Testing the iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) for the use with chronic disease patients in Switzerland / Prüfung des iMTA Productivity Costs Questionnaire (iPCQ) für den Einsatz bei Patienten/-innen mit chronischen Krankheiten in der Schweiz

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education 2014 Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing American Educational Research Association Search in Google Scholar

Amler, N. (2016). Produktivität, Präsentismus und Arbeitsfähigkeit—Konzepte und Instrumente. Health Economics Research Zentrum HERZ. AmlerN. 2016 Produktivität, Präsentismus und Arbeitsfähigkeit—Konzepte und Instrumente Health Economics Research Zentrum HERZ Search in Google Scholar

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. BeatonD. E. BombardierC. GuilleminF. FerrazM. B. 2000 Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures Spine 25 24 3186 3191 10.1097/00007632-200012150-0001411124735 Search in Google Scholar

Bouwmans, C., Hakkaart-von Roijen, L., Koopmanschap, M., & Krol, M. (2013). Productivity Costs Questionnaire—Manual. Institute for Medical Technology Assessments – Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam. BouwmansC. Hakkaart-von RoijenL. KoopmanschapM. KrolM. 2013 Productivity Costs Questionnaire—Manual Institute for Medical Technology Assessments – Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam Search in Google Scholar

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews. Sage Publications. BrinkmannS. KvaleS. 2014 InterViews Sage Publications 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7_161 Search in Google Scholar

Bundesamt für Statistik, B. (2021). Teilzeitarbeit. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/wirtschaftliche-soziale-situation-bevoelkerung/gleichstellung-frau-mann/erwerbstaetigkeit/teilzeitarbeit.html. Bundesamt für Statistik B. 2021 Teilzeitarbeit https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/wirtschaftliche-soziale-situation-bevoelkerung/gleichstellung-frau-mann/erwerbstaetigkeit/teilzeitarbeit.html. Search in Google Scholar

Collins, D., d’Ardenne, J., Blake, M., & Gray, M. (2015). Cognitive Interviewing Practice. Sage. CollinsD. d’ArdenneJ. BlakeM. GrayM. 2015 Cognitive Interviewing Practice Sage 10.4135/9781473910102 Search in Google Scholar

d’Ardenne, J., & Collins, D. (2015). Data Management. In D. Collins (Hrsg.), Cognitive Interviewing Practice (S. 142–161). Sage. d’ArdenneJ. CollinsD. 2015 Data Management In CollinsD. (Hrsg.), Cognitive Interviewing Practice 142 161 Sage 10.4135/9781473910102.n7 Search in Google Scholar

Friedli, T., Villiger, P. M., & Gantschnig, B. E. (2018). Workability for persons with chronic diseases. A systematic review of validity and utility of assessments in German language. International Journal of Health Professions, 5(1), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2018-0008. FriedliT. VilligerP. M. GantschnigB. E. 2018 Workability for persons with chronic diseases. A systematic review of validity and utility of assessments in German language International Journal of Health Professions 5 1 72 90 https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp-2018-0008. 10.2478/ijhp-2018-0008 Search in Google Scholar

iMTA. (o. J.). Questionnaires for the measurement of costs in economic evaluations. iMTA. https://www.imta.nl/questionnaires/ (Zugriff am 12.10.2021). iMTA (o. J.). Questionnaires for the measurement of costs in economic evaluations iMTA https://www.imta.nl/questionnaires/ (Zugriff am 12.10.2021). Search in Google Scholar

Johannesson, M., & Karlsson, G. (1997). The friction cost method: A comment. Journal of Health Economics, 16(2), 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00006-4. JohannessonM. KarlssonG. 1997 The friction cost method: A comment Journal of Health Economics 16 2 249 255 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00006-4. 10.1016/S0167-6296(97)00006-4 Search in Google Scholar

Kim, H., Park, K. S., Yoo, J.-E., Kim, S., Han, S., & Suh, H. S. (2020). Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire. Healthcare, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020184. KimH. ParkK. S. YooJ.-E. KimS. HanS. SuhH. S. 2020 Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Korean Version of the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire Healthcare 8 2 https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8020184. 10.3390/healthcare8020184734984632599752 Search in Google Scholar

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4. Aufl.). Sage. PattonM. Q. 2015 Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods 4. Aufl. Sage Search in Google Scholar

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2017). Nursing Research—Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice (10^th Edition). Wolters Kluwer. PolitD. F. BeckC. T. 2017 Nursing Research—Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice 10th Edition Wolters Kluwer Search in Google Scholar

Register für Patienten für chronischen Schmerz. (2018). [Patientenund Qualitätsregister]. Universitätsklinik für Rheumatologie, Immunologie und Allergologie. Register für Patienten für chronischen Schmerz 2018 [Patientenund Qualitätsregister]. Universitätsklinik für Rheumatologie, Immunologie und Allergologie Search in Google Scholar

Schulze, C., Page, J., Kottorp, A., & Lilja, M. (2013). Adapting functional assessments for use in a new context: A balancing act. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 20(5), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2013.802010. SchulzeC. PageJ. KottorpA. LiljaM. 2013 Adapting functional assessments for use in a new context: A balancing act Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 20 5 336 342 https://doi.org/10.3109/11038128.2013.802010. 10.3109/11038128.2013.80201023713724 Search in Google Scholar

Sireci, S., & Faulkner-Bond, M. (2014). Validity evidence based on test content. Psicothema, 26(1), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256. SireciS. Faulkner-BondM. 2014 Validity evidence based on test content Psicothema 26 1 100 107 https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.256. Search in Google Scholar

Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., & O’Connor, W. (2014). „Analysis: Practices, principles and processes“ in Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Hrsg.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers (Second edition, S. 199–218). Sage. SpencerL. RitchieJ. O’ConnorW. 2014 „Analysis: Practices, principles and processes“ in Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers In RitchieJ. LewisJ. McNaughton NichollsC. OrmstonR. (Hrsg.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers Second edition 199 218 Sage Search in Google Scholar

Tan, S. S., Bouwmans, C. A. M., Rutten, F. F. H., & Hakkaart-von Roijen, L. (2012). Update of the Dutch Manual for Costing in Economic Evaluations. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 28(2), 152–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000062. TanS. S. BouwmansC. A. M. RuttenF. F. H. Hakkaart-von RoijenL. 2012 Update of the Dutch Manual for Costing in Economic Evaluations International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 28 2 152 158 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462312000062. 10.1017/S026646231200006222559757 Search in Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R. (1984). Cognitive sciences and survey methods. In T. B. Jabine, M. L. Straf, J. M. Tanur, & R. Tourangeau (Hrsg.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines (S. 73–100). National Academy Press. TourangeauR. 1984 Cognitive sciences and survey methods In JabineT. B. StrafM. L. TanurJ. M. TourangeauR. (Hrsg.), Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: Building a bridge between disciplines 73 100 National Academy Press Search in Google Scholar

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health. (2009, Dezember 9). Guidance for Industry on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims; Availability. Federal Register. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, & U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health 2009 Dezember 9 Guidance for Industry on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims; Availability Federal Register https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/patient-reported-outcome-measures-use-medical-product-development-support-labeling-claims. Search in Google Scholar