Open Access

Morphological and Molecular note on the identity of Mylonchulus sigmaturus Cobb, 1917 (Nematoda: Mylonchulidae) from Pakistan


Cite

Introduction

The order Mononchida was proposed by Jairajpuri in 1969. These nematodes are predators in nature and found in different habitats both terrestrial and aquatic (Ahmad & Jairajpuri, 2010).

The predator nematodes are free-living nematodes, they usually use other nematodes and invertebrates as feed (Ahmad and Jairajpuri, 2010) and distributed worldwide (Koohkan et al., 2014). The genus Mylonchulus Cobb, 1916 comprises of 62 nominal species (Ahmad and Jairajpuri, 2010; Jana et al., 2010; Shah and Hussain, 2015) with the type species M. minor (Cobb, 1893) Cobb, 1916. From Pakistan, a total of twelve species of the genus Mylonchulus Cobb, 1916 have so far been reported from different climatic zones, including M. amurus Khan and Jairajpuri, 1979; M. brachyuris (Butschli, 1873) Cobb, 1917; M. contractus Jairajpuri, 1970; M. lacustris (Cobb in Cobb, 1915) Cobb, 1917; M. minor (Cobb, 1893) Cobb, 1916; M. nainitalensis Jairajpuri, 1970; M. paitensis Yeates, 1992; M. rosensis Khan, 1975 and M. sigmaturus Cobb, 1917 (Shahina et al., 2019). A new species, M. capsicumi along with two new recorded species viz., M. polinicus (Stefanski, 1915) Cobb, 1917 and M. maritimus Jimenez-Guirado and Murillo-Navarro, 2008 were described and redescribed, respectively (Ishaque et al., 2021). M. sigmaturus was first reported by Khan and Saeed, 1987 from the soil around the roots of banana plantation, Malir and cultivated soil from Jam Goth Sindh, Pakistan. In the present study, four different populations of M. sigmaturus were recovered from the rhizosphere of banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) in different localities of Pakistan. The male of this species is reported for the first time from Pakistan. Therefore, the aims of the research were to study M. sigmaturus using morphological, multivariate and molecular analysis using 18S and 28S rDNA regions.

Materials and Methods
Nematode extraction and morphological identification

Nematodes were extracted from soil samples by Cobb’s wet sieving and decanting methods (Cobb, 1918), followed by the modified Baermann funnel technique (Baermann, 1917). Specimens were fixed with hot 4 % formaldehyde solution and processed to anhydrous glycerin by the method of Seinhorst’s method (Seinhorst, 1959). Preserved specimens were observed under different magnifications of a compound microscope. Measurements were taken directly using an ocular micrometer. De Man’s formula was used for denoting the dimensions of the nematodes. Line drawing was made with the aid of a camera lucida attached to the microscope and photomicrographs were taken by Nikon DS L2 camera. Ahmad and Jairajpuri (2010) was followed for taxonomic descriptions.

Statistical analysis

The principal component analysis was used to study the variation among the populations of M. sigmaturus and M. arenicolus. We have included M. arenicolus, because of being placed together with M. sigmaturus through molecular analysis of 18S rDNA. A total of fourteen populations were analyzed for this study. Twenty-two morphometric characters, viz. body length (L), a, b, c, c’, V, G1, G2, lip region width (LW), buccal cavity length (BCL), buccal cavity width (BCW), dorsal tooth apex % (DTA%), amphids opening to anterior end, amphid diameter, nerve ring to anterior end (NR), neck length, neck base diameter (NBD), mid-body diameter (MBD), anal body diameter (ABD), rectum, tail length (TL), and tail length % of body length (TL%BL) were used for analysis. Measurements for the PCA were taken from original descriptions. Data on the morphometric measurements of the species were analyzed using XLSTAT (Addinsoft, 2007). The morphometric measurements for the PCA analysis were taken from the original descriptions. The measures were normalized using XLSTAT software before their analysis (Addinsoft, 2007). The score values were determined for each species based on each of the principal components. The scores for the first two components were used to form a two-dimensional plot (F1 and F2) of each isolate based on the eigenvalues given by the software XLSTAT.

DNA extraction, PCR, and phylogenetic analysis

DNA extraction was done using the Chelex method (Shokoohi, 2021). Two specimens of each species were hand-picked with a fine tip needle and transferred to a 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube containing 5 μl double distilled water. The nematodes in the tube were crushed with the tip of a fine needle and vortexed. Thirty microliters of 5 % Chelex® 50 and 2 μl of proteinase K were added to each of the microcentrifuge tubes that contained the crushed nematodes and mixed. These separate microcentrifuge tubes with the nematode lysate were incubated at 56 °C for two hours and then incubated at 95 °C for 10 minutes to deactivate the protein-ase K and finally spun for 2 min at 16000 rpm (Shokoohi and Abolafia, 2021). The supernatant was then extracted from each of the tubes and stored at −20 °C. Following this step, the forward and reverse primers, SSU F04 (5′-GCTTGTCTCAAAGATTAAGCC–3′) and SSU R26 (5′-CATTCTTGGCAAATGCTTTCG–3′) (Blaxter et al., 1998); D2A (5′-ACAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGTTG–3′), D3B (5′-TCGGAAGGAACCAGCTACTA–3′) (De Ley et al., 1999), were used in the PCR reactions for partial amplification of the 18S rDNA, and 28S rDNA regions. PCR was conducted with 5 μl of the DNA template, 12.5 μl of 2X PCR Master Mix Red (Promega, USA) for the Pakistani specimens, 1 μl of each primer (10 pmol μl−1), and ddH2O for a final volume of 30 μl. The amplification was processed using an Eppendorf master cycler gradient (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), with the following program: initial denaturation for 3 min at 94 °C, 37 cycles of denaturation for 45 s at 94°C; 54 °C, and 56 °C annealing temperatures for 18S, and 28S rDNA, respectively; extension for 45 s to 1 min at 72 °C, and finally an extension step of 6 min at 72 °C followed by a temperature on hold at 4 °C. After DNA amplification, 5 μl of product from each tube was loaded on a 1 % agarose gel in TBE buffer (40 mM Tris, 40 mM boric acid, and 1 mM EDTA) for evaluation of the DNA bands. The bands were stained with GelRed® and visualized and photographed on a UV transilluminator. The amplicons of each gene were stored at −20 °C. Finally, the PCR products were purified for sequencing. Available sequences for other Mononchida were obtained from NCBI GenBank for comparison. Also, Mermis nigrescens Dujardin, 1842 (KF583882; AF036641) and (KF886018) were used as outgroups for 18S and 28S rDNA, respectively. Outgroups were selected based on Van Megen et al. (2009). The ribosomal DNA sequences were analyzed and edited with BioEdit (Hall, 1999) and aligned using CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al., 1994). The length of the alignments was 1015 and 850 bps for 18S, and 28S rDNA, respectively. Phylogenetic trees were generated using the Bayesian inference method as implemented in the program Mr Bayes 3.1.2 (Ronquist & Huelsenbeck, 2003). The GTR model was selected using jModeltest 2.1.10 (Guindon & Gascuel, 2003; Darriba et al., 2012). Then, the selected model was initiated with a random starting tree and ran with the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) for 106 generations. The 18S sequence alignments were also used to construct phylogenetic Median Joining Networks using PopART software (http://popart.otago.ac.nz) (Bandelt et al., 1999). The partial rDNA sequences of M. sigmaturus were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers: OM278259–OM278262 for 18S rDNA, and OM317560–OM317561 for 28S rDNA.

Taxonomy Section

The genus Mylonchulus is characterized by goblet or funnel shaped stoma, dorsal wall thicker than ventral. Dorsal tooth large directed forward with pointed apex in anterior half of stoma. Subventral walls bearing several small rasp like denticles arranged in rather regular transverse rows. Often ventro-sublateral denticles opposite to the base of the dorsal tooth. Pharyngo-intestinal junction non-tuberculate.

Female genital system didelphic, amphidelphic. Spicules slender, arcuate, gubernaculum simple or bidentate with or without lateral accessory pieces. Tails similar in both sexes, short or slightly elongated with usually conspicuous glands and terminal or subterminal spinneret.

