Open Access

C-Reactive Protein and Fibrinogen as Indicators of Systemic Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing VATS and Conventional Pulmonary Lobectomy


Cite

1. Cattaneo SM, Park BJ, Wilton AS, Seshan VE, Bains MS, Downey RJ, Flores RM, Rizk N, Rusch VW. Use of video-assisted thoracic surgery for lobectomy in elderly results in fewer complications // Ann Thorac Surg, 2008; 85:231-235Search in Google Scholar

2. Craig SR, Leaver HA, Yap PL, Pugh GC, Walker WS. Acute responses following minimal access and conventional thoracic surgery // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2001; 20:455-463Search in Google Scholar

3. Jheon S, Yang HC, Cho SC. Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer // Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2012; 60:255-260Search in Google Scholar

4. Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with videoassisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy // Ann Thorac Surg, 2000; 70:1644-1646Search in Google Scholar

5. McKenna RJ, Houck W, Fuller CB. Video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy: experience with 1,100 cases // Ann ThoracSurg, 2006; 81:421-425Search in Google Scholar

6. McKenna RJ, Wolf RK, Brenner M, Fischel RJ, Wurning P. Is lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery an adequate cancer operation? // Ann Thorac Surg, 1998; 66:1903-1908Search in Google Scholar

7. Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, Sano Y, Date H, Shimizu N. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure// Ann Thorac Surg, 2001; 72:362-365Search in Google Scholar

8. Nakata M, Saeki H, Yokoyama N, Kurita A, Takiyama W, Takashima S. Pulmonary function after lobectomy: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy // Ann Thorac Surg, 2000; 70:938-941Search in Google Scholar

9. Nicastri DG, Wisnivesky JP, Litle VR, Yun J, Chin C, Dembitzer FR, Swanson SJ. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: report on safety, discharge independence, pain, and chemotherapy tolerance // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2008; 135:642-647Search in Google Scholar

10. Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, Lee PC, Harpole DH, Onaitis MW, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from STS database // J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2010; 139:366-378Search in Google Scholar

11. Roviaro G, Rebuffat C, Varoli FC, Mariani C, Maciocco M. Videoendoscopic pulmonary lobectomy for cancer // Surg Laparosc Endosc, 1992; 2:244-247Search in Google Scholar

12. Shaw JP, Dembitzer FR, Wisnivesky JP, Litle VR, Weiser TS, Yun J, et al. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy:state of the art and future directions // Ann Thorac Surg, 2008; 85:S705-S70910.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.11.04818222201Search in Google Scholar

13. Silins I, Apsvalks M, Sirgeda A. VATS Lobectomy: a Report of Our Initial Experience // Acta Chirurgica Latviensis, 2008; 8:64-70Search in Google Scholar

14. Song SW, Lee HS, Kim MS, Nam BH, Zo JI. Preoperative serum fibrinogen level predicts postoperative pulmonary complications after lung cancer resection // Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81:1974-1981Search in Google Scholar

15. Sugi K, Kaneda Y, Esato K. Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy achieves a satisfactory long-term prognosis in patients with clinical stage IA lung cancer // World J Surg, 2000; 24:27-31Search in Google Scholar

16. Swanson SJ, Herndon JE, D`Amico TA. Videoassistedthoracic surgery lobectomy: report of CALGB 39802 - a prospective, multi-institution feasibility study // J Clin Oncol 2007; 25:4993-4997Search in Google Scholar

17. Thomas P, Dodolli C, Yena S, Thirion X, Sebag F, Fuentes P, Giudicelli R. VATS is an adequate oncological operation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2002; 21:1094-1099Search in Google Scholar

18. Turna A, Solak O, Cetinkaya E, Kilicgun A, Metin M, Sayar A, Gurses A. Lactate dehydrogenase levels predict pulmonary morbidity after lung resection for non-small cell lung cancer // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 26:483-487Search in Google Scholar

19. Uramoto H, Naknishi R, Fujino Y, Imoto H, Takenoyama M, Yoshimatsu T, Oyama T, Osaki T, Yasumoto K. Prediction of pulmonary complications after lobectomy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer // Thorax, 2001; 56:59-61Search in Google Scholar

20. Walker WS, Codispoti M, Soon SY, Stamenkovic S, Carnochan F, Pugh G. Long-term outcomes following VATS lobectomy for non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma // Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2003; 23:397-402Search in Google Scholar

21. Walker WS, Leaver HA. Immunologic and stress responses following video-assisted thoracic surgery and open pulmonary lobectomy in early stage lung cancer. // Thor Surg Clin 2007; 17:241-24910.1016/j.thorsurg.2007.04.00117626402Search in Google Scholar

22. Whitson BA, Andrade RS, Boettcher A, Bardales R, Kratzke RA, Dahlberg PS, Maddaus MA. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is more favourable than thoracotomy of clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer // Ann Thorac Surg, 2007; 83:1965-1970Search in Google Scholar

23. Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, Swanson SJ, Maddaus MA. Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the videoassisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy // Ann Thorac Surg, 2008; 86:2008-2016Search in Google Scholar

24. Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG, McCaughan BC. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer // J Clin Oncol, 2009; 27:2553-2562Search in Google Scholar

25. Yim APC, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA. VATS Lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with Conventional surgery // Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70:243-247 Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1407-981X
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
Volume Open
Journal Subjects:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, Surgery, other