1. bookVolume 12 (2021): Issue 1 (May 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Sep 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Effect of External Knowledge Sources on Organizational Innovation in Small and Medium Enterprises in Germany

Published Online: 04 Jun 2021
Page range: 60 - 79
Received: 13 Jan 2020
Accepted: 25 Jun 2020
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
First Published
19 Sep 2012
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Background: Firms increasingly depend on external actors for the process of generating innovation. Interaction with these actors might occur through an official collaboration agreement or via external actors as the source of information.

Objectives: Although open innovation has received more attention, still less is known about its effect on organizational innovation. To fill this gap, this study investigates the impact of various external knowledge sources on the willingness of small and mediumsized enterprises to introduce organizational innovation.

Methods/Approach: To achieve the proposed objective, the German Community Innovation Survey conducted in 2017 is used for the econometric analysis.

Results: Different external sources of knowledge are relevant for the introduction of organizational innovation in small firms (customers in the private sector, competitors, conferences, and crowdsourcing) compared to medium-sized firms (customers in the private sector and industry associations).

Conclusions: External knowledge sources are more important for small firms compared to medium firms, and those small firms are more likely to use various sets of external knowledge.

Keywords

JEL Classification

1. Abdul Basit, S., Kuhn, T., Ahmed, M. (2018), “The Effect of Government Subsidy on Non-Technological Innovation and Firm Performance in the Service Sector: Evidence from Germany”, Business Systems Research, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 118-137. Search in Google Scholar

2. Al-Laham, A., Amburgey, T. L., Baden-Fuller, C. (2010), “Who is my partner and how do we dance? Technological collaboration and patenting speed in US biotechnology”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 789-807. Search in Google Scholar

3. Anzola-Román, P., Bayona-Sáez, C., García-Marco, T. (2018), “Organizational innovation, internal R&D and externally sourced innovation practices: Effects on technological innovation outcomes”, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 91, pp. 233-247. Search in Google Scholar

4. Bach, M. P., Lojpur, A., Peković, S., Stanovčić, T. (2015), “The influence of different information sources on innovation performance: Evidence from France, The Netherlands and Croatia”,. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 89-101. Search in Google Scholar

5. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., Mol, M. J. (2008), “Management innovation”, Academy of management Review, Vol. 33 No.4, pp. 825-845. Search in Google Scholar

6. Bogers, M., Zobel, A.-K., Afuah, A., Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., Frederiksen, L., Gawer, A., Gruber, M., Haefliger, S. (2017), “The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis”, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 24 No.1, pp. 8-40. Search in Google Scholar

7. Brettel, M., Cleven, N. J. (2011), “Innovation culture, collaboration with external partners and NPD performance”, Creativity and Innovation Management, Vol.20 No.4, pp. 253-272. Search in Google Scholar

8. Brunswicker, S., Vanhaverbeke, W. (2015), “Open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): External knowledge sourcing strategies and internal organizational facilitators”, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 53 No.4, pp. 1241-1263. Search in Google Scholar

9. Castellacci, F. (2008), “Technological paradigms, regimes and trajectories: Manufacturing and service industries in a new taxonomy of sectoral patterns of innovation”, Research Policy, Vol. 37 No.6-7, pp. 978-994. Search in Google Scholar

10. Chang, S. J., Chung, C. N., Mahmood, I. P. (2006), “When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies”, Organization Science, Vol.17 No. 5, pp. 637–656. Search in Google Scholar

11. Chang, W., Taylor, S. A. (2016), “The effectiveness of customer participation in new product development: A meta-analysis”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 80 No.1, pp. 47-64. Search in Google Scholar

12. Chen, Q., Wang, C. H., Huang, S. Z. (2019), “Effects of organizational innovation and technological innovation capabilities on firm performance: evidence from firms in China’s Pearl River Delta”, Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 26 No.1, pp. 1-25. Search in Google Scholar

13. Chesbrough, H. (2003), “Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting From Technology”, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press. Search in Google Scholar

14. Chesbrough, H. (2011), “Open services innovation: Rethinking your business to grow and compete in a new era”, San Francisco, CA, Jossey Bass A Wiley Imprint. Search in Google Scholar

15. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., Eds., (2006), “Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm”, New York, Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

16. Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J., (2014), “New frontiers in open innovation”, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

17. Choi, S. B., Lee, S. H., Williams, C. (2011), “Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: Evidence from China”, Research Policy, Vol. 40No.3, pp. 441–452. Search in Google Scholar

18. Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990), “Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative science quarterly, Vol. 35 No.1, pp. 128-152. Search in Google Scholar

19. Criscuolo, P., Laursen, K., Reichstein, T., Salter, A. (2018), “Winning combinations: search strategies and innovativeness in the UK”, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 25No.2, pp. 115-143. Search in Google Scholar

20. Damanpour, F. (2014), “Footnotes to research on management innovation”,. Organization Studies, Vol. 35 No. 9, pp. 1265-1285. Search in Google Scholar

21. Damanpour, F., Sanchez-Henriquez, F., Chiu, H. H. (2018), “Internal and external sources and the adoption of innovations in organizations”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 29 No.4, pp. 712-730. Search in Google Scholar

22. Dotzel, K. R., Faggian, A. (2019), “The impact of external knowledge sourcing on innovation outcomes in rural and urban businesses in the US”, Growth and Change, Vol. 50 No.2, pp. 515-547. Search in Google Scholar

23. Faems, D., Van Looy, B., Debackere, K. (2005), “Interorganizational collaboration and innovation: Toward a portfolio approach”, Journal of product innovation management, Vol. 22 No.3, pp. 238-250. Search in Google Scholar

24. Ferraris, A., Santoro, G., Dezi, L. (2017), “How MNC’s subsidiaries may improve their innovative performance? The role of external sources and knowledge management capabilities”, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 540-552. Search in Google Scholar

25. Fitjar, R. D., Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2013), “Firm collaboration and modes of innovation in Norway”, Research Policy, Vol. 42 No.1, pp. 128-138. Search in Google Scholar

26. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E. (2004), “Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes”, In Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, Lisbon, July 6–9, RADMA, Portugal, pp.1-18. Search in Google Scholar

27. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., Chesbrough, H. (2010), “The future of open innovation”, R&D Management, Vol.40 No.3, pp. 213-221. Search in Google Scholar

28. Gellynck, X., Vermeire, B. (2009), “The contribution of regional networks to innovation and challenges for regional policy”, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 33 No.3, pp. 719-737. Search in Google Scholar

29. Gnyawali, D.R., Park, B.J., (2011), “Co-opetition between giants: collaboration with competitors for technological innovation”, Research Policy. Vol. 40 No.5, pp. 650–663. Search in Google Scholar

30. Gómez, J., Salazar, I., Vargas, P. (2016), “Sources of information as determinants of product and process innovation”, PLoS One, Vol. 11No.4, e0152743. Search in Google Scholar

31. Greenan, N., Mairesse, J. (2003), “How do new organizational practices shape production jobs”, working paper No. 28, Centre d’études de l’emploi et du travail, France, September 2003. Search in Google Scholar

32. Gulerwe, I., Guillén, M. F., Macpherson, J. M. (2002), “Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates”, Administrative science quarterly, Vol. 47 No. 2, pp. 207-232. Search in Google Scholar

33. Hair, J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E. (2010), “Multivariate data analysis”, (7th ed.), Pearson Prentice Hall, available at: http://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/clc/1809603 (12 November 2019). Search in Google Scholar

34. Hall, R. (1992), “The strategic analysis of intangible resources”, Strategic management journal, Vol. 13 No.2, pp. 135-144. Search in Google Scholar

35. Hervas-Oliver, J. L., Sempere-Ripoll, F., Boronat-Moll, C., Rojas, R. (2015), “Technological innovation without R&D: unfolding the extra gains of management innovations on technological performance”, Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, Vol. 27 No.1, pp. 19-38. Search in Google Scholar

36. Hinteregger, C., Durst, S., Temel, S., Yesilay, R. B. (2019), “The impact of openness on innovation in SMEs”, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 23 No.01, 1950003. Search in Google Scholar

37. Hipp, C. (2000), “Information flows and knowledge creation in knowledge-intensive business services: scheme for a conceptualization”, in Metcalfe J.S., Miles I. (Ed.), Innovation Systems in the Service Economy, Boston, MA, Springer, pp. 149-167. Search in Google Scholar

38. Hippel, E.V. (1988), “The Sources of Innovation”, New York, Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

39. Hossain, M. (2013), “Open innovation: so far and a way forward”, World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, Vol.10 No.1, pp. 30-41. Search in Google Scholar

40. Iglesias-Sánchez, P. P., Correia, M. B.,Jambrino-Maldonado, C. (2019), “Challenges of Open Innovation in the Tourism Sector”, Tourism Planning & Development, Vol.16 No.1, pp. 22-42. Search in Google Scholar

41. Kang, K. H., Kang, J. (2009), “How do firms source external knowledge for innovation? Analysing the effects of different knowledge sourcing methods”, International Journal of Innovation Management, Vol.13 No.01, pp. 1-17. Search in Google Scholar

42. Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., Gassmann, O. (2012), “The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol.14 No.4, pp. 367-390. Search in Google Scholar

43. Khanna, T., Rivkin, J. W. (2001), “Estimating the performance effects of business groups in emerging markets”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 22 No.1, pp. 45–74. Search in Google Scholar

44. Knoben, J., Oerlemans, L. A. G. (2010), “The importance of external knowledge sources for the newness of innovations of South African firms”, International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, Vol. 2 No.3, pp. 165-181. Search in Google Scholar

45. Köhler, C., Sofka, W., Grimpe, C. (2012), “Selective search, sectoral patterns, and the impact on product innovation performance”, Research Policy, Vol.41 No.8, pp. 1344-1356. Search in Google Scholar

46. Laursen, K., Salter, A. (2006), “Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms”, Strategic management journal, Vol.27 No.2, pp. 131-150. Search in Google Scholar

47. Lefebvre, V. M., De Steur, H., Gellynck, X. (2015), “External sources for innovation in food SMEs”, British Food Journal, Vol. 117 No.1, pp. 412-430. Search in Google Scholar

48. Leiponen, A. (2005), “Organization of knowledge and innovation: the case of Finnish business services”, Industry & Innovation, Vol.12 No.2, pp. 185-203. Search in Google Scholar

49. Leiponen, A., Helfat, C. E. (2011), “Location, decentralization, and knowledge sources for innovation”, Organization Science, Vol. 22 No.3, pp. 641-658. Search in Google Scholar

50. Lhuillery, S.,Pfister, E. (2009), “R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data”, Research policy, Vol.38 No.1, pp. 45-57. Search in Google Scholar

51. Love, J. H., Mansury, M. A. (2007), “External linkages, R&D and innovation performance in US business services”, Industry and Innovation, Vol.14 No.5, pp. 477-496. Search in Google Scholar

52. Mol, M. J.,Birkinshaw, J. (2009), “The sources of management innovation: When firms introduce new management practices”, Journal of business research, Vol. 62 No.12, pp. 1269-1280. Search in Google Scholar

53. Mol, M. J.,Birkinshaw, J. (2014), “The role of external involvement in the creation of management innovations”, Organization Studies, Vol. 35 No.9, pp. 1287-1312. Search in Google Scholar

54. Mowery, D. C., Oxley, J. E., Silverman, B. S. (1996), “Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.17 No. S2 - Winter Special Issue, pp. 77–91. Search in Google Scholar

55. Muller, P., Caliandro, C., Peycheva, V., Gagliardi, D., Marzocchi, C., Ramlogan, R., Cox, D. (2015), “Annual report on European SMEs”, European Commission, available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/7c9fbfe0-e044-11e5-8fea-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-208087183, (15 November 2019). Search in Google Scholar

56. OECD. (2005), “The measurement of scientific and technological activities”, in Oslo Manual, Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data (3rd ed.), OECD EUROSTAT, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5889925/OSLO-EN.PDF/60a5a2f5-577a-4091-9e09-9fa9e741dcf1?version=1.0, (10 November 2019). Search in Google Scholar

57. Papke, L. E., Wooldridge, J. M. (1996), “Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401 (k) plan participation rates”, Journal of applied econometrics, Vol. 11 No.6, pp. 619-632. Search in Google Scholar

58. Pippel, G. (2014), “R&D cooperation for non-technological innovations”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Vol. 23 No.7, pp. 611-630. Search in Google Scholar

59. Pullen, A. J., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Groen, A. J., Fisscher, O. A. (2012), “Open innovation in practice: goal complementarity and closed NPD networks to explain differences in innovation performance for SMEs in the medical devices sector”, Journal of product innovation management, Vol. 29 No.6, pp. 917-934. Search in Google Scholar

60. Reed, R., DeFillippi, R. J. (1990), “Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage”, Academy of management review, Vol.15 No.1, pp. 88-102. Search in Google Scholar

61. Santoro, G., Ferraris, A., Giacosa, E., Giovando, G. (2018a), “How SMEs Engage in Open Innovation: a Survey”, Journal of Knowledge Economy, Vol.9 No.2, SI, pp. 561–574. Search in Google Scholar

62. Santoro, G., Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Dezi, L. (2018b), “The internet of things: building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.136, pp. 347-354. Search in Google Scholar

63. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934), “The theory of economic development”, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, Search in Google Scholar

64. Sofka, W., Grimpe, C. (2010), “Specialized search and innovation performance– evidence across Europe”, R&D Management, Vol.40 No.3, pp. 310-323. Search in Google Scholar

65. Spithoven, A., Vanhaverbeke, W. Roijakkers, N. (2013), “Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises”, Small Business Economics, Vol.41 No.3, pp. 537-562. Search in Google Scholar

66. Stuermer, M., Spaeth, S., Von Krogh, G. (2009), “Extending private-collective innovation: a case study”, R&D Management, Vol.39 No.2, pp. 170-191. Search in Google Scholar

67. Teece, D. J. (1986), “Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research policy, Vol.15 No.6, pp. 285-305. Search in Google Scholar

68. Tether, B. S. (2002), “Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis”, Research policy, Vol. 31No.6, pp. 947-967. Search in Google Scholar

69. Tether, B. S. (2005), “Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the European innobarometer survey”, Industry & Innovation, Vol.12 No.2, pp. 153-184. Search in Google Scholar

70. Tether, B. S., Tajar, A. (2008 a), “Beyond industry–university links: Sourcing knowledge for innovation from consultants, private research organisations and the public science-base”, Research Policy, Vol.37 No.6-7, pp. 1079-1095. Search in Google Scholar

71. Tether, B. S., Tajar, A. (2008b), “The organisational-cooperation mode of innovation and its prominence amongst European service firms”, Research policy, Vol. 37 No.4, pp. 720-739. Search in Google Scholar

72. Tidd, J., Bessant, J., Pavitt, K. (2005), “Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organization Change”, 3rd ed., Chichester, UK, John Wiley and Sons. Search in Google Scholar

73. Tsai, K. H. (2009), “Collaborative networks and product innovation performance: Toward a contingency perspective”, Research Policy, Vol.38 No.5, pp. 765-778. Search in Google Scholar

74. Tsoukas, H. (1996), “The firm as a distributed knowledge system: A constructionist approach”, Strategic management journal, Vol.17 No. S2, pp. 11-25. Search in Google Scholar

75. Turulja, L., Bajgorić, N. (2018), “Knowing Means Existing: Organizational Learning Dimensions and Knowledge Management Capability”, Business Systems Research, Vol.9 No.1, pp. 1-18. Search in Google Scholar

76. Van de Vrande, V., De Jong, J. P., Vanhaverbeke, W., De Rochemont, M. (2009), “Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges”, Technovation, Vol. 29 No.6-7, pp. 423-437. Search in Google Scholar

77. Volberda, H. W., Van Den Bosch, F. A., Mihalache, O. R. (2014), “Advancing management innovation: Synthesizing processes, levels of analysis, and change agents” Organization Studies, Vol.35 No.9, pp. 1245-1264. Search in Google Scholar

78. Wang, X., Xu, M. (2018), “Examining the linkage among open innovation, customer knowledge management and radical innovation: The multiple mediating effects of organizational learning ability”, Baltic Journal of Management, Vol.13 No.3, pp. 368-389. Search in Google Scholar

79. West, J., Bogers, M. (2014), “Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 31No.4, pp. 814-831. Search in Google Scholar

80. Wynarczyk, P. (2013), “Open innovation in SMEs: a dynamic approach to modern entrepreneurship in the twenty-first century”, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 20 No.2, pp. 258-278. Search in Google Scholar

81. Yiu, D. W., Bruton, G. D., Lu, Y. (2005), “Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: Acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 42 No.1, pp. 183–206. Search in Google Scholar

82. Zouaghika, F., Sánchez, M., Martínez, M. G. (2018), “Did the global financial crisis impact firms’ innovation performance? The role of internal and external knowledge capabilities in high- and low-tech industries”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 132, pp. 92-104. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo