Cite

1. Awad, W. A., Ghareeb, K., Abdel-Raheem, S., Böhm, J., 2009: Effects of dietary inclusion of probiotic and synbiotic on growth performance, organ weights, and intestinal histo-morphology of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 88, 1, 49–56. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2008-00244. Search in Google Scholar

2. Bermudez-Brito, M., Plaza-Díaz, J., Muñoz-Quezada, S., Gómez-Llorente, C., Gil, A., 2012: Probiotic mechanisms of action. Ann. Nutr. Metab., 61, 60–174. DOI: 10.1159/000342079. Search in Google Scholar

3. Birchenough, G. M., Johansson, M. E., Gustafsson, J. K., Bergström, J. H., Hansson, G. C., 2015: New developments in goblet cell mucus secretion and function. Muc. Immunol., 8, 4, 712–719. DOI: 10.1038/mi.2015.32. Search in Google Scholar

4. Bogucka, J., Ribeiro, D. M., Bogusławska-Tryk, M., Dankowiakowska, A., da Costa, R. P. R., Bednarczyk, M., 2019: Microstructure of the small intestine in broiler chickens fed a diet with probiotic or synbiotic supplementation. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. (Berl)., 103, 6, 1785–1791. DOI: 10.1111/jpn.13182. Search in Google Scholar

5. Butler, J. E., 2015: Collection, handling, and analysis of specimens for studies of mucosal immunity in animals of veterinary importance. Muc. Immunol., 4th edn., Academic Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2369–2391. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/300857928_Collection_Handling_and_Analysis_of_Specimens_for_Studies_of_Mucosal_Immunity_in_Animals_of_Veterinary_Importance/citations. Search in Google Scholar

6. Deplancke, B., Gaskins, H. R., 2001: Microbial modulation of innate defence: Goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 73, 1131S–1141S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/73.6.1131S. Search in Google Scholar

7. Faixová, Z., Piešová, E., Maková, Z., Levkut, M. jr., Pistl, J., Lauková, A., et al., 2012: Effect of dietary probiotic and plant extract supplementation on mucin dynamics in the chicken intestine and on performance of chickens. Folia Veterinaria, 56 (Supplementum II), 15–16. Search in Google Scholar

8. Hassanin, A., Tony, M. A., Sawiress, F. A., Abdl-Rahman, M. A., Saleh, S. Y., 2015: Influence of dietary supplementation of coated sodium butyrate and/or synbiotic on growth performances, caecal fermentation, intestinal morphometry and metabolic profile of growing rabbits. J. Agric. Sci., 7, 180–190. DOI: 10.5539/jas.v7n2p180. Search in Google Scholar

9. Kogut, M. H., 2019: The effect of microbiome modulation on the intestinal health of poultry. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 250, 32–40. DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2018.10.008. Search in Google Scholar

10. Li, X., Qiang, L. L., Xu, C., 2008: Effects of supplementation of fructooligosaccharide and/or Bacillus Subtilis to diets on performance and on intestinal microflora inb. Arch. Anim. Breed., 51, 64–70. DOI: 10.5194/aab-51-64-2008. Search in Google Scholar

11. Macmillan, J. L., Vicaretti, S. D., Nozovitz, B., Xing, X., Low, K. E., et al., 2019: Structural analysis of broiler chicken small intestinal mucin O-glycan modification by Clostridium perfringens. Poult. Sci., 98, 10. DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez297. Search in Google Scholar

12. Nofouzi, K., Mirzazadeh, S., Khordadmehr, M., Madadi, M. S., Amininia, S., Firouzamandi, M., Ranjbar, V. R., 2021: The effects of heat-killed Tsukamurella inchonensis on intestinal morphology and humoral immune responses of broiler chickens. Iran J. Microbiol., 13, 1, 81–90. DOI: 10.18502/ijm.v13i1.5496. Search in Google Scholar

13. Pelá, F., 2021: The domino effects of symbiotic: From feed to health. In Franco Robles, E. (Ed.): Prebiotics and probiotics – From Feed to Health. IntechOpen, 254 pp. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.99733. Search in Google Scholar

14. Roto, S. M., Rubinelli, P. M., Ricke, S. C., 2015: An introduction to the avian gut microbiota and the effects of yeast-based prebiotic-type compounds as potential feed additives. Front. Vet. Sci., 2, 28. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00028. Search in Google Scholar

15. Scavuzzi, B. M., Henrique, F. C., Miglioranza, L. H. S., Simao, A. N. C., Dichi, I., 2014: Impact of prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics on components of the metabolic syndrome. Ann. Nutr. Disord. Ther., 1, 2, 1009. Search in Google Scholar

16. Śliżewska, K., Markowiak-Kopeć, P., Żbikowski, A., et al., 2020: The effect of synbiotic preparations on the intestinal microbiota and her metabolism in broiler chickens. Sci. Rep., 10, 4281. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61256-z. Search in Google Scholar

17. Smirnov, A., Tako, E., Ferket, P. R., Uni, Z., 2006: Mucin gene expression and mucin content in the chicken intestinal goblet cells are affected by in ovo feeding of carbohydrates. Poult. Sci., J., 8, 669–673. DOI: 10.1093/ps/85.4.669. Search in Google Scholar

18. Szabóová, R., Faixová, Z., Maková, Z., Piešová, E., 2018: The difference in the mucus organisation between the small and large intestine and its protection of selected natural substances. A review. Folia Veterinaria, 62, 48–55. DOI: 10.2478/fv-2018-0037. Search in Google Scholar

19. Villagrán-de la Mora, Z., Nuño, K., Vázquez-Paulino, O., Avalos, H., Castro-Rosas, J., Gómez-Aldapa, C., et al., 2019: Effect of a synbiotic mix on intestinal structural changes, and Salmonella typhimurium and Clostridium perfringens colonization in broiler chickens. Animals, 9, 10, 777. DOI: 10.3390/ani9100777. Search in Google Scholar

20. Yang, S., Yu, M., 2021: Role of goblet cells in intestinal barrier and mucosal immunity. J. Inflamm. Res., 14, 3171–3183. DOI: 10.2147/JIR.S318327. Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2453-7837
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Life Sciences, Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Microbiology and Virology, Medicine, Veterinary Medicine