Flipped Classroom Combined with Drama in Education: A Case Study in a Greek Primary School
Article Category: Research Article
Published Online: Mar 08, 2025
Page range: 64 - 78
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2025-0005
Keywords
© 2025 Maria Kapetanaki et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
In recent years, distance learning has become a necessity. After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, it became clear that traditional teaching methods were not enough to support the needs that arose in education. Many schools worldwide were forced to close for long periods of time while they tried to find solutions to continue providing education opportunities during the pandemic. In this context, distance education was a unique option with several variations (Manousou et al., 2021).
School distance education during the pandemic made -among others- use of blended learning approaches and tools, one of which is flipped classroom. Flipped classroom transforms the traditional classroom as face-to-face teaching and learning is transferred to an online environment, making pupils responsible for their own learning. However, the lack of general preparedness of the teachers and schools has raised pedagogical concerns about the implementation of distance education practices. According to Tait (2021), for example, the quality of the remote education provided was often poor.
In this context, the current case study was planned, in search of a mixed methodology that could strengthen distance learning with the active participation of students in experiential face-to-face explorations. The search for a complementary methodology that focuses on the process and experiences of the pupils led to drama. Drama, due to its nature, can effectively support the flipped classroom with a variety of collaborative activities carried out inside the classroom.
At this point, it is important to make the distinction between research design and educational methods. Research methods refer to how the study was conducted, while educational methods relate to the learning design of the flipped classroom. So, the research method used is case study, while the educational methodologies used are flipped classroom and drama in education.
Therefore, the objective of this study and the upcoming research is to explore the implementation of flipped classroom combined with drama in education. The main research question guiding this study is: How and why can flipped classroom combined with drama be used in education?
The article begins with a literature review of research related to the flipped classroom. This is followed by the research methodology part that explains the research conducted with students in a primary school in Greece as a case study. Then, the qualitative data obtained from the case study are analysed and discussed. Finally, some concluding remarks and suggestions for future research are provided.
The flipped classroom is ‘a pedagogical approach in which direct instruction moves from the group learning space to the individual learning space and the resulting group space is transformed into a dynamic, interactive learning environment where the educator guides students as they apply concepts and engage creatively in the subject matter’ (Flipped Learning Network FLN, 2014). Flipped classroom is used as a methodological tool of blended learning for school distance education (Ahmed, 2016; Alsobaie, 2018; Bārdule, 2021; Bösner et al., 2015; Danker, 2015; D’Addato & Miller, 2016; Eppard & Rochdi, 2017; Giannakos et al., 2014; Halili & Zainuddin, 2015; Kostaris et al., 2017; Loizou & Lee, 2020; Ölmefors & Scheffel, 2021; Sun, 2017; Wang & Jou, 2020; Zainuddin & Attaran, 2015; Zhu, 2021). The flipped classroom methodology changes the classroom management as part of the teaching process is transferred outside of the classroom where homework was taking place initially (Bergmann & Sams, 2012). The students are familiarizing themselves with the theoretical part of a topic at home using a video or a platform. This allows the implementation of interactive learning activities such as collecting, organising, or processing data, discussions, problem-solving activities, games, concept maps, and brainstorming (Papadimitriou et al., 2017) in the class (Abeysekera & Dawson, 2015).
Research has been conducted in the flipped classroom in subjects such as mathematics (D’Addato & Miller, 2016; Ölmefors & Scheffel, 2021; Szparagowski, 2014; Unamba et al., 2016), in language classes (Loizou & Lee, 2020), science (Fahdiran et al., 2022; Yean, 2019; Županec et al., 2018), computer science (Kostaris et al., 2017), in health-related courses (Gómez-García et al., 2020), and English (Yang & Chen, 2020). However, no research has been identified on flipped classroom and education for sustainable development or climate change.
