1. bookVolume 28 (2021): Issue 1 (March 2021)
    Special Issue: ECO-TECHNOLOGY AND ECO-INNOVATION FOR GREEN SUSTAINABLE GROWTH
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

An Empirical Study on Discussion and Evaluation of Green University

Published Online: 23 Apr 2021
Page range: 75 - 85
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
08 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Sustainable development has become an important criterion for human beings to pursue happiness in their daily lives. In order to ensure the sustainable development of the earth, the first step is to let this concept take root. Hence, the key to making a campus into a green university and promoting national consensus lies in the implementation quality. Moreover, the influence of the factors can be effectively examined and improved by providing correction plans on a rolling basis according to the green university certification criteria and from the perspective of business performance. The aim is to provide detailed coping strategies and facilitate schools moving towards the goal of a green university. By the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL), this study explored the criteria for green university evaluation, investigated the causal relationship and mutual influence among criteria. It also offered suggestions on green performance management for the case university. The findings of this study can help schools to develop environmental policies, identify the priorities for implementing green university policies, and achieve the goal of a green university efficiently.

Keywords

[1] Mamoudou C. Determinants of production-based and consumption-based CO2 emissions: a comparative analysis. Int J Environ Pollut. 2020;67(1):22-47. DOI: 10.1504/IJEP.2020.108362. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Marszałek M, Kowalski Z, Makara A. The possibility of contamination of water-soil environment as a result of the use of pig slurry. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(2):313-30. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0022. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Suwartha N, Sari RF. Evaluating UI Green Metric as a tool to support green universities development: assessment of the year 2011 ranking. J Clean Prod. 2013;61:46-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.034. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Bekessy S, Samson K, Clarkson R. The failure of non-binding declarations to achieve university sustainability - a need for accountability. Int J Sust High Educ. 2007;8:301-16. DOI: 10.1108/14676370710817165. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Biasutti M, Frate S. A validity and reliability study of the attitudes toward sustainable development scale. Environ Educ Res. 2017;23(2):214-30. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2016.1146660. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bartlett PF, Chase GW. Sustainability on Campus: Stories and Strategies for Change. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press; 2004. ISBN: 9780262524223. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Creighton SH. Greening the Ivory Tower: Improving the Environmental Track Record of Universities, Colleges, and Other Institutions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1998. ISBN: 9780262531511. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Cioca LI, Ivascu L, Rada EC, Torretta V, Ionescu G. Sustainable development and technological impact on CO2 reducing conditions in Romania. Sustainability. 2015;7(2):1637-50. DOI: 10.3390/su7021637. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Holdsworth S, Thomas IA. Sustainability education academic development framework (SEAD). Environ Educ Res. 2016;22(8):1073-97. DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1029876. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Jajo NK, Harrison J. World university ranking systems: an alternative approach using partial least squares path modelling. J Higher Educ Policy Manage. 2014;36(5):471-82. DOI: 10.1080/1360080X.2014.936090. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Lauder A, Sari RF, Suwartha N, Tjahjono G. Critical review of a global campus sustainability ranking: GreenMetric. J Clean Prod. 2015;108:852-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.080. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Lukman R, Kranjc D, Glavic P. University ranking using research, educational and environmental indicators. J Clean Prod. 2010;18:619-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.09.015. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Moed HF. Critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings. Scientometrics. 2016;1-24. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2212-y. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Scott R. Education for sustainability through a photography competition. Sustainability. 2015;6(2):474-86. DOI: 10.3390/su6020474. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Handfield R, Walton SV, Sroufe R, Melnyk SA. Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of Analytical Hierarchy Process. European J Operational Res. 2002;141:70-87. DOI: 10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00261-2. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Izunildo C, Antonio G, Virgilio CM. A decision-making model for lean, agile, resilient and green supply chain management. Int J Product Res. 2012;50(17):4830-45. DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2012.657970. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Tsai SB, Huang CY, Wang CK, Chen Q. Using a mixed model to evaluate job satisfaction in high-tech industries. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(5):e0154071. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154071. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Wu WW, Lee YT. Developing global managers’ competencies using Fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Systems Applications. 2007;32(2):499-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2005.12.005. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Lin CJ, Wu WW. A causal analytical method for group decision making under fuzzy environment. Expert System Applications. 2008;34(1):205-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.012. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Lee YC, Hsieh YF. Integration of revised simultaneous importance performance analysis and decision making trial and evaluation laboratory - A study of mobile telecommunication industry in Taiwan. African J Business Manage. 2011;5(6):2312-21. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299308104. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Wu WW. Segmenting critical factors for successful knowledge management implementation using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Appl Soft Computing. 2012;12(1):527-35. DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2011.08.008. Search in Google Scholar

[22] Guo JJ, Tsai SB. Discussing and evaluating green supply chain suppliers: A case study of the printed circuit board industry in China. South African J Industrial Eng. 2015;26(2):56-67. DOI: 10.7166/26-2-956. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Tsai SB, Wang K. Using a novel method to evaluate the performance of human resources in green logistics enterprises. Ecol Chem Eng S. 2019;26(4):629-40. DOI: 10.1515/eces-2019-0045. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo