1. bookVolume 12 (2021): Issue 1 (May 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Sep 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Differences in Slovenian NUTS 3 Regions and Functional Regions by Gender

Published Online: 04 Jun 2021
Page range: 45 - 59
Received: 27 Nov 2020
Accepted: 21 Mar 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Sep 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Background: Regions at the level of NUTS 3, which is a system used in the EU for various analyses and statistical reports, can be defined as functional regions in terms of labour markets, education areas, and supply markets.

Objectives: This study analyses the functional regions of Slovenia, differentiated by gender, and their correspondence with the statistical regions at the level of NUTS 3.

Methods/Approach: Functional regions are analysed as labour market areas, which are modelled according to the CURDS method, and evaluated using the fuzzy set approach.

Results: The analysis of functional regions resulted in ten regions for male commuters and fourteen regions for female commuters. Only four of the twelve functional regions for commuters relate to the corresponding statistical regions. Functional region Ljubljana is much larger than the corresponding statistical region, mainly at the expense of neighbouring regions. In recent decades, two new functional regions have been created which are becoming candidates for inclusion in the system of NUTS 3 regions.

Conclusions: A detailed analysis showed that functional region Velenje is becoming an important local labour market and should be included in the system of NUTS 3 regions of Slovenia, while the Central Sava Statistical Region should be removed from it.

Keywords

JEL Classification

1. Arnuš, D. (2020), “Analiza funkcionalnih regij v Sloveniji po spolu delovno aktivnega prebivalstva« (Analysis of functional regions in Slovenia by gender of persons in employment), BSc thesis University of Ljubljana, available at: https://repozitorij.unilj.si/IzpisGradiva.php?lang=slv&id=117357 (15 November 2020). Search in Google Scholar

2. Berry, B. J. L., Garrison, W. L. (1958), “The Functional Bases of the Central Place Hierarchy”, Economic Geography, Vol. 34 No. 2, pp. 145–154. Search in Google Scholar

3. Blumen, O. (1994), “Gender Differences in the Journey to Work”, Urban Geography, Vol. 15, No. 3, pp. 223–245. Search in Google Scholar

4. Bole, D. (2011), “Changes in employee commuting: a comparative analysis of employee commuting to major Slovenian employment centers from 2000 to 2009”, Acta geographica Slovenica, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 93–108. Search in Google Scholar

5. Christaller, W. (1933). Die zentralen Orte in Süddeutschland. Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp. 327-331. Search in Google Scholar

6. Coombes, M. G., Green, A. E., Openshaw, S. (1986), “An efficient algorithm to generate official statistical reporting areas: the case of the 1984 travel-to-work-areas revision in Britain”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 37 No. 10, pp. 943-953. Search in Google Scholar

7. Coombes, M., Bond, S. (2008), “Travel-to-Work Areas: the 2007 review Office for National Statistics”, London, available at: https://www.ncl.ac.uk/media/wwwnclacuk/curds/files/TTWA%20report.pdf (15 August 2020). Search in Google Scholar

8. Coombes, M., Casado-Díaz, J. M., Martínez-Bernabeu, L., Carausu, F. (2012), “Study on comparable labour market areas - Final research report”, available at: http://www.istat.it/it/files/2014/12/Final-Report_LMA-v1-0-17102012.pdf (15 August 2020). Search in Google Scholar

9. Cörvers, F., Hensen, M., Bongaerts, D. (2009), “Delimitation and coherence of functional and administrative regions”, Regional Studies, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 19–31. Search in Google Scholar

10. Drobne, S. (2016), “Model vrednotenja števila in območij funkcionalnih regij” (A model evaluating the number and areas of functional regions), PhD thesis, University of Ljubljana, available at: https://repozitorij.uni-lj.si/Dokument.php?id=97829&lang=slv (7 November 2019). Search in Google Scholar

11. Drobne, S. (2020), “Kakovost funkcionalne regionalizacije po metodah CURDS in Intramax na makro ravni: študija primera za Slovenijo” (The quality of functional regionalisation by using CURDS and Intramax methods at the macro level: a case study for Slovenia), Geodetski vestnik, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 13–32. Search in Google Scholar

12. Drobne, S., Garre, A., Hontoria, E., Konjar, M. (2020), “Comparison of Two Network-Theory-Based Methods for Detecting Functional Regions”, Business Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 15-29. Search in Google Scholar

13. Drobne, A., Lakner, M. (2016), “Use of constraints in the hierarchical aggregation procedure Intramax”, Business Systems Research, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 5-22. Search in Google Scholar

14. EC (2019), “Regulation (EC) No 1059/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 May 2003 on the establishment of a common classification of territorial units for statistics (NUTS), Consolidated text 13/11/2019”, European Commission (EC), Brussels, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02003R1059-20191113 (15 October 2020). Search in Google Scholar

15. Eurostat (2019), “Ageing Europe, Looking at the Lives of Older People in the EU, 2019 Edition”, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/10166544/KS-02-19%E2%80%91681-EN-N.pdf/c701972f-6b4e-b432-57d2-91898ca94893 (19 March 2021). Search in Google Scholar

16. Eurostat (2020a), “NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics. History of NUTS”, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/history (15 October 2020). Search in Google Scholar

17. Eurostat (2020b), “NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics. Background”, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/background (12 October 2020). Search in Google Scholar

18. Eurostat (2020c), “NUTS – Nomenclature of territorial units for statistics. Local Administrative Units (LAU)”, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/nuts/local-administrative-units (11 October 2020). Search in Google Scholar

19. Fanning-Madden, J. (1981), “Why Women Work Closer to Home”, Urban Studies, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 181-194. Search in Google Scholar

20. Franconi, L., D’Alò, M., Ichim, D. (2016a), “Istat Implementation of the Algorithm to Develop Labour Market Areas, Technical Report”, Istat, available at: https://www.istat.it/en/files/2016/03/Description-of-the-LabourMarketAreas-algorithm.pdf, (15 September 2020). Search in Google Scholar

21. Franconi, L., Ichim, D., D’Alò, M., Cruciani, S. (2016b), “Guidelines for Labour Market Area Delineation Process: From Definition to Dissemination”, Istat, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cros/system/files/guidelines_for_lmas_production08082017_rev300817.pdf (15 September 2020). Search in Google Scholar

22. Franconi, L., Ichim, D’Alò, M. (2017). Labour Market Areas for Territorial Policies: Tools for a European Approach. Istat, available at: https://content.iospress.com/download/statistical-journal-of-theiaos/sji160343?id=statistical-journal-of-the-iaos%2Fsji160343 (15 September 2020). Search in Google Scholar

23. Feng, Z. (2009), “Fuzziness of travel to work areas”, Regional Studies, Vol. 43 No. 5, pp. 707-720. Search in Google Scholar

24. Green, A. E., Coombes, M. G., Owen, D. W. (1986), “Gender-Specific Local Labour Market Areas in England and Wales”, Geoforum, Vol. 17 No. 3, pp. 339–351. Search in Google Scholar

25. Karlsson, C., Olsson, M. (2006), “The identification of functional regions: theory, methods, and applications”, The Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 40 No. 1, pp. 1-18. Search in Google Scholar

26. Van der Laan, L., Schalke, R. (2001), “Reality versus policy: the delineation and testing of local labour market and spatial policy areas”, European Planning Studies, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 201-221. Search in Google Scholar

27. Nafilyan V. (2019), “Gender Differences in Commute Time and Pay”. Office for National Statistics, London, United Kingdom, available at https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkin ghours/articles/genderdifferencesincommutetimeandpay/2019-09-04#toc (9 September 2020). Search in Google Scholar

28. OECD (2002), Redefining territories - The functional regions. OECD Publishing, Paris. Search in Google Scholar

29. Prashker, J., Shiftan, Y., Hershkovitch-Sarusi, P. (2008), “Residential Choice Location, Gender and the Commute Trip to Work in Tel Aviv”, Transport geography, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 332–341. Search in Google Scholar

30. Rebec, J. (1983), Razvoj naselij mestnega značaja z več kot 2000 prebivalci v SR Sloveniji, 1971–1981. Prikazi in študije, Ljubljana. No. 28. Search in Google Scholar

31. Rebec, J. (1984). Funkcijska klasifikacija mestnih naselij z več kot 2000 prebivalci v SR Sloveniji, 1981. Prikazi in študije, No. 29. Search in Google Scholar

32. Roberts, J., Hodgson, R., Dolan, P. (2011), “It’s Driving her Mad: Gender Differences in the Effects of Commuting on Psychological Health”, Journal of Health Economics, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 1064–1076. Search in Google Scholar

33. Sang, S. M. A. (2008), “Examining Commuting Patterns and Spatial Mismatch by Occupation and Gender: Disaggregate Journey-to-Work Model”. PhD thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus. Search in Google Scholar

34. SMARS (2020), “Spatial data on municipalities, 2019”, the Surveying and Mapping Authority of the Republic of Slovenia, available at: https://egp.gu.gov.si/egp/ (10 August 2020). Search in Google Scholar

35. SORS (2020a), “Slovene Statistical Regions and Municipalities in Figures”, Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, available at https://www.stat.si/obcine/en (12 October 2020). Search in Google Scholar

36. SORS (2020b), “SI-Stat data portal”, available at: http://pxweb.stat.si/pxweb/dialog/statfile1.asp (25 August 2020). Search in Google Scholar

37. Tkocz, Z., Kristensen, G. (1994), “Commuting Distances and Gender: A Spatial Urban Model”, Geographical analysis, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 1–14. Search in Google Scholar

38. Vanhove, N., Klaassen, L. H. (1987). Regional Policy: A European Approach, 2 Edition. Gower Publishing Company Limited, Aldershot. Search in Google Scholar

39. Vrišer, I. (1974), “Mesta in urbano omrežje v SR Sloveniji. Značilnosti njihovega razvoja in družbeno gospodarskega pomena s posebnim ozirom na mala mesta”, Geografski zbornik, Vol. 14 No. 3, pp. 179–337. Search in Google Scholar

40. Vrišer, I. (1978), Regionalno planiranje. Mladinska knjiga, Ljubljana. Search in Google Scholar

41. Vrišer, I., Rebernik, D. (1993), »Družbenogospodarska in dejavnostna usmeritev slovenskih mest«, Geografski zbornik, No. 33, pp. 9–40. Search in Google Scholar

42. Watts, M. (2009), “Rules versus hierarchy: an application of fuzzy set theory to the assessment of spatial grouping techniques”, in Kolehmainen, M., Toivanen, P., Beliczynski, B. (eds), 9th International Conference on Adaptive and Natural Computing Algorithms, 23-25 April, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 517-526. Search in Google Scholar

43. Watts, M. (2013), “Different spatial grouping algorithms: an application to the design of Australia’s new statistical geography”, Spatial Economic Analysis, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 92-112. Search in Google Scholar

44. White, M. J. (1977), “A Model of Residential Location Choice and Commuting by Men and Women Workers”, Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 41–52. Search in Google Scholar

45. Wikipedia (2020), “Statistical Regions of Slovenia”, Wikipedia Free Encyclopedia, available at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_regions_of_Slovenia (12 October 2020). Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo