A Randomised Control Study Comparing Ultrasonography with Standard Clinical Methods in Assessing Endotracheal Tube Tip Positioning
, , and
Apr 30, 2024
About this article
Article Category: Research Article
Published Online: Apr 30, 2024
Page range: 177 - 182
Received: Feb 13, 2024
Accepted: Apr 03, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2024-0019
Keywords
© 2024 Jayalekshmi Sreedevi et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 3.

Length of ETT at incisors varying with height
ETT length at teeth after x ray | <165 | 20.01(1.35) |
165–180 | 20.73 (1.26) | |
>180 | 23.5 (0.50) |
Demographic data
Age (years) | 52.48 ± 17.65 | 50.04 ± 16.61 | 0.617 |
Height (cm) | 166. ± 18.9 | 162.7 ± 6.9 | 0.140 |
ETT size (mm) | 7.9 ± 0.45 | 7.6 ± 0.54 | 0.055 |
Female No: (%) | 5 (20%) | 12 (48%) | |
Male No: (%) | 20 (80%) | 13 952%) | 0.072 |