1. bookVolume 25 (2020): Issue 1-2 (December 2020)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2084-4506
First Published
17 Jan 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Lower-Secondary School Chemistry Textbooks’ Didactic Equipment

Published Online: 29 Jan 2021
Page range: 69 - 77
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2084-4506
First Published
17 Jan 2013
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Textbooks’ fundamental influence on teaching is caused not only by their subject matter, but also by their didactic elaboration. Textbooks’ individual functions are fulfilled through incorporated structural elements. Their pool is referred to as the didactic equipment of the textbook and represents qualities of the textbook through the options it gives to its users. The presented overview of lower-secondary chemistry textbooks’ didactic equipment included 7 series of currently available textbooks. Results of the analysis serve not only as a possible guide for chemistry teachers’ textbook selection, but they also provide insight into the current state to authors of textbooks and other didactic materials. Chemistry textbooks for lower-secondary schools achieve relatively high didactic equipment (75-92 %). The best equipped are the series of textbooks published after the current state curriculum introduction (by publishing houses Fraus and Nova Skola). Surprisingly, however, the most recently published textbooks by the Taktik publishing house showed the lowest didactic equipment.

Keywords

[1] Sikorová Z, Václavík M, Červenková I. Stud Paed. 2019;24:111-29. DOI: 10.5817/SP2019-3-5.10.5817/SP2019-3-5Search in Google Scholar

[2] Isikoglu N, Basturk R, Karaca F. Teach Teach Educ. 2009;25:350-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.004.10.1016/j.tate.2008.08.004Search in Google Scholar

[3] Council recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance). Official J Europ Union. 2018,1-13. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)&from=EN.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Vojíř K, Rusek M. Int J Sci Educ. 2019;41:1496-516. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584.10.1080/09500693.2019.1613584Search in Google Scholar

[5] Průcha J. Učebnice: Teorie a analýzy edukačního média. Příručka pro studenty, učitele, autory učebnic a výzkumné pracovníky (Theory and analysis of education medium. A Handbook for students, teachers, textbook authors and researchers). Brno: Paido; 1998. ISBN: 8085931494.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Shulman LS. Educ Researcher. 1986;15:4-14. DOI: 10.3102/0013189X015002004.10.3102/0013189X015002004Search in Google Scholar

[7] Pyburn DT, Pazicni S. J Chem Educ. 2014;91(6):778-83. DOI: 10.1021/ed500006u.10.1021/ed500006uSearch in Google Scholar

[8] Bansiong AJ. Cogent Educ. 2019;6(1):1-22. DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2019.1706395.10.1080/2331186X.2019.1706395Search in Google Scholar

[9] Guo DB, Wright KL, McTigue EM. Elem School J. 2018;119:244-69. DOI: 10.1086/700266.10.1086/700266Search in Google Scholar

[10] Park JK. J Korean Chem Soc. 2016;60:327-41. DOI: 10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.5.327.10.5012/jkcs.2016.60.5.327Search in Google Scholar

[11] Andersson-Bakken E, Jegstad KM, Bakken J. Int J Sci Educ. 2020;42:1320-38. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2020.1756516.10.1080/09500693.2020.1756516Search in Google Scholar

[12] Andersen KN. J Res Sci Teach. 2020;57:481-509. DOI: 10.1002/tea.21599.10.1002/tea.21599Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bergqvist A, Chang Rundgren S-N. Res Sci Technol Edu. 2017;35:215-37. DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2017.1295934.10.1080/02635143.2017.1295934Search in Google Scholar

[14] Sikorová Z. Učitel a učebnice: užívání učebnic na 2. stupni základních škol (Teachers and textbooks: using textbooks at lower-secondary level). Ostrava: Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě, Pedagogická fakulta; 2010. ISBN: 8073689235.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Vojíř K, Rusek M. Chem listy. 2020:366-9. Available from: http://ww.chemicke-listy.cz/ojs3/index.php/chemicke-listy/article/view/3606/3552.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Vojíř K, Rusek M. In: Používání učebnic chemie na základních školách v České republice: tvorba a pilotní ověření dotazníku (The use of chemistry textbooks at basic schools in the Czech Republic: A questionnaire preparation and piloting). Project-based and other activating strategies in science education XVI. Praha, Rusek M, Vojíř K, editors. Praha: Charles University, Faculty of Education; 2019. WOS: 000482135600022.Search in Google Scholar

[17] McDonald CV. Res Sci Ed. 2016;46:481-509. DOI: 10.1007/s11165-015-9468-8.10.1007/s11165-015-9468-8Search in Google Scholar

[18] Bizzo N, Tolentino-Neto LCB, Garcia PS In: What do teachers expect from the textbooks? The study of the process of choice of textbooks in Brazilian public schools. Int Meeting Critical Analysis of School Science Textbook, IOSTE Proc. Tunisia, Tunisia: 2007. Available from: http://coral.ufsm.br/ideia/images/producao/Bizzo_Garcia_Tolentino_IOSTE_2007.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Hemmi K, Koljonen T, Hoelgaard L, Ahl L, Ryve A. In: Antalya, Ubuz, B., et al., editors. Analyzing mathematics curriculum materials in Sweden and Finland: Developing an analytical tool, The Proceedings of the Eighth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. CERME - 8, Antalya: Middle East Technical University; 2013. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Analyzing-mathematics-curriculum-materials-in-and-%3A-Hemmi-Koljonen/2f65ceef755a83001f6abd1b59e6db3bd9772cfa.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Armbruster P, Patel M, Johnson E, Weiss M. Cbe-Life Sci Educ. 2009;8:203-13. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.09-03-0025.10.1187/cbe.09-03-0025273602419723815Search in Google Scholar

[21] Rusek M, Vojíř K. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2019;20:85-94. DOI: 10.1039/C8RP00141C.10.1039/C8RP00141CSearch in Google Scholar

[22] Janoušková S, Žák V, Rusek M. Stud Paed. 2019;24:93-109. DOI: 10.5817/SP2019-3-4.10.5817/SP2019-3-4Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo