1. bookVolume 22 (2019): Issue 1 (July 2019)
Journal Details
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
access type Open Access

Examining Faculty Readiness to Teach Online: A Comparison of US and German Educators

Published Online: 24 Jan 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 22 (2019) - Issue 1 (July 2019)
Page range: 53 - 69
Journal Details
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

With the increase in the number of online courses being offered, it is important for faculty to be prepared to teach online. In this study, we examine US and German faculty perceptions on their preparedness to teach online based on the perception of importance of teaching online competencies and their efficacy to teach online. We also examine factors (gender, age, country located, academic discipline, academic rank, method of teaching, years of teaching, years of teaching online and level taught) that are related to US and German faculty perception of the importance and efficacy of online teaching. Overall, the US faculty rated the competencies higher compared to the German faculty both in perception of importance and self-efficacy. Significant differences in the perception of the importance of competencies were noted based on gender, training, level taught, rank, and age. For self-efficacy, there were significant differences between the faculty in teaching format (synchronous, asynchronous or hybrid format), years of teaching online, and age. This study has implications for instructors who teach online, for instructional designers who offer professional development for online teaching and for administrators who support online learning at the universities.

1. Al-Azawei, A.; Parslow, P. & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Barriers and Opportunities of E-Learning Implementation in Iraq: A Case of Public Universities. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(5), 126-146.10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501 Search in Google Scholar

2. Ali, R., & Leeds, E. M. (2009). The impact of face-to-face orientation on online retention: A pilot study. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 7(4). Search in Google Scholar

3. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on Demand: Online Education in the United States. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium. Search in Google Scholar

4. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2016). Online report card: Tracking online education in the United States. Babson Park, MA: Babson Survey Research Group and Quahog Research Group. Retrieved from http://onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/onlinereportcard.pdf Search in Google Scholar

5. Anderson, C. (2012). Barriers and enabler to teachers’ adoption of online teaching at an Australian University. Dissertation RMIT University. Retrieved from https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/view/rmit:160215 Search in Google Scholar

6. Aydin, C. (2005). Turkish mentors’ perception of roles, competencies and resources for online teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(3). Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/makale_goster.php?id=208 / Search in Google Scholar

7. Bacow, L. S., Bowen, G. B., Guthrie, K. M., Lack, K. A., & Long, M. P. (2012). Barriers to Adoption of Online Learning Systems in U.S. Higher Education. New York: Ithaka. Search in Google Scholar

8. Badiee, F., & Kaufman, D. (2015). Design Evaluation of a Simulation for Teacher Education. SAGE Open, 5(2). doi:10.1177/215824401559245410.1177/2158244015592454 Search in Google Scholar

9. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 Search in Google Scholar

10. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman. Search in Google Scholar

11. Baran, E. (2011). The transformation of online teaching practice: Tracing successful online teaching in higher education. Dissertation Iowa State University. Search in Google Scholar

12. Bawane, J., & Spector, J. (2009). Prioritization of online instructor roles: Implications for competency-based teacher education programs. Distance Education, 30(3), 383–397. doi:10.1080/0158791090323653610.1080/01587910903236536 Search in Google Scholar

13. Beldarrain, Y. (2006). Distance Education Trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2). doi:10.1080/0158791060078949810.1080/01587910600789498 Search in Google Scholar

14. Bigatel, P. M., Ragan, L. C., Kennan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B. F. (2012). The identification of competencies for online teaching success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1), 59-77.10.24059/olj.v16i1.215 Search in Google Scholar

15. Billings, D. M. (1988). A conceptual model of correspondence course completion. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(2), 23-35.10.1080/08923648809526621 Search in Google Scholar

16. Borup, J., West, R. E., & Graham, C. R. (2013). The influence of asynchronous video communication on learner social presence: a narrative analysis of four cases. Distance Education, 34(1), 48–63.10.1080/01587919.2013.770427 Search in Google Scholar

17. Bozarth, J., Chapman, D., & LaMonica, L. (2004). Preparing for Distance Learning: Designing an Online Student Orientation Course. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1). Search in Google Scholar

18. Brindley, J., Blaschke, L. M., & Walti, C. (2009). Creating effective collaborative learning groups in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(3).10.19173/irrodl.v10i3.675 Search in Google Scholar

19. Cavanaugh, J. (2005). Teaching online: A time comparison. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 3(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/cavanaugh81.htm Search in Google Scholar

20. Chi, A. (2015). Development of the readiness to teach online scale. Master’s Thesis. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.du.edu/etd/1018/ Search in Google Scholar

21. Ching, Y.-H., & Hsu, Y.-C. (2013). Collaborative learning using VoiceThread in an online graduate course. Knowledge Management & ELearning, 5(3), 298–314. Search in Google Scholar

22. Chyung, S. Y. Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy, and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 213. Search in Google Scholar

23. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Search in Google Scholar

24. Coomey, M., & Stephenson, J. (2001). Online learning: It is all about dialogue, involvement, support, and control - according to the research. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching and learning online, pedagogies for new technologies (pp. 37-53). Abingdon: Routledge Falmer. Search in Google Scholar

25. Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 320–334.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x Search in Google Scholar

26. Correa, T. (2010). The participation divide among “online experts”: Experience, skills, and psychological factors as predictors of college students’ web content creation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 71–92.10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01532.x Search in Google Scholar

27. Cuthrell, K. & Lyon, A. (2007). Instructional strategies: What do online students prefer? MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(4). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol3no4/cuthrell.htm Search in Google Scholar

28. Dahlstrom, E.; Brooks, D. C., & Bichsel, J. (2014). The Current Ecosystem of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Student, Faculty, and IT Perspectives. Research report. Louisville, CO: ECAR. Search in Google Scholar

29. Denis, B., Watland, P., Pirotte, S., & Verday, N. (2004). Roles and competencies of the e-tutor. Proceedings of Networked Learning Competence 2004. Search in Google Scholar

30. Dennen, V. P., Aubteen Darabi, A., & Smith, L. J. (2007). Instructor–learner interaction in online courses: The relative perceived importance of particular instructor actions on performance and satisfaction. Distance education, 28(1), 65-79.10.1080/01587910701305319 Search in Google Scholar

31. Downing, J. J., & Dyment, J. E. (2013). Teacher Educators’ Readiness, Preparation, and Perceptions of Preparing Preservice Teachers in a Fully Online Environment: An Exploratory Study. The Teacher Educator, 48(2), 96-109. doi: 10.1080/08878730.2012.76002310.1080/08878730.2012.760023 Search in Google Scholar

32. Draus, P., Curran, M., & Trempus, M. (2014). The Influence of Instructor-Generated Video Content on Student Satisfaction with and Engagement in Asynchronous Online Classes. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2). Search in Google Scholar

33. Fusani, D. S. (1994). “Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student-faculty interaction outside the classroom.10.1080/00909889409365400 Search in Google Scholar

34. Gay, G. (2016). An assessment of online instructor e-learning readiness before, during, and after course delivery. Journal of Computer in Higher Education, 2016(28), 199–220.10.1007/s12528-016-9115-z Search in Google Scholar

35. Geddes, D. (2009). How Am I Doing? Exploring On-Line Gradebook Monitoring as a Self-Regulated Learning Practice That Impacts Academic Achievement. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 494-510. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27759188 Search in Google Scholar

36. Griffiths, M., & Graham, C. (2009). The Potential of Asynchronous Video in Online Education. Distance Learning, 6(2). Search in Google Scholar

37. Guasch, T., Alvarez, I., & Espasa, A. (2010). University teacher competencies in a virtual teaching/learning environment: Analysis of a teacher training experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(2), 199–206. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.01810.1016/j.tate.2009.02.018 Search in Google Scholar

38. Horvitz, B. S., Beach, A. L., Anderson, M. L., & Xia, J. (2015). Examination of faculty self-efficacy related to online teaching. Innovative Higher Education, 40(4), 305-316.10.1007/s10755-014-9316-1 Search in Google Scholar

39. Johnson, S. G., & Berge, Z. (2012). Online education in the community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(11), 897-902.10.1080/10668920903323948 Search in Google Scholar

40. Jokiaho, A. & May, B. (2017). Hindernisse für die Nutzung von E-Learning an Hochschulen: Aktueller Forschungsstand. In C. Igel (Ed.), Bildungsräume (pp..20-31). Münster: Waxmann. Search in Google Scholar

41. Keramati, A., Afshari-Mofrad, M., & Kamrani, A. (2011). The Role of Readiness Factors in E-Learning Outcomes: An Empirical Study. Computers & Education, 57(3). doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.00510.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.005 Search in Google Scholar

42. Ko, S., & Rossen, S. (2010). Teaching Online – A Practical Guide. New York, NY: Routledge.10.4324/9780203855201 Search in Google Scholar

43. Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, Internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35-50.10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001 Search in Google Scholar

44. Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research methods, 9, 202-220.10.1177/1094428105284919 Search in Google Scholar

45. Lichoro, D. M. (2015). Faculty preparedness for transition to teaching online courses in the Iowa Community College Online Consortium. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. Paper 14376. Search in Google Scholar

46. Loewenthal, K. M. (2004). An introduction to psychological tests and scales (2nd ed.). Hove, U. K.: Psychology Press. Search in Google Scholar

47. Nadler, M., & Nadler, L. (1995, November). The roles of empathy, credibility, and sex in out of class communication between faculty and students. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX. Search in Google Scholar

48. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Search in Google Scholar

49. Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2011). The excellent online instructor: Strategies for professional development. John Wiley & Sons. Search in Google Scholar

50. Pajares, F. (2009). Motivational role of self-efficacy beliefs in self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 111-139). New York, NY: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

51. Pennsylvania State University (2016). Faculty Self-Assessment: Preparing for Online Teaching. Search in Google Scholar

52. Pollanen, M. (2007). Improving learner motivation with online assignments. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 3(2), 203-213. Search in Google Scholar

53. Puzziferro, M. (2008). Online technologies self-efficacy and self-regulated learning as predictors of final grade and satisfaction in college-level online courses. The American Journal of Distance Education, 22(2), 72-89.10.1080/08923640802039024 Search in Google Scholar

54. Reis, L., Ikari, O., Taha-Neto, K., Gugliotta, A., & Denardi, F. (2015). Delivery of a urology online course using Moodle versus didactic lectures methods. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 84(2). doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.00110.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.11.001 Search in Google Scholar

55. Randall, F. A. (2001). Factor Analysis of Online Instruction Self-Efficacy Using the Tennessee Online Instruction Survey. PhD diss., University of Tennessee. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/2649 Search in Google Scholar

56. Rangecroft, M., Gilroy, P., Tricker, T., & Long, P. (2002). Gathering and using quality-of-student experience data on distance education courses. Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 75-83. Search in Google Scholar

57. Roach, K. D., & Byrne, P. R. (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and German classrooms. Communication Education, 50(1), 1-14.10.1080/03634520109379228 Search in Google Scholar

58. Robinia, K. A., & Anderson, M. L. (2010). Online teaching efficacy of nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 26(3), 168-175.10.1016/j.profnurs.2010.02.006 Search in Google Scholar

59. Rollnick, S., Mason, P., & Butler, C. C. (2010). Health Behavior Change E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences. Search in Google Scholar

60. Rovai, A. (2003). In Search of Higher Persistence Rates in Distance Education Online Programs. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1). doi:10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-610.1016/S1096-7516(02)00158-6 Search in Google Scholar

61. Schleef, E. (2009). A cross-cultural investigation of German and American academic style. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(6), 1104-1124.10.1016/j.pragma.2009.01.002 Search in Google Scholar

62. Schmid, U., Goertz, L., Radomski, S., Thom, S., & Behrens, J. (2017). Monitor Digitale Bildung – Die Hochschulen im digitalen Zeitalter. Retrieved December 12, 2017, from https://www.bertelsmannstiftung.de/fileadmin/files/BSt/Publikationen/GrauePublikationen/DigiMonitor_Hochschulen_final.pdf Search in Google Scholar

63. Shea, P. (2007). Bridges and Barriers to Teaching Online College Courses: A Study of Experienced Online Faculty in Thirty-Six Colleges. Online Learning Consortium, 11(2), 73-128. Search in Google Scholar

64. Sheridan, K., & Kelly, M. (2010). The Indicators of Instructor Presence that are Important to Students in Online Courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(4). Search in Google Scholar

65. Shi, M., Bonk, C. & Magjuka, R. (2006). Time management strategies for online teaching. International Journal for Technology and Distance Learning, 3(2). Retrieved March, 27, 2013 from http://itdl.org/journal/feb_06/article01.htm Search in Google Scholar

66. Shie, R., Gummer, E., & Niess, M. (2008). The quality of a web based course: perspectives of the instructor in the students. TechTrends, 52(6), 61-68.10.1007/s11528-008-0220-3 Search in Google Scholar

67. Spector, J. M., & De la Teja, I. (2001). Competencies for online teaching. ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University. Search in Google Scholar

68. Steinhardt, I. (2015). Lehre stärkt Forschung: Studiengangentwicklung durch ProfessorInnen im Handlungssystem Universität. Springer-Verlag. Search in Google Scholar

69. Tallent-Runnels, M., Thomas, J., Lan, W., Cooper, S, Ahern, S., & Xiaoming L. (2016).Teaching Courses Online: A Review of Research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), pp. 93-135. Search in Google Scholar

70. Thiele, J. (2003). Learning patterns on online students, Journal of Nursing Education, 42(8), 364-367.10.3928/0148-4834-20030801-08 Search in Google Scholar

71. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.10.3102/00346543068002202 Search in Google Scholar

72. University of Toledo (2016). Faculty Online Teaching Readiness Survey. Retrieved online from https://www.utdl.edu/lv/assessments/faculty_readiness.html Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo