This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Admiraal, W. (2022). A typology of educators using open educational resources for teaching. International Journal on Studies in Education, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.60AdmiraalW.(2022).A typology of educators using open educational resources for teaching.,4(1),1–23. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.60Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Alexander, R. J. (2008). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk (4th ed.). Dialogos.AlexanderR. J.(2008).(4th ed.).Dialogos.Search in Google Scholar
Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OERs) movement: Achievements, challenges, and new opportunities. Report to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).AtkinsD. E.BrownJ. S. & HammondA. L.(2007).. Report to the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation. https://hewlett.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/ReviewoftheOERMovement.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Baas, M., van der Rijst, R., Huizinga, T., van den Berg, E., & Admiraal, W. (2022). Would you use them? A qualitative study on teachers’ assessment of open educational resources in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 54, 100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857BaasM.van der RijstR.HuizingaT.van den BergE. & AdmiraalW.(2022).Would you use them? A qualitative study on teachers’ assessment of open educational resources in higher education.,54,100857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2022.100857Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Belikov, O. M., & Bodily, R. (2016). Incentives and barriers to OERs adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions. Open Praxis, 8(3), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308BelikovO. M. & BodilyR.(2016).Incentives and barriers to OERs adoption: A qualitative analysis of faculty perceptions.,8(3),235–246. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.8.3.308Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Belikov, O., & McLure, M. (2020). A qualitative analysis of open textbook reviews. The International Journal of Open Educational Resources, 3(2), 77-114. https://doi.org/10.18278/ijoer.3.2.6BelikovO. & McLureM.(2020).A qualitative analysis of open textbook reviews.,3(2),77-114. https://doi.org/10.18278/ijoer.3.2.6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bliss, T., Robinson, T. J., Hilton, J., & Wiley, D. A. (2013). An OERs COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 1(4), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04BlissT.RobinsonT. J.HiltonJ. & WileyD. A.(2013).An OERs COUP: College teacher and student perceptions of open educational resources.,1(4),1–25. https://doi.org/10.5334/2013-04Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bugler, D., Marple, S., Burr, E., Chen-Gaddini, M., & Finkelstein, N. (2017). How teachers judge the quality of instructional materials. WestEd. https://www.wested.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/resource-selecting-instructional-materials-brief-1-quality.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).BuglerD.MarpleS.BurrE.Chen-GaddiniM. & FinkelsteinN.(2017)..WestEd. https://www.wested.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/resource-selecting-instructional-materials-brief-1-quality.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Clarà, M., & Mauri, T. (2010). Toward a dialectic relation between the results in CSCL: Three critical methodological aspects of content analysis schemes. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 5(1), 117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9078-4ClaràM. & MauriT.(2010).Toward a dialectic relation between the results in CSCL: Three critical methodological aspects of content analysis schemes.,5(1),117–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-009-9078-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Clements, K. I., & Pawlowski, J. M. (2011). User-oriented quality for OERs: Understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.xClementsK. I. & PawlowskiJ. M.(2011).User-oriented quality for OERs: Understanding teachers’ views on re-use, quality, and trust.,28(1),4–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00450.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cox, G., & Trotter, H. (2017). An OER framework, heuristic and lens: Tools for understanding lecturers’ adoption of OER. Open Praxis, 9(2), 151–171. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.571CoxG. & TrotterH.(2017).An OER framework, heuristic and lens: Tools for understanding lecturers’ adoption of OER.,9(2),151–171. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.2.571Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Creative Commons. (2017). State of the commons. https://stateof.creativecommons.org. (Accessed 11 May 2023).Creative Commons. (2017).. https://stateof.creativecommons.org. (Accessed 11 May 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14DeciE. L. & RyanR. M.(2008).Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains.,49(1),14–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/0708-5591.49.1.14Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
De los Arcos, B., Farrow, R., Pitt, R., Weller, M., & McAndrew, P. (2016). Adapting the curriculum: How K-12 teachers perceive the role of open educational resources. Journal of Online Learning Research, 2(1), 23–40.De los ArcosB.FarrowR.PittR.WellerM. & McAndrewP.(2016).Adapting the curriculum: How K-12 teachers perceive the role of open educational resources.,2(1),23–40.Search in Google Scholar
Downes, S. (2007). Models for sustainable open education resources. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 29–41.DownesS.(2007).Models for sustainable open education resources.,3,29–41.Search in Google Scholar
Haughey, M., & Muirhead, B. (2005). Evaluating learning objects for schools. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology, 8(1).HaugheyM. & MuirheadB.(2005).Evaluating learning objects for schools.,8(1).Search in Google Scholar
Hood, N., & Littlejohn, A. (2017). Knowledge typologies for professional learning: Educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 1583–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9536-zHoodN. & LittlejohnA.(2017).Knowledge typologies for professional learning: Educators’ (re)generation of knowledge when learning open educational practice.,65(3),1583–1604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9536-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/37351085.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).HylénJ.(2006)..OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/37351085.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Jung, I., Sasaki, T., & Latchem, C. A. (2016). A framework for assessing fitness for purpose in open educational resources. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(3), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0002-5JungI.SasakiT. & LatchemC. A.(2016).A framework for assessing fitness for purpose in open educational resources.,13(3),1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0002-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kimmons, R. (2015). OER quality and adaptation in K-12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341KimmonsR.(2015).OER quality and adaptation in K-12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks.,16(5),39–57. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kurilovas, E., Bireniene, V., & Serikoviene, S. (2011). Methodology for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 9(1), 39–51.KurilovasE.BirenieneV. & SerikovieneS.(2011).Methodology for evaluating quality and reusability of learning objects.,9(1),39–51.Search in Google Scholar
Kursun, E., Cagiltay, K., & Can, G. (2014). An investigation of faculty perspectives on barriers, incentives, and benefits of the OER movement in Turkey. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(6), 14–32.KursunE.CagiltayK. & CanG.(2014).An investigation of faculty perspectives on barriers, incentives, and benefits of the OER movement in Turkey.,15(6),14–32.Search in Google Scholar
Leighton, R. H., & Griffioen, D. M. E. (2021). Lecturers’ curational behaviour in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1872530LeightonR. H. & GriffioenD. M. E.(2021).Lecturers’ curational behaviour in higher education.. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.1872530Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Littlejohn, A., & Hood, N. (2017). How educators build knowledge and expand their practice: The case of open education resources. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12438LittlejohnA. & HoodN.(2017).How educators build knowledge and expand their practice: The case of open education resources.,48(2),499–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12438Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Luo, T., Hostetler, K., Freeman, C., & Stefaniak, J. (2020). The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(2), 140–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222LuoT.HostetlerK.FreemanC. & StefaniakJ.(2020).The power of open: Benefits, barriers, and strategies for integration of open educational resources.,35(2),140–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1677222Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Maine, F., Cook, V., & Lähdesmäki, T. (2019). Reconceptualizing cultural literacy as a dialogic practice. London Review of Education, 17(3), 383–392. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.3.12MaineF.CookV. & LähdesmäkiT.(2019).Reconceptualizing cultural literacy as a dialogic practice.,17(3),383–392. https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.17.3.12Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mayweg-Paus, E., Zimmermann, M., & Ruwe, T. (2021). DIALLS Dataset of evaluations of Open Educational Resources – The Cultural Literacy Learning Programme resources [Data set]. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5553923Mayweg-PausE.ZimmermannM. & RuweT.(2021).[Data set].Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5553923Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mercer, N., Wegerif, R., & Dawes, L. (1999). Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107MercerN.WegerifR. & DawesL.(1999).Children’s talk and the development of reasoning in the classroom.,25(1),95–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192990250107Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nikoi, S. K., Rowlett, T., Armellini, A., & Witthaus, G. (2011). CORRE: A framework for evaluating and transforming teaching materials into open educational resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 26(3), 191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.611681NikoiS. K.RowlettT.ArmelliniA. & WitthausG.(2011).CORRE: A framework for evaluating and transforming teaching materials into open educational resources.,26(3),191–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2011.611681Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Otto, D. (2019). Adoption and diffusion of open educational resources (OERs) in education: A meta-analysis of 25 OERs-projects. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472OttoD.(2019).Adoption and diffusion of open educational resources (OERs) in education: A meta-analysis of 25 OERs-projects.,20(5),122–140. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4472Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Reznitskaya, A., & Wilkinson, I. A. (2017). The most reasonable answer: Helping students build better arguments. Harvard Education Press.ReznitskayaA. & WilkinsonI. A.(2017)..Harvard Education Press.Search in Google Scholar
Richter, T., & Ehlers, U.-D. (2011). Barriers and motivators for using open educational resources in schools. eLearning Papers, 23, 1–7.RichterT. & EhlersU.-D.(2011).Barriers and motivators for using open educational resources in schools.,23,1–7.Search in Google Scholar
Salikhova, N. R., Lynch, M. F., & Salikhova, A. B. (2020). Psychological aspects of digital learning: A selfdetermination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584SalikhovaN. R.LynchM. F. & SalikhovaA. B.(2020).Psychological aspects of digital learning: A selfdetermination theory perspective.,12(2),1–13. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8584Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sitzmann, T., & Ely, K. (2011). A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go. Psychological Bulletin, 137(3), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777SitzmannT. & ElyK.(2011).A meta-analysis of self-regulated learning in work-related training and educational attainment: What we know and where we need to go.,137(3),421–442. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022777Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Zhang, X., Huang, R., & Chang, T.-W. (2023). The evolution of sustainability models for open educational resources: Insights from the literature and experts. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1421–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839507TliliA.NascimbeniF.BurgosD.ZhangX.HuangR. & ChangT.-W.(2023).The evolution of sustainability models for open educational resources: Insights from the literature and experts.,31(3),1421–1436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1839507Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Werth, E., & Williams, K. (2021). Learning to be open: Instructor growth through open pedagogy. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1970520WerthE. & WilliamsK.(2021).Learning to be open: Instructor growth through open pedagogy..1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2021.1970520Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wiley, D. (2007). On the sustainability of Open Educational Resource initiatives in higher education: Paper commissioned by the OECD’s centre for educational research and innovation (CERI). OECD’s Centre for Educational Research and Innovation (CERI), 21. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/9/38645447.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).WileyD.(2007).On the sustainability of Open Educational Resource initiatives in higher education: Paper commissioned by the OECD’s centre for educational research and innovation (CERI).,21. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/9/38645447.pdf. (Accessed 20 June 2023).Search in Google Scholar
Wiley, D., & Hilton III, J. L. (2018). Defining OER-enabled pedagogy. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(4), 133–147.WileyD. & HiltonJ. L.III(2018).Defining OER-enabled pedagogy.,19(4),133–147.Search in Google Scholar
Zawacki-Richter, O., & Mayrberger, K. (2017). Qualität von OER. Internationale Bestandsaufnahme von Instrumenten zur Qualitätssicherung von open educational resources (OER) – Schritte zu einem deutschen Modell am Beispiel der Hamburg Open Online University. Sonderband zum Fachmagazin Synergie. Universität Hamburg. https://doi.org/10.25592/978.3.924330.61.3Zawacki-RichterO. & MayrbergerK.(2017)..Sonderband zum Fachmagazin Synergie. Universität Hamburg. https://doi.org/10.25592/978.3.924330.61.3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar