Preventing surgical site infection using operating room bundle of care in patients undergoing elective exploratory laparotomy cholecystectomy surgery
and
Sep 21, 2023
About this article
Article Category: Original Article
Published Online: Sep 21, 2023
Page range: 335 - 345
Received: Jul 21, 2022
Accepted: Dec 15, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fon-2023-0037
Keywords
© 2023 Erika Leslie R Magat et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Differences in patients’ wound status between control and experimental groups after application of the operating room bundle of care and usual care per day of evaluation_
Day of evaluation | Mean | SD | Mann–Whitney | Interpretation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
390 | Not significant | ||||
Control | 28.13 | 1.48 | |||
Experimental | 28.5 | 0.86 | |||
129.5 | Significant | ||||
Control | 23.73 | 1.44 | |||
Experimental | 21.45 | 1.54 | |||
0 | Significant | ||||
Control | 19.83 | 0.79 | |||
Experimental | 15.83 | 0.75 |
Patients wound status based on BWAT in the control group_
BWAT score | Day 1 Hemostasis phase | Day 2 Inflammatory phase | Day 3 Proliferative phase | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | % | % | ||||
18.0 | 1 | 3.3 | ||||
19.0 | 9 | 30.0 | ||||
20.0 | 14 | 46.7 | ||||
21.0 | 1 | 3.3 | 6 | 20.0 | ||
21.5 | 1 | 3.3 | ||||
22.0 | 4 | 13.3 | ||||
22.5 | 1 | 3.3 | ||||
23.0 | 5 | 16.7 | ||||
23.5 | 2 | 6.7 | ||||
24.0 | 7 | 23.3 | ||||
25.0 | 6 | 20.0 | ||||
26.0 | 6 | 20.0 | 2 | 6.7 | ||
27.0 | 4 | 13.3 | 1 | 3.3 | ||
28.0 | 8 | 26.7 | ||||
29.0 | 4 | 13.3 | ||||
30.0 | 8 | 26.7 | ||||
Total | 30 | 100.0 | 30 | 100.0 | 30 | 100.0 |
Mean | 28.13 | 23.73 | 19.83 | |||
SD | 1.48 | 1.44 | 0.79 | |||
VI. | Mild severity | Mild severity | Minimal severity |
Patients’ wound status based on BWAT in the experimental group_
BWAT score | Day 1 Hemostasis phase | Day 2 Inflammatory phase | Day 3 Proliferative phase | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
% | % | % | ||||
15.0 | 11 | 36.7 | ||||
16.0 | 13 | 43.3 | ||||
17.0 | 6 | 20.0 | ||||
18.0 | ||||||
19.0 | 5 | 16.7 | ||||
20.0 | 4 | 13.3 | ||||
21.0 | 2 | 6.7 | ||||
21.5 | 1 | 3.3 | ||||
22.0 | 11 | 36.7 | ||||
22.5 | 1 | 3.3 | ||||
23.0 | 4 | 13.3 | ||||
23.5 | ||||||
24 | 1 | 3.3 | ||||
24.5 | 1 | 3.3 | ||||
25.0 | ||||||
26.0 | ||||||
27.0 | 2 | 6.7 | ||||
28.0 | 16 | 53.3 | ||||
29.0 | 7 | 23.3 | ||||
30.0 | 5 | 16.7 | ||||
Total | 30 | 100.0 | 30 | 100.0 | 30 | 100.0 |
Mean | 28.50 | 21.45 | 15.83 | |||
S.D. | 0.86 | 1.54 | 0.75 | |||
VI | Mild severity | Mild severity | Minimal severity |
The day-to-day comparison of patients’ wound status after the application of usual care and operating room bundle of care_
Phases of wound healing process | Mean | SD | Chi-square | |
---|---|---|---|---|
60 | ||||
Hemostasis | 28.13 | 1.48 | ||
Inflammatory | 23.73 | 1.44 | ||
Proliferative | 19.83 | 0.79 | ||
60 | ||||
Hemostasis | 28.5 | 0.86 | ||
Inflammatory | 21.45 | 1.54 | ||
Proliferative | 15.83 | 0.75 |