1. bookVolume 22 (2019): Issue 1 (July 2019)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

An Analysis of Intercultural Students’ Self-Determination in Graduate Online Programmes: Implications for Praxis

Published Online: 24 Jan 2020
Volume & Issue: Volume 22 (2019) - Issue 1 (July 2019)
Page range: 36 - 52
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1027-5207
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

The self-determination of online graduate students was studied in terms of the impact of autonomy, competence and relatedness upon their persistence. Unique to this study was the assessment of the potential influence of socio-cultural factors. As the majority of research into online university students’ persistence is generated from the US, Canada, UK and European countries assessing their own domestic populations, the global nature of this study provides a new perspective. Fifty-four online graduate students representing 26 countries participated representing 19 lesser developed economies and 7 developed economies. Collectivist versus individualistic cultures were equally represented. Self-determination Theory (SDT) was examined both in terms of the online classroom environment as well as overcoming life challenges for programme perseverance. A correlational matrix was used to reject the null hypothesis. Results indicated that statistically significant correlations exist among the three variables, and, in the instances of the variables of autonomy and relatedness, a significant negative correlation exists. The findings indicate that the participants displayed strong internal locus of control, self-directed learning, competency and relatedness in attaining success within the online environment programme. Cultural communitarianism values were not found to be of significant influence.

Keywords

1. Baumeister, R., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.49710.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 Search in Google Scholar

2. Bissessar, C. S. (2014). Students’ perceptions of an online B.Ed. programme. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(10), 57-65. Search in Google Scholar

3. Chen, K.-C., & Jang, S.-J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26(4), 741-752. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.01.01110.1016/j.chb.2010.01.011 Search in Google Scholar

4. Cho, M., & Heron, M. (2015). Self-regulated learning: The role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online Mathematics course. Distance Education, 36(1), 80-99. doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.101996310.1080/01587919.2015.1019963 Search in Google Scholar

5. Clarida, B. H., Bobeva, M., Hutchings, M., & Taylor, J. (2015). Strategies for Digital Inclusion: Towards a Pedagogy for Embracing and Sustaining Student Diversity and Engagement with Online Learning. IAFOR: Journal of Academic Education, 3(SE). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.3.se.0610.22492/ije.3.se.06 Search in Google Scholar

6. deCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation. New York: Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

7. Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4613-4446-9 Search in Google Scholar

8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum Press.10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 Search in Google Scholar

9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on motivation: Perspectives on motivation, 38 (pp. 237–288). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Search in Google Scholar

10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (n.d.) Self-determination theory: Overview. Retrieved from http://selfdeterminationtheory.org/theory/ Search in Google Scholar

11. Durksen, T. L., Chu, M.-W., Ahmad, Z. F., Radil, A. I., & Daniels, L. M. (2016). Motivation in a MOOC: a probabilistic analysis of online learners’ basic psychological needs. Social Psychology of Education, 19(2), 241–260. doi:10.1007/s11218-015-9331-910.1007/s11218-015-9331-9 Search in Google Scholar

12. Filak, V. F., & Nicolini, K. M. (2018). Differentiations in motivation and need satisfaction based on course modality: a self-determination theory perspective. Educational Psychology, 38(6), 772–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.145777610.1080/01443410.2018.1457776 Search in Google Scholar

13. Glenn, E. (2000). Citizenship and equality: Historical and global perspectives. Social Problems, 47(1), 1-20. doi: 10.2307/309714910.2307/3097149 Search in Google Scholar

14. Guay, F., Vallerand, J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the Assessment of Situational Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and Emotion, 24(3), 175-213.10.1023/A:1005614228250 Search in Google Scholar

15. Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: Toward a developmental model. Human Development, 1, 661-669. https://doi.org/10.1159/00027157410.1159/000271574 Search in Google Scholar

16. Hartnett, M., St. George, A., & Dron, J. (2011). Examining Motivation in Online Distance Learning Environments: Complex, Multifaceted, and Situation-Dependent. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 20-38. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1030/195410.19173/irrodl.v12i6.1030 Search in Google Scholar

17. Held, M. F., Thoma, C. A., & Thomas, K. (2004). “The John Jones Show”: How one teacher facilitated self-determined transition planning for a young man with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19(3), 177-188.10.1177/10883576040190030501 Search in Google Scholar

18. Heo, J. C., & Han, S. (2018). Effects of motivation, academic stress and age in predicting self-directed learning readiness (SDLR): Focused on online college students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(1), 61–71.10.1007/s10639-017-9585-2 Search in Google Scholar

19. Hofstede, G. (2018). Country Comparison. Hofstede Insights. Retrieved from https://www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare-countries/ Search in Google Scholar

20. Joo, Y. J., So, H.-J., & Kim, N. H. (2018). Examination of relationships among students’ self-determination, technology acceptance, satisfaction, and continuance intention to use K-MOOCs. Computers & Education, 122, 260–272. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.00310.1016/j.compedu.2018.01.003 Search in Google Scholar

21. Kahn, P., Everington, L., Kelm, K., & Watckins, F. (2017). Understanding student engagement in online learning environment: the role of reflexivity. Educational Technology Research and development, 65(1).10.1007/s11423-016-9484-z Search in Google Scholar

22. LeBaron, M. (2003a) Communication tools for understanding cultural differences. Beyond Intractability. Retrieved from https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/communication_tools Search in Google Scholar

23. LeBaron, M. (2003b) Cross-cultural communication. Beyond Intractability. Retrieved from https://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/cross-cultural-communication Search in Google Scholar

24. Miltiadou, M., & Savenye, W. C. (2003). Applying social cognitive constructs of motivation to enhance student success in online distance education. Educational Technology Review, 11(1). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/17795/ Search in Google Scholar

25. MSCI (2018). Annual market classification review. Retrieved from https://www.msci.com/market-classification Search in Google Scholar

26. Mullen, G. E., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2006). Student outcomes and perceptions of instructors’ demands and support in online and traditional classrooms. Internet & Higher Education, 9(4), 257–266. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.00510.1016/j.iheduc.2006.08.005 Search in Google Scholar

27. OECD (2017). Education at a Glance 2017: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2017-en10.1787/eag-2017-en Search in Google Scholar

28. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations Among Perceived Autonomy Support, Forms of Self-Regulation, and Persistence: A Prospective Study. Motivation & Emotion, 25(4), 279–306. doi: 10.1023/A:101480513240610.1023/A:1014805132406 Search in Google Scholar

29. Pentaraki, A. D., & Burkholder, G. (2017). Emerging Evidence Regarding the Roles of Emotional, Behavioural, and Cognitive Aspects of Student Engagement in the Online Classroom. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 20(1), 1-21. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/?p=archives&year=2017&halfyear=1&article=73610.1515/eurodl-2017-0001 Search in Google Scholar

30. Reis, H. T. (1994). Domains of experience: Investigating relationship processes from three perspectives. In R. Erber & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for personal relationships (pp. 87-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Search in Google Scholar

31. Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.74910.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 Search in Google Scholar

32. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.102010.1006/ceps.1999.1020 Search in Google Scholar

33. Ryan, R. M., Kuhl, J., & Deci, E. L. (1997). Nature and autonomy: Organizational view of social and neurobiological aspects of self-regulation in behaviour and development. Development and Psychopathology, 9, 701-728.10.1017/S0954579497001405 Search in Google Scholar

34. Statista (2018). E-learning and digital education – Statistics & Facts. Retreieved from https://www.statista.com/topics/3115/e-learning-and-digital-education/ Search in Google Scholar

35. White, R. W. (1963). Ego and reality in psychoanalytic theory. New York: International Universities Press. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo