1. bookVolume 14 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2029-0454
First Published
05 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Good Faith Based Approach as a Legally Acceptable Intervention in Freedom of Contract to Protect Consumers’ Rights When Banks Unilaterally Close Accounts

Published Online: 17 Mar 2022
Volume & Issue: Volume 14 (2021) - Issue 2 (December 2021)
Page range: 142 - 163
Received: 29 Mar 2021
Accepted: 30 Dec 2021
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2029-0454
First Published
05 Feb 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This article assesses the permissibility of interference in private autonomy under the good faith principle when payment service providers unilaterally terminate contracts with consumers. The protection of the interests of such consumers is impeded by the formal application of legal rules and contractual terms, which ultimately contradicts public interests, including combating money laundering and terrorism financing. To overcome this conflict, the article proposes a doctrinal approach according to which the bank’s right to withdraw from the contract unilaterally should be limited by the systemic and teleological interpretation of regulating rules in combination with the general civil principle of good faith, which, by analogy with the original source of the problem, is called a good faith based approach. One of the general frameworks for implementing this approach is respect for freedom of contract, which is limited by the non-discussion presumption, modern civil law practice, and legal regulation of a consumer’s interests. According to research based on EU and Latvian law, legal doctrine, and case law, there are also valid reasons to intervene in private autonomy that should be recognized as legally acceptable for restoring justice and contractual equality in favor of consumers.

Keywords

1. Apse, Diāna. “Tiesību palīgavoti un Satversmes tiesa.” Scientific Papers. University of Latvia [Juridiskā zinātne. Latvijas Universitātes Raksti] Vol. 703 (Law) (2006): 7–20. Search in Google Scholar

2. Apse, Diāna. “The Influence of Subsidiary Sources of Law on the Quality of Legal Acts in the Legislative Process and the System of National Governance.” Collection of research papers in conjunction with the international scientific conference ‘The Quality of Legal Acts and its Importance in Contemporary Legal Space’ (Riga, October 4-5, 2012): 56–68. Search in Google Scholar

3. Balodis, Kaspars. “Labas ticības principa loma mūsdienu Latvijas civiltiesībās.” Likums un Tiesības 4, no. 9 (2002): 279–286. Search in Google Scholar

4. Balodis, Kaspars. Ievads civiltiesībās. Riga: Zvaigzne, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

5. Berent, Bernhard, Herbert Ehlers, G. Blaese, Carl von Schilling, and T. Zimmermann. “Lettlands Zivilgesetzbuch vom 28. Januar 1937.” In: Ernst Plates. Riga: Einzeldarstellungen, 1938. Search in Google Scholar

6. “Bērns – nevēlams bankas klients. Bērnu un jauniešu tiesības.” Latvijas Republikas tiesībsarga (2020 gada ziņojums) // www.tiesibsargs.lv/uploads/content/tiesibsargs_2020_gada_zinojums_final_1613044295.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

7. Brox, Hans, and Wolf-Dietrich Walker. Allgemeines Schuldrecht. Vol. 44. Munich: C. H. Beck, 2020.10.17104/9783406747472 Search in Google Scholar

8. Brox, Hans, and Wolf-Dietrich Walker. Allgemeiner Teil des BGB. Vol. 34. Munich: Carl Heymanns, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

9. De Koker, Louis, “Aligning anti-money laundering, combating of financing of terror and financial inclusion: questions to consider when FATF standards are clarified.” Journal of Financial Crime 18, no.4 (2011): 361–386 // https://doi.org/10.1108/13590791111173704.10.1108/13590791111173704 Search in Google Scholar

10. De Koker, Louis, Supriya Sindh, and Jonathan Capal. “Closure of Bank Accounts of Remittance Service Providers—Global Challenges and Community Perspectives in Australia.” University of Queensland Law Journal 36 no. 1 (2017): 119–154 // https://ssrn.com/abstract=3094277. Search in Google Scholar

11. Eckert, Jörn. Schuldrecht: Allgemeiner Teil. Vol. 4. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2004. Search in Google Scholar

12. “FATF Clarifies Risk-Based Approach: Case-by-Case, Not Wholesale De-Risking.” Statement of the Financial Action Task Force (Paris, October 23, 2014) // www.fatf-gafi.org/documents/documents/rba-and-de-risking.html. Search in Google Scholar

13. “Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach. The Banking Sector.” Financial Action Task Force (October 2014) // http://www.fatf-gafi.org/media/fatf/documents/reports/Risk-Based-Approach-Banking-Sector.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

14. Grūtups, Andris, and Erlens Kalniņš. Civillikuma komentāri. Trešā daļa. Lietu tiesības, īpašums. 2. izd. Riga: Tiesu namu aģentūra, 2002. Search in Google Scholar

15. Iļjanova [Rezevska], Daiga. “Vispārējo tiesību principu funkcionālā nozīme rakstīto tiesību normu piemērošanā.” Scientific Papers. University of Latvia [Juridiskā zinātne. Latvijas Universitātes Raksti] Vol. 719 (Law) (2007): 59–75. Search in Google Scholar

16. Jelisejevs, Aleksejs. “Crucial Issues with Legal Protection of Consumers’ Human Rights when Banks Unilaterally Close Accounts.” Athens Journal of Law 7, no. 4 (2021): 617–634 // DOI: 10.30958/ajl.7-4-11.10.30958/ajl.7-4-11 Search in Google Scholar

17. Jelisejevs, Aleksejs. “Crucial Issues with Legal Protection of Consumers Human Rights when Banks unilaterally Close Accounts”: 163–180. In: A Contemporary Anthology of Law. Athens: Athens Institute for Education and Research, 2022. Search in Google Scholar

18. Jelisejevs, Aleksejs. “Good Faith-Based Approach as a Way to Protect Payment Service Consumers’ Rights when Banks Unilaterally Terminate Contractual Relations.” Collection of Materials XXII International Scientific Conference of Turiba University (Riga, April 21-22, 2021): 59–67 // https://www.turiba.lv/storage/files/xxii-conference-2021.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

19. Kessler, Friedrich. “Contracts of Adhesion - Some Thoughts About Freedom of Contract.” Columbia Law Review 43 (1943): 629–642.10.2307/1117230 Search in Google Scholar

20. Krons, Mīrons. “Civillikuma pirmais pants (Laba ticība kā tiesiskas rīcības kritērijs).” Tieslietu ministrijas Vēstnesis no. 2 (1937): 270–301. Search in Google Scholar

21. Kull, Irene, “European and Estonian Law of Obligations—Transposition of Law or Mutual Influence.” Juridica International IX/2004 (University of Tartu, 2004): 32–44. Search in Google Scholar

22. Kūtris, Gunārs. “Iesaldēšana, arestēšana un konfiskācija: cilvēktiesības un kriminālprocesa intereses bankas kontos.” Jurista Vārds no. 39 (1149) (September 29, 2020): 16–19. Search in Google Scholar

23. Larenz, Karl. Lehrbuch des Schuldrechts Band I Allgemeiner Teil. Vol. 14. Munich: C. H. Beck, 1987. Search in Google Scholar

24. McKendry, Ian. “Banks Face No-Win Scenario on AML ‘De-Risking.” American Banker (November 17, 2014) // https://www.americanbanker.com/news/banks-face-no-win-scenario-on-aml-de-risking Search in Google Scholar

25. Meļķisis, Edgars. “Satversmes tiesas spriedums. Valsts nekustamā īpašuma aģentūras lietā saistībā ar tiesību vienotības principu.” Likums un Tiesības 1, no. 1 (1999): 22–24. Search in Google Scholar

26. Ozoliņš, Osvalds. “Jaunā Civillikuma ievads. Raksti par Prezidenta K. Ulmaņa Civillikumu.” In: Tieslietu Ministrijas Vēstneša, 1. burtnīcas pielikums. Riga: Tieslietu ministrijas izdevums, 1939. Search in Google Scholar

27. Peczenik, Aleksander. “Principles of Law: The Search for Legal Theory.” Rechtstheorie no. 1 (1971): 17–36. Search in Google Scholar

28. Peczenik, Aleksander. On Law and Reason. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989.10.1007/978-1-4020-8381-5 Search in Google Scholar

29. “Remarks by Acting Under Secretary Adam Szubin [USA] at the ABA/ABA Money Laundering Enforcement Conference” (Washington, DC, November 14, 2016) // https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl0608.aspx. Search in Google Scholar

30. Rezevska, Daiga. Vispārējo tiesību principu nozīme un piemērošana. Riga: Daiga Rezevska, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

31. Riemer, Hans Michael. Die Einleitungsartikel des Schweizerschen Zivilgesetzbuches (Art. 1–10 ZGB). Eine Einführung. Bern: Stämpfli, 2003. Search in Google Scholar

32. Roth, Günter H. Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Bd. 2. Munich: Schuldrecht Allgemeiner, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

33. Schulze, Reiner, ed. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, Handkommentar. Vol. 9. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

34. Siklósi, Iván. “Private Autonomy and Its Restrictions in Roman Law: An Overview Regarding the Law of Contracts and Succession.” Elte Law Journal 2 (2019): 9–15. Search in Google Scholar

35. Slicāne, Evija. “Labas ticības princips un tā piemērošana Latvijas civiltiesībās.” Jurista Vārds no. 6 (February 6, 2007): 5-13. Search in Google Scholar

36. Vītoliņa, Baiba. Patērētāju tiesību aizsardzības pamati. Riga: Apgāds Zvaigzne, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

37. Von Bar, Christian. Towards a European Civil Code. 4th revised and expanded edition. Ed. Arthur Hartkamp, Martijn Hesselink, Ewoud Hondius, and Edgar du Perron. Boston: Kluwer Law International, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

38. Weitzenböck, Emily M. “Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Contracts Formed and Performed by Electronic Agents.” Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (March 2004): 83–110 // DOI: 10.1007/s10506-004-1908-0.10.1007/s10506-004-1908-0 Search in Google Scholar

39. Zadraks, Gints. “Direktīvas 93/13/EEK par netaisnīgiem noteikumiem patērētāju līgumos nepieciešamā reforma.” Likums un Tiesības 7, no. 4 (68) (2005): 103–107. Search in Google Scholar

40. Zimmermann, Reinhard. The Law of Obligations. Roman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. Search in Google Scholar

1. Citadele Bank General Terms of Transactions No. VDN/NO-S-FJ-LV-0819.10-LV. In Force from September 14, 2019 // https://online.citadele.lv/pwww/apps/p/agreement_doc/language/LV/location/LV/residence/RN/service/VDN/type/JF/?filename=agreement.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

2. Civil Law of the Republic of Latvia [Civillikums]. Valdības Vēstnesis, No. 41, 20 February 1937. Search in Google Scholar

3. Consumer Rights Protection Law of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 104/105, 01.04.1999. Search in Google Scholar

4. Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 337, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

5. Directive (EU) 2015/849 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2015 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purposes of money laundering or terrorist financing, amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Directive 2006/70/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L141, 2015. Search in Google Scholar

6. Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on consumer rights, amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 85/577/EEC and Directive 97/7/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Official Journal of the European Union, L 304, 2011. Search in Google Scholar

7. Directive 2014/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on the comparability of fees related to payment accounts, payment account switching and access to payment accounts with basic features. Official Journal of the European Union, L 257, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

8. Judgment of Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia of 4 February 2003 in case No. 2002-06-01 // www.satv.tiesa.gov.lv/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2002-06-01_Spriedums.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

9. Judgment of Department for Administrative Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 7 March 2006 in case No. SKA-59 // https://at.gov.lv/files/uploads/files/archive/department3/2006/ska59-2006.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

10. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 17 December 2012 in case No. C12153910 // https://at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/701. Search in Google Scholar

11. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 12 March 2013 in case No. SKC-108/2013 // http://at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/3002. Search in Google Scholar

12. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 14 September 2016 in case No. C10100611 // http://www.at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/186. Search in Google Scholar

13. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 27 October 2017 in case No. C09020614. LV:AT:2017:1027.C09020614.1.S. Search in Google Scholar

14. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Latvia of 30 June 2017 in case No. C33439211 // https://at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/5210. Search in Google Scholar

15. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 12 March 2020 in case No. C68278418. LV:AT:2020:0312.C68278418.8.S. Search in Google Scholar

16. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 16 December 2020 in case No. C30501917. LV:AT:2020:1216.C30501917.11. Search in Google Scholar

17. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 17 December 2019 in case No. C04169414. LV:AT:2019:1217.C04169414.5.S. Search in Google Scholar

18. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 18 December 2018 in case No C73346818. LV:AT:2018:1218.C73346818.10.S. Search in Google Scholar

19. Judgment of Department for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court Senate of the Republic of Latvia of 4 October 2006 in case No. SKC–540 // https://www.at.gov.lv/downloadlawfile/3475. Search in Google Scholar

20. Judgment of Her Majesty’s High Court of Justice in England of 5 November 2013 in case No HC13E04267 (Dahabshiil Transfer Services Ltd v. Barclays Bank PLC) and in case No. HC13E04616 (Harada Ltd., Berkeley Credit and Guarantee Limited v. Barclays Bank PLC). EWHC 3379 (Ch) // http://www.brickcourt.co.uk/news-attachments/LWT_2013_11_31877320.pdf). Search in Google Scholar

21. Judgment of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) of 26 October 2006 in case Elisa María Mostaza Claro v. Centro Móvil Milenium SL (C-168/05). EU:C:2006:675. Search in Google Scholar

22. Judgment of the European Court of Justice (Fourth Chamber) of 4 June 2009 in case Pannon GSM Zrt. v. Erzsébet Sustikné Győrfi (C-243/08). EU:C:2009:350. Search in Google Scholar

23. Judgment of the European Court of Justice of 27 June 2000 in joined cases Océano Grupo Editorial SA v. Rocío Murciano Quintero (C-240/98) and Salvat Editores SA v. José M. Sánchez Alcón Prades (C-241/98), José Luis Copano Badillo (C-242/98), Mohammed Berroane (C-243/98), Emilio Viñas Feliu (C-244/98). EU:C:2000:346. Search in Google Scholar

24. Law on International Sanctions and National Sanctions of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 116, 15.02.2016. Search in Google Scholar

25. Law on Payment Services and Electronic Money of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 43, 17.03.2010. Search in Google Scholar

26. Law on Taxes and Fees of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 26, 18.02.1995 (as amended by law of 23.11.2016, Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 241, 10.12.2016, and by law of 03.04.2019, Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 75, 12.04.2019). Search in Google Scholar

27. Law on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorism and Proliferation Financing of the Republic of Latvia. Latvijas Vēstnesis, No. 116, 30.07.2008. Search in Google Scholar

28. Luminor Bank General Terms of Transactions. In Force from September 1, 2020 // www.luminor.lv/sites/default/files/docs/noteikumi/luminor-general-business-terms-01-09-2020.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

29. Ordinance No. 2016-131 of French Republic of 10 February 2016 // www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/LEGIARTI000032006591/2016-10-01/. Search in Google Scholar

30. SEB Bank General Terms of Transactions. In Force from January 3, 2020 // www.seb.lv/sites/default/files/web/files/prod_doc/VDN_LV.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

31. Swedbank General Terms of Transactions No. R-18235. Dated September 25, 2020 // www.swedbank.lv/static/pdf/about/terms/visparejie_darijumu_noteikumi_25092020_LAT.pdf. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo