1. bookVolume 64 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2453-7837
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Morphometric Characteristics of the Extreme Eastern Algerian Domestic Donkey (Equus asinus)

Published Online: 13 Apr 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 64 (2020) - Issue 1 (March 2020)
Page range: 66 - 76
Received: 27 Oct 2019
Accepted: 21 Feb 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2453-7837
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The aim of this study was to define the morphometric variability of the extreme Eastern Algerian donkeys. The study was carried out from June to December 2018 in El-Tarf, Souk-Ahras, and Tebessa provinces. The study population involved 65 individuals (32 jacks and 33 jennies) between the ages of 3 and 16 years old. In total, 13 body measurements were used, and 5 zootechnical indexes were calculated. The quantitative and qualitative characteristics were studied in order to establish an ethnic and functional classification of this particular subspecies. The qualitative data demonstrated that the coat colour was variable. Bay and greyish colours were dominant with a respective rate of 61.5 % and 38.5 %, respectively. The head, the nose, as well as the eyes contour colours were mainly grey with 52.3 %, 58.5 % and 50.8 % respectively. The partial absence of the coat particularities was observed. The population presented a significate relationship between the quantitative characters (P < 0.05). The donkeys were longilinear, of a rectilinear profile, compact with massive trends. They had a hyper-metric format. The animals are good for meat production. The General Linear Model (GLM) showed that the body measurements were variable by sex and body mass. The principal component analysis (PCA), the multiple correspondence analyses (MCA) and the ascending hierarchical classification (AHC) revealed that the population was composed of 2 clusters representing 4 animal classes. This study was the first report on the phenotypic characterization of donkeys in the extreme Eastern Algerian area, based on corporal measurements. The results indicated the existence of heterogeneity and suggested the possibilities of genetic improvement within the species.

Keywords

1. Ayad, A., Aissanou, S., Amis, K., Latreche, A., Iguer-Ouada, M., 2019: Morphological characteristics of donkeys (equus asinus) in Kabylie area, Algeria. Slovak J. Anim. Sci., 52, 2, 53—62.Search in Google Scholar

2. Beja-Pereira, A., England, P. R., Ferrand, N., Jordan, S., Bakhiet, A. O., Abdalla, M. A., et al., 2004: African origins of the domestic donkey. Science, 304, 5678, 1781. DOI: 10. 1126/science.1096008.Search in Google Scholar

3. Benhamadi, M., Mezouar, K., Benyarou, M., Bouhandasse, A., Gaouar, S. B. S., 2017: Morphometric characterization of the equine barbe breed in northwest of Algeria. Gen. Biodiv. J., 1, 2, 48—65.10.46325/gabj.v1i2.106Search in Google Scholar

4. Boujenane, I., Machmoum, M., 2008: Mensurations corporelles des ânes des races Poitevine et Catalane et de leurs croisés au Maroc. Revue Élev. Méd. Vét. Pays Trop., 61, 1, 63—67. DOI: 10.19182/remvt.10015.10.19182/remvt.10015Search in Google Scholar

5. Camps, G., Musso, J. C., Chaker, S., 2012:«Âne», Encyclopédie Berbère. Document A218, Online since 01 December 2012, Accessed on 26 October 2019. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/encyclopedieberbere/2503.Search in Google Scholar

6. Chabchoub, A., Landolsi, F., Jari, Y., 2004: Etude des paramètres morphologiques des chevaux Barbes de Tunisie. Revue Méd. Vét., 155, 1, 31—37.Search in Google Scholar

7. Colli, L., Perrotta, G., Negrini, R., Bomba, L., Bigi, D., Zambonelli, P., et al., 2013: Detecting population structure and recent demographic history in endangered livestock breeds. Anim. Genet., 44, 1, 69—78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02356.x.10.1111/j.1365-2052.2012.02356.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Daloum, S., Meutchieye, F., Manjeli, Y., 2015: Phenotypic diversity of domestic donkeys in the sahelian region of Hadjer-Lami, Chad. Bull. Anim. Hlth. Prod. Afr. AnGR, Special edn., 123—135.Search in Google Scholar

9. De Aluja, A. S., Tapia Pérez, G., Lopez, F., Pearson, R. A., 2005: Live weight estimation of donkey in Central Mexico from measurement of thoracic circumference. Trop. Anim. Health. Prod., 37, Suppl. 1, 159—71, DOI: 10.1007/s11250-005-9007-0.10.1007/s11250-005-9007-0Search in Google Scholar

10. Defeu, M., Meutchieye, F., Manjeli, Y., 2015: Phenotypic diversity of domestic donkeys (Equus Africanus Asinus) in Northwest Cameroon Highlands. Bull. Anim. Hlth. Prod. Afr. AnGR, Special edn., 137—149.Search in Google Scholar

11. Djaout, A., Afri-Bouzebda, F., Bouzebda, Z., Benidir, M., 2018: Morphological characterization and study of zootechnical indexes of Berbere sheep in Eastern Algeria. Ind. J. Anim. Sci., 88, 6, 706—713.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ebangi, A. L., Vall, E., 1998: Phenotypic characterization of draft donkeys within the Sudano-Sahelian zone of Cameroon. Revue Élev. Méd. Vét. Pays Trop., 51, 4, 327—334.Search in Google Scholar

13. Esquivelzeta, C., Fina, M., Bach, R., Madruga, C., Caja, G., Casellas, J., et al., 2011: Morphological analysis and sub-population characterization of Ripollesa sheep breed. Anim. Genet. Res., 49, 9—17. DOI: 10.1017/S2078633611000063.10.1017/S2078633611000063Search in Google Scholar

14. FAO, 2012: Phenotypic characterization of animal genetic resources. FAO Animal Production and Health Guidelines, No. 11. Rome, 7—28.Search in Google Scholar

15. Folch, P., Jordana, J., 1997: Characterization, references ranges and the influence of gender on morphological parameters of endangered Catalonian donkey breed. J. Eq. Vet. Sci., 17, 2, 102—111. DOI: 10.1016/S0737-0806(97)80347-4.10.1016/S0737-0806(97)80347-4Search in Google Scholar

16. Guedaoura, S., Cabaraux, J. F., Moumene, A., Tahraoui, A., Nicks, B. 2011: Evaluation morpho-métrique de chevaux de race barbe et derives en algerie. Ann. Méd. Vét., 155, 14—22.Search in Google Scholar

17. Gupta, A. K., Kumar, S., Pal, Y., Chauhan, M., Kumar, B., Prince, P., 2017: Phenotypic characteristics and general managemental practices for working donkey populations in South Western Bihar region of India. Ind. J. Anim. Sci., 87, 11, 1414—1417.Search in Google Scholar

18. Hair, Jr., J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., 2014:Multivariant Data Analysis. Pearson Education Limited by Pearson New International Edition, U. K. Printed in the United States of America, 519—540.Search in Google Scholar

19. Han, H., Chen, N., Jordana, J., Li, C., Sun, T., Xia, X., et al., 2017: Genetic diversity and paternal origin of domestic donkeys in Animal Genetics. Anim. Genet., 48, 6, 708—711. DOI: 10.1111/age.12607.10.1111/age.1260728929497Search in Google Scholar

20. Hanot, P., Bochaton, C., 2018: New osteological criteria for the identification of domestic horses, donkeys and their hybrids in archaeological contexts. J. Archaeol. Sci., 94, 12—20. DOI:10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.012.10.1016/j.jas.2018.03.012Search in Google Scholar

21. John, P. A., 2016:Characterization of Donkeys () in Northwestern Nigeria Using Morphological and Morphometric Measures. A dissertation submitted to the school of postgraduate studies, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria, 64—182.Search in Google Scholar

22. Kabore, S., 2014:Caractérisation Morphobiométrique et Biochimique des ânes (Equus asinus) du Burkina-Faso. PhD. Thesis No 15. Cheikh Anta Diop University (UCAD). Burkina-Faso. 41—68.Search in Google Scholar