Mylonchulus sigmaturus was originally described by Cobb, 1916 from various parts of the United States and Mexico. This species is recognized by the outlandish ventrally bent tail which is similar in both males and females. Tail of the male bears a series of 13 to 15 low mammliform accessary organs which have distinct connections with the inner body tissues. Spicule slightly arcuate, tapering and subacute and about as long as the anal body diameter. The wedge shaped accessory pieces taper at both ends. Besides the accessory pieces, there are furcate lateral guiding pieces. The caudal glands lie tandem in the tail (Thorne, 1924).

Mylonchulus sigmaturus Cobb, 1917 (Fig. 1. A-I; 2. A-O)

Measurements: Table 1.

Fig. 1.

Mylonchulus sigmaturus Cobb, 1917, Female: A: Pharyngeal region; B: Anterior region; C. Tail; D: Reproductive system; E. Cardia; Male: F: Anterior region, G. Tail region, H. whole body; I. Tail having precloacal genital papillae.

Fig. 2.

Mylonchulus sigmaturus Cobb, 1917, A–D: Anterior region of P1–P4 populations; E–H: Cardiac Junction (P1–P4); I: Vulval region; J: Whole-body female; K: Male tail; L–O: Female tail (P1–P4).

Morphometric data of different populations of Mylonchulus sigmaturus along with other populations of M. sigmaturus from different ecological zones. All measurements are in µm except body length.

References Present specimens Koohkan et al., (2014) Ahmad et al., (2010) Farahmand et al., (2009) De Bruin & Heyns (1992) Chaves (1990) Khan & Saeed (1987) Coetzee (1966) Mulvey (1961)

Locality Pakistan Iran Japan Iran South Africa Argentina Pakistan South Africa Sweden

n 40♀♀ 1♂ 5 ♀♀ 10♀♀ 11♀♀ 1 ♀ 18 ♀♀ 1♀ 4 ♀ 58♀♀
L 1.22 ±1.056 (1.04– 1.46) 1.21 1.294 ± 4.94 (1.22 – 1.36) 1.30 ± 0.08 (1.16 – 1.46) 1.20 ±1.29 (1.01 – 1.46) 1.25 1.12 ± 0.1 (1.0 – 1.32) 0.95 1.1 (1.1 – 1.2) 1 – 1.7
a 28.04 ±2.02 (25.8 – 33.7) 31.8 31.7 ± 1.3 (30.1 – 33.3) 29.7 ± 1.27 (27.3 – 31.8) 28.0 ± 2.1 (24.1 – 30.7) 34.7 29.7 ± 2.3 (26 – 36.2) 23 23.1 (29 – 33) 24 – 47
b 3.475 ± 0.196 (3.1 – 3.9) 3.4 3.5 ± 0.1 (3.4 – 3.6) 3.37 ± 0.12 (3.16 – 3.55) 3.7 ± 0.2 (3.2 – 3.9) 3.3 3.3 ± 0.2 (3.2 – 3.8) 4 3.2 (3.1 – 3.3) 3 – 4
c 35.17 ± 3.52 (26.0 – 40.93) 28.8 32.8 ± 5.6 (27.8 – 42.1) 35 ± 2.4 (30.5 – 38.6) 27.5 2.6 (26.6 – 30.7) 37.9 30 ± 2.6 (2558 – 32.2) 17.9 26.9 (25 – 29) 24 – 39.2
ć 1.205 ± 0.115 (1.0 – 1.42) 1.2 1.5 ± 0.2 (1.2 – 1.9) 1.21 ± 0.07 (1.1 – 1.3) 1.4 ± 0.2 (1.1 – 1.8) 1.5 1.4 ± 0.2 (1.2 – 1.6) 1.2 1.4 1 – 1.8
V 65.72 ± 2.217 (60.41 – 70.6) -- 64 ± 1.1 (63.1 – 65.9) 65.14 ± 1.4 (62.9 – 67.3) 62.8± 1.9 (59.7 – 66.4) 65 64.6 ± 1.5 (62 – 68) 58.4 66.0 (66 – 67) 50 – 77
G1 9.92 ± 1.50 (6.1 – 14.0) -- 18.7 ± 1.5 (18 – 20) 14.15 ± 3.69 (7 – 20) 12.1 ± 0.8 (11.1 – 12.9) - - 13.7 1.4 (9.2 – 11.8) -
G2 9.731 ± 1.77 (5.4 – 14.4) -- 18.0 ± 4.0 (13 – 22) 11.3 ± 2.5 (9 – 18) 10.5± 1.3 (8.5 – 11.7) - - - 9.5 (9.1 – 9.8) -
Lip region width 24.54 ± 1.44 (22 – 27) 22 24.2 ± 1.5 (23 – 27) 25.1 ± 1.4 (23 – 27) 24.6±1.8 (22.4 – 28) 23 21.5 ± 1.8 (20 – 25) 23.2 19.1 -
Buccal cavity length 25.75 ± 1.198 (25 – 27) 26 24.7 ± 0.8 (24 – 26) 25 ± 1.06 (24 – 27) 22.9± 1.4 (21 – 25.2) 26 22.7 ± 1.4 (20 – 25) 26.5 22.1 20 – 31
Buccal cavity width 16 ± 2.01 (15 – 17) 15 14.1 ± 0.4 (14 – 15) 15.2 ± 0.4 (15 – 16) 15.8±0.7 (15.4 – 16.8) 13 14.3 ± 1.0 (13 – 16) 13.1 9.6 11 – 17
Dorsal tooth apex % of buccal cavity 78.5 ± 1.945% (74 – 80%) 77 81.2 ± 2.6 (79 – 85) 80.2±4.6 (72.2 – 87.6) 15 77.2 ± 2.6 (74 – 81) 20 -
Amphid position from anterior end 9 ± 1.07 (8 – 10) 11 12±0.0 (12) - - - - - -
Amphidial aperture diameter 4.50±0.31 (4 – 5) 5 3.0±0.0 (3) - - - - - - -
Excretory pore from anterior end 102.5 ± 3.05 (94 – 113) -- - - - - - - - -
Nerve ring from anterior end 82.166 ± 3.46 (80– 90) 84 104.9±11.3 (89 – 117) 108 ± 3.6 (102 – 114) 99.6±11.9 (87.5 – 122.5) - - - -
Neck length 348.8 ± 17.6 (318 – 372) 352 367.5± 10.2 (355 – 379) 386 ± 12 (370 – 410) 330.6±29.3 (297.5 – 392) - 293.7 ± 12.3 (279 – 309) - -
Body diameter at: -- - - - - - - -
Neck base 37.12 ± 3.91 (30 – 47) 36 37.1±1.8 (35 – 39) - - - - - - -
Mid body 43.75 ± 3.78 (38 – 50) 38 40.9±2.3 (39 – 44) - - - - - - -
Anus 29.04 ± 1.92 (26 – 33) 37 27.3±3.0 (24 – 31) - 30.9±1.4 (28 – 31.5) - - - - -
Rectum 21.91 ± 1.49 (20 – 24) -- 21.4±2.1 (18 – 24) 21 ± 2.4 (17 – 25) 24.5±3.1 (21 – 28) - - - -
Tail length 35 ± 4.20 (30 – 50) 42 40.3±6.2 (31 – 47) 38.6 ± 2.6 (35 – 42) 44.2±5.5 (35 – 52.5) 33 33.2 ± 3.5 (29 – 37) 26.5 -
Tail length as % of total body length 2.76 ± 0.288 (2.26% – 3.38%) 3.46 3.1±0.5 (2 – 4) - - - - - - -
Spicules -- 46 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
Gubernaculum -- 18 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --

Factor loading for different populations of M. sigmaturus.