According to research, the implementation of flipped classroom results in a better understanding of the subject matter (Loizou & Lee, 2020; Szparagowski, 2014; Yang & Chen, 2020; Županec et al., 2018), enhancement of the learning outcomes (Županec et al., 2018), engagement/interest for the lesson (Fahdiran et al., 2022; Gomez-Garcia et al., 2020; Loizou-Raouna & Lee, 2018; Szparagowski, 2014; Yean, 2019; Županec et al., 2018), development of confidence and positive self-image (D’Addato & Miller, 2016), as well as development of their autonomy (D’Addato & Miller, 2016; Gomez-Garcia et al., 2020). The research also showed that flipped classroom offers more opportunities for collaborative and interactive activities (D’Addato & Miller, 2016; Fahdiran et al., 2022; Loizou & Lee, 2020; Szparagowski, 2014; Umamba et al., 2016; Županec et al., 2018). Such activities increase the interaction among the students and among the students and the teacher. This can lead to deep thinking, self-reflection, and self-regulation (Wang & Jou, 2020). Learning through collaborative activities also has a positive impact on the students’ interest for the lesson and subsequently on their understanding and improvement of the learning outcomes. Apart from that, the classroom time increases, offering the opportunity for both individual-cognitive and social-cognitive procedures, which are crucial for the development of the students’ autonomy according to Little (1991 as cited in Gavranović, 2017).
However, the literature review also highlighted pedagogical concerns regarding the implementation of the flipped classroom approach (Bates, 2019; Karanikola et al., 2022; Nafplioti & Tzimogiannis, 2017; Ölmefors & Scheffel, 2021; Rindaningsih et al., 2021; Zhu, 2021). For example, Ahmed (2016) pointed out that traditional teaching methods are still present in the flipped classroom, just transferred into an online environment. In addition to this, Koutromanos et al. (2016), Mouzakis et al. (2017) and Cronin and Coakley (2018) raised concerns about the quality of the educational resources used and the lack of interaction between the teacher and the students. Such pedagogical concerns were also present during the pandemic of 2019 as mentioned above. The need therefore to ensure pedagogical practices like active learning and inclusion in future use of the flipped classroom is crucial. In addition to the pedagogical challenges, the flipped classroom approach needs to keep up with the social and educational changes. Hence, it also needs to promote and develop competences related to soft skills (e.g., communication, teamwork, and adaptability) (Ananiadou & Claro, 2009), metacognitive skills (Sala et al., 2020), green skills (environmental awareness, sustainability, and climate literacy), and digital skills (Bianchi et al., 2022; OECD, 2023).
The above pedagogical concerns that arose from the literature review are what prompted us to search for a complementary approach that could ensure the quality of the in-classroom practices. The following session is devoted to the research design of this study, which was based on the literature review.
This paper is about case study research. Case study explores empirically a contemporary phenomenon in real-life context using various sources of evidence (Yin, 2009 as cited in Robson & McCartan, 2016, p. 150). Case studies can lead to both theory generation and testing (Bryman, 2008). Very often, there is a case study plan (Mills et al., 2017; Robson & McCartan, 2016), and although if it is difficult sometimes, pilot testing is also possible in case studies to offer opportunities for research design enhancement (Robson & McCartan, 2016). To approach the research question, which is descriptive, it was important to study the process of implementing the suggested mixed methodology to one or more groups of students as well as to understand the participants’ perception of this. Mills et al. (2017) recommended in this case, the case study. The case study plan of this study is presented below as suggested by Mills et al. (2017):
Setting the purpose of the study Setting the objectives Conducting literature review Determining the case study and the selection of the sample Determining the data collection strategy Determining the data analysis and interpretation
The implementation of the flipped classroom took place over a period of 1 week in December 2022 in a primary school in Crete. The small number of informants makes generalisation almost impossible, although this is common for case studies (Robson & McCartan, 2016). The initial case study design was piloted with one group of students and then tested with another group (10 hr per group in the context of a subject entitled ‘Skills Workshops’ in primary school). During the pilot study, some design changes were made and implemented in the second group. These changes mainly involved some technical adjustments to the original design.
A researcher had the role of the teacher working with the two groups having the opportunity to guide, to intervene, and to observe and record the improvement of the learning process (Robson & McCartan, 2016). The teachers in charge of the classes throughout the school year were present and had the role of two ‘critical friends’.
The informants of this study were students of two different fifth grade classes (11 years old) in a public 6-grade primary school in Crete. The students had no previous experience in drama and little experience in distance learning during the COVID-19 outbreak. The first group consisted of 14 students (7 girls and 7 boys), and the second group consisted of 12 students (7 girls and 5 boys). The pilot study was applied to the first group in order to provide feedback and make necessary improvements. In this group, all students had access to the internet except one who was given printed materials. All students were present on the first 2 days of the pilot survey, 12 students were present on the third day of the survey and 13 students were present on the fourth and fifth days. The second group was the one in which the main survey was conducted. All students in this group had access to the internet. All students were present on the first day and 11 students on the following days, except on the third day when 10 students participated. It is important to mention that both the pilot and the main survey were conducted in the same week, and the results were obtained from both groups. At the end of the week, a focus group was held with pupils participating in a reflective discussion.
Data collection was based on five different tools: observations and notes of the researcher, observations of two critical friends/educators of the two groups, visual material (photographs), reflection sheets, and reflective discussion. The researcher’s participant observations were recorded every day during and after the implementation of the research to create a transparent way of reflecting on the research questions. The field notes include descriptive information and reflective information, following the recommendations of Mills et al. (2017). The observations of the two critical friends were made every day during and after the sessions. A researcher had shared the research questions with them. Visual material was taken during each session. At the end of every session, the participants were given reflection sheets made by the researcher with questions based on what they studied at home and what they experienced in the class. Finally, at the end of the five—day implementation, there was a reflective discussion with all the students, during which they had an additional opportunity to evaluate their experience and make connections between what they studied at home and what they were doing in the class. During this discussion, it was of great importance that the students remain critical of the whole experience. The qualitative data were analysed by thematic analysis by hand due to their volume.
Education on sustainable development and climate change offered the content explored using flipped classroom. Even though there is lack of research on the combination of flipped classroom and drama in education (Papadimitriou et al., 2017), there are several studies that highlight the methodology of drama as a great means of raising students’ environmental awareness (Andrikopoulou & Koutrouba, 2019; Curtis et al., 2013; McNaughton, 2006; Nda, 2012; Wake & Birdsall, 2020). Drama provides a safe context for students to explore complex issues (Fleming, 1996; McNaughton, 2004). This exploration through various roles that the students assume not only leads to understanding of the topic (Andrikopoulou & Koutrouba, 2019; Appleby, 2005; Curtis et al., 2013; McNaughton, 2004; Nda, 2012; Wake & Birdsall, 2020) but also can determine their subsequent beliefs and attitudes towards the environment and the world around them (Akyol et al., 2018; O’Neil, 1995).
Drama was used during the face-to-face stage of the flipped classroom with active involvement of the students in the learning process taking place in their classroom. The initial pedagogical design of the drama process was based on the principles and guidelines for teachers and students with little experience in drama (Avdi & Chatzigeorgiou, 2007; Fleming, 1996; Woolland, 1996). The participants’ evaluation of the process was based on research suggestions such as O’Neil and Lambert (1982) and Morgan and Saxton (1987). The structure of the drama implemented in the classroom is presented in Table 1.
Drama planning
Questions for exploration | What does climate change stand for us? Why is that something that should concern us? |
What is our attitude towards the environment? To what extent can we adopt measures to protect the environment? | |
Choosing stimulus and creating pre-text | Teacher in role, students in role Stimulus: a lost beach |
Choosing roles | Students’ roles: village citizens |
Teacher’s role: old woman, citizen of the village | |
Creating episodes | Use of various techniques/conventions (Neelands, 1998) |
Each day began with warm-up activities, and then episodes were created using various drama conventions (Neelands, 1990, 1998). During the one-week intervention, the following activities/conventions were used (Figure 1):
Whole-group role play Teacher-in-role Interviews-interrogations Mantle of the expert Still image Meetings Hot-seating Conscience alley

Drama activities/conventions.
At the end of each day, students were given a reflection sheet. Students were given explanations or clarifications if needed. In this way, they had the opportunity to evaluate their participation each day, make connections between what they were asked to study at home and what they did in class (flipped classroom), while being critical and reflective towards their learning process.
For the first and last stage of the flipped classroom (before and after class), distance learning material was designed using Microsoft Sway software (Redmond, WA, US). Microsoft Sway was chosen taking into account the objectives of the teaching/learning intervention, its accessibility, flexibility, and ease of use.
The distance education material was designed considering challenges of the flipped classroom, such as access to technology and familiarity with it (Koutromanos et al., 2016; Mouzakis et al., 2017, 2021; Rindaningsih et al., 2021), teacher’s partial replacement by the technology (Ahmed, 2016), the reliability of the digital content and the need for pedagogical planning. For these reasons, the design of the distance education material was based on the typology of West and Lionarakis (Lionarakis, 2001), which includes principles of design and development of educational material for distance education and can ensure the pedagogical aspect and application of the out of class activities. The visual material from the online environment clarifies the basic principles and characteristics that quality educational material should have, for example, activities in various forms, clear instructions, examples, and feedback. The content of the distance education material consists of five small sections, one for each day of the flipped classroom implementation as follows:
Day 1: The climate change and its connection to the greenhouse effect Day 2: Climate change and human activity Day 3: The consequences of the climate change Day 4: Climate change—what can we do? Day 5: Climate change—quick review
The material included:
Instructions for navigating the Sway presentation, instructions for using the material and the activities available A presentation with images and explanations Quiz Expression of opinions and feelings through Padlet A game with questions from the material (‘Who wants to become a millionaire’) (Interactive) videos Open questions Glossary for vocabulary that may be difficult for the students
The distance learning material created allowed students to interact with the content, perform various activities, watch interactive videos, and play games. The material was also designed so that students’ engagement with it does not exceed the time limit of 10–15 min/day. The duration of the videos was also consistent with the findings of the literature review on video use in the flipped classroom as no video or combination of videos exceeded the 8-min time limit. Specifically, two types of videos were used:
Four videos found online and deemed suitable for this content. One video was created by the researcher with the addition of music and questions for the students. There was also information for the students about what they had to do, how they had to do it and when, and approximately how long each activity would take. There was a final reflective class discussion about what they did and whether they did it correctly.
The above features are vital in educational materials appropriately structured for distance education according to Lionarakis (2005, p. 27).
The data analysis followed the analysis guidelines of Mills et al. (2017). The key themes that emerged were as follows:
excitement because of the distance education material and the class activities increased interest on the lesson and its progression engagement with the content (climate change), pupils’ cooperation, connection between the two methodologies.
The key research question running through this research concerns the ways in which flipped classroom and drama can be used, and why they should be combined. Table 2 summarises the main findings from the researcher’s field notes, students’ worksheets, classroom teachers’ observations, and online activities before and after the drama activities in school. It seems that the informants, in response to the why of the research question, highlight enthusiasm and a strong interest in the lesson and the educational process, opportunities for expression and collaboration, and a sense of responsibility towards what is happening around them as the main motivation. On the contrary, in terms of how to use the flipped classroom and drama, the connection between what students’ study at home and what they explore in class and the pedagogical design of the educational material seems to be preferred.
Findings of the application research
Interest/enthusiasm for the educational process | Enthusiasm for the lesson and the whole process | Interest/enthusiasm for the lesson | Interest/enthusiasm for the online delivery and the content |
Cooperation | All students liked the distance learning material that was created and used | Cooperation/participation | All students believed that they learned a lot about the environment and the climate change |
Ability to connect what they did at home with what they did in class | No difficulties or need for changes were addressed by the students | Taking responsibilities for the environmental problem they were facing | Taking responsibility for the environmental problem they were facing while in role |
Taking responsibility for the environmental problem while in role | The students were able to name at least two examples of activities that are harmful for the environment | Opportunities for expression | They were able to connect what they did at home and what they did in the class |
Most of the students were able to explain what they did at home and what they did at school and connect the two methodologies as well as explain how each helps them |
The findings indicate that students were enthusiastic about the two methodologies, and at the same time, they were motivated to engage with the educational material at home because it provided them with ideas and information necessary to continue the activity the next day at school. It seemed that one methodology complemented the other and helped them approach the environmental issue under consideration from different angles. Students also linked climate change to human behaviour and took responsibility for their actions in the context of drama. A selection of the most important findings of all the data collection tools is presented below starting with the observations of the researcher and the comments of some students during the in-class activities.
The next findings come from the observations of the teachers-critical friends, who were present in the classroom observing and recording their observations during and at the end of each day to gather their perspective about how the students experienced the suggested methodology of the flipped classroom. They put emphasis on the enthusiasm and the participation of the students.
They also referred to the mixed methodology of the flipped classroom and how it encouraged the students with learning difficulties to participate in the lesson.
The data collection tools also included visual material from the in-class activities. Such photos pinpoint key moments and mainly the pupils’ engagement, opportunities to develop 21st century skills like creativity, problem solving and critical thinking. In addition to this, there were two crucial opportunities for the students to reflect on their (learning) experience. The first was through the reflection sheets that were designed and used at the end of each day. These helped them to gain insight on how they experienced every day and supported them to realise the ways they were connected and worked together through the different stages of the flipped classroom. The students were able to explain in detail how the methodology of flipped classroom helped them understand the topic, while stating how much they liked the process.
A discussion at the end of the week with pupils in a circle offered them the opportunity to reflect on their experience. This discussion was recorded to offer some overall data from students. The questions were divided into the following two main groups:
questions about the implementation of the flipped classroom and questions about the combination of the two methodologies (flipped and drama).
The students of both groups participated with enthusiasm and wanted to answer all questions. The overall discussion confirmed the above-mentioned points about the students’ enthusiasm, their interest, raising awareness of climate change, and the responsibility of all to act to mitigate it or adapt ourselves to the change.
Finally, the students made positive comments for both methodologies, flipped classroom and drama in education. The flipped classroom helped them understand the topic and drama helped them explore it deeper.
Table 3 presents the main findings from the reflective discussion at the end of the fifth day in school.
Findings from the reflective discussion
About the flipped classroom |
The pupils:
liked learning new things at home, found effective the distance education material, especially the activities and the videos, learned about climate change. |
About drama |
The pupils:
enjoyed all the activities, felt challenged to solve an environmental problem on their own, disliked the long introduction (explanations and clarifications about the process). |
About the combination of the two methodologies |
The pupils:
enjoyed the combination of flipped classroom and drama because this was new and challenging for them, realised that flipped classroom methodology helped them understand more about the topic and offered them the content needed for the activities at school, were supported from drama to deepen their understanding on issues they studied at home, would like to try the methodologies in other subjects as well. |
The next section is devoted to a discussion based on the findings and the main research question of this study.
In this case study, a mixed pedagogical methodology was used based on the principles of flipped classroom combined with drama in education as presented in Table 4.
Suggested mixed methodology
First stage of the flipped classroom (before the class): interaction with the distance learning educational material |
Second stage of the flipped classroom (in the classroom): drama in education |
Third stage of the flipped classroom (after class): interaction with the distance learning material |
One of the main findings of the implementation was the students’ interest and enthusiasm throughout the whole process. The pupils were particularly interested in what was happening in the classroom as their answers in several questions focused on their experience during drama. They were also curious to interact with the online educational material at first, yet there was observed a reduced interest in the activities after class. The reasons of the low participation might be the following:
Microsoft Sway provides a linear presentation of the educational material, so this may deprive the educational material of the element of surprise. Students may have forgotten they had to do an activity before moving on to the material of the next day. Considering that the 5 implementation days were in the same week, two activities per day (before and after the classroom) were too much. The reflection activities were not particularly preferred by students. Although there was an attempt to reduce them, combined with the reflection sheets at the end of each day, they may have tired them out. Then again, perhaps they were not so familiar with such activities and did not recognise their role and value.
Another finding that emerged from our research was the students’ cooperation in parallel with individualized study. On the one hand, distance education material encourages and promotes students’ metacognitive skills like self—regulation and self—assessment. Therefore, the students become responsible for their learning. On the other hand, drama encourages group interaction through the participation in the episodes where the students and their contribution have a catalytic role. A key point to this process is the high degree of quality and cohesion between what the students studied at home, so the content of the educational material, its structure, its characteristic, as well as the content, and the activities chosen in the drama context at school.
Due to this experiential nature, drama in education is considered a methodology, which can effectively complement the flipped classroom (Papadimitriou et al., 2017). The students in our research were aware that the two methodologies supported them effectively to study and approach the issue of climate change. They were also able to explain how each methodology helped them. According to them, they studied data at home, which helped them understand the problem of climate change, while at school, they used these data to shape the drama process and deepen their understanding. They were also able to distinguish what they studied at home and what was the purpose of further exploration at school, focusing on the online material as a central part of the flipped classroom methodology and on play and exploration as a key element for drama. An initial awareness of the way they learned can therefore be observed a basic characteristic of metacognition (Papaleontiou-Louka, 2002) and the main focus of distance education according to Lionarakis (2005). The above findings lead to the conclusion that the two methodologies combined can provide opportunities for active involvement in the learning process and development of metacognitive skills, such as reflection and self-regulation (Matsaggouras, 2007). Finally, the two methodologies combined encourage exploration, reflection, engagement and personal involvement. Apart from that, they create opportunities for collaboration and development of problem-solving skills, which are essential for the development of critical thinking.
Apart from metacognitive skills, the two methodologies can offer opportunities for the development of digital skills, creative and critical thinking. More specifically, the development of digital skills is encouraged and promoted through the methodology of the flipped classroom and the online material that was appropriately developed and used having specific characteristics necessary for quality distance education (Lionarakis, 2001). The students had the opportunity to familiarize themselves with various digital tools, they expressed themselves creatively using them, they developed their critical thinking through reflective activities, and this is also supported by other research on flipped classroom (Avery et al., 2018; Bishnoi, 2020; Fung et al., 2022; Sakulprasertsri, 2017).
In this context, the students being in a role realized the responsibility they bore for the environmental problem they were facing in the context of the scenario unfolding in the drama due to their personal involvement, which has been mentioned by Chawla (2008).
Another finding that is highlighted during the data analysis is the understanding of the environmental problem the students were facing while in role. The data analysis also indicates that students were able to use information from the online material they were studying at home in their attempt to explain the problem they were facing and argue about it in class. This was observed and reported by the teachers/critical friends, the teacher/researcher and also by the students themselves during the reflective discussion at the end of the five days’ work. This finding is considered important as according to Lewis et al. (2019 as cited in Daskolia, 2020), there is a low level of understanding and acceptance of climate change in the general population. However, this understanding can lay the foundations for climate literacy, which should be a priority for school education (Piliouras et al., 2021). Pupils’ understanding in the context of this research is the foundation for climate literacy and is an added value for the two methodologies combined. Yet, there is a need for further research, for example, with learning analytics from the platform, in order to obtain robust evidence that apart from the very positive view of the stakeholders on the combination of the two pedagogical methodologies, there have in fact been significant learning outcomes in terms of targeting education for sustainable development.
The results of the research implementation are summarized in Table 5. Overall, they are considered positive and provide an answer to the key research question as mentioned above.
Results of the implementation
Positive attitude towards the combination of the two methodologies |
Interest/enthusiasm for the lesson |
Indications of understanding of the topic—a basis for climate literacy |
Collaborative learning—distance learning—experiential learning |
Participation—commitment |
Metacognitive skills (self-regulation, self-control, reflection, and self-assessment) |
Strong connection between what was done at home and what was done in the class |
Alternative opportunities for expression and learning |
21st century skills’ development (creative and critical thinking, responsibility, communication, and cooperation) |
The purpose of this study was to examine the implementation of the flipped classroom and drama in the context of environmental education. In this study, students interacted with the designed online material at home, while the classroom drama format was used for face-to-face lessons. Environmental education provided content with problems that are difficult to answer and problems that urgently need solutions.
This study showed that both, flipped classroom and drama, promote active learning in different ways. The flipped classroom encourages students to engage with content before and after class, while drama form requires participation and interaction in classroom, leading to deeper cognitive and emotional involvement.
This study also responds to pedagogical concerns about the implementation of distance education practices. More specifically, it proposes the use of West and Lionarakis’ (Lionarakis, 2001) typology of online activities in the context of digital learning materials, which can ensure their pedagogical quality. More specifically, appropriately designed and developed for distance education materials as part of the flipped classroom approach plays a catalytic role in presenting and studying new content to students in a format that intrigues them to explore it at their own pace. Moreover, it creates favourable learning conditions with multiple representations and the use of a variety of digital applications and tools to better understand the topics explored and to cultivate metacognitive skills such as self-regulation, self-control and self-assessment. It is therefore vital to ensure that students are engaged with the online material. The learning design, the design of online activity play, even the choice of digital tools, and content set up play a crucial role in engaging students.
Our research revealed that students had low interaction with the digital educational material. It is suggested, in addition to using West and Lionarakis’ typology (Lionarakis, 2001), to inform students beforehand about the important role of the teaching material and to remind them whenever necessary during the implementation of the flipped classroom. What is needed when designing educational material is to take into account the needs, preferences and interests of specific students, in order to use them to produce an educational material that is specifically designed for them and therefore more attractive to them in order to seek greater engagement and interaction with it.
This study also indicates that in drama sessions students are offered the chance to collaborate and communicate, exploring complex content like environmental issues. Time in school is devoted to experiential learning, and drama appears to be an effective option for addressing and exploring social issues approached in the context of different views and interests. However, applying drama to pupils with little or no experience can be challenging. Therefore, it is recommended that the pedagogical design of the drama process is based on principles and guidelines for students.
This study results in a blended methodology using distance education strategies and tools, as well as drama form to raise environmental awareness and climate literacy. The methodological choice of this study seems an ideal approach in environmental education for promoting digital, soft (e.g., communication, collaboration, and critical thinking), and green skills (e.g. environmental awareness), which is a big challenge for education right now (Figure 2).

Skills developed in the context of flipped classroom.
Overall, flipped classroom and drama seemed to ‘work ideally in a complementary way as they embrace the goal of a student-centered educational process with active participation of learners and the teacher who guides the process’ (Papadimitriou et al., 2017, p. 2).
Despite the findings and results of the research, there are some limitations. The first limitation was the lack of literature on the combination of the two methodologies and their implementation, especially in primary schools. This led to a search for literature on the application of each methodology separately. Another limitation was the number of informants and the short intervention time, which cannot allow for generalised conclusions. Specifically, the case study was implemented in two different groups of primary school students in Greece (a group of 14 students and a group of 12 students) over a 1-week period. The duration was related to time constraints as this case study was part of a postgraduate thesis research, which had to be conducted in a certain amount of time.
This study offers a different perspective on the implementation of flipped classroom practices. However, more research focusing on the combination of flipped classroom and drama in the context of environmental education is needed. First of all, it would be of great importance to reimplement the study to larger groups of students and possibly for a longer period. It would also be interesting to apply the proposed mixed methodology in different contexts, such as different grades, educational stages and environmental issues/concepts. Kind recommendations for teachers or researchers who would like to implement and apply some research on the combination of flipped classroom and drama drawing content from environmental education could be summarised on a robust pedagogical design. That means thoughtful planning with careful selection of learning objectives, appropriate content selection, appropriately designed for distance learning educational material using various digital media, teaching techniques and activities that will capture and retain students’ interest while in face-to-face meetings, activities that respond to learners’ needs, as well as assessment strategies. Finally, a key point is the strong connection between what is studied at home and what is going on in the classroom.
The content of this study was drawn from environmental education. However, there is little evidence to highlight the extent to which the learning outcomes were achieved as articulated in the educational materials developed. The students showed some understanding of the environmental issues studied, but of course more research is needed on this. Therefore, it is also proposed to examine more focused learning outcomes in terms of students’ knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values before and after the implementation of the combined methodology and also over a longer period of time. A documentation of students’ progress during this process and obviously at the end of it could highlight whether and to what extent the expected learning outcomes were achieved. In addition, limited participation in post-lesson activities was observed. Possibly, this was due to technical reasons or lack of previous experience in this type of distance learning. It is recommended that future research should focus on reasons such as these and focus on ways of engaging students more widely in the context of developing post-course activities and ensuring that students understand the importance of self-evaluation and reflection activities. Finally, ideally this study could encourage research into learning approaches that promote the development of digital, green and 21st century skills.