Batterham et al. (2014) |
CG:30APACHE-II:16.4(7.8)IG:29APACHE-II:15.9(7.9) |
CG: Standard care(medical follow-up, no rehabilitation)IG : Program with cycle ergometer 30′ of moderate intensity, 2 supervised sessions/1 unsupervised |
SF-36 (PF) |
9 weeksFollow up: 26 weeks |
SF-36 (PF): IG : 43.5 (18)vs CG: 40.1(23),95% confidence interval [-1.4-8.2]) |
Battle et al. (2018) |
CG :30APACHE-II:15 (12-19)IG :30APACHE-II:13 (9-19) |
CG : Standard care (no rehabilitation prescription)IG : Personalized supervised exercise program in an outpatient gym |
6MWT, Berg balance, HG |
6 weeks afterhospital Followup:7 weeks, 6months, 12 months |
At 6 weeks6MWT: IG:379.3(207.9) vs CG:283.6(229.3), p=0.491Berg :IG :53.4(6.2) vs CG:50.5 (7.0), p=0.99HG(L): IG:20.7(11.4) vs19.5(12.5),p=0.287 |
Connolly et al. (2015) |
CG :10APACHE-II:23.5 (21-30.3)IG :10APACHE-II:24.5(18.8-29.5) |
CG: Weekly telephone follow-upIG: 16 sessions in an outpatient gym |
ISWT, 6MWT, SF-36 (PCS), |
3 months afterhospital |
Change in outcomesISWT(m): CG: 170(40-315)vs IG: 115(-2.5-237.5)6MWT(m):CG:185(40-285)vs IG:140(35.8-210.3)PCS: CG: 11(4.3-28.3) vs IG:1.8 (-6.8-15.9) |
Elliot et al. (2011) |
CG: 91APACHE-II:19.5(7.2)IG: 92APACHE-II:19.4(12.6) |
CG : Standard care (medical follow-up)IG : Home rehabilitation program with an emphasis on increasing muscle strength & walking |
SF-36 (PF), 6MWT |
8 weeksFollow up:26 weeks |
SF-36 (PF) :IG :39.9 vs CG :41.0, p<0.05,while the effect time was notable for PF (p=0,034) and for 6MWT(p=0,0003). |
McDowell et al. (2016) |
CG : 30APACHE-II:15.2(5.6)IG : 30APACHE-II:17.3 (7.7) |
CG : Standard care(no support)IG : personalized exercise program in the hospital gym (supervised-2 sessions) or at home (unsupervised-1 session) |
SF-36(PF),ISWT HG |
6 weeksFollow up: 6 months |
SF-36(PF) :IG :6.8(10.9) vs CG:3.9(8.2),p=0,26ISWT : IG :135.5(119.8) vs CG:52.4(126.7),p=0.03HG(dominant): IG:6.1(28.1)vs CG:12.5(22.8), p=0.39 |
McWilliams et al. (2016) |
CG :36APACHE-II:15.9(5.3)IG :37APACHE-II:16.6(5.7) |
CG : Standard care (no exercise prescription or consultation)IG : supervised session with a 10-station program-cardiovascular exercises |
SF-36 (PCS), |
7 weeks |
Degree of improvement SF-36 (PF) IG :3.5(95% CI;1.6-6.7 vs CG :8.6(95%;5.4-10.6), p=0,048) |
Vitacca et al. (2016) |
CG :24IG :24 |
OE: Standard care (medical support, free to conduct physical activity without monitoring or support)IG : pulmonary rehabilitation program at home under supervision |
MIP/MEP, BADL, MRC-SS, |
6 months |
MIP: IG : +33cm H2O vs CG : +26cm H2O,p<0.03MEP :IG : +42cm H2O vs CG : +28cm H2O, p<0.03BADL: p=0.63Biceps MRC-SS: p=0.07Quadriceps MRC-ss:p=0.53 |
Veldema et al. (2019) |
CG : 14IG : a)13b)12 |
OE: Standard careIG : a) cycle ergometer program, b) resistance program(inpatients in a neurological rehabilitation clinic) 5times/week, 4 sets of 15 repititions |
FAC, TUG test, 10MWT, MMS test SF-36(PF) |
2 weeks4 weeks |
6MWT (4 weeks): p<0.05 within groupsTUG(4weeks):p<0.05 within groupsFAC(2weeks):p<0.05 between groupsMRC knee flexion (2weeks): p<0.05 between groups |
Shelly et al (2017) |
CG:18, IG:17 |
IG: 4 weeks unsupervised home rehabilitation programCG: no exercise prescrition |
SF-36 (PF) |
4weeks |
SF-36 (PF ): IG: 10.32(8.51-14.92) vs CG: 7.36(3.68-8.48), p=0.003 |