F1 F2
Body length (BL) 0.486 0.360
a 0.170 0.833
b 0.110 −0.568
c 0.106 0.550
c′ −0.621 0.398
V 0.116 0.430
G1 −0.799 0.256
G2 −0.816 0.231
Lip region width (LW) 0.897 −0.109
Buccal cavity length (BCL) 0.576 0.164
Buccal cavity width (BCW) 0.614 0.350
Dorsal tooth apex (DTA%) 0.141 −0.357
Amphid to anterior end 0.109 0.532
Amphid diameter 0.082 −0.769
Nerve ring to anterior end (NR) 0.412 0.150
Neck length 0.851 0.005
Neck base diameter (NBD) 0.104 0.646
Mid-body diameter (MBD) 0.980 −0.123
Anal body diameter (ABD) 0.867 −0.180
Rectum 0.941 −0.123
Tail length (TL) 0.903 0.083
TL%BL 0.803 0.380

Factor score for different populations of M. sigmaturus.

Observation F1 F2
P1 −0.629 −1.704
P2 −0.112 −2.305
P3 0.224 0.378
P4 0.436 0.645
Koohkan et al., (2014); Iran −0.725 1.769
Chaves (1990); Argentina −2.506 0.567
Coetzee (1966); South Africa −2.479 −0.303
de Bruin & Heyns (1992); South Africa −1.260 2.193
Khan & Saeed (1987); Pakistan −1.636 −4.145
Ahmad et al., (2010); Japan −0.034 1.920
Farahmand et al., (2009); Iran 0.122 −0.773
Mulvey (1961); Sweden −0.414 2.491
M. arenicolus 9.168 −0.271

Female: Medium sized slender nematodes, with cylindroid, ventrally curved C-shaped body upon fixation. Body truncate anteriorly and arcuate-digitate at posterior end. Cuticle smooth under light microscopy, 1 – 2 μm thick at mid body. Lateral chord about one third of body width at mid body. Lip region is almost continuous with the adjoining body, about 2.5 – 3.0 times as wide as high and about two thirds as wide as body width at neck base. Labial and cephalic papillae distinct and prominent interfering with the labial contour. Amphidial aperture slit like, the openings appear to be higher than the dorsal tooth apex, 16 – 20 % of lip region width. Buccal cavity funnel shaped, thick walled, tapering at base 1.58 – 1.66 times as long as wide. Subventral teeth well developed, 15 – 17 μm from anterior end. Ventro-sublateral denticles arranged in seven rows: a pair of ventro-sublateral foramina present near the oblique basal plate of stoma. Dorsal tooth strong, claw like, obliquely forward directed, sharply pointed terminus, 9 – 11 μm long, 6 – 9 μm wide, situated in the anterior half of buccal cavity and its apex situated at 74 – 80 % from base of stoma. Nerve ring located at 21 – 24 % of the neck length from anterior end. Pharyngo-intestinal junctional non-tuberculate. Excretory pore 94 – 106 μm from anterior end. Genital system didelphic amphidelphic, with both branches almost equally developed. Vulva a transverse slit, vagina strongly muscular, extending inwards to about one third corresponding of body width with pars refringens consisting of two small drop shaped sclerotized pieces in lateral view, each measuring 3 – 4 × 1.5 – 2 μm. Ovaries generally small, reflexed with oocytes arranged in a single or two rows. Oviduct with distinctly swollen pars dialata; anterior ovary 50 – 80 μm and posterior ovary 60 – 100 μm long. Sphincter at the oviduct-uterus junction, well developed; uterus like structure, with distal part slightly swollen (pars dialata). Three females with a uterine egg measuring 100 – 106 × 35 – 38 μm oblong. Vulva a transverse slit, vagina strongly muscular, extending inwards to about one third corresponding of body width with pars refringens consisting of two small drop shaped sclerotized pieces in lateral view, each measuring 3 – 4 × 1.5 – 2 μm. Advulval papillae absent. Rectum 0.75 – 0.76 times anal body width long. Tail short conoid, curved ventral, with its ventral side strongly curved and the dorsal one convex, often tapering near the terminus giving a digitate appearance. Caudal glands well developed arranged in tandem spinneret opening terminally.

Male: General morphology similar to that of female except for being more strongly curved ventrally in the posterior region of body. Buccal cavity same as female. Lip region 24 μm wide. Apex of dorsal tooth 77 % from base of stoma. Genital system diorchic, each testis thin walled, contain many immature germ cells and elongated spindle-shaped spermatozoa 6 – 7 long. The two testes join to form a common vas deferens which leads to the ejaculatory duct. Spicules slender, slightly curved ventrally, 1.2 times the body diameter long. Lateral guiding piece about one fifth of spicule length, with bifurcate distal end which are connected to accessory pieces by strong muscular bands. Gubernaculum wedge shaped with more than a third as long as the spicule length, tapering at both ends. Caudal glands lie tandem in the tail leading to a common duct which opens terminally. Eleven ventromedian supplements well developed and regularly spaced. Male tail similar to that of female, provided with two pairs of caudal pores (one dorsal and one ventral) on digitate portion of tail.

Locality and habitat

Four populations of a reported species of predatory nematode, M. sigmaturus Cobb, 1917 have been isolated from the different geographical locations of Pakistan viz., P1-Thatta (Sindh), P2-Matiari (Sindh), P3-Lasbella (Balochistan), P4-Khanewal (Punjab), from the soil around plantation of banana (Musa paradisiaca L.) (Table S1; Table 1; aggregated).

Remarks

M. sigmaturus is a cosmopolitan species described or reported from various parts of the world (Koohkan et al., 2014). This species was first reported in Pakistan by Khan & Saeed (1987). In the present study, the specimens were collected from around the roots of banana plants (Musa paradisiaca L.) in different localities of Pakistan.

In comparison with the material studied by Koohkan et al., (2014) the present specimens have a slightly wider buccal cavity (15 – 17 vs 14 – 15 μm), having slightly anterior position of amphid aperture (8 – 10 vs 12 μm) and more anterior nerve ring (78 – 88 vs 89 – 117 μm). Compared with the specimens studied by Coetzee (1966) present specimens have a wider lip region (25 – 27 vs 19 μm), longer buccal cavity (25 – 27vs 22 μm) and longer tail (30 – 40 vs 26.5 μm). Compared with the material examined by de Bruin & Heyns (1992), the present population differs in lower c’ value (1.0 – 1.4 vs 1.5) and smaller buccal cavity width (15 – 17 vs 13 μm). The specimens described by Khan & Saeed (1987) differ from the present population in higher ‘a’ and ‘c’ ratios (a=25.8 – 33.7 vs 23; c=26 – 40 vs17.9) and in slightly posteriorly located vulva (V=60 – 70 vs 58). The present specimens examined fits well with description of Ahmad et al., (2010), but differs in anteriorly located nerve ring (78 – 88 vs 102 – 114 μm), in shorter neck length (318 – 372 vs 370 – 410 μm) and in shorter G2 ratio (5 – 14 vs 23 – 27). In comparison with the specimens examined by Farahmand et al., (2009), the present specimens have a longer buccal cavity (25 – 27 vs 21 – 25 μm) and nerve ring located more anteriorly (78 – 88 vs 87.5 – 122.5 μm). In the specimens described by Chaves (1990), advulval papillae were observed, but this character was not observed in the Pakistani specimens. The present specimens have a longer neck and long buccal cavity (318 – 372 vs 279 – 309 and 25 – 27 vs 20 – 25 μm), respectively.

Principal Component Analysis of M. sigmaturus populations

Principal component analysis using morphometric features of females of M. sigmaturus showed a close relationship to these populations.

An accumulated variability of 55.61 % was observed in female-based PCA, 40.02 % in the F1, and 15.69 % in the F2.

The PCA indicated that P1-(Thatta) Sindh and P4 (Khanewal) Punjab are more similar to the South African and Iranian populations. In addition, P2-(Matiari) Sindh and P3-(Lasbella) Balochistan are similar to each other. Overall, the populations of M. sigmaturus showed a low morphometric variation based on the female’s morphometrics (Fig. 3). The Pakistani populations of M. sigmaturus were categorized into two groups on the based on their morphometrics. Furthermore, a population P4 (Khanewal) Punjab from Pakistan stands separately from other M. sigmaturus in the present work, possibly belonging to another species than M. sigmaturus. The results indicated that M. arenicolus stands separate from the M. sigmaturus populations, differentiating them into two valid species.

Fig. 3.

Principal component analysis biplot for M Mylonchulus sigmaturus from Pakistan and Mylonchulus arenicolus.

DNA characterization of M. sigmaturus

The sequence flanked by the two primers SSU F04 and SSU R26 of the 18S regions of M. sigmaturus isolates is 800 bp long. The blastn search revealed that this population has 5 nucleotides differences with M. sigmaturus from Japan (acc. no. AB361446; AB361447) with 99 % similarity. Estimates of genetic distance using the maximum composite likelihood method among the 18S rDNA region of M. sigmaturus ranges from 0.007 to 0.014. The result showed that Pakistani M. sigmaturus (OM278261) has 0.016 genetic distance from other populations in Pakistan, which is the highest variation. In addition, M. arenicolus Clark, 1961 (AF036596) showed 0.002 genetic distance from M. sigmaturus (AY284755; The Netherlands).

Phylogenetic analysis

The consensus tree inferred using our 18S rDNA marker (Fig. 4) indicated that the mononchids included in the molecular study were grouped into six clades, including I) Bathyodontus mirus Andrássy, 1956, and Cryptonchus tristis (Ditlevsen, 1911) Filipjev, 1934 and unidentified Cryptonchus; II) Mylonchulus spp. (e.g., M. sigmaturus (Cobb, 1917) Altherr, 1953; M. oceanicus Andrássy, 1986; M. brachyuris (Bütschli, 1873) Cobb, 1917; and M. rotuni-caudatus Skwarra, 1921; and M. arenicolus Clark, 1961, III) Actus salvadoricus Baqri & Jairajpuri, 1974, IV) Iotonchus species and Anatonchus tridentatus (de Man, 1876), De Coninck, 1939, V) Mononchus aquaticus Coetzee, 1968; M. truncatus Bastian, 1865, and M. tunbridgensis Bastian, 1865 and Coomansus gerlachei (de Man, 1904) Jairajpuri, 1970, and VI) Clarkus papillatus (Bastian, 1865) Jairajpuri, 1970; Prionchulus punctatus (Cobb, 1917) Andrássy, 1958; P. muscorum (Du Jardin, 1845) Wu and Hoeppli, 1929; Parkellus zschokkei (Menzel, 1913) Ahmad & Jairajpuri, 2010 and unidentified Parkellus.

Fig. 4.

18S rDNA Bayesian tree inferred from known and newly sequenced Mylonchulus sigmaturus from Pakistan.

The consensus tree inferred using our 28S rDNA marker (Fig. 5) indicated that the mononchids included in the molecular study are grouped into four clades, including I) Prionchulus punctatus, Clarkus papillatus, and Mylonchulus sigmaturus; II) Coomansus parvus, Parkellus zschokkei and unidentified Parkellus, III) Anatonchus tridentatus and Iotonchus sp., IV) Mononchus aquaticus, M. truncates, M. tunbridgensis, M. maduei Schneider, 1925 and unidentified Mononchus.

Fig. 5.

28S rDNA Bayesian tree inferred from known and newly sequenced Mylonchulus sigmaturus from Pakistan.

A phylogenetic median-joining network showing the relationships between populations of M. sigmaturus, is given in Fig. 6. The populations studied could be divided into two groups, including (I) OM278259–OM278262, AY284755, AB361446, and AB361447, and (II) AY284756 and AY284757. The Pakistani M. sigmaturus (OM278259 and OM278262) differed from Dutch M. sigmaturus (AY284755) and Japanese M. sigmaturus (AB361446; AB361447) in 2 nucleotides. Besides, Pakistani M. sigmaturus (OM278259 and OM278262) in the first group was represented as an identical sequence (Fig. 6). Nucleotide differences of 18S rRNA sequences of 27 populations of Mylonchulus was estimated as Л = 0.338214.

Fig. 6.

Phylogenetic median-joining network showing the relationships between the 18S rRNA gene sequences of Mylonchulus sigmaturus. The sizes of circles are proportional to the number of identical sequences. The number of changes between haplotypes are given in hatch marks.

Discussion

Mononchida members are predacious and well-distributed nematodes worldwide (Ahmad and Jairajpuri, 2010). In the present study, we have analyzed the populations of M. sigmaturus from Pakistan through morphological, multivariate and phylogenetic analysis. Regarding the PCA, result showed a low variation among M. sigmaturus. The previous work showed three species, namely M. sigmaturus, M. brachyuris, and M. lacustris differentiated based on the female morphometrics (Koohkan et al., 2014). They have shown a low variation among M. sigmaturus. The same result was obtained in the present study. However, the result also indicated that despite the close relationship of M. sigmaturus and M. arenicolus based on 18S rDNA, they differ in morphometrical features, as shown by PCA plots. This result agrees with Ahmad and Jairajpuri (2010), who indicated both species with different morphological characteristics. Therefore, a further study was conducted to verify the Pakistani populations as M. sigmaturus, including molecular approaches.

Regarding the phylogenetic analysis, results showed that Mylonchulus group is a monophyletic taxon. However, a close relationship between M. sigmaturus and M. arenicolus was observed using 18S rDNA. However, despite the similarities of these two species, they differ in female tail length (30 – 44 vs 47 μm), and male (present vs absent). Additionally, the pairwise genetic distance showed a very low variation between M. arenicolus (AF036596) and M. sigmaturus (AY284755). Therefore, further investigations are needed to determine the relationship between these two species. Furthermore, the population of M. sigmaturus from Pakistan forms a strongly supported clade with the other M. sigmaturus sequences used in the analysis. This is consistent with the results obtained by van Megen et al. (2009), Shokoohi et al. (2013), and Koohkan et al. (2015). Although, two populations of M. sigmaturus (AY284756, AY284757) were placed separately from other M. sigmaturus.

The 28S rDNA is reported for the first time for M. sigmaturus. Therefore, due to lack of other Mylonchulus to compare, the present sequence stands molecularly close with P. punctatus. However, morphological, they differ in buccal cavity length (25 – 27 vs 35 – 45 μm), buccal cavity denticle (in a transverse rows vs longitudinal rows), spinneret (present vs absent), and male supplementary organs (11 vs 18 – 21). They also differ with C. papillatus in buccal cavity (funnel-shaped vs cup-shaped), denticles (present vs absent), and tail spinneret (present vs absent) (Ahmad and Jairajpuri 2010).

Genetic pairwise distance estimating for different populations of M. sigmaturus (numbers 1–7) and M. arenicolus (number 8) [upper matrix indicates standard error).

species Accession number Locality 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 M. sigmaturus N18_988 OM278259 Pakistan 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.004
2 M. sigmaturus N19_988 OM278260 Pakistan 0.008 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.004 0.003
3 M. sigmaturus N21_988 OM278261 Pakistan 0.012 0.016 0.004 0.007 0.008 0.006 0.007
4 M. sigmaturus N22_988 OM278262 Pakistan 0.007 0.010 0.016 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.003
5 M. sigmaturus AB361447 Japan 0.012 0.012 0.045 0.009 0.002 0.000 0.002
6 M. sigmaturus AY284755 The Netherlands 0.014 0.010 0.047 0.012 0.008 0.002 0.001
7 M. sigmaturus AB361446 Japan 0.012 0.012 0.033 0.009 0.000 0.008 0.002
8 M. arenicolus AF036596 UK 0.013 0.010 0.042 0.010 0.007 0.002 0.008

In conclusion, the rDNA helps to separate Mylonchulus species. However, mtDNA can be a good option for distinguishing the close species of Mylonchulus. The phylogenetic analysis showed some differences between the Pakistani M. sigmaturus, and other related species. However, due to the morphology and morphometrics similarity, we consider all Mylonchulus populations from Pakistan, as M. sigmaturus, with the male being reported for the first time. In addition, the potential of the pest biocontrol or ecological behavior of Mylonchlus needs to be investigated.

eISSN:
1336-9083
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Zoology, Ecology, other, Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Microbiology, Virology and Infection Epidemiology