0.021)

Successful extubation is less likely in patients with delirium: HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30–0.95; p = 0.02

Alcohol abuse (median, IQR): 11 (25.6%) successful extubation with delirium vs. 1 (4.2%) successful extubation without delirium; p = 0.044

Urinary 6-SMT was associated with alterations in the circadian rhythm in patients with delirium and was identified as a measurable marker of the circadian rhythm.

Study characteristics – effect of hospitalized patient' sleep quality (subjectively evaluated) on weaning from mechanical ventilation

Author(s), year, country Objective(s) Study design/patients Definitions of groups Methods (parameters assessed) Use of sedation during patient monitoring Results Sleep and weaning outcome Other weaning predictors Conclusion (sleep concerning weaning)
Chen et al., 2015, Taiwan To investigate the predictors of sleep quality and successful weaning

A cross-sectional study of 94 patients in the process of weaning from MV at 3 respiratory care centers

Groups: “weaned group” (successfully weaned within 72 hours) and “nonweaned group

Subjective evaluation:

The first two parts of a questionnaire: demographic (age, gender) and clinical (co-existing chronic illnesses, alcohol drinking, use of hypnotics, tracheotomy, albumin, days on MV) information

Third part: disease severity (APACHE II and GCS scores)

Fourth part: sleep (VSH score)

Other parameters assessed: Days on MV

YES

53 patients (56.4%) weaned group vs. 41 (43.6%) non-weaned group

Days on MV: 37.9 (SD 17.8) weaned group vs. 42.5 (SD 20.4) non-weaned group; p = 0.240

Sleep quality was better in the weaned group than in the non-weaned group: 45.9 (SD 15.3) vs. 36.1 (SD 16.5); p = 0.004

Sleep quality negatively influenced by disease severity (APACHE II score: b = −1.323, 95% CI −2.052 to −0.593; p < 0.001), use of hypnotics (b = −10.707, 95% CI −16.718 to −4.696; p < 0.001), and 3–4 co-existing illnesses (b = −9.905, 95% CI −17.734 to −2.077; p < 0.14

The weaned group characterized by younger patients (p = 0.038) with higher GCS scores (p = 0.05) and less severe disease (p < 0.001)

Other factors identified as independent predictors of weaning (based on regression analysis): APACHE II score (OR = 1.644, 95% CI 1.150–2.351; p < 0.06), GCS score (OR = 0.810, 95% CI 0.695–0.944; p < 0.07), and alcohol use (OR = 0.208, 95% CI 0.063–0.689; p < 0.09)

Sleep quality was identified as a significant predictor of successful weaning from MV.

Huttmann* et al., 2017, Germany To assess sleep quality in tracheotomized patients undergoing prolonged weaning

A cross-sectional study of 19 patients undergoing prolonged weaning at a specialized weaning unit of a pneumology department

Groups: “successful weaning” and “unsuccessful weaning”

Objective measurements:

PSG (10 pm – 6 am)

Gas exchange monitoring

Subjective evaluation: Sleep quality and SRI

Other parameters assessed: Days on invasive MV

NO

7 patients (36.8%) successful weaning vs. 12 (63.2%) unsuccessful weaning

Days on MV: 39 (SD 22) successful weaning vs. 187 (SD 335) unsuccessful weaning; p = 0.473

No significant difference in sleep quality or any items of the questionnaire between the groups No difference was identified in sleep quality or questionnaire items between the successful and unsuccessful weaning groups.