Research on the Construction Path of Physical Education Teaching Reform Innovation Guarantee System Driven by Digital Technology

Figure 1.

Figure 2.

Evaluation of the experiment class on the evaluation of physical education

Project	Satisfaction value	Views (%)
		Agree	Consent	Still can	Different meaning	Very different
Evaluation structure of achievement	3.94	36.92	35.95	24.53	2.6	0
The teacher’s score is fairness	4.10	36.89	41.23	21.01	0.87	0
Form of examination	3.75	29.68	33.71	35.68	0.91	0.02
Scoring criteria for examinations	3.85	39.47	35.22	21.49	2.64	1.18

Optimization of intelligent scheduling system

	General intelligent scheduling system	Now the lecture system
Teacher conflict	6 times	0 time
Class conflict	3 times	0 time
Classroom conflict	2 times	0 time
The degree of the course is distributed	Bad	Good
System running time	350s	60s
System operability	Bad	Good

The experimental class is satisfied with the school sports teacher

Project	Satisfaction value	Views (%)
		Agree	Consent	Still can	Different meaning	Very different
Teaching skills, demonstration and accuracy	4.13	50.36	23.54	26.1	0	0
The teaching process is organized	4.35	48.56	20.53	30.91	0	0
Fair treatment of students and teaching	4.22	48.94	31.52	19.54	0	0
Teaching enthusiasm	4.08	47.65	30.42	21.93	0	0
Teachers and students have a harmonious relationship and encourage students	4.26	52.56	29.65	17.79	0	0

The effect of the number of courses on algorithm efficiency

Number of courses	Time per second/s	Fitness
30	45	1247
60	117	1250
90	229	1264
120	345	1271
150	409	1278
180	512	1285

Results of the experimental class’s satisfaction with the reform of sports teaching

Project	Satisfaction value	Views (%)
		Agree	Consent	Still can	Different meaning	Very different
Exercise in physical education	3.96	42.63	35.18	22.14	0.05	0
Physical education is strong	4.21	39.51	31.19	29.3	0	0
The teaching is rich	4.15	41.58	32.34	26.08	0	0
The teaching content is varied and practical	3.89	36.15	28.64	35.21	0	0
Health and sports knowledge can be obtained	4.35	43.5	32.14	24.36	0	0
The teaching content is simple and easy to learn	3.78	35.69	28.54	35.21	0.56	0

Partial result

K1	K2	K3	K4	The fitness value of an approximate solution	Iteration number
0.6	0.4	0.9	0.7	1055	356
0.8	0.7	0.7	0.8	1270	320
0.8	0.7	0.6	0.9	1120	275
1	0.9	0.5	0.7	1136	293
1	1	0.6	0.7	1245	301

Test results of the experimental class and the comparison class were analyzed

Test item	Experimental section (n= 90)	Cross section (n=90)	T	P
Lung capacity	3025.07±821.651	2968.54±825.22	2.354	0.271
50m run	8.327±1.023	8.478±1.132	1.527	0.145
Fixed jump	204.65±35.204	203.22±30.854	2.996	0.155
Preflexion	17.69±7.14	14.65±5.99	1.905	0.062
Sit-ups	33.25±7.002	34.07±7.614	0.365	0.758
Lead up	8.21±6.915	8.72±5.078	4.214	0.426
800 meters run	230.51±30.214	230.47±25.34	0.357	0.833
1000 meters run	245.36±30.79	242.589±31.01	0.569	0.742

Test results of the experiment and the comparison class

Test item	Experimental section (n= 90)	Cross section (n=90)	T	P
Lung capacity	3390.512±821.145	3187.509±815.196	-4.539	0.001
50m run	7.563±0.859	8.012±0.811	-3.157	0.024
Fixed jump	208.526±36.79	205.67±504	-1.386	0.007
Preflexion	19.65±6.241	17.03±7.499	4.523	0.003
Sit-ups	39.86±8.658	38.505±823	-0.374	0.756
Lead up	13.54±7.051	10.47±8.915	2.135	0.041
800 meters run	227.14±25.712	230.08±25.601	2.364	0.035
1000 meters run	253.91±30.66	261.75±30.48	2.896	0.008