23. Kefena, E., Beja-Pereira, A., Han, J. L., Haile, A., Mohammed, Y. K., Dessie, T., 2011: Eco-geographical structuring and morphological diversities in Ethiopian donkey populations. Livest. Sci., 141, 232—241.10.1016/j.livsci.2011.06.011Search in Google Scholar

24. Kimura, B., Marshall, F. B., Chen, S., 2011: Ancient DNA from Nubian and Somali wild ass provides insights into donkey ancestry and domestication. Proc. Biol. Sci., 278, 1702, 50‒57. Epub July 28, 2010. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.0708.10.1098/rspb.2010.0708299271520667880Search in Google Scholar

25. Konen, F., 2011: Dermatologie de l’âne (Equus asinus). Thèse pour obtenir le grade de Docteur Vétérinaire. Vet. Agro Sup., Campus vétérinaire de Lyon. 33‒37.Search in Google Scholar

26. Labbaci, M., Djaout, A., Benyarou, M., Ameur, A., Gaouar, S. B. S., 2018: Morphometric characterization and typology of donkey farming (Equus Asinus) in the wilaya of Tlemcen. Genet. Biodiv. J., 2, 1, 60—72.10.46325/gabj.v2i1.115Search in Google Scholar

27. Lauvergne, J. J., 2006: Inventaire des ressources génétiques caprines dans un pays d’Afrique à l’aide de différents marqueurs et indices. Synthèse Méthodologique, INA-PG, Clamart, 5 pp.Search in Google Scholar

28. Legrand, R., Abitbol, M., 2016: Identification of mutations at the origin of various phenotypes in donkeys. Bull. Acad. Vét. France, 169, 2, 110—116. DOI: 10.4267/2042/60679.10.4267/2042/60679Search in Google Scholar

29. Marcenac, L. N., Aublet, H., D’autheville, P., 1980: Etude comparative des régions proportions- compensations hippo-métrie. In Maloines, A. (Ed.):Encyclopédie du Cheval, Paris, France, 195—212.Search in Google Scholar

30. Mariante, A., Da, S., Miserani, M. G., Mc Manus, C., Santos, S. A., De Abreu, U. G. P., et al., 2002: Body indexes for the Pantaneiro horse. In Proceedings 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., 30, 431—434.Search in Google Scholar

31. Nicks, B., Delfontaine, B., Canart, B., Vanderbruggen, J., Vandenheede, M., 2006: Caractéristiques morphologiques des juments de Trait belge. Ann. Méd. Vét., 150, 247—251.Search in Google Scholar

32. Nininahazwe, P. C., Sow, A., Roamba, R. C., Kalandi, M., Ahmed, H. D., Ouédraogo, G. A. et al., 2017: West African donkey’s liveweight estimation using body measurements. Vet. World, 10, 10, 1221—1226. Published online Oct. 12, 2017. DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2017.1221-1226.10.14202/vetworld.2017.1221-1226568226729184368Search in Google Scholar

33. Osthaus, B., Proops, L., Long, S., Bell, N., Hayday, K., Burden F., 2017: Hair coat properties of donkeys, mules and horses in a temperate climate. Eq. Vet. J., 50, 2018, 339—342. DOI: 10.1111/evj.12775.10.1111/evj.12775590086429053900Search in Google Scholar

34. Pearson, R. A., Ouassat, M., 1996: Estimation of the live-weight and body condition of working donkeys in Morocco. Vet. Rec., 138, 10, 229—233.10.1136/vr.138.10.2298686139Search in Google Scholar

35. Pearson, R., Ouassat, M., 2000:A Guide to Live Weight Estimation and Body Conditions Scoring of Donkeys. Centre for Tropical Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, 4—16.Search in Google Scholar

36. Papa, L., Kume, K., 2012: The results of identification and characterisation the donkey population in Albania. Agric. Forest., 58, 3, 125—134.Search in Google Scholar

37. Porter, V., Alderson, G. L. H., Hall, S. J. G., Sponenberg, D. P., 2016: Asses. In Mason’s World Encyclopedia of Livestock Breeds and Breeding. CABI Edition, U.K., 2 (pack), Vol 1, 1—53.10.1079/9781845934668.0000Search in Google Scholar

38. Rabier, L., 2012:L’Alimentation de l’âne et ses Relations avec les Maladies Asines. Thèse d’exercice, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse—ENVT, 151 pp. http://oatao.univ-toulouse.fr/Eprints ID: 6261.Search in Google Scholar

39. Raveneau, A., Daveze, J., 1996: Le livre de l’âne, son histoire, sa famille, son éducation, toute sa vie. Collection archives animaux. Rustica Editions, France, 128—129.Search in Google Scholar

40. Richard, M. M., 1857:Bulletin Mensuel de la Société Impériale Zoologique d’Acclimatation: Espèces Chevaline, Asine, Bovine et Porcine de l’Algérie. T 4. 323—389. https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k5448173s/f6.image.Search in Google Scholar

41. Roamba, C. R., 2014: Caractérisation morpho-biométrique et biochimique des asins (Equus asinus) du Sénégal. These Med. Vet. Dakar, 10, 100.Search in Google Scholar

42. Rosenbom, S., Costa, V., Al-Araimi, N., Kefena, E., Abdel-Moneim, A. S., Abdalla, M. A., et al., 2014: Genetic diversity of donkey populations from the putative centers of domestication. Anim. Genet., 46, 1, 30—36. DOI: 10.1111/age.12256.10.1111/age.1225625516010Search in Google Scholar

43. Shawaf, T. M., Almathen, F., Al-Ahmad, J., Elmoslemany, A., 2016: Morphological characteristics of Hassawi donkey, Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. Alexandria J. Vet. Sci., 49, 2, 178—183. DOI: 10.5455/ajvs.226158.10.5455/ajvs.226158Search in Google Scholar

44. Stanišić, L., Dimitrijević, V., Simeunović, P., Lakić, N., Radović, I., Ivanković, A., et al., 2015: Morphological, biochemical and haematological characterization of endangered Balkan donkey breed. Acta Vet.-Beograd, 65, 1, 125—136. DOI: 10.1515/acve-2015-0010.10.1515/acve-2015-0010Search in Google Scholar

45. Svendsen, E., 2008:The Professional Handbook of the Donkey. Whittet Books Ltd U. K., 3rd edn., 438 pp.Search in Google Scholar

46. Thomas, P., 1884:Recherche Stratigraphiques et Paléontologiques sur Quelques Formations d’eau Douce de l’Algérie. Mémoire de la société géologique de France. Troisième série. Tome 3. 19—51.Search in Google Scholar

47. Vall, E., Ebangi, A. L., Abakar, O., 2001: Mise au point d’une grille de notation de l’état corporel des ânes de trait au Nord du Cameroun. Revue Élev. Méd. Vét. Pays Trop., 54, 3—4, 255—262.10.19182/remvt.9782Search in Google Scholar

48. Vlaeva, R., Georgieva, S., Barzev, G., Ivanova, I., 2016: Morphological and phenotypic characteristics of donkeys in some regions of Bulgaria. Trakia J. Sci., 14, 1 92—95. DOI: 10. 15547/tjs.2016.01.013.10.15547/tjs.2016.01.013Search in Google Scholar

49. Yilmaz, O., Ertuğrul, M., 2011: Some morphological traits of donkeys raised in Iğdir, Turkey. Iğdir Üniv. J. Inst. Sci. Tehn., 1, 2, 113—116.Search in Google Scholar

50. Yilmaz, O., Ertuğrul, M., 2012: The morphologic traits of donkeys raised in east and southeast of Turkey. Hayvansal Üretim, 53, 1, 10—13.Search in Google Scholar

51. Zhang, Y. S., Yang, X. Y., Wang, X. B., Zhang, C. M., Qin, F., Zhou, Z. H., et al., 2010: Cytochrome b genetic diversity and maternal origin of Chinese domestic donkey. Biochem. Genet., 48, 7—8, 636—46. Epub May 25, 2010. DOI: 10.1007/s10528-010-9345-0.10.1007/s10528-010-9345-020499156Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo